AMENDED AND RESTATED CHAPTER 11 RESTRUCTURING SUPPORT
AGREEMENT
This AMENDED AND RESTATED CHAPTER 11 RESTRUCTURING SUPPORT AGREEMENT (including all exhibits, annexes, and schedules hereto in accordance with
Section 15.02, in each case, as may be amended, supplemented, or otherwise modified from time to time in accordance with the terms hereof, this “
Agreement”) is made and entered into as of February 21, 2023 (the “
Execution Date”), by and among the following parties (each of the following described in
clauses
(a) through
(e) of this preamble, collectively, the “
Parties”):
1
(a)
Revlon, Inc. (“
Revlon”), a company incorporated under the
Laws of Delaware, and each of its direct
and indirect subsidiaries that are debtors and debtors in possession in the
Chapter 11 Cases listed on
Exhibit A to this
Agreement that have executed and delivered counterpart signature pages to this
Agreement to counsel to the
Consenting Creditor Parties (collectively, the “
Debtors”);
(b)
the holders of, or investment advisors, sub-advisors, or managers of discretionary accounts that hold, 2020
Term B-1
Loan Claims that have executed and delivered counterpart signature pages to the Original RSA, this
Agreement, a
Joinder, or a
Transfer Agreement to counsel to the
Debtors and
counsel to the
Consenting Creditor Parties (collectively, the “
Consenting 2020 B-1
Lenders”);
1
|
Capitalized terms used but not defined in the preamble and recitals to this Agreement have the meanings ascribed to them in Section 1 or in the Plan attached hereto as Exhibit B.
|
(c)
the holders of, or investment advisors, sub-advisors, or managers of discretionary accounts that hold, 2020
Term B-2
Loan Claims that have executed and delivered counterpart signature pages to the Original RSA, this Agreement, a
Joinder, or a
Transfer Agreement to counsel to the
Debtors and counsel to the
Consenting Creditor Parties
(collectively, the “
Consenting 2020 B-2 Lenders” and, together with the
Consenting 2020 B-1 Lenders, the “
Consenting BrandCo Lenders”);
(d) the holders of, or investment advisors, sub-advisors, or managers of discretionary accounts that hold, 2016 Term Loan Claims that have executed and delivered counterpart signature pages to the Original RSA,
this Agreement, a Joinder, or a Transfer Agreement to counsel to the Debtors and counsel to the Consenting Creditor Parties (collectively, the “Consenting 2016 Lenders” and, together with the Consenting BrandCo Lenders, the “Consenting
Lenders”); and
(e)
the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors appointed in the
Chapter 11
Cases (the “
Creditors’ Committee”
and, together with the Consenting Lenders, the “
Consenting
Creditor Parties”). For the avoidance of doubt, the Parties acknowledge that each individual member of the Creditors’ Committee is not a Party or a Consenting Creditor Party by reason of its membership or participation on the Creditors’
Committee and expressly reserves all rights and remedies with respect to its General Unsecured Claims or Unsecured Notes Claims and the Unsecured Notes Indenture, as applicable, without limitation hereby.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, on June 15, 2022 (the “Petition Date”),
each of the Debtors commenced a case (collectively, the “Chapter 11 Cases”) under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy
Court”);
WHEREAS, on December 19, 2022, the Debtors, certain of the Consenting BrandCo Lenders, and the
Creditors’ Committee entered into that certain Chapter 11 Restructuring Support Agreement (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time prior to the date hereof, the “Original RSA”), pursuant to which such
parties agreed to take certain actions to implement certain restructuring transactions with respect to the Debtors on the terms and conditions set forth therein;
WHEREAS, the Debtors, the Consenting BrandCo Lenders, the Consenting 2016 Lenders, and the
Creditors’ Committee have in good faith and at arm’s length negotiated certain modifications to the restructuring transactions with respect to the Debtors and settlements in respect of disputes among the
Parties on the terms set forth in this Agreement and as specified in the First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization of
Revlon, Inc. and Its Debtor Affiliates Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code attached as Exhibit B hereto (as may be amended, supplemented, or otherwise modified from time to time pursuant to this Agreement, including all exhibits, schedules, supplements, appendices, annexes, and attachments thereto, the “Plan”);
WHEREAS, Section 14(a) of the Original RSA provides that the Original RSA may be modified,
amended, or supplemented in accordance with its terms and subject to the consent rights set forth therein;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Original RSA, the Debtors, the Required Consenting
BrandCo Lenders, and the Creditors’ Committee desire to amend, restate and replace in its entirety the Original RSA with this Agreement, and the Consenting 2016 Lenders desire to join this Agreement, in each case effective as of the Amendment
Effective Date; and
WHEREAS, the Consenting BrandCo Lenders party to the Original RSA shall remain and be bound by
this Agreement in all respects.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements
contained herein, and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, each Party, intending to be legally bound, hereby agrees as follows:
Section 1. Definitions and Interpretation.
1.01 Definitions. The following terms shall have the following definitions:
“Adversary Proceeding” means the adversary proceeding captioned AIMCO CLO 10 LTD, et al. v. Revlon, Incl., et al., Adv. Pro. No. 22-01167 (DSJ)
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 2022).
“Adversary Stay and Dismissal Order” has the meaning set forth in Section 7.01(k) of this Agreement.
“
Agreement” has the meaning set forth in the preamble hereof and,
for the avoidance of doubt, includes all the exhibits, annexes, and schedules hereto in accordance with
Section 15.02 (including the Plan).
“
Agreement Effective Period” means, with respect to a Party, the period from the Amendment Effective Date to the Termination Date
applicable to that Party.
“
Alternative Restructuring Counterproposal Notice” has the meaning set forth in
Section 9.02 of
this
Agreement.
“
Alternative Restructuring Proposal” means any inquiry, proposal, offer, bid, term sheet, discussion, or
agreement with respect to a sale, disposition, new-money investment, restructuring, reorganization, merger, amalgamation, acquisition, consolidation, dissolution, debt investment, equity investment (including
any equity commitment or investment for which the
Debtors have not received the prior written consent of the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders),
liquidation, tender offer, recapitalization, plan of reorganization, share exchange, business combination, capital structure inconsistent with the Plan, or similar transaction involving any one or more
Debtors,
or any material portion of any of their assets, in each case in whole or in part, or the debt, equity, or other interests in any one or more
Debtors other than in accordance with or in furtherance of one or
more of the
Restructuring Transactions.
“
Amendment Effective Date” means the date on which each of the conditions set forth in
Section 2 has been satisfied
or waived by the appropriate
Party or
Parties in accordance with this
Agreement.
“
Backstop Motion” means the motion seeking approval of the Backstop Commitment Agreement.
“
Bankruptcy Code” has the meaning set forth in the recitals to this
Agreement.
“
Bankruptcy Court” has the meaning set forth in the recitals to this
Agreement.
“
BrandCo Settlement Termination Date” has the meaning set forth in
Section 6.02(a).
“
Breach Notice” means a written notice which shall (a) be delivered in connection with a purported breach of this
Agreement in accordance with this
Agreement and (b) set forth the provision(s) under this
Agreement pursuant to
which the purported breach has occurred and the purported grounds for the delivery of such notice.
“
Business Day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday, or other day on which commercial banks are authorized to close under the
Laws of, or are in fact closed in, the state of New York.
“
Canadian Recognition Proceeding” means the proceeding commenced before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (
Commercial List) pursuant to the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act to recognize the
Chapter 11 Cases in Canada.
“Cash-Out Backstop Lenders” means, collectively, the Specified Cash-Out Backstop Lenders
and the Consenting 2016 Lenders managed or advised by (a) Angelo, Gordon & Co. L.P., (b) Glendon Capital Management L.P., (c) King Street Capital Management, L.P., (d) Nut Tree Capital Management, LP, or (e) Oak Hill Advisors, L.P..
“
Chapter 11 Cases” has the meaning set forth in the recitals to this
Agreement.
“
Company Claims/Interests” means
Claims against, and
Interests
in, any
Debtor.
“
Confidentiality Agreement” means an executed
confidentiality
agreement, including with respect to the issuance of a “cleansing letter” or other public disclosure of material non-public information, in connection with any proposed
Restructuring Transactions.
“Consenting 2016 Lenders” has the meaning set forth in the preamble to this Agreement.
“Consenting 2016 Lenders Termination Events” has the meaning set forth in Section 13.02.
“
Consenting 2020 B-1 Lenders” has the meaning set forth in the preamble to this
Agreement.
“
Consenting 2020 B-2 Lenders” has the meaning set forth in the preamble to this
Agreement.
“
Consenting BrandCo Lenders” has the meaning set forth in the preamble to this
Agreement.
“Consenting BrandCo Lenders Termination Events” has the meaning set forth in Section 13.01.
“
Consenting Creditor Parties” has the meaning set forth in the preamble to this
Agreement.
“
Consenting Creditor Parties Termination Events” has the meaning set forth in
Section 13.03.
“Consenting Lenders” has the meaning set forth in the preamble to this Agreement.
“
Creditors’ Committee” has the meaning set forth in the preamble to this
Agreement.
“
Creditors’ Committee Constituent Claims” has the meaning set forth in
Section 6.01(a)(i).
“
Creditors’ Committee Termination Events” has the meaning set forth in
Section 13.03.
“
Debtor Termination Events” has the meaning set forth in
Section 13.04.
“
Debtors” has the meaning set forth in the preamble to this
Agreement.
“Deferred B-1 Adequate Protection Payment” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.04(c).
“
Definitive Documents” shall mean the documents set forth in
Section 3.01, including all exhibits, annexes, schedules, amendments, and supplements relating to such documents.
“
Equivalent GUC Treatment” has the meaning set forth in
Section 6.01(a)(i).
“
Execution Date” has the meaning set forth in the preamble to this
Agreement.
“First Lien Exit Facilities Term Sheet” means the term sheet which sets forth the material terms of the First Lien Exit Facilities, which is attached as Exhibit
C hereto.
“
Fiduciary Out Notice” has the meaning set forth in
Section 9.01 of this
Agreement.
“Independent Investigation” means the internal investigation of potential claims, if any, that certain Debtors may hold against insiders and affiliates being conducted by the investigation
committee of the board of directors of Holdings.
“Interim Compensation Order” means the Order Authorizing Procedures for Interim Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses of Professionals entered by
the Bankruptcy court on July 21, 2022 [Docket No. 259].
“
Joinder” means a joinder to this
Agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as
Exhibit D.
“
Law” means any federal, state, provincial, local, or foreign law (including common law), statute, code, ordinance, rule,
regulation, order, ruling, or judgment, in each case, that is validly adopted, promulgated, issued, or entered by a governmental authority of competent jurisdiction (including the
Bankruptcy Court).
“
Milestones” has the meaning set forth in
Section 4.01
of this
Agreement.
“Original RSA” has the meaning set forth in the recitals to this Agreement.
“
Parties” has the meaning set forth in the preamble to this
Agreement.
“
Permitted Transfer” has the meaning set forth in
Section 10.01 of this
Agreement.
“
Permitted Transferee” means each
transferee of any
Company Claims/Interests that meets the requirements of
Section 10.01.
“
Petition Date” has the meaning set forth in the recitals to this
Agreement.
“
Plan Effective Date” means the “Effective Date” as defined in the Plan.
“
Qualified Marketmaker” means an Entity that (a) holds itself out to the public or the applicable private markets as standing ready in the
ordinary course of its business to purchase from customers and sell to customers
Company Claims/Interests (including debt securities, other debt, or interests) or enter into with customers long
and short positions in
Company Claims/Interests (including debt securities, other debt, or interests), in its capacity as a dealer or market maker in such
Company Claims/Interests, and (b) is, in fact, regularly in the business of making a market in
Claims against, or
Interests
in, issuers or borrowers (including debt securities, other debt, or interests).
“Required Consenting 2016 Lenders” means, as of the relevant date, Consenting 2016 Lenders holding a majority of the aggregate principal amount of the 2016 Term Loan Claims held by Consenting
2016 Lenders that are members of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders as of such date.
“Required Consenting 2020 B-1 Lenders” means, as of the relevant date, Consenting 2020 B-1 Lenders holding a majority of the aggregate principal amount of the 2020 Term B-1 Loans held by the
Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders as of such date.
“Required Consenting 2020 B-2 Lenders” means, as of the relevant date, Consenting 2020 B-2 Lenders holding a majority of the aggregate principal amount of the 2020 Term B-2 Loans held by the
Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders as of such date.
“
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders” means, as of the relevant date, the Required Consenting B-1 Lenders and the Required Consenting
B-2 Lenders.
“
Revlon” has the meaning set forth in the preamble to this
Agreement.
“
Settled Litigation” has the meaning set forth in
Section 6.01(b)(ii) of
this
Agreement.
“Specified Cash-Out Backstop Lenders” means, collectively, the Consenting 2016 Lenders
that are or are managed or advised by (a) Sunrise Partners Limited Partnership, (b) HPS Investment Partners, (c) New Generation Advisors, LLC, (d) Benefit Street Partners, (e) Cedar Funding V CLO, Ltd, or (f) Ellington CLO Management LLC.
“
Termination Date” means, with respect to a
Party, the date on which
termination of this
Agreement as to such
Party is effective in accordance with
Section 13.01,
13.02,
13.03,
13.04,
13.05, or
13.06, as applicable.
“
Termination Events” has the meaning set forth in
Section 13.04.
“
Termination Notice” means a written notice which shall (a) be delivered in connection with a
Termination
Event in accordance with this
Agreement and (b) set forth the provision(s) under this
Agreement pursuant to which the
Termination Event has occurred and the
purported grounds for such termination.
“
Transfer” means, as the context requires, (a) to sell, resell, reallocate, use, pledge, assign, transfer,
hypothecate, participate, donate, or otherwise encumber or dispose of, directly or indirectly (including through derivatives, options, swaps, pledges, forward sales, or other transactions), or (b) a transaction effectuating any of the foregoing.
“
Transfer Agreement”
means an executed form of transfer agreement (a) providing, among other things, that a transferee of Company Claims/Interests is bound by the terms of this Agreement to the same extent as the transferor of such Company Claims/Interests, including,
with respect to any transferee of 2016 Term Loan Claims Transferred by a Cash-Out Backstop Lender, the obligations set forth in
Section 5.01(a)(x) and (b) substantially
in the form attached hereto as
Exhibit E.
“UCC BrandCo Challenge” means any Challenge by the Creditors’ Committee to the Prepetition BrandCo Credit Facilities, the Prepetition BrandCo Credit Facility Debt, the Prepetition BrandCo
Liens, or the Prepetition BrandCo Secured Parties (in each case, as defined in the Final DIP Order).
“
UCC BrandCo Challenge Deadline” means the last day of the Challenge Period (as defined in the
Final
DIP Order) with respect to
the UCC BrandCo Challenges.
“
UCC Settlement Termination Date” has the meaning set forth in
Section 6.02(c).
“
UCC Settlement Waiver Date” has the meaning set forth in
Section 6.02(b).
“
U.S. Trustee”
means the
United
States Trustee for the Southern District of New York.
1.02 Interpretation. For purposes of this
Agreement:
(a)
in the appropriate context, each term, whether stated in the singular or the plural, shall include both the singular and the plural, and pronouns stated in the masculine, feminine,
or neuter gender shall include the masculine, feminine, and neuter gender;
(b) capitalized terms defined only in the plural or singular form shall nonetheless have their defined meanings when used in the opposite form;
(c)
unless otherwise specified, any reference herein to an existing document, schedule, or exhibit shall mean such document, schedule, or exhibit, as it may have been or may be
amended, restated, supplemented, or otherwise modified from time to time;
provided that any capitalized terms herein which are defined with reference to another
agreement,
are defined with reference to such other
agreement as of the date of this
Agreement,
without giving effect to any termination of such other
agreement or amendments to such capitalized terms in any such other
agreement following the date hereof;
(d)
unless otherwise specified, all references herein to “Sections” are references to Sections of this
Agreement;
(e)
the words “herein,” “hereof,” and “hereto” refer to this
Agreement
in its entirety, including all exhibits, annexes, and schedules attached hereto in accordance with
Section 15.02, rather than to any particular portion of this
Agreement;
(f)
captions and headings to Sections are inserted for convenience of reference only and are not intended to be a part of or to affect the interpretation of this
Agreement;
(g) references to “shareholders,” “directors,” and/or “officers” shall also include “members” and/or “managers,” as applicable, as such terms are defined under the applicable limited liability company
Laws;
(h)
the use of “include” or “including” is without limitation, whether stated or not; and
(i)
the phrase “counsel to the
Consenting Creditor Parties” refers in this
Agreement to each counsel specified in
Section 15.10 other than counsel to the
Debtors.
Section 2. Effectiveness of this Agreement. This
Agreement shall become effective and binding upon each of the
Parties at 12:00 a.m., prevailing Eastern Standard Time, on the
Amendment Effective Date, which is the date on which all of the following conditions have been satisfied or waived in accordance with this
Agreement:
(a)
each of the
Debtors shall have executed and delivered counterpart signature pages of this
Agreement to counsel to each of the
Parties;
(b)
the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders shall have executed and delivered counterpart signature pages to this
Agreement in accordance with
Section 15.07;
(c) holders (or investment advisors,
sub-advisors, or managers of discretionary accounts of holders) of at least two-thirds of the combined aggregate amount of (i) Allowed 2016 Term Loan Claims (inclusive of validly executed but unsettled trades) and (ii) Allowed 2020 Term B‑3
Loan Claims shall have executed and delivered counterpart signature pages to this Agreement in accordance with Section 15.07;
(d) an authorized representative of the
Creditors’ Committee shall have executed and delivered a counterpart signature page to this
Agreement to counsel to each of the
Parties; and
(e)
counsel to the
Debtors shall have given notice to counsel to the
Consenting
Creditor Parties in the manner set forth in
Section 15.10 hereof (by email or otherwise) that the conditions to the
Amendment Effective Date set
forth in this
Section 2 have occurred.
Section 3. Definitive Documents.
3.01 The
Definitive Documents governing the
Restructuring
Transactions shall include the following, which shall, in each case, be in form and substance consistent with this
Agreement,
including
Section 3.02:
(a)
the
Plan (including, for the avoidance of doubt, all exhibits, annexes, exhibits, schedules, and supplements related thereto, including the
Plan Supplement);
(b)
the Confirmation Order;
(c)
the Disclosure Statement Order;
(d)
the
Solicitation Materials, including the Disclosure Statement;
(e)
the
Exit Facilities Documents, including the
Incremental New Money
Commitment Letter;
(f) the
Equity Rights Offering Documents, including the Backstop Commitment Agreement, the Backstop Order, and the
Equity Rights Offering Procedures;
(h)
the
New Organizational Documents;
(i)
the
Talc PI Distribution Procedures;
(j) the
GUC Trust Agreement;
(k) the
New Warrant Agreement;
(l)
the documentation setting the distribution record date and means of distribution under the
Plan and the procedures for designating the
recipients of distributions under the
Plan;
(m) any materials relating to (a) through (l) above or (n) below, that are filed in the
Canadian Recognition Proceeding or any other foreign proceeding
commenced by any
Debtor in connection with the
Restructuring Transactions; and
(n) all other documents, motions, pleadings, briefs, applications, orders,
agreements, supplements, and other filings, including any summaries or term sheets in respect
thereof, that are directly related to any of the foregoing or as may be reasonably necessary or advisable to implement the
Restructuring Transactions.
3.02 The
Definitive Documents not executed or in a form attached to this
Agreement as of the
Execution Date remain subject to negotiation and completion. The
Definitive Documents, including all amendments and modifications thereto and including all forms thereof filed with the
Bankruptcy Court, shall contain
terms, conditions, representations, warranties, and covenants consistent with the terms of this
Agreement, as they may be
modified, amended, or supplemented in accordance with
Section 14 and be in form and substance reasonably acceptable to the
Debtors and the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders;
provided that (i) the
Definitive Documents identified in
Section 3.01(a)-
(c), and
(e) shall be in form and substance acceptable to the
Debtors and the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders, other than the Third-Party New Money Exit Facility, which shall be in form and substance acceptable
solely to the Debtors and the Required Consenting 2020 B-2 Lenders, (ii) the Definitive Documents identified in
Section 3.01(f) and (
k) shall be in form
and substance acceptable solely to the Debtors and the Required Consenting 2020 B-2 Lenders;
provided that any material reduction in the ERO Price Per Share shall also be reasonably acceptable to the Required
Consenting 2020 B-1 Lenders, (iii) the Definitive Documents identified in
Section 3.01(i) and
(j) shall be in form and substance reasonably acceptable
solely to the Debtors and the Required Consenting 2020 B-2 Lenders,
and (iv) the Definitive Documents identified in
Section 3.01(h) and the Reorganized Holdings Board shall
be determined by and acceptable to the Required Consenting 2020 B-2 Lenders in their sole discretion;
provided further that, if any provision, or any amendment or modification of such provision, of the
Definitive Documents has the effect of causing the Plan treatment of holders of the 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims or holders of the 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims to be less favorable than that set forth in the Plan, only the affected group of the Required
Consenting 2020 B-1 Lenders and/or the Required Consenting 2020 B-2 Lenders, as applicable, receiving the less favorable treatment may exercise the consent rights as set forth in this
Section 3, solely
with respect to such provision, or any amendment or modification of such provision. In addition and not in limitation of the foregoing, (w) the provisions of the
Definitive Documents providing for
or impacting treatment of
General Unsecured Claims and/or
Unsecured Notes Claims shall also be in form and substance reasonably acceptable to the
Creditors’ Committee, (x) the
New Warrant Agreement shall also be in form and substance reasonably acceptable to the
Creditors’ Committee, (y) any
provision, or any amendment or modification of such provision, of the Definitive Documents that has a material, disproportionate and adverse effect on the treatment or economic recovery of the OpCo Term Loan Claims (including that otherwise
disproportionately and materially adversely affects OpCo Term Loan Claims as a class as compared to 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims as a class) shall also be in form and substance reasonably acceptable to the Required Consenting 2016 Lenders, and (z) the
New Organizational Documents shall have minority protections consistent with the Article IV.G of the Plan or otherwise reasonably acceptable to the Required Consenting 2016 Lenders. For the avoidance of doubt, the terms of this
Agreement (including the exhibits attached hereto) have been agreed by all the
Parties.
4.01 The
Debtors shall implement the
Restructuring
Transactions in accordance with the following milestones (the “
Milestones”):
(a)
no later than February 21, 2023, the Debtors shall file with the Bankruptcy Court: (i) the Plan; and (ii) an amended Disclosure Statement reflecting the Plan;
(b) no later than February 22, 2023, the
Bankruptcy Court shall have entered the Disclosure Statement Order;
(c) no later than February 22, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court shall have entered the Backstop Order;
(d) no later than February 28, 2023, the
Debtors shall have commenced the solicitation of votes to accept or reject the
Plan;
(e)
no later than April 4, 2023, the
Bankruptcy Court shall have entered the Confirmation Order; and
(f)
no later than April 18, 2023, the
Plan Effective Date shall have occurred.
4.02 A Milestone may only be extended or waived with the prior written consent of the
Debtors and the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders (email being sufficient).
Section 5. Commitments of the Consenting Creditor Parties.
5.01 Affirmative Commitments.
(a)
During the
Agreement Effective Period as to each
Consenting
Creditor Party, such
Consenting Creditor Party agrees, (in the case of each
Consenting Creditor Party, in respect of all of its
Company Claims/Interests presently owned and hereafter acquired (for so long as it remains the beneficial or record owner thereof, or the nominee, investment manager, or advisor for beneficial
holders thereof)), to:
(i)
support the consummation and implementation of the
Restructuring Transactions;
(iii)
negotiate in good faith and use commercially reasonable efforts to execute and implement the
Definitive Documents to which it
is required to be a
party;
(iv) with respect to each Consenting Lender,
prior to the date by which the Consenting Lender shall be required to vote on the Plan, vote each of its Company Claims/Interests (including, with respect
to any unsettled trades by using commercially reasonable efforts to exercise all rights it has under the related trade confirmation to cause and direct the applicable holder of such Company Claims/Interests to vote) to accept the Plan by delivering its duly executed and completed ballot accepting the Plan in accordance with the Solicitation
Materials;
(v)
with respect to each Consenting Lender, to the extent it is permitted to opt out of the releases set forth in the
Plan, elect not to opt out
of the releases set forth in the
Plan by timely delivering its duly executed and completed ballot(s) indicating such election;
(vi)
with respect to each Consenting Lender, to the extent that it is permitted to opt in to the releases set forth in the
Plan, elect to opt in to
the releases set forth in the
Plan by timely delivering its duly executed and completed ballot(s) indicating such election;
(vii)
with respect to each Consenting Lender, not change, withdraw, amend, or revoke (or cause to be changed, withdrawn, amended, or revoked) any vote or election referred to in clause
(ii), (iv), (v), or (vi) above;
(viii) support, and not directly or indirectly object to, delay, impede, or take any other action to interfere with, Confirmation or consummation of the
Plan;
(ix)
support, and not directly or indirectly object to, delay, impede, or take any other action to interfere with, any motion or other pleading or document filed by a
Debtor in the
Bankruptcy Court or any other court that is consistent in all respects with this
Agreement and the
Restructuring Transactions;
(x) with respect to each Cash-Out Backstop
Lender, not make the Class 4 Equity Election in respect of the treatment under the Plan for such Consenting 2016 Lender’s 2016 Term Loan Claims; provided that the Cash-Out
Backstop Lenders, other than the Specified Cash-Out Backstop Lenders, may be deemed to make the Class 4 Equity Election in accordance with the Plan in the event the Class 4 Equity Election is made for less than $543 million of Allowed OpCo Term
Loan Claims in the aggregate;
(xi) with respect to the Consenting Lenders, if reasonably requested by counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders, execute and deliver any documentation reasonably requested by counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of
BrandCo Lenders necessary to evidence such
Consenting Lender’s election under section 1111(b)(2) of the
Bankruptcy Code for such
Consenting Lender’s
2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims, 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims, and/or OpCo Term Loan Claims, as applicable; and
(b)
In addition to the commitments set forth in
Section 5.01(a),
during the
Agreement Effective Period as to the
Creditors’ Committee, the
Creditors’
Committee agrees to:
(i)
upon the written request of the
Debtors, timely file a formal objection, or
joinder to any such
objection, to any motion, application, or other pleading filed with the
Bankruptcy Court or any other court seeking the entry of an order for relief that: (A) is inconsistent with this
Agreement in any material respect; or (B) would, or would be reasonably expected to, frustrate the purposes of this
Agreement, including by preventing the consummation of the
Restructuring
Transactions;
(ii) provide, for inclusion in the
Solicitation Materials, a letter recommending that all holders of
General
Unsecured Claims and Unsecured Notes Claims vote in favor of the
Plan and grant the releases contained in the
Plan; and
(iii)
upon the written request of the
Debtors, timely file a formal objection or opposition to any motion, application, or adversary proceeding
or other action or proceeding asserting any
Settled Litigation.
5.02 Negative Commitments.
(a) During the
Agreement Effective Period as to each
Consenting Creditor Party, such
Consenting Creditor Party agrees (in the case of each Consenting Lender, in respect of all of its
Company Claims/Interests presently owned
(as detailed on the signature pages attached hereto) and hereafter acquired, in each case, for so long as it remains the beneficial or record owner thereof, or the nominee, investment manager, or advisor for beneficial holders thereof) that it shall
not directly or indirectly, and it shall not direct any other Entity to:
(i) object to, delay, impede, or take any other action to interfere with, delay, or impede the acceptance, consummation, or implementation of the
Plan or the
Restructuring Transactions;
(ii) seek, solicit, propose, file, support, vote in favor of, assist, engage in negotiations in connection with, or participate in the formulation, preparation, filing, or prosecution of any
Alternative Restructuring Proposal;
(iii) file any motion, pleading, or other document with the
Bankruptcy Court or any other court (including any modifications or amendments thereof) that, in whole or
in part, is materially inconsistent with this
Agreement or the
Restructuring
Transactions;
(iv) initiate, or have initiated on its behalf, any litigation or proceeding of any kind that is inconsistent with this
Agreement or the
Restructuring Transactions against the
Debtors or the other
Parties (it being understood, for the avoidance of doubt, that any litigation or proceeding to enforce this
Agreement or any
Definitive Document or that is otherwise permitted under this
Agreement shall not be construed to be inconsistent with this
Agreement or the
Restructuring Transactions);
(v) exercise, or direct any other Person to exercise, any right or remedy for the enforcement, collection, or recovery of any
Company Claims/Interests in a
manner that is inconsistent with this
Agreement; or
(vi)
object to, delay, impede, or take any other action to interfere with the
Debtors’ ownership and possession of their assets, wherever
located, or interfere with the automatic stay arising under section
362 of the
Bankruptcy Code or any stay in the Canadian Recognition Proceeding, other than as permitted by
this
Agreement.
5.03 Additional Provisions Regarding the
Consenting Creditor Parties’ Commitments.
Notwithstanding anything contained in this
Agreement, nothing in this
Agreement shall:
(a)
be construed to prohibit any
Consenting Creditor Party from appearing as a
party
in interest in any matter to be adjudicated in the
Chapter 11 Cases, so long as such appearance and the positions advocated in connection therewith are not inconsistent with this
Agreement and are not for the purpose of delaying, interfering, or impeding, directly or indirectly, the
Restructuring Transactions;
(b) affect the ability of any
Consenting Creditor Party to consult with any other
Consenting
Creditor Party, the
Debtors, or any other
party in interest in the
Chapter 11 Cases (including the
United States Trustee), so as long as such consultation and any communications in connection therewith are not inconsistent with this
Agreement or any applicable
confidentiality agreement, and are not for the purpose of delaying, interfering,
or impeding, directly or indirectly, the
Restructuring Transactions;
(c) impair or waive the rights of any
Consenting Creditor Party to assert or raise any objection permitted under this
Agreement in connection with the
Restructuring Transactions;
(d)
prevent any
Consenting Creditor Party from enforcing this
Agreement or contesting whether any matter, fact, or thing is a breach of, or is inconsistent with, this
Agreement;
(e)
be construed to prohibit any Consenting Lender from, either itself or through any representatives or agents, soliciting, initiating, negotiating, facilitating, proposing,
continuing, or responding to any proposal to purchase or sell
Company Claims/Interests, so long as such Consenting Lender complies with
Section 10;
or
(f) obligate a Consenting Lender to deliver a vote to support the
Plan or prohibit a Consenting Lender from changing such vote, in each case from and after the
Termination Date as to such Consenting Lender (other than pursuant to
Section 13.06). For the avoidance of doubt, upon the
Termination Date as to a Consenting Lender (other than pursuant to
Section 13.06), such
Consenting
Lender’s vote shall automatically be deemed void
ab initio and such Consenting Lender shall have a reasonable opportunity to cast a vote; or
(g) prohibit any
Consenting Creditor Party from taking any other action that is not inconsistent with this
Agreement, the
Restructuring Transactions, or any
Definitive
Document.
5.04 Additional Commitments of the
Consenting BrandCo Lenders.
During the
Agreement Effective Period, each
Consenting BrandCo Lender agrees to:
(a) with respect to
Consenting BrandCo Lenders that are DIP Lenders, which collectively constitute
Required
DIP Lenders (as defined in the
Final DIP Order), consent to the payment by the
Debtors of the fees and expenses incurred by the professionals retained by the
Creditors’ Committee in connection with or relating to the investigation and/or prosecution of any
Challenge (as defined in the
Final DIP Order) through December 19, 2022 notwithstanding the application of any
Investigation Cap (as such term is defined by the
Final DIP Order) immediately upon execution of this
Agreement and approval
and/or authorization to pay such fees and expenses in accordance with the Interim Compensation Order and other such orders of the
Bankruptcy Court, so long as the
Creditors’ Committee remains bound to this
Agreement and not in breach of
any of their respective obligations hereunder;
(b) negotiate in good faith and use commercial best efforts to reach an agreement with the Debtors on the outstanding terms of the Global Bonus Program in accordance with the terms of the Restructuring Term Sheet
attached as Exhibit B to the Original RSA by March 2, 2023;
(c) with respect to Consenting B-1 Lenders, which constitute the Majority Facility Lenders (as defined in the BrandCo Credit Agreement) with respect to the 2020 Term B-1 Loans, consent to the deferral of an
amount equal to $20,000,000 of the BrandCo B-1 Payment (as defined in the Final DIP Order) due on March 8, 2023 to the Holders of the 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims pursuant to the Final DIP Order (the “
Deferred B-1 Adequate Protection Payment”)
until the earliest of the termination of this Agreement as to the Consenting 2016 Lenders that are members of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders, the termination of this Agreement as to the Consenting BrandCo Lenders and the Plan Effective
Date. The Parties agree that such Deferred B-1 Adequate Protection Payment shall bear interest, payable quarterly at the non-default interest rate applicable to the 2020 Term B-1 Loans under the BrandCo Credit Agreement; and
(d) with respect to Consenting BrandCo Lenders that are Debt Commitment Parties and
that have delivered a signature page to this Agreement, negotiate in good faith an amendment to the Debt Commitment Letter to reflect the increase of the Aggregate Rights Offering Amount from $650 million to $670 million and to provide in a
manner consistent with the changes that were made to the Backstop Commitment Agreement in connection with the execution of this Agreement that the Backstop Commitment Cash Premium (as defined in the Debt Commitment Letter) shall not be payable if
the Backstop Commitment Letter is terminated by any party thereto as a result of (i) the entry of Confirmation Order or the Backstop Order being denied, or any of such orders being reversed, vacated, reconsidered or otherwise ceasing to
constitute a final order, (ii) any ruling in the Adversary Proceeding that would render confirmation of the Plan impractical or impossible, or (iii) any applicable law or order of any governmental unit shall prevent or prohibit the confirmation
of the Plan or the consummation of a material portion of the transactions contemplated by the Debt Commitment Letter or the other First Lien Exit Facilities Documents (as defined in the Debt Commitment Letter).
5.05 Additional Commitments of the Consenting 2016 Lenders.
During the Agreement Effective Period, each Consenting 2016 Lender that is a member of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders agrees to:
(a) (i) consent to and cooperate with the
Debtors and the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders in causing the entry of the Adversary Stay and Dismissal Order, (ii) at the hearing on the Disclosure Statement, cause counsel for the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders to make an oral
request for entry of the Adversary Stay and Dismissal Order, and (iii) support the entry of the Adversary Stay and Dismissal Order by the Bankruptcy Court and deliver all consents necessary thereto;
(b) prior to or at the hearing on the
Disclosure Statement, take all actions necessary to cause all objections filed by the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders pending in the Chapter 11 Cases as of the Amendment Effective Date to be withdrawn, including (i) the Objection of Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders to the Debtors’ Disclosure Statement [Docket No. 1389], (ii) the Objection of Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders to Motion of Debtors for the Entry of an Order (I) Authorizing the (A) Debtors’ Entry Into the Backstop Commitment Agreement, (B) Debtors’ Entry Into the Debt Commitment Letter, (C)
Debtors to Perform all Obligations Under the Backstop Commitment Agreement and the Debt Commitment Letter, and (D) Incurrence, Payment, and Allowance of Related Premiums, Fees, Costs, and Expenses as Administrative Expense Claims, (II)
Approving the Rights Offering Procedures and Related Forms, and (III) Granting Related Relief [Docket No. 1391] and (iii) the Objection of Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term
Loan Lenders to Debtors’ Second Motion to Extend the Debtors’ Exclusive Periods to File a Chapter 11 Plan and Solicit Acceptances Thereof Pursuant to Section 1121 of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 1396];
(c)
not, directly or indirectly, and not direct any other Entity to (i) investigate, assert, prosecute, or support, directly or indirectly, including by
filing any document in support of, propounding discovery in support of, advocating to the Bankruptcy Court in favor of, or transferring material work product (whether in writing or orally) in furtherance of another’s support of, any Settled
Litigation or any other litigation or objection inconsistent in any way with the Consummation of the Plan; or (ii) seek payment from the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors for any fees relating to any of the foregoing, other than as expressly
permitted by this Agreement; and
(d) support inclusion in the Confirmation Order of (i) findings
of fact and conclusions of law acceptable to the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders that all claims and causes of action asserted in the Adversary Proceeding are Estate Causes of Action and released under the Plan, (ii) an injunction acceptable
to the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders barring any Person from pursuing any such claims or causes of action or any other claims arising out of or related to the facts and circumstances alleged in the Adversary Proceeding, and (iii) a bar
order prohibiting the assertion by any party that is not a Released Party of any claim for indemnity or contribution against any Released Party arising out of or reasonably flowing from the claims or allegations in any claim that is released as
against the Released Parties under the Plan, in each case to be binding and final solely from and after the Plan Effective Date; provided that the Parties agree the
Consenting 2016 Lenders shall not be prejudiced in any manner by such provisions in the Confirmation Order in the event the Plan Effective Date does not occur and no Party shall be permitted to rely on or assert the effectiveness of any such
provision against such Consenting 2016 Lenders in the absence of the occurrence of the Plan Effective Date.
Section 6. Continuing Obligations of the Consenting BrandCo Lenders and the Creditors’ Committee.
6.01 Commitment of the
Consenting BrandCo Lenders and the
Creditors’
Committee.
(a) Upon the
Amendment Effective Date and continuing until the
BrandCo Settlement Termination Date,
each
Consenting BrandCo Lender agrees to:
(i)
use its commercially reasonable best efforts to cause the
Plan and any
Alternative
Restructuring Proposal sought, solicited, proposed, filed, supported, voted in favor of, negotiated, formulated, prepared, or otherwise prosecuted by the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders
provides for treatment of each class of
General Unsecured Claims,
Unsecured Note Claims, and
Qualified
Pension Plans (collectively, “
Creditors’ Committee Constituent Claims”) that is not economically less favorable to the holders of such class than the treatment of such class contemplated
under the reorganization transaction contemplated under the Plan (such treatment, “
Equivalent GUC Treatment”); and
(ii) without the
Creditors’ Committee’s consent, not amend the
Plan in any manner, or seek, solicit, propose, file, support,
or participate in the formulation, preparation, filing, or prosecution of any
Alternative Restructuring Proposal, that would offer or likely result in treatment of any class of
Creditors’ Committee Constituent Claims that is less favorable to the holders of such class than the
Equivalent GUC Treatment of such class
contemplated under the Plan.
(b) Upon the
Amendment Effective Date and continuing until the
UCC Settlement Termination Date, the
Creditors’ Committee agrees that it shall not directly or indirectly, and shall not direct any other Entity to:
(i) object to, delay, impede, or take any other action to interfere with, delay, or impede the acceptance, consummation, or implementation of any
Alternative
Restructuring Proposal sought, solicited, filed, supported, voted in favor of, negotiated, formulated, prepared or otherwise prosecuted by the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders that provides
for
Equivalent GUC Treatment; or
(ii) (A) investigate, assert, prosecute, or
support, directly or indirectly, including by filing any document in support of, propounding discovery in support of, advocating to the Bankruptcy Court in favor of, or transferring material work
product (whether in writing or orally) in furtherance of another’s support of (except but solely to the extent the Creditors’ Committee is required by applicable Law
to disclose any such work product that is not entitled to protection from discovery), (I) any challenge to the amount, validity, perfection, enforceability, priority, or extent of, or seek avoidance, disallowance, subordination, or
recharacterization of, any portion of any Claim of, or security interest or continuing lien granted to or for the benefit of, the 2016 Agent, any Holder of a 2020 Term Loan Claim or BrandCo Agent; (II) any action for preferences, fraudulent transfers or conveyances, other avoidance power claims or any other claims, counterclaims or causes of action,
objections, contests, or defenses against the 2016 Agent, any Holder of a 2020 Term Loan Claim, BrandCo Agent or BrandCo Entity; (III) any other Challenge
(as defined in the Final DIP Order) against the 2016 Agent, any Holder of a 2020 Term Loan Claim or
BrandCo Agent or any Claims or liens thereof; or (IV) any other Financing Transactions Litigation Claims (collectively, “Settled Litigation”); or (B) seek payment for any fees relating to any of the foregoing, other than as expressly permitted by this Agreement.
6.02 Termination and Remedies.
(a)
The
Consenting BrandCo Lenders’ obligations under
Section 6.01(a) shall
automatically terminate upon the occurrence of any of the following events (the date of such termination, the “
BrandCo Settlement Termination Date”):
(i)
the termination of this
Agreement, in each case
solely, as to the
Creditors’ Committee, by (A) the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders pursuant to
Section
13.01(a), (
e), or
(k), (B) the
Creditors’ Committee, other than pursuant to pursuant to
Section 13.03(a) as a result of a breach by the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders of their obligations under
Section
6.01(a), or (C) by the
Debtors pursuant to
Section 13.04(c);
(ii)
the delivery of a notice by the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders to counsel to the
Creditors’ Committee upon the breach by the
Creditors’ Committee of its obligations under
Section 6.01(b),
which breach remains uncured (to the extent curable) for ten (10)
Business Days after the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders transmit a
Breach Notice to counsel to the
Creditors’ Committee hereof detailing any such breach; or
(iii)
the occurrence of the
UCC Settlement Termination Date.
(b) The
Creditors’ Committee agrees that, upon the occurrence of a
BrandCo Settlement Termination Date
occurring pursuant to any of the events described in
Section 6.02(a)(i) or
(ii)
(such date, the “
UCC Settlement Waiver Date”), (i) the
Creditors’ Committee’s obligations under
Section
6.01(b) shall survive; (ii) the
UCC BrandCo Challenge Deadline shall immediately and automatically be deemed to have
expired; and (iii) the
Creditors’ Committee shall be deemed to have waived any and all rights to assert any
Settled Litigation or objections to
Confirmation of the
Plan on any basis other than an objection on behalf of
Holders of General Unsecured Claims and/or
Unsecured Notes Claims to Confirmation based upon a valid
Alternative Restructuring Proposal for an Acceptable Alternative Transaction (as
defined in the restructuring term sheet attached as Exhibit B to the Original RSA) received by the
Debtors.
(c) In the event of a breach by the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders of their obligations under
Section 6.01(a), which breach remains uncured for ten (10)
Business Days after the
Creditors’ Committee transmits a
Breach Notice to counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders detailing such breach, the
Creditors’ Committee may elect to either (i) terminate the
Creditors’ Committee’s obligations under
Section 6.01(b) by delivering a notice to counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders (the date of such
termination, the “
UCC Settlement Termination Date”) or (ii) seek specific performance of the
Consenting BrandCo Lenders’
obligations under
Section 6.01(a);
provided that, for the avoidance of doubt, the
Creditors’ Committee shall
not be permitted to seek specific performance of
Section 6.01(a) at any time after the
UCC Settlement Waiver Date. Upon the
UCC Settlement Termination Date, (x) the
Creditors’ Committee shall be permitted to seek standing and, if granted standing, to prosecute a
UCC BrandCo Challenge in respect to the
Settled Litigation and (y) the
UCC BrandCo Challenge
Deadline shall be deemed to occur on the date that is five (5) days after the
UCC Settlement Termination Date;
provided that, if the breach by the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders is subsequently cured, the Creditors’ Committee shall immediately withdraw such UCC BrandCo Challenge and any notice of a UCC Settlement Termination Date shall be deemed rescinded. For the avoidance of doubt, at
any time prior to the
UCC Settlement Termination Date, the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders may seek specific performance of the
Creditors’ Committee’s obligations under
Section 6.01(b). For the avoidance of doubt, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, the
provisions of
Section 6 hereof shall survive termination of this
Agreement.
Section 7. Commitments of the Debtors.
7.01 Affirmative Commitments. Except as expressly permitted in
Section 9.02, during the
Agreement Effective Period, each of the
Debtors agrees to, and agrees to cause each of its direct and indirect subsidiaries to:
(a)
support and take all steps reasonably necessary and desirable to consummate the
Restructuring Transactions in accordance
with this
Agreement and the Milestones;
(b)
to the extent any legal or structural impediment arises that would prevent, hinder, impede, or delay the consummation of the
Restructuring
Transactions, take all steps reasonably necessary and desirable to address any such impediment, and negotiate in good faith any appropriate additional or alternative provisions or
agreements to address any
such impediment;
(c)
use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain any and all required governmental, regulatory, and/or third-
party approvals for the
Restructuring Transactions;
(d) negotiate in good faith and use commercially reasonable efforts to take all steps reasonably necessary to (i) consummate the
Restructuring Transactions
and (ii) execute and implement the
Definitive Documents;
(e) not file or seek authority to file any pleading inconsistent with this
Agreement,
including the consent rights set forth in
Section 3, or the
Restructuring Transactions;
(f) timely file a formal objection to any motion, application, or pleading filed with the
Bankruptcy Court seeking the entry of an order for relief that: (i) is
materially inconsistent with this
Agreement or any
Definitive
Document; or (ii) would, or would be reasonably expected to, frustrate the purposes of this
Agreement or any
Definitive Document, including by preventing the consummation of the
Restructuring Transactions;
(g)
timely file a formal objection or opposition to any motion, application, or adversary proceeding or other action or proceeding asserting any
Settled Litigation;
(h) oppose and object to any motion, application, adversary proceeding, or cause of action filed with the
Bankruptcy Court by any
party seeking the entry of an order (i) directing the appointment of a trustee or examiner (with expanded powers beyond those set forth in sections 1106(a)(3) and
(4) of the
Bankruptcy Code); (ii) converting the
Chapter 11 Cases to cases under chapter 7 of the
Bankruptcy Code; (iii)
dismissing the
Chapter 11 Cases; or (iv) modifying or terminating the
Debtors’ exclusive right to file and/or solicit acceptances of a plan of reorganization, as
applicable;
(i) oppose any objections filed with the
Bankruptcy Court to the
Plan, any other
Definitive Document, or the
Restructuring Transactions;
(j) support inclusion in the Confirmation Order of (i) findings of fact and conclusions of law acceptable to the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders that all claims and causes of action asserted in the Adversary
Proceeding are Estate Causes of Action and released under the Plan, (ii) an injunction acceptable to the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders barring any Person from pursuing any such claims or causes of action or any other claims arising out of or
related to the facts and circumstances alleged in the Adversary Proceeding, and (iii) a bar order prohibiting the assertion by any party that is not a Released Party of any claim for indemnity or contribution against any Released Party arising out of
or reasonably flowing from the claims or allegations in any claim that is released as against the Released Parties under the Plan, in each case to be binding and final from and after the Plan Effective Date;
(k) (i) prior to
the hearing on the Disclosure Statement, take all actions necessary to cause an order acceptable to the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders, the Debtors and the Required Consenting 2016 Lenders staying the Adversary Proceeding and holding such
litigation in abeyance as to all parties to the Adversary Proceeding pending confirmation of the Plan and providing for the automatic dismissal of the Adversary Proceeding with prejudice as to all parties to the Adversary Proceeding upon the
occurrence of the Plan Effective Date (the “Adversary Stay and Dismissal Order”) to be submitted to the Bankruptcy Court, (ii) make a request at the hearing on the Disclosure Statement
for the Adversary Stay and Dismissal Order to be entered by the Bankruptcy Court, and (iii) support the entry of the Adversary Stay and Dismissal Order by the Bankruptcy Court and deliver all consents necessary thereto;
(l) inform counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of
BrandCo Lenders, the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders, and the Creditors’ Committee within two (2) Business Days after becoming aware of (i) any
matter or circumstance, that they know or believe is likely, to be a material impediment to the implementation or consummation of the Restructuring Transactions; (ii) a breach of this Agreement (including a breach by any Debtor); or (iii) any representation or
statement made or deemed to be made by any Debtor under this Agreement which
is or proves to have been incorrect or misleading in any material respect when made or deemed to be made;
(m) upon reasonable request of any Consenting Creditor Party, reasonably and promptly inform counsel to such party of: (i) the status and progress of the Restructuring Transactions, including progress in relation to the negotiations of the Definitive Documents; and (ii) the status of
obtaining any necessary authorizations (including any consents) from each Consenting Creditor Party, any competent judicial body, governmental authority, banking, taxation, supervisory,
regulatory body, or any stock exchange. For the avoidance of doubt, the Debtors shall continue to provide financial data to stakeholders, including the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders, the Ad Hoc Group of
2016 Term Loan Lenders, and the Creditors’ Committee, as required by the Final DIP Order; and
(n) negotiate in good faith an amendment to
the Debt Commitment Letter to reflect the increase of the Aggregate Rights Offering Amount from $650 million to $670 million and to provide in a manner consistent with the changes that were made to the Backstop Commitment Agreement in connection
with the execution of this Agreement that the Backstop Commitment Cash Premium (as defined in the Debt Commitment Letter) shall not be payable if the Backstop Commitment Letter is terminated by any party thereto as a result of (i) the entry of
Confirmation Order or the Backstop Order being denied, or any of such orders being reversed, vacated, reconsidered or otherwise ceasing to constitute a final order, (ii) any ruling in the Adversary Proceeding that would render confirmation of the
Plan impractical or impossible, or (iii) any applicable law or order of any governmental unit shall prevent or prohibit the confirmation of the Plan or the consummation of a material portion of the transactions contemplated by the Debt Commitment
Letter or the other First Lien Exit Facilities Documents (as defined in the Debt Commitment Letter).
7.02 Negative Commitments. Except as expressly permitted in
Section 9.02, during the
Agreement Effective Period, each of the
Debtors shall not, and shall cause each of its direct and indirect subsidiaries to not, directly or indirectly:
(a) without the reasonable consent of the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders, object to, delay, impede, or take any other action or inaction that is
reasonably avoidable and would interfere with, delay, or impede the acceptance, implementation, or consummation of the
Plan or the
Restructuring
Transactions;
(b) take any action or inaction that is inconsistent in any material respect with, or is intended or could reasonably be expected to frustrate or impede approval, implementation, and consummation of the
Restructuring Transactions or this
Agreement;
(c) file any motion or pleading, with the
Bankruptcy Court or any other court (including any modifications or amendments thereof) that, in whole or in part, is
inconsistent with this
Agreement, including the consent rights set forth in
Section 3,
or the
Restructuring Transactions;
(d)
execute or file any
Definitive Document with the
Bankruptcy Court (including
any modifications or amendments thereto) that, in whole or in part, is inconsistent with this
Agreement, including the
consent rights set forth in
Section 3, or the
Restructuring Transactions;
(e)
take any other action or inaction in contravention of this
Agreement or any
Definitive Document, or to the material detriment of the
Restructuring
Transactions;
(f) without the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) of the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders,
transfer any asset or right of any
Debtor or any material asset or right used in the business of the
Debtors to any Entity
outside the ordinary course of business;
(g) without the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) of the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders, take any action or inaction
that would cause a change to the tax status of any
Debtor; or
(h) without the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) of the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders, engage in any merger,
consolidation, material disposition, material acquisition, investment, dividend, incurrence of indebtedness, or other similar transaction outside of the ordinary course of business other than the
Restructuring
Transactions.
Section 8. Additional Commitments.
8.01 Cooperation and Support. The
Debtors shall provide draft copies of all material pleadings and documents that any
Debtor intends to file with or submit to the
Bankruptcy Court or any governmental authority (including any regulatory authority), as applicable, and draft copies
of all press releases that any
Debtor intends to issue regarding this
Agreement or
the
Restructuring Transactions, to Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, as counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, as counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of
2016 Term Loan Lenders, and Brown Rudnick LLP, as counsel to the
Creditors’ Committee, at least two (2)
Business Days prior to the date when such
Debtor intends to file, submit or issue such document to the extent reasonably practicable, but in all events at least one (1) day prior to such date. Counsel to the respective
Parties shall consult in good faith regarding the form and substance of any such proposed filing with or submission to the
Bankruptcy Court
. The
Debtors shall provide the advisors to the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders, the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders, and the
Creditors’
Committee with, in each case, upon a minimum of two (2)
Business Days’ advance written notice to counsel to the
Debtors, (a) reasonable access (without any material
disruption to the conduct of the
Debtors’ businesses) during normal business hours to the
Debtors’ books and records, (b) reasonable access to the management and
advisors of the
Debtors for the purposes of evaluating the
Debtors’ assets, liabilities, operations, businesses, finances, strategies, prospects, and affairs, and (c)
timely and reasonable responses to all reasonable diligence requests;
provided that all rights provided for in this
Section 8.01 shall be subject to the terms
of any
agreements between the
Debtors and third
parties that may be affected by the exercise of the foregoing rights.
Further, the
Debtors shall reasonably consult with counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders, the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders, and the
Creditors’
Committee regarding any regulatory or other third-
party approvals necessary to implement the
Restructuring Transactions and share copies of any documents
filed or submitted to any regulatory or other governmental authority in connection with obtaining any regulatory or other third-
party approvals.
Section 9. Additional Provisions Regarding Fiduciary
Obligations.
9.01 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Agreement, nothing in this
Agreement shall require (a) any
Debtor or the board of directors, board of managers, or similar governing body of any
Debtor, or (b) the
Creditors’
Committee or any member thereof (the aforementioned
parties collectively as to the
Debtors and the
Creditors’
Committee, “
Fiduciaries”), in each case, acting in their capacity as such, to take any action or to refrain from taking any action to the extent such
Fiduciary determines, after consulting with counsel, that taking or failing to take such action would be inconsistent with applicable
Law or its fiduciary obligations under
applicable
Law, including based on the results of the Independent Investigation;
provided that counsel to the
Debtors or the
Creditors’ Committee, as applicable, shall give notice not later than two (2)
Business Days following such determination (with email being sufficient) (a “
Fiduciary Out Notice”), to counsel to each other
Party to this
Agreement following a determination made in accordance with this
Section 9.01 to take or not take action, in each case in a manner that would result in a breach
of this
Agreement. This
Section 9.01 shall not be deemed to amend,
supplement or otherwise modify, or constitute a waiver of any
Party’s rights to terminate this
Agreement pursuant to
Section 13 or 9.02 of this
Agreement that may arise as a result of any such action or inaction.
9.02 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Agreement:
(a) Each
Debtor and its respective board of directors (or committees thereof, but not any individual director), officers, employees, investment bankers, attorneys,
accountants, consultants, and other advisors or representatives, each acting in their capacity as such, shall have the right, consistent with their
fiduciary duties, to continue to conclusion any ongoing
discussions with interested
parties and to respond to any inbound indications of interest, but will no longer solicit
Alternative Restructuring
Proposals (or inquiries or indications of interest with respect thereto).
(b) If any
Debtor or the board of directors of any of the
Debtors determines, in the exercise of its
fiduciary duties, to accept or pursue an
Alternative Restructuring Proposal, including by making any written or oral proposal or counterproposal with
respect thereto, the
Debtors shall notify (with email being sufficient) counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders, the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders, and the
Creditors’ Committee within two (2)
Business Days following such determination and/or proposal or counterproposal (with respect to a notice in respect of an
Alternative Restructuring Proposal, an “
Alternative Restructuring Counterproposal Notice”). Upon receipt of such
Alternative Restructuring Counterproposal Notice, the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders shall have the right to terminate this
Agreement pursuant to
Section 13.01(e) of this
Agreement;
provided that any such
Termination
Notice must notify the
Debtors that the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders do not support the applicable
Alternative Restructuring Proposal and would intend to credit bid their claims as an alternative to such
Alternative Restructuring
Proposal.
(c) The
Debtors’ advisors shall provide the advisors to the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders, the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders, the
Creditors’ Committee, and any other
party determined by the
Debtors, with (x) regular updates as to the status and
progress of any
Alternative Restructuring Proposals and (y) reasonable responses to any reasonable information requests related to any
Alternative
Restructuring Proposals or the
Debtors’ actions taken pursuant to this
Section 9.02.
(d) Nothing in this
Agreement shall: (a) impair or waive the rights of any
Debtor to assert or raise any objection permitted under this
Agreement in
connection with the
Restructuring Transactions, or (b) prevent any
Debtor from enforcing this
Agreement or contesting whether any matter, fact, or thing is a breach of, or is inconsistent with, this
Agreement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Agreement, the sole remedy available to any
Party upon termination of this
Agreement resulting from the
Debtors’ exercise of their rights under this
Section 9 shall be to terminate this
Agreement and no other remedy in equity or in
Law, including specific performance or
actual or expectation damages, shall be available.
Section 10. Transfer of Interests and Securities.
10.01 During the
Agreement Effective Period, no Consenting Lender shall
Transfer any ownership (including any beneficial ownership as defined in the Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) in any
Company
Claims/Interests to any affiliated or unaffiliated
party, including any
party in which it may hold a direct or indirect beneficial interest, unless (a “
Permitted
Transfer”):
(a) the authorized
transferee is (i) a qualified institutional buyer as defined in Rule 144A of the Securities Act, (ii) a non-U.S. person in an offshore transaction as
defined under Regulation S under the Securities Act, (iii) an institutional accredited investor (as defined in rules 501(a)(1), (2), (3), and (7) of the Securities Act), or (iv) a Consenting Lender; and
(b) the
transferee (i) executes and delivers to counsel to the
Debtors and counsel to the
Consenting Creditor Parties in accordance with
Section 15.07, within two (2)
Business Days of the
Transfer, a fully executed
Transfer Agreement, (ii) controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with such
transferor
Consenting Lender or is an affiliate, affiliated fund, or affiliated entity with a common investment advisor therewith that is bound by this Agreement, or (iii) is a Consenting Lender (or controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with a
Consenting Lender or is an affiliate, affiliated fund, or affiliated entity with a common investment advisor therewith that is bound by this Agreement) unaffiliated with such
transferor Consenting Lender,
and, in the case of (iii), the
transferee provides notice of such
Transfer and the identification of the Consenting Lender that is the
transferee or affiliated therewith (including the amount and type of
Company Claim/Interest transferred) to counsel to the
Debtors and counsel to the
Consenting Creditor Parties in accordance with
Section 15.07, within two (2)
Business Days of the
Transfer.
10.02 Upon compliance with the requirements of
Section 10.01, the
transferor shall be deemed to relinquish its rights (and be released from its obligations) under this
Agreement to the extent of the rights and obligations in respect of such transferred
Company Claims/Interests. Any
Transfer in violation of
Section 10.01 shall be void
ab initio. Any Consenting Lender that effectuates a
Transfer in accordance with this
Section 10 shall have no liability under this
Agreement arising from or
related to the failure of the
transferee to comply with the terms of this
Agreement.
10.03 This
Agreement
shall in no way be construed to preclude the Consenting Lenders from acquiring additional
Company Claims/Interests;
provided that (a) such additional
Company Claims/Interests shall automatically and immediately upon acquisition by a Consenting Lender be deemed subject to the terms of this
Agreement (regardless of when or whether notice of such acquisition is given to counsel to the
Debtors or counsel to the
Consenting Creditor Parties), and (b) such Consenting Lender must provide notice of such acquisition (including the amount and type of
Company
Claim/Interest acquired) on a confidential basis to counsel to the
Debtors within three (3)
Business Days of such acquisition.
10.04 This
Section 10 shall not impose any obligation on any
Debtor to issue any “cleansing letter” or otherwise publicly disclose information for the purpose of enabling a Consenting Lender to
Transfer any of its
Company Claims/Interests or acquire any
Company Claims/Interests. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, to the extent a
Debtor and another
Party have entered into a
Confidentiality Agreement, the terms of such
Confidentiality Agreement shall continue to apply and remain in full force and effect according to its terms, and this
Agreement does not supersede any rights or obligations otherwise arising under such
Confidentiality
Agreements.
10.05 Notwithstanding
Section 10.01, a
Qualified Marketmaker that acquires any
Company Claims/Interests shall not (x) be required to be or
become a Consenting Lender to effect any
Transfer of any
Company Claims/Interests by a Consenting Lender to such
Qualified Marketmaker or (y) be required to execute and deliver a
Transfer Agreement in respect of such
Company Claims/Interests if (a) such
Qualified Marketmaker acquired such
Company
Claims/Interests with the purpose and intent of acting as a
Qualified Marketmaker, (b) such
Qualified Marketmaker subsequently
Transfers such
Company Claims/Interests (by purchase, sale assignment, participation, or otherwise) within ten (10)
Business Days of its acquisition to a
transferee that is an Entity that is not an affiliate, affiliated fund, or affiliated entity with a common investment advisor,
(c) such subsequent
transferee otherwise is a
Permitted Transferee under
Section 10.01, and (d) such subsequent
Transfer otherwise is a Permitted Transfer under
Section 10.01. To the extent that a Consenting Lender is acting in its capacity as a
Qualified Marketmaker, it may
Transfer or
participate any right, title, or interest in any
Company Claims/Interests that the
Qualified Marketmaker acquires from a holder of
Company Claims/Interests who is not a
party hereto without the requirement that the
transferee be a
Permitted Transferee. For the avoidance of doubt, to the extent
Section 10.01 is
applicable to such
Transfer, the ultimate
Permitted Transferee must deliver a properly executed
Transfer
Agreement to the
Debtors in accordance with
Section 15.10 unless such
Permitted Transferee is a Consenting Lender as of the date of the
Transfer.
10.06 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Section 10, the restrictions on
Transfer set forth in this Section
10 shall not apply to the grant of any liens or encumbrances on any claims and interests in favor of a bank or broker-dealer holding custody of
such claims and interests in the ordinary course of business and which lien or encumbrance is released upon the
Transfer of such claims and interests.
Section 11. Representations and Warranties of Consenting Lenders.
(a)
Each Consenting Lender, severally, and not jointly, represents and warrants that, as of the date such Consenting Lender executes and delivers this
Agreement:
(i)
it is (except as indicated on such Consenting Lender’s signature page with respect to validly executed but unsettled trades), the beneficial or record owner of the face amount of
the
Company Claims/Interests or is the nominee, investment manager, or advisor for beneficial holders of the
Company Claims/Interests
reflected in, and, having made reasonable inquiry, is not the beneficial or record owner of any
Company Claims/Interests other than those reflected in, such
Consenting Lender’s signature page to this
Agreement, a
Transfer Agreement or a
Joinder, as applicable (as may be updated pursuant to
Section 10);
(ii)
the
Company Claims/Interests held by it are free and clear of any pledge, lien, security interest, charge, claim, equity,
option, proxy, voting restriction, right of first refusal, or other limitation on disposition,
Transfer, or encumbrances of any kind, that would adversely affect in any way such
Consenting Lender’s ability to perform any of its obligations under this
Agreement at the time such obligations are required to be performed; and
(iii) (A) with
respect to settled trades, it has the full power to vote and consent to matters concerning all of its Company Claims/Interests referable to it as contemplated by this Agreement subject to applicable Law; and (B) with respect to trades that are
not settled by the Voting Record Date (as defined in the Disclosure Statement), it shall use commercially reasonable efforts to exercise all rights it has under the related trade confirmation to cause and direct the applicable record holder to
vote and consent to matters concerning all of its Company Claims/Interests referable to it as contemplated by this Agreement subject to applicable Law; and
(iv) in connection with the Plan, it has the
full power to settle and release all Settled Claims arising out of or relating to such Consenting Lender’s Company Claims/Interests or such Consenting Lender’s capacity as a creditor of the Debtors, including, as applicable, as a lender under
the 2016 Credit Agreement or the BrandCo Credit Agreement, as applicable.
(b) In addition to the representations and warranties set forth in
Section 11(a), each Consenting Lender, severally, and not jointly, represents and warrants that,
as of the date such Consenting Lender executes and delivers this
Agreement:
(i) it is either (A) a qualified institutional buyer as defined in Rule 144A of the Securities Act, (B) not a U.S. person (as defined in Regulation S of the Securities Act), or (C) an institutional accredited
investor (as defined in rules 501(a)(1), (2), (3), and (7) of the Securities Act), and
(ii) any securities acquired by the Consenting Lender in connection with the
Restructuring Transactions will have been acquired for investment and not with a
view to distribution or resale in violation of the Securities Act.
Section 12. Mutual Representations, Warranties, and Covenants. Each of the
Parties represents, warrants, and covenants to each other
Party, as of the date such
Party executes and delivers this
Agreement and as of the
Plan Effective Date:
(a) except as to the
Creditors’ Committee, such
Party is validly existing and in good standing under the
Laws of the state of its organization, and this
Agreement is a legal, valid, and
binding obligation of such
Party, enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, except as enforcement may be limited by applicable
Laws relating to or limiting
creditors’ rights generally or by equitable principles relating to enforceability;
(b)
as to the
Creditors’ Committee, it was duly appointed by the
Office of the
United States Trustee on or about June 24, 2022 (as reconstituted from time to time) and continues to exist as such pursuant to Section 1102 of the
Bankruptcy
Code;
(c) the entry into and performance by it of, and the transactions contemplated by, this
Agreement do not, and will not, conflict in any material respect with any
Law or regulation applicable to it or with any of its articles
of
association, memorandum of association, or other constitutional documents;
(d) except as expressly provided in this
Agreement, it has (or will have, at the
relevant time) all requisite corporate or other power and authority to enter into, execute, and deliver this
Agreement
and to effectuate the
Restructuring Transactions contemplated by, and perform its respective obligations under, this
Agreement;
(e)
except as expressly provided by this
Agreement,
it is not
party to any restructuring or similar
agreements or arrangements with the other
Parties to this
Agreement that have not been disclosed to all
Parties to this
Agreement; and
(f)
it has been represented by legal counsel of its choosing in connection with this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, has had the
opportunity to review this
Agreement with its legal counsel, and has not relied on any statements made by any other
Party or its legal counsel as to the meaning of any term or condition contained herein or in deciding whether to enter into this
Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby.
Section 13. Termination Events.
13.01 Consenting BrandCo Lender Termination Events.
The
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders may terminate this
Agreement
as to all
Parties (except as otherwise provided below), by delivering a
Termination Notice to counsel to the
Debtors,
the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders and the
Creditors’ Committee in accordance with Section 15.10 hereof upon the occurrence of any of the following events, unless waived in writing by the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders (such events, the “
Consenting BrandCo Lender Termination Events”):
(a)
the material breach by any
Debtor, any Consenting 2016 Lender (or the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders
acting at the direction of any Consenting 2016 Lender), or the
Creditors’ Committee of any of the representations, warranties, or covenants of the
Debtors,
the Consenting 2016 Lenders or the
Creditors’ Committee, as applicable set forth in this
Agreement that remains uncured (to the extent curable) for ten (10)
Business Days after the
Required
Consenting BrandCo Lenders transmit a
Breach Notice in accordance with
Section 15.10 hereof detailing any such breach;
provided,
however, that (x) in the case of any breach according to the foregoing by the
Creditors’ Committee, the
Required
Consenting BrandCo Lenders may only terminate this
Agreement as to the
Creditors’
Committee and (y) in the case of any breach according to the foregoing by a Consenting 2016 Lender, the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders may only terminate this Agreement as to such Consenting 2016 Lender;
provided
that, in the case of any breach according to the foregoing by the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders or by Consenting 2016 Lenders that are members of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders that hold a majority of the aggregate principal
amount of the 2016 Term Loan Claims held by Consenting 2016 Lenders that are members of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders, the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders may terminate this Agreement as to all Consenting 2016 Lenders that are
members of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders;
(b) any of the Milestones set forth in
Section 4 (as may be extended or waived in accordance with this
Agreement) has not been achieved by the date specified for such Milestone, unless such failure is the result of any act,
omission, or delay on the part of the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders in violation of their obligations under this Agreement;
(c) any
Debtor files, amends, modifies, executes, or enters into, or files a pleading seeking authority to execute, enter into, amend or modify, any
Definitive Document that is not in form or substance consistent with this
Agreement,
including the consent rights of the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders set forth in
Section 3 of this
Agreement, or publicly announces its intention to take any such
action;
(d) the issuance by any governmental authority, including the
Bankruptcy Court, any regulatory authority or court of competent jurisdiction, of any final,
non-appealable ruling or order that (i) enjoins the consummation of a material portion of the
Restructuring Transactions, or (ii) (A) would prevent the consummation of a material portion of the
Restructuring Transactions, and (B) remains in effect for ten (10)
Business Days after such terminating
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders transmit a written notice in accordance with
Section 15.10 detailing any such issuance; notwithstanding the
foregoing, this termination right may not be exercised by any
Party that sought or requested such ruling or order in contravention of any obligation set out in this
Agreement;
(e) any
Debtor or the
Creditors’ Committee (i) provides a
Fiduciary
Out Notice or
Alternative Restructuring Counterproposal Notice to counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders or (ii) publicly announces or executes a definitive
agreement with respect to an
Alternative Restructuring Proposal;
provided,
however
that in the case of any breach by the
Creditors’ Committee according to the foregoing, the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders may only
terminate this
Agreement as to the
Creditors’ Committee;
(f) any
Debtor files any motion or application seeking authority to sell any material asset or right used in the business of the
Debtors
to any Entity outside the ordinary course of business without the prior written consent of the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders, or provides notice thereof to counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of
BrandCo Lenders;
(g) the entry of an order by the
Bankruptcy Court or other court of competent jurisdiction, or the filing of a motion or application by any
Debtor, any Consenting 2016 Lender, the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders, or the
Creditors’ Committee seeking an order (without the prior written consent
of the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders):
(i) (A) converting one or more of the
Chapter 11 Cases of a
Debtor to a case under chapter 7 of the
Bankruptcy Code; (B) appointing a trustee, receiver, or an examiner with expanded powers beyond those set forth in sections 1106(a)(3) and
(4) of the
Bankruptcy Code in one or more of the
Chapter 11 Cases of a
Debtor; (C) dismissing the
Chapter 11 Cases; or (D) terminating any of the
Debtors’ exclusive right to file a plan pursuant to section 1121 of the
Bankruptcy Code;
(ii)
(A) approving the rejection of this
Agreement or
the Backstop Commitment Agreement, or (B) denying approval of the
Backstop Motion;
(iii)
(A) denying confirmation of the
Plan, or confirming the
Plan pursuant to an order that is not in form
and substance consistent with this
Agreement, including the consent rights set forth in
Section 3, and such order remains in effect for (10)
Business Days after entry thereof; (B) reversing or vacating the Confirmation Order; or (C) approving any plan, disclosure
statement, or
Definitive Document, in any such case, that is not in form or substance consistent with this
Agreement, including the consent rights set forth in
Section 3; or
(iv)
granting relief from the automatic stay (as set forth in Section
362 of the
Bankruptcy Code)
authorizing any
party or Entity to proceed against any asset of a
Debtor in excess of $25 million without the consent of the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders;
provided that (x) upon any such filing by the Creditors’ Committee, the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders may terminate this Agreement solely as to the Creditors’ Committee
and (y) upon any such filing by any Consenting 2016 Lender, the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders may terminate this Agreement solely as to such Consenting 2016 Lender; provided that, upon any such filing
by the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders or by Consenting 2016 Lenders that are members of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders that hold a majority of the aggregate principal amount of the 2016 Term Loan Claims held by Consenting 2016
Lenders that are members of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders, the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders may terminate this Agreement as to all Consenting 2016 Lenders that are members of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders.
(h) the
Debtors take any action or inaction to receive or obtain
debtor-in-possession financing, cash collateral usage, exit
financing, and/or financing arrangements, other than as expressly contemplated in this
Agreement, the
Final DIP Order, or with the consent of the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders;
(i) [reserved];
(j) the occurrence and continuation of an event of default under, or the termination of, the
Term DIP Credit Agreement (as defined in the
Final DIP Order),
ABL DIP Credit Agreement (as defined in the
Final DIP Order), the
Final DIP Order, the Backstop Commitment Agreement, or the
Equity Rights Offering Documents;
(k) any
Debtor, any Consenting 2016 Lender, the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders, or the
Creditors’ Committee
(i) investigates, asserts, prosecutes, or supports, directly or indirectly, including by filing any document in support of, propounding discovery in support of, advocating to the
Bankruptcy Court in
favor of, or
transfers material work product in furtherance of another’s support of (except to the extent the
transferor in complying with applicable
Law), any
Settled Litigation or (ii) consents to the standing of any third
party to bring a motion, application, adversary
proceeding, or other action or proceeding in respect of any
Settled Litigation;
provided that (x) upon any such action or consent by the
Creditors’ Committee, the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders may terminate this
Agreement solely as to the
Creditors’ Committee and (y) upon any such action or consent by any Consenting 2016
Lender, the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders may terminate this Agreement solely as to such Consenting 2016 Lender;
provided that, upon any such action or consent by the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan
Lenders or by Consenting 2016 Lenders that are members of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders that hold a majority of the aggregate principal amount of the 2016 Term Loan Claims held by Consenting 2016 Lenders that are members of the Ad Hoc
Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders, the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders may terminate this Agreement as to all Consenting 2016 Lenders that are members of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders;
(l) the failure of the
Debtors to promptly pay the reasonable fees and expenses of the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders in accordance with this
Agreement;
(m) any
Debtor enters into any key employee incentive plan or key employee retention plan, any new or amended
agreement regarding
executive compensation, or other compensation
agreement, in each case, outside of the ordinary course of business without obtaining the prior written consent of the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders;
(n) the failure of the Consenting 2016 Lenders to constitute holders (or investment advisors, sub-advisors, or managers of discretionary accounts of holders) of, in the aggregate, at least two-thirds of the
aggregate outstanding principal amount of 2016 Term Loans (inclusive of validly executed but unsettled trades as to which such Consenting 2016 Lenders have the power to direct the vote and consent in respect of such 2016 Term Loans); provided that, in such event, the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders may terminate this Agreement solely as to all Consenting 2016 Lenders that are members of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders; or
(o) the Adversary Stay and Dismissal Order
shall not have been entered by the Bankruptcy Court on or before February 24, 2023, or shall have been vacated, withdrawn, terminated, amended or otherwise no longer in full force and effect with respect to any plaintiff to the Adversary
Proceeding; provided that, in such event, the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders may terminate this Agreement solely as to all Consenting 2016 Lenders that are members
of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders.
13.02 Consenting 2016 Lender Termination Events. The Required Consenting 2016 Lenders may terminate this Agreement as to all
Consenting 2016 Lenders that are members of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders by delivering a Termination Notice to counsel to the Debtors, the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders, and the Creditors’ Committee in accordance with Section 15.10
hereof upon the occurrence of any of the following events, unless waived in writing by the Required Consenting 2016 Lenders (such events, the “
Consenting 2016 Lender Termination Events”):
(a) the material breach by any Debtor, the Consenting BrandCo Lenders holding a majority of the 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims and the 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims held by the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders, or the
Creditors’ Committee of any of the representations, warranties, or covenants of the Debtors, the Consenting BrandCo Lenders, or the Creditors’ Committee, as applicable, set forth in this Agreement that remains uncured (to the extent curable) for ten
(10) Business Days after the Required Consenting 2016 Lenders transmit a Breach Notice in accordance with Section 15.10 hereof detailing any such breach;
(b) this Agreement or the Plan is amended or
modified without the prior written consent of the Required Consenting 2016 Lenders in any manner that has a material, disproportionate and adverse effect on the treatment or economic recovery of the OpCo Term Loan Claims (including in a manner
that disproportionately and materially adversely affects OpCo Term Loan Claims as a class as compared to 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims as a class);
(c) the termination of the Backstop
Commitment Agreement as to the 2016 Lender Equity Commitment Parties (as defined in the Backstop Commitment Agreement); or
(d) the Debtors (i) (A) provide a Fiduciary
Out Notice to counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Lenders or (B) publicly announce or execute a definitive agreement with respect to an Alternative Restructuring Proposal, and (ii) publicly announce their intention to withdraw the Plan and
not support the Restructuring Transactions.
13.03 Creditors’ Committee Termination Events. The
Creditors’ Committee may terminate this
Agreement as to itself, by delivering a
Termination Notice to counsel to
the
Debtors, the
Consenting BrandCo Lenders and the Consenting 2016 Lenders in accordance with
Section 15.10
hereof upon the occurrence of any of the following events, unless waived (such events, the “
Creditors’ Committee Termination Events” and, together with the
Consenting BrandCo Lender Termination Events and the Consenting 2016 Lender Termination Events, the “
Consenting Creditor Parties
Termination Events”):
(a) the material breach by a
Debtor or the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders of any of the representations,
warranties, or covenants of the
Debtors or the
Consenting BrandCo Lenders, as applicable, set forth in this
Agreement that (i) adversely affects the rights, obligations, or interests of holders of
General Unsecured
Claims and/or
Unsecured Notes Claims and (ii) remains uncured (to the extent curable) for ten (10)
Business Days after the
Creditors’ Committee transmits a
Breach Notice in accordance with
Section 15.10 hereof detailing any such
breach; or
(b) this
Agreement or the
Plan is amended or
modified without the prior written consent of the
Creditors’ Committee in any manner that is adverse to the treatment of
General Unsecured
Claims and/or
Unsecured Notes Claims.
13.04 Debtor Termination Events. Any
Debtor
may terminate this
Agreement as to all
Parties (except as otherwise provided
below) by delivering written notice to all
Parties in accordance with
Section 15.10 hereof upon the occurrence of any of the following events (such events, the “
Debtor Termination Events” and, together with the
Consenting Lender Termination Events, the “
Termination Events”):
(a)
the board of directors, board of managers, restructuring officer, or such similar governing body of any
Debtor determines in good faith,
after consulting with counsel, (i) that proceeding with any of the
Restructuring Transactions would be inconsistent with the exercise of its
fiduciary
duties or its compliance with applicable
Law, or (ii) in the exercise of its
fiduciary duties, to pursue an
Alternative
Restructuring Proposal;
(b)
the issuance by any governmental authority, including the
Bankruptcy Court, any regulatory authority or court of competent
jurisdiction, of any final, non-appealable ruling or order that (i) enjoins the consummation of a material portion of the
Restructuring Transactions, and (ii) remains in effect for ten (10)
Business Days after such terminating
Debtor transmits a written notice in accordance with
Section 15.10 hereof
detailing any such issuance;
provided that this termination right shall not apply to or be exercised by any
Debtor that sought or requested such ruling or order in
contravention of any obligation or restriction set out in this
Agreement;
(c)
the material breach by any
Consenting Lender or the
Creditors’ Committee of any of the representations, warranties, or covenants made thereby set forth in this
Agreement that remains uncured for a period of ten (10)
Business Days after the receipt by counsel to the
Creditors’
Committee, the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders, and the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders of a
Breach Notice;
provided,
however,
that (x) in the case of a breach by the Creditors’ Committee according to the foregoing, the
Debtors may solely terminate this
Agreement as to the
Creditors’ Committee, (y) in the case of a breach by any Consenting BrandCo Lender according
to the foregoing, the Debtors may choose to terminate this Agreement solely as to such Consenting BrandCo Lender, and (z) in the case of a breach by any Consenting 2016 Lender according to the foregoing, the Debtors may solely terminate this
Agreement as to such Consenting 2016 Lender;
(d) the failure of the
Consenting BrandCo Lenders to constitute holders (or investment advisors, sub-advisors, or managers of discretionary accounts of
holders) of, in the aggregate, at least two-thirds of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of 2020
Term B-1
Loans;
(e)
the failure of the
Consenting BrandCo Lenders to constitute holders (or investment advisors, sub-advisors, or managers of
discretionary accounts of holders) of, in the aggregate, at least two-thirds of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of 2020
Term B-2
Loans;
(f) the failure of the Consenting 2016 Lenders
to constitute holders (or investment advisors, sub-advisors, or managers of discretionary accounts of holders) of, in the aggregate, at least two-thirds of the combined aggregate amount of (i) Allowed 2016 Term Loan Claims (inclusive of validly
executed but unsettled trades as to which such Consenting 2016 Lenders have the power to direct the vote and consent in respect of such 2016 Term Loans) and (ii) Allowed 2020 Term B-3 Loan Claims; provided that, in such event, the Debtors may terminate this Agreement solely as to all Consenting 2016 Lenders that are members of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders.; or
(g)
the failure of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders to, by March 2, 2023, reach an agreement with the Debtors
on the
terms and conditions of the Global Bonus Program in a form and manner consistent with this Agreement, the Executive Employment Term Sheet and the Executive Severance Term Sheet (as applicable);
provided that
so long as the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders continue to negotiate such terms in good faith, the Debtors shall not terminate this Agreement.
13.05 Mutual Termination. This
Agreement, and the obligations of all
Parties hereunder, may be terminated by mutual written
agreement among all of the
following: (a) the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders; (b) the Required Consenting 2016 Lenders; (c) the
Creditors’ Committee; and (d) each
Debtor.
13.06 Automatic Termination. This
Agreement shall terminate automatically without any further required action or notice immediately after the occurrence of the
Plan Effective Date.
13.07 Effect of
Termination. Upon the occurrence of a Termination Date as to a Party, except as provided in this section or Section 6 hereof, this Agreement shall be of no further force or effect as to such Party and each Party
subject to such termination shall be released from its commitments, undertakings, and agreements under or related to this Agreement and shall have the rights and remedies that it would have had, had it not entered into this Agreement, and shall be entitled to take all actions, whether with respect to the Restructuring
Transactions or otherwise, that it would have been entitled to take had it not entered into this Agreement,
including with respect to any and all Claims or causes of action. Upon a termination of this Agreement solely as to the Creditors’ Committee or that arises from any breach of this Agreement by the Creditors’ Committee, the other Parties shall have
no further obligations to the Creditors’ Committee hereunder, or to any other Party with respect to the treatment of General Unsecured Claims and/or Unsecured Notes Claims under the Plan. Upon a termination of this
Agreement solely as to the Consenting 2016 Lenders that are members of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders or that arises from any breach of this Agreement by the Consenting 2016 Lenders that are members of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term
Loan Lenders, the other Parties shall have no further obligations to the Consenting 2016 Lenders that are members of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders with respect to the treatment of their OpCo Term Loan Claims under the Plan as
provided under this Agreement, and the treatment of the OpCo Term Loan Claims of such Consenting 2016 Lenders may be reverted to the treatment contemplated under the Original RSA; provided
that such terminated Consenting 2016 Lenders shall retain all rights to contest such treatment. Upon the occurrence of a Termination Date other than pursuant to Section 13.06, (x) any and all consents or ballots tendered prior to such Termination Date by the Parties
subject to such termination shall automatically be deemed, for all purposes, to be null and void from the first instance and shall not be considered or otherwise used in any manner by the Parties in
connection with the Plan, the Restructuring Transactions or otherwise; and (y) such ballots may be changed or resubmitted regardless of whether the
applicable voting deadline has passed (without the need to seek a court order or consent from the Debtors allowing such change or resubmission); provided, however, that any Consenting Lender withdrawing or changing its vote pursuant to this Section 13.07 shall promptly provide written notice of such withdrawal or change to each other Party to this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as prohibiting any Party from contesting whether any such termination is in accordance with the terms of this Agreement or to seek enforcement of any rights under this Agreement that arose or existed before a Termination Date. Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, nothing herein is intended to, or does, in any manner waive, limit, impair, or restrict any right of any Party or the ability of any Party to protect and reserve its rights (including rights under this Agreement), remedies, and interests, including its claims against any other Party. No purported termination of this Agreement shall be effective under this Section
13.07 or otherwise if the Party seeking to terminate this Agreement
is in material breach of this Agreement, with such material breach causing, or resulting in, the occurrence of one
or more Termination Events. Nothing in this Section 13.07 shall restrict any Debtor’s
right to terminate this Agreement in accordance with Section 13.04(a). Following the occurrence of a Termination Date, the following shall survive any such termination: (a) any claim for breach of this Agreement that occurs prior to such Termination Date, and all rights
and remedies with respect to such claims shall not be prejudiced in any way; (b) the Debtors’ obligations in Section 15.22
of this Agreement up to and including such Termination Date, and
after any such Termination Date arising under Section 13.06; and (c) Sections 1.02, 6.01, 6.02, 13.07, 15.01,
15.02, 15.04, 15.05,
15.06, 15.07, 15.08,
15.09, 15.10, 15.11,
15.13, 15.14, 15.15,
15.16, 15.17, 15.18,
and 15.19 hereof. The automatic stay applicable under section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code
shall not prohibit a Party from taking any action or delivering any notice necessary to effectuate the termination of this Agreement pursuant to and in accordance with the terms hereof. For the avoidance of doubt, in the event that any provision of this Section
13.07 conflicts with Section 6 hereof, Section 6 shall control.
Section 14. Amendments and Waivers.
(a) Except as otherwise set forth in this Section 14, this Agreement (including the
exhibits, annexes, and schedules hereto (including the Plan)) may not be modified, amended, or supplemented, and no condition or requirement of this Agreement may be waived, in any manner without the prior written consent of each of the Debtors and the Required
Consenting BrandCo Lenders; provided that (i) if the proposed modification, amendment, waiver, or supplement has a material, disproportionate, and adverse effect on the
rights of the holders of General Unsecured Claims and/or Unsecured Notes Claims, then the consent of the Creditors’ Committee shall also be required to effectuate such modification, amendment, waiver, or supplement; (ii) if the proposed modification, amendment, waiver, or supplement has a material,
disproportionate, and adverse effect on the treatment or economic recovery of the OpCo Term Loan Claims (including in a manner that disproportionately and materially adversely affects OpCo Term Loan Claims as a class as compared to 2020 Term B-2
Loan Claims as a class), then the consent of the Required Consenting 2016 Lenders shall also be required to effectuate such modification, amendment, waiver, or supplement; and (iii) if the proposed modification, amendment, waiver, or supplement
has a material, disproportionate, and adverse effect on the treatment or economic recovery of any of the Company Claims/Interests held by a Consenting Lender, then the consent of each such affected Consenting Lender shall also be required to
effectuate such modification, amendment, waiver, or supplement.
(b) Any proposed modification, amendment, waiver, or supplement that does not comply with this Section 14 shall be ineffective and void ab initio.
(c) The waiver by any
Party of a breach of any provision of this
Agreement shall not operate or be construed as a further or continuing waiver of such breach or as a waiver of any other or subsequent breach. No failure on the part of any
Party to exercise, and no delay in exercising, any right, power, or remedy under this
Agreement
shall operate as a waiver of any such right, power, or remedy or any provision of this
Agreement, nor shall any single
or partial exercise of such right, power, or remedy by such
Party preclude any other or further exercise of such right, power, or remedy or the exercise of any other right, power, or remedy. All remedies
under this
Agreement are cumulative and are not exclusive of any other remedies provided by
Law.
(d) Any consent or waiver contemplated in this
Section 14 may be provided by electronic mail from counsel to the relevant
Party.
Section 15. Miscellaneous.
15.01 Acknowledgement. Notwithstanding any other provision herein, this
Agreement is not and shall not be deemed to be an offer with respect to any securities or solicitation of votes for the acceptance of a plan of reorganization for
purposes of sections 1125 and 1126 of the
Bankruptcy Code or otherwise. Any such offer or solicitation will be made only in compliance with all applicable securities
Laws,
provisions of the
Bankruptcy Code, and/or other applicable
Law.
15.02 Exhibits Incorporated by Reference; Conflicts. Each of the exhibits, annexes, signatures pages,
and schedules attached hereto is expressly incorporated herein and made a part of this
Agreement, and all references to
this
Agreement shall include such exhibits, annexes, and schedules. In the event of any inconsistency between this
Agreement (without reference to the exhibits, annexes, and schedules hereto) and the exhibits, annexes, and schedules
hereto (including the Plan), this
Agreement (without reference to the exhibits, annexes, and schedules thereto) shall
govern.
15.03 Further Assurances. Subject to the other terms of this
Agreement during the
Agreement Effective Period, the
Parties agree
to execute and deliver such other instruments and perform such acts, in addition to the matters herein specified, as may be reasonably appropriate or necessary, or as may be required by order of the
Bankruptcy
Court, from time to time, to effectuate the
Restructuring Transactions, as applicable.
15.04 Complete Agreement. Except as otherwise explicitly provided herein, this
Agreement
constitutes the entire
agreement among the
Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior
agreements,
oral or written, among the
Parties with respect thereto, other than any
Confidentiality Agreement.
15.05 GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS
AGREEMENT IS TO BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
LAWS OF THE STATE
OF NEW YORK APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTS MADE AND TO BE PERFORMED IN SUCH STATE, WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO THE CONFLICT OF
LAWS PRINCIPLES THEREOF. Each
Party hereto agrees that
it shall bring any action or proceeding in respect of any claim arising out of or related to this
Agreement, to the
extent possible, in the
Bankruptcy Court, and solely in connection with claims arising under this
Agreement: (a) irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the
Bankruptcy Court; (b) waives any objection to laying venue in any such action or
proceeding in the
Bankruptcy Court; and (c) waives any objection that the
Bankruptcy Court is an inconvenient forum or does not have jurisdiction over
any
Party hereto.
15.06 TRIAL BY JURY WAIVER. EACH
PARTY HERETO IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ANY AND ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL
BY JURY IN ANY LEGAL PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS
AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.
15.07 Execution of Agreement. This
Agreement may be executed and delivered in any number
of counterparts and by way of electronic signature and delivery, each such counterpart, when executed and delivered, shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall constitute the same
agreement.
Except as expressly provided in this
Agreement, each individual executing this
Agreement on behalf of a
Party has been duly authorized and empowered to execute and deliver this
Agreement on behalf of said
Party. No
Party
or its advisors shall disclose to any Person or Entity (including, for the avoidance of doubt, any other
Party) the holdings information of any Consenting Lender without such
Consenting Lender’s prior written consent;
provided that signature pages executed by Consenting Lenders shall be delivered to (a) all Consenting Lenders
in redacted form that removes the details of such
Consenting Lenders’ holdings of the
Company Claims/Interests listed thereon, (b) the
Debtors in unredacted form (to be held by the
Debtors on a professionals’ eyes-only basis), and (c) the
Creditors’
Committee in redacted form that removes the details of
Consenting Lenders’ holdings of the
Company Claims/Interests listed thereon. Any
public filing of this
Agreement, with the
Bankruptcy Court or
otherwise, which includes executed signature pages to this
Agreement shall include such signature pages only in redacted
form with respect to the holdings of each Consenting Lender, unless specifically required by the
Bankruptcy Code.
15.08 Rules of Construction. This
Agreement is the product of negotiations among the
Debtors and the
Consenting Creditor Parties, and in the
enforcement or interpretation hereof, is to be interpreted in a neutral manner, and any presumption with regard to interpretation for or against any
Party by reason of that
Party
having drafted or caused to be drafted this
Agreement, or any portion hereof, shall not be effective in regard to the
interpretation hereof. The
Debtors and the
Consenting Creditor Parties were each represented by counsel during the negotiations and drafting of this
Agreement and continue to be represented by counsel.
15.09 Successors and Assigns; Third Parties. This
Agreement is intended to bind and inure to the benefit of the
Parties and their
respective successors and permitted assigns, as applicable. There are no third-
party beneficiaries under this
Agreement, and, except as set forth in
Section 10, the rights or obligations of any
Party under this
Agreement may not be assigned, delegated, or transferred to any other Person or Entity.
15.10 Notices. All notices hereunder shall be deemed given if in writing and delivered, by electronic mail, courier, or registered or certified mail (return
receipt requested), to the following addresses (or at such other addresses as shall be specified by like notice):
Revlon, Inc.
55 Water St., 43rd Floor
New York, NY 10041-0004
Attention: Andrew Kidd, EVP, General Counsel
Matthew Kvarda, Interim Chief Financial Officer
Email: Andrew.Kidd@revlon.com
Mkvarda@alvarezandmarsal.com
with copies to:
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
1285 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10019-6064
Facsimile: (212) 757-3990
Attention: Paul M. Basta
Alice B. Eaton
Kyle J. Kimpler
Robert A. Britton
Brian Bolin
Sean A. Mitchell
Email: pbasta@paulweiss.com
aeaton@paulweiss.com
kkimpler@paulweiss.com
rbritton@paulweiss.com
bbolin@paulweiss.com
smitchell@paulweiss.com
(b)
if to the
Consenting BrandCo Lenders:
To the address set forth on its signature page hereto or such
Consenting BrandCo Lender’s
Transfer Agreement or
Joinder, as applicable
with copies to:
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
450 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10017
Facsimile: (212) 701-5331
Attention: Eli J. Vonnegut
Angela M. Libby
Stephanie Massman
Email: eli.vonnegut@davispolk.com
angela.libby@davispolk.com
stephanie.massman@davispolk.com
(c)
if to the Consenting 2016 Lenders:
To the address set forth on such Consenting 2016 Lender’s Transfer Agreement or Joinder, as applicable
with copies to:
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
2001 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
Facsimile: (202) 887-4288
Attention: James Savin
Kevin Zuzolo
Email: jsavin@akingump.com
kzuzolo@akingump.com
(d) if to the
Creditors’ Committee:
Brown Rudnick LLP
Seven Times Square
New York, New York 10036
Facsimile: (212) 209-4801
Attention: Robert J. Stark
Bennett S. Silverberg
Email: rstark@brownrudnick.com
bsilverberg@brownrudnick.com
Any notice given by delivery, mail, or courier shall be effective when received.
15.11 Reservation of Rights; Waiver. If the
Restructuring Transactions are
not consummated, or if this
Agreement is terminated for any reason pursuant to
Section
13 (other than pursuant to
Section 13.06), the
Parties each fully reserve any and all of their respective rights, remedies, claims, and interests,
subject to
Sections 14 and
Section 6 herein, in the case of any claim for breach of this
Agreement. Further, nothing herein shall be construed to prohibit any
Party from appearing as a
party in interest in any matter to be adjudicated in the
Chapter 11 Cases, so long as, during the
Agreement
Effective Period, such appearance and the positions advocated in connection therewith are consistent with this
Agreement
and any
Definitive Document and are not for the purpose of, and could not reasonably be expected to have the effect of, hindering, delaying, or preventing the consummation of the
Restructuring Transactions.
15.12 Independent Due Diligence and Decision-Making. Each
Consenting
Creditor Party hereby confirms that its decision to execute this
Agreement has been based upon its independent
investigation of the operations, businesses, financial, and other conditions, and prospects of the
Debtors.
15.13 Settlement or Compromise. Pursuant to
Federal Rule of Evidence 408 and
any other applicable rules of evidence, this
Agreement and all negotiations relating hereto shall not be admissible into
evidence in any proceeding other than a proceeding to enforce its terms, pursue the consummation of the
Restructuring Transactions, or the payment of damages to which a
Party may be entitled under this
Agreement.
15.14 Specific Performance. It is understood and agreed by the
Parties that money damages
would be an insufficient remedy for any breach of this
Agreement by any
Party,
and, except as otherwise provided herein (including
Section 6.02 hereof), each non-breaching
Party shall be entitled to specific performance and injunctive or
other equitable relief (without the posting of any bond and without proof of actual damages) as a remedy of any such breach, including an order of the
Bankruptcy Court or other court of competent
jurisdiction requiring any
Party to comply promptly with any of its obligations hereunder. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Agreement, none of the
Parties will be liable for, and none of the
Parties shall
claim or seek to recover, any punitive, special, indirect, or consequential damages or damages for lost profits.
15.15 Several, Not Joint, Claims. Except where otherwise specified, the
agreements,
representations, warranties, and obligations of the
Consenting Creditor Parties under this
Agreement are, in all respects, several and not joint.
15.16 Severability and Construction. If any provision of this
Agreement shall be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect if essential terms and conditions of this
Agreement for each
Party remain valid, binding, and enforceable.
15.17 Remedies Cumulative. Except as otherwise provided herein (including
Section 6.02
hereof), all rights, powers, and remedies provided under this
Agreement or otherwise available in respect hereof at
Law or in equity shall be cumulative and not alternative, and the exercise of any right, power, or remedy thereof by any
Party shall not preclude the simultaneous or later
exercise of any other such right, power, or remedy by such
Party.
15.18 Capacities of Consenting Lenders. Each Consenting Lender has entered into this
Agreement on account of all
Company Claims/Interests that it holds (directly or through discretionary
accounts that it manages or advises) and, except where otherwise specified in this
Agreement, shall take or refrain from
taking all actions that it is obligated to take or refrain from taking under this
Agreement with respect to all such
Company Claims/Interests.
15.19 Email Consents. Where a written consent, acceptance, approval, or waiver is required pursuant to or contemplated by this
Agreement, pursuant to
Section 3,
Section 14, or otherwise, including a written approval by the
Debtors, the
Required Consenting BrandCo
Lenders, the Required Consenting 2016 Lenders, and the
Creditors’ Committee, such written consent, acceptance, approval, or waiver shall be deemed to have occurred if, by
agreement between counsel to the
Parties submitting and receiving such consent, acceptance, approval, or waiver, it is conveyed in writing (including electronic mail)
between each such counsel without representations or warranties of any kind on behalf of such counsel.
15.20 Enforceability of Agreement.
Each of the
Parties waives any right to assert that the exercise of termination rights under this
Agreement is subject to the automatic stay provisions of the
Bankruptcy Code, and expressly stipulates and consents hereunder to the prospective modification of
the automatic stay provisions of the
Bankruptcy Code for purposes of exercising termination rights under this
Agreement, to the extent the
Bankruptcy Court determines that such relief is required.
15.21 Relationship among Consenting Creditor Parties.
(a) None of the Consenting Creditor Parties shall have any fiduciary duty, any duty of trust or confidence in any form, or other duties or responsibilities in
any kind or form to each other, any Consenting Creditor Party, any Debtor, or any of the Debtor’s
respective creditors or other stakeholders, and there are no commitments among or between the Consenting Lenders as a result of this Agreement or the transactions contemplated herein or in the Plan,
in each case except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement, and no action taken by any Consenting Lender pursuant hereto is intended to constitute the Consenting Lenders as a partnership, an association,
a joint venture or any other kind of entity, or create a presumption that any Consenting Lender is in any way acting in concert or as a member of a “group” with any other Consenting Lender or Consenting Lenders within the meaning of Rule 13d-5
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. As of the date hereof and for so long as this Agreement remains in effect, the Parties have no agreement, arrangement or understanding with respect to acting together for the purpose of
acquiring, holding, voting or disposing of any securities of any of the Debtors and do not constitute a “group” within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act or Rule 13d-5 promulgated thereunder.
(b) The Debtors acknowledge that the Consenting Lenders are engaged in a wide range of financial services and businesses, and, in furtherance of the foregoing, the Consenting Lenders and the Debtors acknowledge and agree that the obligations set forth in this Agreement
shall only apply to the trading desk(s) and/or business group(s) of the Consenting Lenders that principally manage and/or supervise such Consenting Lender’s investment in the Debtors, and shall not apply to any other trading desk or business group of such Consenting Lender so long as they are not acting at the direction or for the benefit of such Consenting Lender.
15.22 Fees and Expenses. The
Debtors shall promptly pay or reimburse
when due all reasonable and documented fees and expenses of (a) the BrandCo Lender Group Advisors incurred prior to and during the
Agreement Effective Period and after any termination pursuant
to
Section 13.06, and (b) subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein or in the
Final DIP Order and consistent with the orders and
procedures applicable to the payment of compensation to estate professionals, the
Creditors’ Committee;
provided that nothing herein shall alter or modify
the
Debtors’ payment obligations under the
Final DIP Order or any other order of the
Bankruptcy Court governing
compensation of estate professionals. On the Plan Effective Date, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan and so long as this Agreement has not been terminated as to all of the Consenting 2016 Lenders that are members of the Ad Hoc
Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders, the Debtors shall pay or reimburse all reasonable and documented fees and expenses of (x) the 2016 Term Loan Lender Group Advisors incurred prior to February 16, 2023, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $11 million
(excluding any fees and expenses paid to the 2016 Term Loan Lender Group Advisors prior to February 16, 2023) and (y) Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, as counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders, incurred after February 16, 2023
through the Plan Effective Date, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $350,000 per month (with such cap prorated for any partial months during such period);
provided that such fees and expenses referenced in
this clause (y) shall be limited to amounts incurred in furtherance of the Restructuring Transactions and shall be subject to the limitations on the use of funds set forth in paragraph 28 of the Final DIP Order.
[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first
above written.
REVLON, INC., and each of the Debtors
listed on Exhibit A to this Agreement
|
/s/ Robert M. Caruso
|
|
Name:
|
Robert M. Caruso
|
|
Title:
|
Authorized Signatory
|
|
[Debtor Signature Page to Amended and Restated Restructuring Support Agreement]
Consenting BrandCo Lender Signature Page to
the
Amended and Restated Restructuring Support Agreement
[Consenting BrandCo Lender Signature Pages are on file with the Debtors]
[Consenting BrandCo Lender Signature Page to Amended and Restated Restructuring Support Agreement]
Consenting 2016 Lender Signature Page to
the Amended and Restated Restructuring Support Agreement
[Consenting 2016 Lender Signature Pages are on file with the Debtors]
[Consenting 2016 Lender Signature Page to Amended and Restated Restructuring Support Agreement]
Creditors’ Committee Signature Page to
the Amended and Restated Restructuring Support Agreement
[Creditors’ Committee Signature Page is on file with the Debtors]
[Creditors’ Committee Signature Page to Amended and Restated Restructuring Support Agreement]
Exhibit A
Debtors
Elizabeth Arden USC, LLC
BrandCo Almay 2020 LLC
Elizabeth Arden, Inc.
BrandCo Charlie 2020 LLC
FD Management, Inc.
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation
BrandCo CND 2020 LLC
North America Revsale Inc.
OPP Products, Inc.
Almay, Inc.
BrandCo Curve 2020 LLC
RDEN Management, Inc.
BrandCo Elizabeth Arden 2020 LLC
Art & Science, Ltd.
Realistic Roux Professional Products Inc.
Roux Laboratories, Inc.
BrandCo Giorgio Beverly Hills 2020 LLC
Revlon Development Corp.
Roux Properties Jacksonville, LLC
BrandCo Halston 2020 LLC
Revlon Government Sales, Inc.
SinfulColors Inc.
BrandCo Jean Nate 2020 LLC
RML, LLC
Revlon International Corporation
Bari Cosmetics, Ltd.
PPI Two Corporation
Revlon Professional Holding Company LLC
BrandCo Mitchum 2020 LLC
Revlon (Puerto Rico) Inc.
Riros Corporation
BrandCo Multicultural Group 2020 LLC
Elizabeth Arden (UK) Ltd.
Riros Group Inc.
Beautyge Brands USA, Inc.
Elizabeth Arden (Canada) Limited
BrandCo PS 2020 LLC
BrandCo White Shoulders 2020 LLC
Revlon Canada Inc.
Beautyge USA, Inc.
|
Beautyge I
Charles Revson Inc.
Beautyge II, LLC
Creative Nail Design, Inc.
Cutex, Inc.
DF Enterprises, Inc.
Elizabeth Arden (Financing), Inc.
Elizabeth Arden Investments, LLC
Elizabeth Arden NM, LLC
Elizabeth Arden Travel Retail, Inc.
|
Plan
Exhibit C
First Lien Exit Facilities Term Sheet
[Joinder to Amended and Restated Restructuring Support Agreement]
Exhibit D
The undersigned (“
Joinder Party”)
hereby acknowledges that it has read and understands the Amended and Restated Chapter 11
Restructuring Support Agreement, dated as of February 21, 2023 (the “
Agreement”),
1 by and
among
Revlon and its affiliates and subsidiaries bound thereto and the
Consenting Creditor Parties, and agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions
thereof, and shall be deemed a (a) “
Consenting Creditor Party” and (b) “
Consenting BrandCo Lender” or “Consenting 2016 Lender”, as
applicable, under the terms of the
Agreement.
The
Joinder Party specifically agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of the
Agreement and makes all representations and warranties contained in the
Agreement applicable to a
Consenting Creditor Party as of the date hereof and any further date specified in the
Agreement, in each case, applicable to such class of
Consenting Creditor Party.
Date Executed:
Name:
Title:
Address:
Email address(es):
Aggregate Principal Amounts Beneficially Owned or Managed on Account of:
|
ABL DIP Facility
|
|
Term DIP Facility
|
|
FILO ABL Claims
|
|
2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims
|
|
2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims
|
|
2020 Term B-3 Loan Claims
|
|
2016 Term Loan Claims
|
|
Unsecured Notes Claims
|
|
General Unsecured Claims
|
|
Interests
|
|
1 |
Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall having the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.
|
[Joinder to Amended and Restated Restructuring Support Agreement]
The undersigned (“
Transferee”) hereby acknowledges that it has read and understands the
Amended and Restated Chapter 11 Restructuring Support Agreement, dated as of February
21, 2023 (the “
Agreement”),
1
by and among the
Debtors and the
Consenting Creditor Parties, including the transferor to the
Transferee of
any
Company Claims/Interests (each such transferor, a “
Transferor”), and agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions thereof to the extent the
Transferor was thereby bound, and shall be deemed a (a) “
Consenting Creditor Party” and (b) “Consenting BrandCo Lender” or “Consenting 2016 Lender”, as applicable, under the terms of the Agreement.
The
Transferee specifically agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of the
Agreement and makes all representations and warranties contained in the
Agreement applicable to a
Consenting Creditor Party as of the date of the
Transfer, including the
agreement to be bound by the vote of (and release of claims and actions by) the
Transferor if such
vote was cast (or release granted) before the effectiveness of the
Transfer discussed herein.
Date Executed:
Name:
Title:
Address:
Email address(es):
Aggregate Principal Amounts Beneficially Owned or Managed on Account of:
|
ABL DIP Facility
|
|
Term DIP Facility
|
|
FILO ABL Claims
|
|
2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims
|
|
2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims
|
|
2020 Term B-3 Loan Claims
|
|
2016 Term Loan Claims
|
|
Unsecured Notes Claims
|
|
General Unsecured Claims
|
|
Interests
|
|
1 |
Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall having the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.
|
[Transfer Agreement to Amended and Restated Restructuring Support Agreement]
WHEREAS, certain of the Parties entered into the Restructuring Support Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2022, by and among (i) the Debtors, (ii) the Consenting BrandCo Lenders, and (iii) the
Creditors’ Committee, which provided for the restructuring of the Debtors’ capital structure and financial obligations pursuant to the terms set forth therein;
WHEREAS, in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases, the Debtors have engaged in good faith, arm’s-length negotiations with certain parties in interest regarding the terms of the First Amended Plan;
WHEREAS, certain of the Parties entered into that certain Backstop Commitment Agreement, dated as of January 17, 2023, by and among (i) the Debtors and (ii) certain of the Consenting BrandCo Lenders
(including all exhibits, annexes, and schedules thereto) (the “Original Backstop Commitment Agreement”);
WHEREAS, subject to entry of the Backstop Order, pursuant to the First Amended Plan and this Agreement, Holdings will conduct a rights offering in accordance with the Equity Rights Offering Procedures,
whereby it shall (x) distribute Subscription Rights to purchase the Subscription Shares and (y) offer for purchase to the Equity Commitment Parties the Direct Allocation Shares, for an aggregate purchase price of $670 million (the “Aggregate Rights Offering Amount”) (or, if applicable, the Adjusted Aggregate Rights Offering Amount, which amount shall represent a reduction of the Aggregate Rights Offering Amount on account of Excess
Liquidity in accordance with the First Lien Exit Facilities Term Sheet), at a purchase price per Rights Offering Share calculated at a 30% discount to Plan Equity Value (the “Purchase Price”) (the
foregoing collectively, the “Equity Rights Offering”);
WHEREAS, subject to the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement, Holdings has agreed to sell to each Equity Commitment Party, and each Equity Commitment Party has agreed to purchase (on a
several and not joint basis), its Backstop Commitment Percentage of the Unsubscribed Shares, if any;
WHEREAS, as consideration for their respective Funding Commitments, the Debtors have agreed, subject to the terms, conditions and limitations set forth herein, to pay the Equity Commitment Parties the
Backstop Commitment Premium (or in the alternative, the Backstop Commitment Termination Premium (if applicable)) and the Expense Reimbursement, and provide the indemnification on the terms set forth herein;
WHEREAS, Section 6.2 and Section 11.7 of the Original Backstop Commitment Agreement provide that the Original Backstop Commitment Agreement may be amended, restated, modified, or changed in accordance
with its terms and subject to the consent rights set forth therein; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 6.2 and Section 11.7 of the Original Backstop Commitment Agreement, the Parties desire to amend, restate and replace in its entirety the Original Backstop Commitment
Agreement with this Agreement, effective as of the date of this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, agreements, representations, warranties and covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged, each of the Parties hereby agrees as follows:
(c) words expressed in the singular number shall include the plural and vice versa; words expressed in the masculine shall include the feminine and neuter gender and vice versa;
(d) the words “hereof,” “herein,” “hereto” and “hereunder,” and words of similar import, when used in this Agreement, shall refer to this Agreement as a whole, including all Exhibits and Schedules attached to this
Agreement, and not to any provision of this Agreement;
(e) the term this “Agreement” shall be construed as a reference to this Agreement as the same may have been, or may from time to time be, amended, modified, varied, novated or supplemented;
(f) “include,” “includes” and “including” are deemed to be followed by “without limitation” whether or not they are in fact followed by such words;
(i) unless otherwise specified, references to a statute mean such statute as amended from time to time and include any successor legislation thereto and any rules or regulations promulgated thereunder in effect
from time to time; and
(j) references to “dollars” or “$” refer to the currency of the United States of America, unless otherwise expressly provided.
(d) Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to require an Equity Commitment Party to purchase more than its Backstop Commitment Percentage of the Unsubscribed Shares or its Direct Allocation Percentage of the
Direct Allocation Shares.
(e) For the avoidance of doubt, notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in Section 10.6, but subject to Section 11.10, no provision of this
Agreement shall relieve any Defaulting Equity Commitment Party from any liability hereunder, or limit the availability of the remedies set forth in Section 11.9, in connection with any such Defaulting Equity Commitment Party’s Equity Commitment
Party Default under this Article II or otherwise.
(b) At the Closing, the funds held in the Subscription Escrow Account shall be released to Holdings and utilized as set forth in, and in accordance with, the Plan and the Confirmation Order.
(c) At the Closing, the issuance of the Rights Offering Shares will be made by Holdings to each Equity Commitment Party (or to its designee in accordance with Section 2.7) against payment of such Equity
Commitment Party’s Funding Amount, in satisfaction of such Equity Commitment Party’s Funding Commitment.
(c) For the avoidance of doubt, nothing herein shall alter or modify the Debtors’ payment obligations under the Final DIP Order or the RSA.
(a) As of the Closing Date, the Total Outstanding Shares of Holdings will have been duly authorized and validly issued and will be fully paid and non-assessable, and will not be subject to any preemptive rights
(other than any rights set forth in the New Organizational Documents).
(b) Except as set forth in this Agreement, the First Amended Plan and the New Organizational Documents, and except for a sufficient number of shares of New Common Stock reserved for issuance pursuant to the
Management Incentive Plan, as of the Closing Date, no shares of capital stock or other equity securities or voting interest in Holdings will have been issued, reserved for issuance or outstanding.
(c) Except as described in this Agreement and except as set forth in the First Amended Plan, Registration Rights Agreement, if applicable, the New Organizational Documents, or the Exit Facilities Documents, upon
the Closing, none of the Debtors will be party to or otherwise bound by or subject to any outstanding option, warrant, call, right, security, commitment, Contract, arrangement or undertaking (including any preemptive right) that (i) obligates any Debtor to issue, deliver, sell or transfer, or repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, or cause to be issued, delivered, sold or transferred, or repurchased, redeemed or otherwise acquired, any
shares of the capital stock of, or other equity or voting interests in any Debtor or any security convertible or exercisable for or exchangeable into any capital stock of, or other equity or voting interest in any Debtor, (ii) obligates any Debtor to issue, grant, extend or enter into any such option, warrant, call, right, security, commitment, Contract, arrangement or undertaking, (iii) restricts the Transfer of
any shares of capital stock of any Debtor (other than any restrictions included in the Exit Facilities or any corresponding pledge agreement) or (iv) relates to the voting of any shares of capital stock of any
Debtor.
(b) Each Debtor is in compliance with all obligations under all leases (as may be amended from time to time) to which it is a party that have not been rejected in the Chapter 11 Cases, except where the failure to
comply has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect, and all such leases are in full force and effect (except to the extent subject to applicable to bankruptcy, insolvency,
fraudulent conveyance, fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium, and similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally and to general principles of equity), except leases in respect of which the failure to be in full force and effect have not
had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect. Each Debtor enjoys peaceful and undisturbed possession under all such leases, other than leases in respect of which the failure to enjoy
peaceful and undisturbed possession have not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect.
(b) Other than in connection with (i) the Chapter 11 Cases, or (ii) Taxes being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings for which adequate provisions have been made (to the extent required in accordance
with GAAP), (A) there is no outstanding audit, assessment or written claim concerning any Tax liability of any Debtor, (B) no Debtor has received any written notices from any taxing authority relating to any outstanding tax issue that could affect any
Debtor after the Effective Date; and (C) there are no Liens with respect to Taxes upon any of the assets or properties of any Debtor, other than Permitted Liens.
(c) All Taxes that any Debtor was required by law to withhold or collect in connection with amounts paid or owing to any employee, independent contractor, creditor, stockholder or other third party have been duly
withheld or collected, and have been timely paid to the proper authorities to the extent due and payable.
(d) None of the Debtors are parties to any Tax sharing, allocation or indemnification agreement or arrangement that would have a continuing effect after the Effective Date (other than such agreements or
arrangements that form part of a larger commercial agreement or arrangement, the primary subject matter of which is not Tax, and agreements or arrangements wholly between the Debtors and their subsidiaries).
(e) No Debtor has been requested in writing, and, to the Knowledge of the Debtors, there are no claims against any Debtor, to pay any liability for Taxes of any Person (other than the Debtors or their direct or
indirect subsidiaries) that is material to any Debtor, arising from the application of Treasury Regulation Section 1.1502-6 or any analogous provision of state, local or foreign law, or as a transferee or successor.
(f) No Debtor has been either a “distributing corporation” or a “controlled corporation” in a distribution occurring during the last five years in which the parties to such distribution treated the distribution as
one to which Section 355 of the IRC is applicable.
(b) Each Debtor and its Subsidiaries have not incurred, and do not reasonably expect to incur, any liability under ERISA or the IRC with respect to any Single Employer Plan that is subject to Title IV of ERISA or
Section 412 of the IRC or Section 302 of ERISA and that is maintained or contributed to by an ERISA Affiliate (other than the Debtor and its Subsidiaries) merely by virtue of being treated as a single employer under Title IV of ERISA with the sponsor
of such plan that would reasonably be likely to have a Material Adverse Effect.
Each Equity Commitment Party represents and warrants as to itself only (unless otherwise set forth herein, as of the date of this Agreement and as of the Closing Date) as set forth below.
During the Pre-Closing Period, (i) each of the Debtors, with respect to subsections (a)-(k) of this Section 6.5, agrees to, and agrees to cause each of its direct and indirect
subsidiaries to, (ii) each of the Equity Commitment Parties, with respect to subsections (a), (d), and (e) of this Section 6.5, and (iii) each 2016 Lender Equity Commitment Party, with respect to subsection (l)
of this Section 6.5 agrees to:
(a) support and take all steps reasonably necessary and desirable to consummate the Restructuring Transactions in accordance with this Agreement and the RSA (including the milestones therein);
(b) to the extent any legal or structural impediment arises that would prevent, hinder, impede, or delay the consummation of the Restructuring Transactions, take all steps reasonably necessary and desirable to
address any such impediment, and negotiate in good faith any appropriate additional or alternative provisions or agreements to address any such impediment;
(c) use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain any and all required governmental, regulatory, and/or third-party approvals for the Restructuring Transactions;
(d) negotiate in good faith and use commercially reasonable efforts to take all steps reasonably necessary to (i) consummate the Restructuring Transactions and (ii) execute, as applicable, and implement this
Agreement and the other Definitive Documents;
(e) not file or seek authority to file any pleading inconsistent with this Agreement, the RSA (including the consent rights set forth therein), or the Restructuring Transactions;
(f) timely file a formal objection to any motion, application, or pleading filed with the Bankruptcy Court seeking the entry of an order for relief that: (i) is materially inconsistent with the RSA, this
Agreement, or any other Definitive Document; or (ii) would, or would be reasonably expected to, frustrate the purposes of the RSA, this Agreement, or any other Definitive Document, including by preventing the consummation of the Restructuring
Transactions;
(g) timely file a formal objection or opposition to any motion, application, or adversary proceeding or other action or proceeding asserting any Settled Litigation;
(h) oppose and object to any motion, application, adversary proceeding, or cause of action filed with the Bankruptcy Court by any party seeking the entry of an order (i) directing the appointment of a trustee or
examiner (with expanded powers beyond those set forth in sections 1106(a)(3) and (4) of the Bankruptcy Code); (ii) converting the Chapter 11 Cases to cases under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code; (iii) dismissing the Chapter 11 Cases; or (iv) modifying
or terminating the Debtors’ exclusive right to file and/or solicit acceptances of a plan of reorganization, as applicable;
(i) oppose any objections filed with the Bankruptcy Court to this Agreement, the Plan, any other Definitive Document, or the Restructuring Transactions;
(j) inform counsel to the Initial Equity Commitment Parties and counsel to the 2016 Lender Equity Commitment Parties within two (2) Business Days after becoming aware of (i) any matter or circumstance, that they
know or believe is likely, to be a material impediment to the implementation or consummation of the Restructuring Transactions; (ii) a breach of this Agreement (including a breach by any Debtor); or (iii) any representation or statement made or deemed
to be made by any Debtor under this Agreement which is or proves to have been incorrect or misleading in any material respect when made or deemed to be made;
(k) upon reasonable request of any Equity Commitment Party, reasonably and promptly inform counsel to such party of: (i) the status and progress of the Restructuring Transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
including progress in relation to the negotiations of the Definitive Documents; and (ii) the status of obtaining any necessary authorizations (including any consents) from each Equity Commitment Party, any competent judicial body, governmental
authority, banking, taxation, supervisory, regulatory body, or any stock exchange; and
(l) take all actions necessary to make a Class 4 Equity Election on account of all of its Allowed OpCo Term Loan Claims; provided that if a 2016 Lender Equity Commitment Party acquires additional Allowed OpCo Term
Loan Claims from a transferor that did not make a Class 4 Equity Election (and was not required to make a Class 4 Equity Election), such 2016 Lender Equity Commitment Party shall not be required (and not doing so shall not be a breach of this
Agreement) to make a Class 4 Equity Election on account of such Allowed OpCo Term Loan Claims under this Agreement.
(a) without the reasonable consent of the Parties, object to, delay, impede, or take any other action or inaction that is reasonably avoidable and would interfere with, delay, or impede the acceptance,
implementation, or consummation of this Agreement, the Plan or the Restructuring Transactions;
(b) take any action or inaction that is inconsistent in any material respect with, or is intended or could reasonably be expected to frustrate or impede approval, implementation, and consummation of the
Restructuring Transactions, the RSA, or this Agreement;
(c) file any motion or pleading, with the Bankruptcy Court or any other court (including any modifications or amendments thereof) that, in whole or in part, is inconsistent with this Agreement, the RSA (including
the consent rights set forth in Section 3 therein), or the Restructuring Transactions;
(d) execute or file any Definitive Document with the Bankruptcy Court (including any modifications or amendments thereto) that, in whole or in part, is inconsistent with this Agreement, the RSA (including the
consent rights set forth in Section 3 therein), or the Restructuring Transactions;
(e) take any other action or inaction in contravention of the RSA, this Agreement, or any other Definitive Document, or to the material detriment of the Restructuring Transactions;
(f) without the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) of the Required Equity Commitment Parties, transfer any asset or right of any Debtor or any material asset or right used in the
business of the Debtors to any Entity outside the ordinary course of business;
(g) without the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) of the Required Equity Commitment Parties, take any action or inaction that would cause a change to the tax status of any Debtor;
(h) without the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) of the Required Equity Commitment Parties, engage in any merger, consolidation, material disposition, material acquisition,
investment, dividend, incurrence of indebtedness, or other similar transaction outside of the ordinary course of business other than the Restructuring Transactions;
(i) without the consent of the Required Equity Commitment Parties, make any material amendment, material modification, termination, material waiver, material supplement, material restatement, or other material
change to any Material Contract;
(j) without the consent of the Required Equity Commitment Parties, become a party to, establish, adopt, amend, or terminate any collective bargaining agreement or other agreement with a labor union, works council,
or similar organization; or
(k) directly or indirectly, or direct any other Entity to, (i) investigate, assert, prosecute, or support, directly or indirectly, including by filing any document in support of, propounding discovery in support
of, advocating to the Bankruptcy Court in favor of, or transferring material work product (whether in writing or orally) in furtherance of another’s support of, any Settled Litigation or any other litigation or objection inconsistent in any way with
the Consummation of the Plan; or (ii) seek payment from the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors for any fees relating to any of the foregoing, other than as expressly permitted by this Agreement or the RSA.
“THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE WERE ORIGINALLY ISSUED ON [DATE OF ISSUANCE], HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “ACT”), OR ANY OTHER APPLICABLE STATE
SECURITIES LAWS, AND MAY NOT BE SOLD OR TRANSFERRED IN THE ABSENCE OF AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE ACT OR AN AVAILABLE EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION THEREUNDER.”
In the event that any such Direct Allocation Shares or Unsubscribed Shares are uncertificated, such Direct Allocation Shares or Unsubscribed Shares shall be subject to a restrictive notation
substantially similar to the Legend in the stock ledger or other appropriate records maintained by Holdings or its transfer agent and the term “Legend” shall include such restrictive notation.
Holdings shall remove the Legend (or restrictive notation, as applicable) set forth above from the certificates evidencing any such shares (or the stock ledger or other appropriate records, in the case
of uncertified shares) at any time after the restrictions described in such Legend cease to be applicable, including, as applicable, when such shares may be sold under Rule 144 of the Securities Act without volume or manner of sale restrictions.
Holdings may reasonably request such opinions, certificates or other evidence that such restrictions or conditions no longer apply as a condition to removing the Legend. For the avoidance of doubt, none of the Subscription Shares or New Common Stock
issued in satisfaction of the Backstop Commitment Premium shall include the Legend.
(a) Each Party agrees to use best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all actions and to do, or cause to be done, all things necessary to consummate and make effective the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement, the Plan and the other Definitive Documents, including (i) if applicable, filing, or causing to be filed, the Notification and Report Form pursuant to the HSR Act with respect to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement with
the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and the United States Federal Trade Commission and any filings (or, if required by any Antitrust Authority, any drafts thereof) under any other Antitrust Laws that are necessary to
consummate and make effective the transactions contemplated by this Agreement as soon as reasonably practicable (and with respect to any filings required pursuant to the HSR Act, no later than fifteen (15) Business Days following the later of (x) the
date hereof or (y) a date reasonably determined by the Required Equity Commitment Parties (not to be later than twenty-five (25) Business Days following the date hereof)) and (ii) promptly furnishing documents or information reasonably requested by any
Antitrust Authority and supplying to any Governmental Authority as promptly as practicable any additional information or documents that may be requested pursuant to any Law or by such Governmental Unit and taking, or causing to be taken, all other
actions and doing, or causing to be done, all other things necessary, proper or advisable to consummate and make effective the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. The Debtors agree to pay all fees of a Governmental Authority incurred by any
Party in connection with the filings and other actions contemplated by this Section 6.14.
Each Equity Commitment Party, including its Affiliates, and its direct and indirect subsidiaries, agrees to take, or cause to be taken, any and all steps and to make, or cause to be made, any and all
undertakings necessary to resolve such objections, if any, that a Governmental Authority or Antitrust Authority may assert under any Antitrust Law with respect to any transaction contemplated by this Agreement, the Plan or the other Definitive
Documents, and to avoid or eliminate each and every impediment under any Antitrust Law that may be asserted by any Governmental Authority or Antitrust Authority with respect to any transaction contemplated by this Agreement, the Plan or the other
Definitive Documents, in each case, so as to enable the Closing to occur as promptly as practicable, including, without limitation, (x) proposing, negotiating, committing to and effecting, by consent decree, hold separate order, or otherwise, the sale,
divestiture or disposition of any businesses, assets, equity interests, product lines or properties of any Equity Commitment Party (including its Affiliates, and its direct and indirect subsidiaries), or any equity interest in any joint venture held
any by any Equity Commitment Party (including its Affiliates, and its direct and indirect subsidiaries), (y) creating, terminating, or divesting relationships, ventures, contractual rights or obligations of any Equity Commitment Party (including its
Affiliates, and its direct and indirect subsidiaries), and (z) otherwise taking or committing to take any action that would limit any Equity Commitment Party’s (including its Affiliates’, and its direct and indirect subsidiaries’) freedom of action
with respect to, or its ability to retain or hold, directly or indirectly, any businesses, assets, equity interests, product lines or properties of any Equity Commitment Party (including its Affiliates, and its direct and indirect subsidiaries) or any
equity interest in any joint venture held by any Equity Commitment Party (including its Affiliates, and its direct and indirect subsidiaries), in each case as may be required in order to obtain all approvals, consents, clearances, expirations or
terminations of waiting periods, registrations, permits, authorizations and other confirmations required directly or indirectly under any Antitrust Law or to avoid the commencement of any action to prohibit any transaction contemplated by this
Agreement, the Plan or the other Definitive Documents under any Antitrust Law, or, in the alternative, to avoid the entry of, or to effect the dissolution of, any injunction, temporary restraining order or other order in any action or proceeding
seeking to prohibit any transaction contemplated by this Agreement, the Plan or the other Definitive Documents or delay the Closing.
The Debtors and each Equity Commitment Party subject to an obligation pursuant to the Antitrust Laws, if applicable, to notify any transaction contemplated by this Agreement, the Plan or the other
Definitive Documents that has notified the Debtors in writing of such obligation (each such Equity Commitment Party, a “Filing Party”) agree to reasonably cooperate with each other as to the appropriate
time of filing such notification and its content. Where applicable in connection with this Agreement, the Debtors and each Filing Party shall, to the extent permitted by applicable Law: (A) promptly notify each other of, and if in writing, furnish each
other with copies of (or, in the case of material oral communications, advise each other orally of) any communications from or with an Antitrust Authority; (B) not participate in any meeting with an Antitrust Authority unless it consults with each
other Filing Party and the Debtors, as applicable, in advance and, to the extent permitted by the Antitrust Authority and applicable Law, give each other Filing Party and the Debtors, as applicable, a reasonable opportunity to attend and participate
thereat; (C) furnish each other Filing Party and the Debtors, as applicable, with copies of all correspondence and communications between such Filing Party or the Debtors and the Antitrust Authority; (D) furnish each other Filing Party with such
necessary information and reasonable assistance as may be reasonably necessary in connection with the preparation of necessary filings or submission of information to the Antitrust Authority; and (E) not withdraw its filing, if any, under the HSR Act
without the prior written consent of the Required Equity Commitment Parties and the Debtors. Any such disclosures, rights to participate or provisions of information by one party to the other parties may be made on a counsel-only basis to the extent
required under applicable Law or as appropriate to protect confidential business information, and any materials provided pursuant to this Section 6.14 may be redacted (i) to remove references concerning valuation; (ii) to the extent necessary
to comply with contractual arrangements; and (iii) to the extent necessary to address reasonable privilege and confidentiality concerns.
(b) Should a Filing Party be subject to an obligation under the Antitrust Laws to jointly notify with one or more other Filing Parties (each, a “Joint Filing
Party”) any transaction contemplated by this Agreement, the Plan or the other Definitive Documents, such Joint Filing Party shall promptly notify each other Joint Filing Party of, and if in writing, furnish each other Joint Filing Party
with copies of (or, in the case of material oral communications, advise each other Joint Filing Party orally of) any communications from or with an Antitrust Authority.
(c) The Debtors and each Filing Party shall use their best efforts to obtain all authorizations, approvals, consents, or clearances under any applicable Antitrust Laws or to cause the
termination or expiration of all applicable waiting periods under any Antitrust Laws in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement at the earliest possible date after the date of filing. The communications contemplated by this Section
6.14 may be made by the Debtors or a Filing Party on an outside counsel-only basis or subject to other agreed upon confidentiality safeguards.
(i) If applicable, a registration rights agreement shall have terms that are customary for a transaction of this nature and shall be in form and substance reasonably
acceptable to the Required Equity Commitment Parties and the Debtors (the “Registration Rights Agreement”). The Registration Rights Agreement, if applicable, shall have been executed and delivered by
Holdings, shall otherwise have become effective with respect to the Equity Commitment Parties and the other parties thereto, and shall be in full force and effect.
(ii) The New Organizational Documents, in the form and substance acceptable to the Debtors and the Required Equity Commitment Parties, shall have been duly approved and
adopted and shall be in full force and effect.
(iii) The representations and warranties of the Debtors contained in this Agreement other than those referred to in clauses (i) and (ii) above shall be true and
correct (disregarding all materiality or Material Adverse Effect qualifiers) on and as of the Closing Date after giving effect to the Plan with the same effect as if made on and as of the Closing Date or will be true and correct in all material
respects on and as of the Closing Date (except for such representations and warranties made as of a specified date, which shall be true and correct only as of the specified date), except where the failure to be so true and correct does not constitute,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect.
(a) the termination of the RSA as to the Debtors in accordance with its terms;
(b) the occurrence of any Debtor Termination Event set forth in Section 13.04 of the RSA, other than in the case of (x) Section 13.04(c) of the RSA with respect to acts or omissions of the
Creditors’ Committee or the Consenting 2016 Lenders or (y) Section 13.04(f) of the RSA;
(c) the Bankruptcy Court denies entry of the Backstop Order or any Order approving this Agreement;
(d) subject to the right of the Required Equity Commitment Parties to arrange an Equity Commitment Party Replacement in accordance with Section 2.3(a) (which will be deemed to cure any
breach by the replaced Equity Commitment Party pursuant to this Section 10.3(d)), (i) any Equity Commitment Party shall have (x) breached any representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement made by such Equity Commitment Party in this
Agreement or any such representation or warranty shall have become inaccurate and such breach or inaccuracy would or would reasonably be expected to, individually or in the aggregate, cause a condition set forth in Section 8.4(f) or Section
8.4(h) not to be satisfied or (y) materially breached or ceased to be a party to the RSA, (ii) the Debtors shall have delivered written notice of such breach or inaccuracy to such Equity Commitment Party, and (iii) such breach or inaccuracy is
not cured by such Equity Commitment Party by the earlier of the tenth (10th) Business Day after receipt of such notice and the third (3rd) Business Day prior to the Outside Date; provided that the Debtors shall not have the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section
10.3(d) if they are then in willful or intentional breach of this Agreement; provided further, that this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect with
respect to the Debtors and the non-breaching Equity Commitment Parties. For purposes of this Agreement, “willful or intentional breach” means a breach of this Agreement that is a consequence of an act
undertaken by the breaching party with the knowledge that the taking of such act would, or would reasonably be expected to, cause a breach of this Agreement;
(e) the Backstop Order or the Confirmation Order is reversed, dismissed, vacated, or reconsidered;
(f) the Closing Date has not occurred by 11:59 p.m., New York City time on April 18, 2023, unless prior thereto the Effective Date occurs and the Rights Offering has been consummated; provided that the Debtors shall not have the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 10.3(f) if they are then in willful or intentional breach of this Agreement;
(g) if Holdings shall not receive the Aggregate Rights Offering Amount (or the Adjusted Aggregate Rights Offering Amount, if applicable) pursuant to the Equity Rights Offering and this
Agreement (subject to the right of the Required Equity Commitment Parties to arrange an Equity Commitment Party Replacement in accordance with Section 2.3(a)); provided that any termination pursuant to
this Section 10.3(g) shall not relieve or otherwise limit the liability of any Defaulting Equity Commitment Party hereto for any breach or violation of its obligations under this Agreement or any documents or instruments delivered in connection
herewith; or
(h) any applicable Law or final and non-appealable Order shall have been enacted, adopted or issued by any Governmental Unit that prohibits the implementation of the Plan or the Equity Rights
Offering or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the other Definitive Documents; provided that this termination right may not be exercised by any Party that sought or requested such ruling or
order in contravention of any obligation set out in this Agreement.
(a) the RSA has been terminated as to the Debtors in accordance with its terms;
(b) the occurrence of any Consenting BrandCo Lender Termination Event set forth in Section 13.01 of the RSA (as in effect as of the date hereof, without reference to any modifications,
amendments or supplements to such RSA), which termination events are hereby incorporated by reference herein, other than in the case of Section 13.01(a), (e), (g), (k), (n), or (o) of the RSA with respect to acts or omissions of the Consenting 2016
Lenders or the Creditors’ Committee; provided that the consent rights referenced in such termination events shall instead refer to the consent of the Required Equity Commitment Parties and be consistent with
the consent rights set forth in Section 6.2 herein;
(c) (i) the Bankruptcy Court has not entered or denies entry of the Backstop Order on or prior to February 22, 2023; or (ii) the Bankruptcy Court has not entered the Confirmation Order on or
prior to April 4, 2023;
(d) the Backstop Order or the Confirmation Order is reversed, dismissed, vacated, reconsidered or is modified or amended in any material respect after entry without the prior written consent of
the Required Equity Commitment Parties; provided that this termination right may not be exercised by any Party that sought or requested such reversal, dismissal, vacation, reconsideration, modification or
amendment;
(e) the Closing Date has not occurred by 11:59 p.m., New York City time on April 18, 2023 (as it may be extended pursuant to this Section 10.4(e) or Section 2.3(a), the “Outside Date”), provided that the Outside Date may be waived or extended with the prior written consent of the Required Equity Commitment Parties up to the Final
Outside Date, and the Final Outside Date may be waived or extended only with the prior written consent of each Equity Commitment Party (excluding any Defaulting Equity Commitment Party);
(f) (i) Holdings or any Debtor shall have breached any representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement made by Holdings or the other Debtors in this Agreement or any such representation
or warranty shall have become inaccurate and such breach or inaccuracy would, individually or in the aggregate, cause a condition set forth in Sections 8.1(j), 8.1(k) or 8.1(l) not to be satisfied, (ii) any Equity Commitment
Party shall have delivered written notice of such breach or inaccuracy to the Debtors, and (iii) if such breach or inaccuracy is capable of being cured, such breach or inaccuracy is not cured by Holdings or the other Debtors by the earlier of (x) the
tenth (10th) Business Day after receipt of such notice, and (y) the third (3rd) Business
Day prior to the Outside Date; provided that this Agreement may not be terminated pursuant to this Section 10.4(f) if the Required Equity Commitment Parties are then in willful or intentional breach of
this Agreement;
(g) since September 30, 2022, there shall have occurred any event, development, occurrence or change that, individually, or together with all other Events, has had or would reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect; or
(h) any applicable Law or final and non-appealable Order shall have been enacted, adopted or issued by any Governmental Unit that prohibits the implementation of the Plan or the Equity Rights
Offering or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the other Definitive Documents; provided that this termination right may not be exercised by any Party that sought or requested such ruling or
order in contravention of any obligation set out in this Agreement.
(a) This Agreement may be terminated as to a 2016 Lender Equity Commitment Party upon written notice by (x) such 2016 Lender Equity Commitment Party to the Debtors and the BrandCo Lender Equity
Commitment Parties, (y) the Required Equity Commitment Parties to the Debtors, the BrandCo Lender Equity Commitment Parties and such 2016 Lender Equity Commitment Party, or (z) the Debtors to the BrandCo Lender Equity Commitment Parties and such 2016
Lender Equity Commitment Party, in each case within one (1) day of the termination of the RSA as to such 2016 Lender Equity Commitment Party.
(b) This Agreement may be terminated by any Equity Commitment Party, with regard to itself only, by written notice to the Debtors and the other Equity Commitment Parties if the Closing does
not occur by the Final Outside Date. If this Agreement is terminated with respect to a 2016 Lender Equity Commitment Party, such 2016 Lender Equity Commitment Party will be treated as a Defaulting Equity Commitment Party pursuant to Section 2.3(c) of
this Agreement.
(b) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, if this Agreement is terminated pursuant to
(xiii) then, as promptly as practicable and in any event no later than two (2) Business Days following such termination, the Debtors shall pay or cause to be paid to the
Equity Commitment Parties that are not (x) Defaulting Commitment Parties or (y) Equity Commitment Parties whose breach of this Agreement caused its termination, (i) the Backstop Commitment Termination Premium (pro rata
in accordance with their Backstop Commitment Percentages, excluding the Backstop Commitment Percentage of any (A) Defaulting Equity Commitment Party or (B) Equity Commitment Party whose breach of this Agreement caused its termination), and (ii) any
filing fees or other similar costs, fees or expenses associated with the matters contemplated by Section 6.14, as well as the Expense Reimbursement pursuant to Section 3.3 (in each case, excluding any such fees or other expenses
referenced in this clause (ii) of any (A) Defaulting Equity Commitment Party or (B) Equity Commitment Party whose breach of this Agreement caused its termination); provided that any invoices shall not
be required to contain individual time detail. Subject to Section 11.10, nothing in this Section 10.6 shall relieve any Party from liability for its breach of this Agreement; provided further that, for the avoidance of doubt, in no event shall the Backstop Commitment Termination Premium be payable if this Agreement is terminated by any Party as a result of (i) the entry of Confirmation Order or
the Backstop Order being denied, or any of such orders being reversed, vacated, reconsidered or otherwise ceasing to constitute a Final Order, (ii) any ruling in the Adversary Proceeding that would render confirmation of the Plan impractical or
impossible, or (iii) any applicable Law or Order of any Governmental Unit shall prevent or prohibit the confirmation of the Plan or the consummation of a material portion of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the other Definitive
Documents; provided further, that in no event shall the Backstop Commitment Termination Premium be payable to any 2016 Lender Equity Commitment Party whose breach
resulted in the termination of the RSA as to such 2016 Lender Equity Commitment Party.
(c) The automatic stay applicable under section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code shall not prohibit a Party from taking any action or delivering any notice necessary to effectuate the termination of
this Agreement pursuant to and in accordance with the terms hereof.
(b) If to the Initial Equity Commitment Parties (or to any of them), counsel to the Initial Equity Commitment Parties, or any other Person to which notice is to be delivered hereunder, to the
address set forth on each such Equity Commitment Party’s signature page to this Agreement,
(c) If to the 2016 Lender Equity Commitment Parties (or to any of them), counsel to the 2016 Lender Commitment Parties, or any other Person to which notice is to be delivered hereunder, to the
address set forth on each such 2016 Lender Commitment Party’s signature page to this Agreement,
(b) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan (including any amendments, supplements or modifications thereto) or the Confirmation Order (and any amendments, supplements or
modifications thereto) or an affirmative vote to accept the First Amended Plan submitted by any Equity Commitment Party, nothing contained in the Plan (including any amendments, supplements or modifications thereto) or Confirmation Order (including any
amendments, supplements or modifications thereto) shall alter, amend or modify the rights of the Equity Commitment Parties under this Agreement unless such alteration, amendment or modification has been made in accordance with Section 11.7.
The terms and conditions of this Agreement (other than the conditions set forth in Section 8.1 and Section 8.4, the waiver of which shall be governed solely by Article VIII) may
be waived (a) by the Debtors only by a written instrument executed by the Debtors and (b) by the Required Equity Commitment Parties only by a written instrument executed by the Required Equity Commitment Parties.
No delay on the part of any Party in exercising any right, power or privilege pursuant to this Agreement will operate as a waiver thereof, nor will any waiver on the part of any Party of any right,
power or privilege pursuant to this Agreement, nor will any single or partial exercise of any right, power or privilege pursuant to this Agreement, preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, power or privilege
pursuant to this Agreement. The rights and remedies provided pursuant to this Agreement are cumulative and are not exclusive of any rights or remedies which any party hereto otherwise may have at law or in equity.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
|
|
|
In re:
|
|
Chapter 11
|
|
|
|
REVLON, INC., et al.,1
|
|
Case No. 22-10760 (DSJ)
|
|
|
|
Debtors.
|
|
(Jointly Administered)
|
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR FIRST AMENDED JOINT PLAN
OF REORGANIZATION OF REVLON, INC. AND ITS DEBTOR
AFFILIATES PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 11 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE
|
Paul M. Basta
Alice Belisle Eaton
Kyle J. Kimpler
Robert A. Britton
Brian Bolin
Sean A. Mitchell
|
|
PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON &
GARRISON LLP
|
|
1285 Avenue of the Americas
|
|
New York, NY 10019
|
|
Telephone: (212) 373-3000
|
|
Facsimile: (212) 757-3990
|
Date: February 21, 2023
|
Counsel to the Debtors and Debtors in Possession
|
1
|
The last four digits of Debtor Revlon, Inc.’s tax identification number are 2955.
Due to the large number of debtor entities in these Chapter 11 Cases, for which the Court has granted joint administration, a complete list of the debtor entities and the last four digits of their federal tax identification numbers is
not provided herein. A complete list of such information may be obtained on the website of the Debtors’ claims and noticing agent at https://cases.ra.kroll.com/Revlon (the “Case Information Website”).
The location of the Debtors’ service address for purposes of these Chapter 11 Cases is: 55 Water St., 43rd Floor, New York, NY 10041-0004.
|
RECOMMENDATION BY THE BOARD AND KEY CREDITOR SUPPORT
The board of directors of Revlon, Inc. (the “Board”), and the
board of directors, managers, or members, as applicable, of each of its Debtor affiliates, have approved the transactions contemplated by the Plan and recommend that all creditors whose votes are being solicited submit ballots (the “Ballot(s)”) to accept the Plan.
|
RECOMMENDATION BY THE CREDITORS’ COMMITTEE
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors appointed in these Chapter 11 Cases (the “Creditors’ Committee”) recommends that all holders of General Unsecured Claims and Unsecured Notes Claims (each as defined below) vote to accept the Plan and grant the releases contained in the Plan. Included in the Solicitation Materials (as defined below) is a letter from the Creditors’ Committee in support of the Plan.
|
PLAN VOTING DEADLINE (THE “VOTING DEADLINE”):
4:00 P.M. PREVAILING EASTERN TIME, ON MARCH 20, 2023
(unless extended by the Debtors)
BENEFICIAL HOLDERS THAT HOLD THEIR CLAIMS THROUGH VOTING NOMINEES MUST RETURN SUCH BENEFICIAL HOLDER BALLOTS TO THEIR RESPECTIVE
VOTING NOMINEES AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO ALLOW SUFFICIENT TIME FOR VOTING NOMINEES TO VALIDATE AND INCLUDE THEIR VOTES ON A MASTER BALLOT AND RETURN SUCH MASTER BALLOTS TO THE VOTING AND CLAIMS AGENT ON OR BEFORE THE VOTING DEADLINE.
FOR YOUR VOTE TO BE COUNTED, THE MASTER BALLOT SUBMITTED ON YOUR BEHALF MUST BE ACTUALLY RECEIVED BY THE VOTING AND CLAIMS AGENT
ON OR BEFORE THE VOTING DEADLINE.
IF YOU HOLD YOUR CLAIMS DIRECTLY, YOU MUST RETURN YOUR COMPLETED BALLOT TO THE VOTING AND CLAIMS AGENT ON OR BEFORE THE VOTING
DEADLINE.
THE DEBTORS ARE PROVIDING THE INFORMATION IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT TO HOLDERS OF CLAIMS FOR THE PURPOSE OF SOLICITING VOTES
TO ACCEPT OR REJECT THE PLAN. NOTHING IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT MAY BE RELIED UPON OR USED BY ANY ENTITY FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN TO DETERMINE HOW TO VOTE ON THE PLAN. BEFORE DECIDING WHETHER TO VOTE FOR OR AGAINST THE PLAN, EACH HOLDER
ENTITLED TO VOTE SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER ALL OF THE INFORMATION IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT, INCLUDING ALL ATTACHED EXHIBITS AND DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED INTO THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT, AS WELL AS THE RISK FACTORS DESCRIBED IN ARTICLE XII OF THIS
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT.
UPON CONFIRMATION OF THE PLAN, THE NEW SECURITIES DESCRIBED IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT WILL BE ISSUED WITHOUT REGISTRATION
UNDER THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “SECURITIES ACT”), ANY STATE SECURITIES LAWS, OR ANY SIMILAR U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL LAWS TO PERSONS RESIDENT OR
OTHERWISE LOCATED IN THE UNITED STATES IN RELIANCE ON THE EXEMPTION SET FORTH IN SECTION 1145 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE, SECTION 4(a)(2) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OR REGULATION D PROMULGATED THEREUNDER, AND/OR ANOTHER AVAILABLE EXEMPTION UNDER THE
SECURITIES LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES.
NO NEW SECURITIES TO BE ISSUED PURSUANT TO THE PLAN HAVE BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION (THE “SEC”) OR BY ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION OR SIMILAR PUBLIC, GOVERNMENTAL, OR REGULATORY AUTHORITY. THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT HAS NOT BEEN FILED FOR
APPROVAL WITH THE SEC OR ANY STATE AUTHORITY, AND NEITHER THE SEC NOR ANY STATE AUTHORITY HAS PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OR UPON THE MERITS OF THE PLAN. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE
IN THE UNITED STATES. NEITHER THIS SOLICITATION NOR THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT CONSTITUTES AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY SECURITIES IN ANY STATE OR JURISDICTION IN WHICH SUCH OFFER OR SOLICITATION IS NOT AUTHORIZED.
THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT CONTAINS “FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.” SUCH STATEMENTS CONSIST OF ANY STATEMENT OTHER THAN A
RECITATION OF HISTORICAL FACT AND CAN BE IDENTIFIED BY THE USE OF FORWARD-LOOKING TERMINOLOGY SUCH AS “MAY,” “EXPECT,” “ANTICIPATE,” “ESTIMATE,” OR “CONTINUE” OR THE NEGATIVE THEREOF OR OTHER VARIATIONS THEREON OR COMPARABLE TERMINOLOGY. THE DEBTORS
CONSIDER ALL STATEMENTS REGARDING ANTICIPATED OR FUTURE MATTERS TO BE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.
THE READER IS CAUTIONED THAT ALL FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE NECESSARILY SPECULATIVE AND THERE ARE CERTAIN RISKS AND
UNCERTAINTIES THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL EVENTS OR RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE PRESENTED IN SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES RELATING TO:
|
• |
any future effects as a result of the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases;
|
|
• |
the Debtors’ liquidity and financial outlook;
|
|
• |
the effects of and changes in economic conditions (such as volatility in the financial markets, whether attributable to COVID-19 or otherwise, inflation,
increasing interest rates, monetary conditions and foreign currency fluctuations, tariffs, foreign currency controls, and/or government-mandated pricing controls, as well as in trade, monetary, fiscal, and tax policies in international
markets), political conditions (such as military actions and terrorist activities), and natural disasters;
|
|
• |
disruptions to the supply chain;
|
|
• |
the ability to execute the Debtors’ business plan (the “Business Plan”) or to
achieve the upside opportunities contained therein;
|
|
• |
reductions in the Debtors’ revenue from market pressures, increased competition, or otherwise;
|
|
• |
the Debtors’ ability to attract, motivate, and/or retain employees necessary to operate competitively in the Debtors’ industry;
|
|
• |
the Debtors’ ability to maintain successful relationships with key customers;
|
|
• |
unexpected significant impacts on the Company (as defined below) from changes in interest rates or foreign exchange rates;
|
|
• |
difficulties, delays, or the inability of the Company to efficiently manage its cash and working capital;
|
|
• |
the Debtors’ ability to effectively manage costs;
|
|
• |
the Debtors’ ability to drive and manage growth;
|
|
• |
changing consumer tastes;
|
|
• |
industry conditions, including existing competition and future competition;
|
|
• |
the impact of general economic and political conditions in the United States or in specific markets in which the Debtors currently do business;
|
|
• |
the Debtors’ ability to generate revenues from new sources;
|
|
• |
the impact of regulatory rules or proceedings that may affect the Debtors’ businesses from time to time;
|
|
• |
disruptions or security breaches of the Debtors’ information technology infrastructure;
|
|
• |
unanticipated adverse effects on the Company’s business, prospects, results of operations, financial condition, and/or cash flows as a result of unexpected
developments with respect to the Company’s legal proceedings, including alleged litigation claims that might not be discharged by the Plan;
|
|
• |
the Debtors’ ability to generate sufficient cash flows to service or refinance debt and other obligations post-emergence;
|
|
• |
the implementation of the Restructuring Transactions; and
|
|
• |
the Company’s success at managing the foregoing risks.
|
STATEMENTS CONCERNING THESE AND OTHER MATTERS ARE NOT GUARANTEES OF THE REORGANIZED DEBTORS’ FUTURE PERFORMANCE. THERE ARE
RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES, AND OTHER IMPORTANT FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE THE REORGANIZED DEBTORS’ ACTUAL PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS TO BE DIFFERENT FROM THOSE THEY MAY PROJECT, AND THE DEBTORS UNDERTAKE NO OBLIGATION TO UPDATE THE PROJECTIONS OR
VALUATIONS MADE HEREIN, EXCEPT AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW. THE LIQUIDATION INFORMATION CONTAINED IN EXHIBITS D, E, AND F HERETO AND UNDER THE CAPTION, “VALUATION OF THE DEBTORS”, THE ANALYSIS, PROJECTIONS, AND OTHER INFORMATION CONTAINED
HEREIN AND ATTACHED HERETO (COLLECTIVELY, THE “FORWARD-LOOKING FINANCIAL INFORMATION”) ARE ESTIMATES ONLY, AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY DISTRIBUTED TO HOLDERS OF ALLOWED
CLAIMS MAY BE AFFECTED BY MANY FACTORS THAT CANNOT BE PREDICTED. THEREFORE, ANY FORWARD-LOOKING FINANCIAL INFORMATION MAY OR MAY NOT TURN OUT TO BE ACCURATE. FURTHERMORE, THE FORWARD-LOOKING FINANCIAL INFORMATION IS BASED ON VARIOUS ASSUMPTIONS,
WHICH ARE DESCRIBED IN MORE DETAIL THEREIN, AND TO THE EXTENT THAT ACTUAL FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES DIFFER FROM SUCH ASSUMPTIONS, ACTUAL RESULTS COULD DIFFER IN MATERIAL RESPECTS FROM THOSE SET FORTH THEREIN. FOR MORE INFORMATION REGARDING THE FACTORS
THAT MAY CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER FROM THOSE PRESENTED IN THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, PLEASE REFER TO ARTICLE XII – CERTAIN RISK FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED OF THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND “ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS” OF THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM
10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021, AS AMENDED, AND THE QUARTERLY REPORTS ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIODS ENDED MARCH 31, 2022, JUNE 30, 2022, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2022, EACH OF REVLON, INC., FILED WITH THE SEC.
THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED PURSUANT TO SECTION 1125 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE AND BANKRUPTCY RULE 3016 AND IS NOT
NECESSARILY IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL OR STATE SECURITIES LAWS OR OTHER SIMILAR LAWS.
THE DEBTORS RECOMMEND THAT POTENTIAL RECIPIENTS OF ANY NEW SECURITIES PURSUANT TO THE PLAN CONSULT THEIR OWN LEGAL COUNSEL
CONCERNING THE SECURITIES LAWS GOVERNING THE TRANSFERABILITY OF ANY SUCH SECURITIES.
NO LEGAL OR TAX ADVICE IS PROVIDED TO YOU BY THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. THE DEBTORS URGE EACH HOLDER OF A CLAIM OR INTEREST TO
CONSULT WITH ITS OWN ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO ANY LEGAL, FINANCIAL, SECURITIES, TAX, OR BUSINESS ADVICE IN REVIEWING THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT, THE PLAN, AND EACH OF THE PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY. FURTHER, THE BANKRUPTCY COURT’S
APPROVAL OF THE ADEQUACY OF DISCLOSURES CONTAINED IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE THE BANKRUPTCY COURT’S APPROVAL OF THE MERITS OF THE PLAN OR A GUARANTEE BY THE BANKRUPTCY COURT OF THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE INFORMATION
CONTAINED HEREIN.
THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT CONTAINS, AMONG OTHER THINGS, SUMMARIES OF THE PLAN, CERTAIN STATUTORY PROVISIONS, CERTAIN EVENTS IN
THE DEBTORS’ CHAPTER 11 CASES, AND CERTAIN DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE PLAN THAT ARE ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE OR THAT MAY BE FILED LATER WITH THE PLAN SUPPLEMENT. ALTHOUGH THE DEBTORS BELIEVE THAT THESE SUMMARIES ARE FAIR
AND ACCURATE, THESE SUMMARIES ARE QUALIFIED IN THEIR ENTIRETY TO THE EXTENT THAT THE SUMMARIES DO NOT SET FORTH THE ENTIRE TEXT OF SUCH DOCUMENTS OR STATUTORY PROVISIONS OR EVERY DETAIL OF SUCH EVENTS. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT, INCONSISTENCY, OR
DISCREPANCY BETWEEN A DESCRIPTION IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THE PLAN OR ANY OTHER DOCUMENTS, THE PLAN OR SUCH OTHER DOCUMENTS WILL GOVERN AND CONTROL FOR ALL PURPOSES. EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SPECIFICALLY NOTED,
FACTUAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE DEBTORS’ MANAGEMENT. THE DEBTORS DO NOT REPRESENT OR WARRANT THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN OR ATTACHED HERETO IS WITHOUT ANY MATERIAL INACCURACY OR OMISSION.
IN PREPARING THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT, THE DEBTORS RELIED ON FINANCIAL DATA DERIVED FROM THE DEBTORS’ BOOKS AND RECORDS, AND ON
VARIOUS ASSUMPTIONS REGARDING THE DEBTORS’ BUSINESSES. THE DEBTORS’ MANAGEMENT HAS REVIEWED THE HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. ALTHOUGH THE DEBTORS HAVE USED THEIR REASONABLE BUSINESS JUDGMENT TO CAUSE THE
HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN, OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO, THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT TO FAIRLY PRESENT, IN ALL MATERIAL RESPECTS, THE HISTORICAL FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE DEBTORS, IT HAS NOT BEEN
AUDITED (UNLESS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY STATED HEREIN OR THEREIN), AND NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES ARE MADE AS TO THE ACCURACY OF THE HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN.
FURTHERMORE, READERS ARE CAUTIONED NOT TO PLACE UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE FORWARD-LOOKING FINANCIAL INFORMATION. SUCH INFORMATION
CONSTITUTES “FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS,” WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO THE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES AND CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS SET FORTH IN AND REFERENCED IN THE DISCUSSION OF FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ABOVE. SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING FINANCIAL INFORMATION HAS
BEEN PREPARED BASED ON VARIOUS ASSUMPTIONS, WHICH ARE DESCRIBED IN MORE DETAIL THEREIN, AND TO THE EXTENT THAT ACTUAL FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES DIFFER FROM SUCH ASSUMPTIONS, ACTUAL RESULTS COULD DIFFER IN MATERIAL RESPECTS FROM THOSE SET FORTH
THEREIN. THE DEBTORS UNDERTAKE NO DUTY TO UPDATE SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING FINANCIAL INFORMATION UNLESS REQUIRED TO BY APPLICABLE LAW.
NONE OF THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT, THE PLAN, THE CONFIRMATION ORDER, OR THE PLAN SUPPLEMENT WAIVES ANY RIGHTS OF THE DEBTORS WITH
RESPECT TO THE HOLDERS OF CLAIMS OR INTERESTS PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE. RATHER, THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SHALL CONSTITUTE A STATEMENT MADE IN SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS RELATED TO POTENTIAL CONTESTED MATTERS, POTENTIAL ADVERSARY PROCEEDINGS, AND
OTHER PENDING OR THREATENED LITIGATION OR ACTIONS.
NO RELIANCE SHOULD BE PLACED ON THE FACT THAT A PARTICULAR LITIGATION CLAIM OR PROJECTED OBJECTION TO A PARTICULAR CLAIM IS OR IS
NOT IDENTIFIED IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED UNDER THE PLAN, THE DEBTORS OR THE REORGANIZED DEBTORS MAY SEEK TO INVESTIGATE, FILE, AND PROSECUTE CLAIMS AND CAUSES OF ACTION AND MAY OBJECT TO CLAIMS AFTER CONFIRMATION OR THE
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE PLAN IRRESPECTIVE OF WHETHER THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT IDENTIFIES ANY SUCH CLAIMS OR OBJECTIONS TO CLAIMS ON THE TERMS SPECIFIED IN THE PLAN.
UNLESS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY NOTED, THE DEBTORS ARE MAKING THE
STATEMENTS AND PROVIDING THE FINANCIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AS OF THE PETITION DATE WHERE FEASIBLE. ALTHOUGH THE DEBTORS MAY SUBSEQUENTLY UPDATE THE INFORMATION IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT, THE DEBTORS HAVE NO
AFFIRMATIVE DUTY TO DO SO, EXCEPT AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW. HOLDERS OF CLAIMS REVIEWING THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT SHOULD NOT INFER THAT, AT THE
TIME OF THEIR REVIEW, THE FACTS SET FORTH HEREIN HAVE NOT CHANGED SINCE THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT WAS SENT. INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, MODIFICATION, OR AMENDMENT. THE DEBTORS RESERVE THE RIGHT TO FILE AN AMENDED OR
MODIFIED PLAN AND RELATED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FROM TIME TO TIME, SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF THE RESTRUCTURING SUPPORT AGREEMENT, BUT HAVE NO DUTY OR OBLIGATION TO DO SO.
THE DEBTORS HAVE NOT AUTHORIZED ANY ENTITY TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION ABOUT OR CONCERNING THE PLAN OTHER THAN THAT WHICH IS
CONTAINED IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. THE DEBTORS HAVE NOT AUTHORIZED ANY REPRESENTATIONS CONCERNING THE DEBTORS OR THE VALUE OF THEIR PROPERTY OTHER THAN AS SET FORTH IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT.
HOLDERS OF CLAIMS ENTITLED TO VOTE TO ACCEPT OR REJECT THE PLAN MUST RELY ON THEIR OWN EVALUATION OF THE COMPANY AND THEIR OWN
ANALYSES OF THE TERMS OF THE PLAN IN DECIDING WHETHER TO VOTE TO ACCEPT OR REJECT THE PLAN. IMPORTANTLY, PRIOR TO DECIDING WHETHER AND HOW TO VOTE ON THE PLAN, EACH HOLDER OF A CLAIM IN A VOTING CLASS SHOULD REVIEW THE PLAN IN ITS ENTIRETY AND
CONSIDER CAREFULLY ALL OF THE INFORMATION IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND ANY EXHIBITS HERETO.
IF THE PLAN IS CONFIRMED BY THE BANKRUPTCY COURT AND THE EFFECTIVE DATE OCCURS, ALL HOLDERS OF CLAIMS AND INTERESTS (INCLUDING
THOSE HOLDERS OF CLAIMS AND INTERESTS WHO DO NOT SUBMIT BALLOTS TO ACCEPT OR REJECT THE PLAN, WHO VOTE TO REJECT THE PLAN, OR WHO ARE NOT ENTITLED TO VOTE ON THE PLAN) WILL BE BOUND BY THE TERMS OF THE PLAN AND THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY.
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY RIGHTS OF APPROVAL PURSUANT TO THE RESTRUCTURING SUPPORT AGREEMENT OR OTHERWISE AS TO THE FORM OR SUBSTANCE
OF THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT, THE PLAN OR ANY OTHER DOCUMENT RELATING TO THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREUNDER, NONE OF THE CREDITORS WHO HAVE EXECUTED THE RESTRUCTURING SUPPORT AGREEMENT, OR THEIR RESPECTIVE REPRESENTATIVES, MEMBERS, FINANCIAL OR
LEGAL ADVISORS OR AGENTS, HAS INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN, TAKES ANY RESPONSIBILITY THEREFOR, OR SHOULD HAVE ANY LIABILITY WITH RESPECT THEREWITH, AND NONE OF THE FOREGOING ENTITIES OR PERSONS MAKES ANY REPRESENTATIONS OR
WARRANTIES WHATSOEVER CONCERNING THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN.
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PLAN IS SUBJECT TO CERTAIN MATERIAL CONDITIONS PRECEDENT DESCRIBED HEREIN AND SET FORTH IN ARTICLE X OF
THE PLAN. THERE IS NO ASSURANCE THAT THE PLAN WILL BE CONFIRMED, OR, IF CONFIRMED, THAT THE CONDITIONS REQUIRED TO BE SATISFIED FOR THE PLAN TO BECOME EFFECTIVE WILL BE SATISFIED (OR WAIVED).
ALL EXHIBITS TO THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ARE INCORPORATED INTO AND ARE A PART OF THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AS IF SET FORTH IN
FULL HEREIN.
ONLY HOLDERS OF OPCO TERM LOAN CLAIMS (CLASS 4), 2020 TERM B-1 LOAN CLAIMS (CLASS 5), 2020 TERM B-2 LOAN CLAIMS (CLASS 6),
UNSECURED NOTES CLAIMS (CLASS 8), TALC PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS (CLASS 9(A)), NON-QUALIFIED PENSION CLAIMS (CLASS 9(B)), TRADE CLAIMS (CLASS 9(C)), AND OTHER GENERAL UNSECURED CLAIMS (CLASS 9(D)) ARE ENTITLED TO VOTE ON THE PLAN AND ARE BEING SOLICITED
TO VOTE UNDER THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT.
VOTING TO ACCEPT THE PLAN, OPTING INTO THE RELEASES, OR FAILING TO OPT OUT OF THE RELEASES (WHERE APPLICABLE) MAY RESULT IN THE
RELEASE OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE RELEASED PARTIES.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
Page
|
I.
|
INTRODUCTION
|
1
|
|
A.
|
Overview
|
1
|
|
B.
|
Who Is Entitled to Vote
|
2
|
|
C.
|
Estimated Recoveries under the Plan
|
3
|
II.
|
OVERVIEW OF THE COMPANY’S OPERATIONS
|
8
|
|
A.
|
Overview
|
8
|
|
B.
|
The Company’s History
|
8
|
|
C.
|
Revlon’s Operations
|
9
|
|
|
1.
|
Revlon
|
9
|
|
|
2.
|
Elizabeth Arden
|
10
|
|
|
3.
|
Portfolio
|
10
|
|
|
4.
|
Fragrances
|
10
|
|
|
5.
|
Customer Contracts
|
11
|
|
D.
|
Corporate Structure
|
11
|
|
|
1.
|
The Debtors’ Corporate Structure
|
11
|
|
|
2.
|
Non-Debtor Affiliates, Joint Ventures, and Partnerships
|
11
|
|
E.
|
Board, Directors, and Officers
|
12
|
|
|
1.
|
Board and Committees
|
12
|
|
|
2.
|
Executive Officers
|
12
|
|
|
3.
|
BrandCo Restructuring Officer – Steven Panagos
|
13
|
III.
|
PREPETITION CAPITAL STRUCTURE
|
13
|
|
A.
|
ABL Facility
|
13
|
|
B.
|
2016 Term Loan Facility
|
14
|
|
C.
|
BrandCo Facilities
|
15
|
|
D.
|
Foreign Asset-Based Term Loan
|
16
|
|
E.
|
Unsecured Notes
|
16
|
|
F.
|
Equity Interests
|
17
|
IV.
|
KEY EVENTS LEADING TO COMMENCEMENT OF CHAPTER 11 CASES
|
17
|
|
A.
|
Elizabeth Arden Acquisition
|
17
|
|
B.
|
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic
|
18
|
|
C.
|
Citibank Wire Transfer Litigation
|
18
|
|
D.
|
Prepetition Financing Efforts
|
20
|
|
|
1.
|
2019 Ares Financing
|
20
|
|
|
2.
|
2020 Refinancing Efforts
|
20
|
|
|
3.
|
Helen of Troy License Agreement
|
23
|
|
|
4.
|
March 2021 Refinancing Efforts
|
23
|
|
|
5.
|
Further Amendment of ABL Facility
|
24
|
|
|
6.
|
Increase of Borrowing Base under the ABL Facility and Foreign ABTL Facility
|
24
|
|
|
7.
|
At the Market Public Equity Offering
|
24
|
|
E.
|
Cost-Cutting Measures
|
24
|
|
F.
|
Market Conditions and Industry Headwinds
|
25
|
|
G.
|
Preparation for Commencement of Chapter 11 Proceedings
|
27
|
V.
|
EVENTS DURING CHAPTER 11 CASES
|
28
|
|
A.
|
Commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases
|
28
|
|
B.
|
First and Second Day Operational Pleadings
|
28
|
|
|
1.
|
DIP Financing
|
28
|
|
|
2.
|
Cash Management
|
29
|
|
|
3.
|
Vendors
|
29
|
|
|
4.
|
Customer Programs
|
29
|
|
|
5.
|
Wages
|
30
|
|
|
6.
|
Taxes
|
30
|
|
|
7.
|
Insurance
|
30
|
|
|
8.
|
Surety Bonds
|
30
|
|
|
9.
|
Utilities
|
31
|
|
|
10.
|
NOL Motion
|
31
|
|
|
11.
|
Foreign Representative Motion
|
31
|
|
C.
|
Canadian Recognition Proceeding
|
31
|
|
D.
|
Milestones for Chapter 11 Cases
|
32
|
|
E.
|
Procedural and Administrative Motions
|
33
|
|
|
1.
|
Ordinary Course Professionals
|
34
|
|
|
2.
|
Retention Applications
|
34
|
|
|
3.
|
Interim Compensation Procedures Order
|
35
|
|
|
4.
|
De Minimis Procedures Order
|
35
|
|
|
5.
|
Bar Date Motion
|
36
|
|
|
6.
|
Removal of Action Deadline Extension Motion
|
36
|
|
|
7.
|
Exclusivity Extension Motion
|
36
|
|
|
8.
|
Lease Rejection Deadline Extension Motion
|
37
|
|
|
9.
|
Omnibus Claims Objection Procedures Motion
|
37
|
|
F.
|
Other Motions
|
37
|
|
|
1.
|
Key Employee Retention Plan Motion.
|
37
|
|
|
2.
|
Key Employee Incentive Plan Motion.
|
37
|
|
|
3.
|
First, Second, and Third Rejection Motions.
|
37
|
|
|
4.
|
Minority Equity Committee Motion.
|
37
|
|
G.
|
PBGC Claims
|
38
|
|
H.
|
Section 341 Meeting
|
38
|
|
I.
|
Appointment of Committee
|
38
|
|
J.
|
NYSE Delisting Decision
|
39
|
|
K.
|
Schedules and Statements
|
40
|
|
L.
|
Stakeholder Engagement
|
40
|
|
M.
|
Certain Postpetition Efforts to Stabilize and Improve Operations
|
41
|
|
N.
|
Independent Investigation
|
42
|
|
|
1.
|
Creation and Purpose of the Investigation Committee
|
42
|
|
|
2.
|
Investigation Committee’s Scope of Work
|
42
|
|
|
3.
|
Recommendation
|
43
|
O.
|
Significant Litigation Related to the 2016 Term Loan Facility and BrandCo Facilities
|
43
|
|
|
1.
|
The Citibank Second Circuit Decision
|
43
|
|
|
2.
|
The Citibank Subrogation Adversary Proceeding
|
44
|
|
|
3.
|
Challenges to the BrandCo Transaction and 2016 Lenders’ Adversary Proceeding
|
44
|
|
P.
|
Debtors’ Sale Efforts
|
46
|
|
Q.
|
Development of the Debtors’ Business Plan
|
46
|
|
R.
|
Tort Claims
|
47
|
VI.
|
RESTRUCTURING SUPPORT AGREEMENT
|
48
|
|
A.
|
Development of the Restructuring Support Agreement
|
49 |
|
B.
|
Certain Key Terms of the Restructuring Support Agreement and Restructuring Transactions
|
49
|
|
|
1.
|
Debtors’ Fiduciary Out Provision
|
49
|
|
|
2.
|
Creditors’ Committee’s Fiduciary Out
|
51 |
|
|
3.
|
Backstop Commitment Agreement, Equity Rights Offering, and Alternative Financing Commitments
|
51
|
|
|
4.
|
1111(b) Election
|
53
|
|
|
5.
|
Consenting 2016 Lenders’ Support for Dismissal of Adversary Proceeding
|
53
|
|
|
6.
|
Additional Consenting 2016 Lender Obligations
|
54 |
|
|
7.
|
Obligations to Support Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Confirmation Order
|
54
|
VII.
|
PLAN SETTLEMENT
|
54
|
|
A.
|
Creditors’ Committee Investigation and Settlement
|
55
|
|
|
1.
|
Plan Distributions
|
56
|
|
|
2.
|
Claims Administration, GUC Trust, and PI Settlement Fund
|
59
|
|
|
3.
|
Consenting BrandCo Lenders’ Continuing Support
|
59
|
|
|
4.
|
Creditors’ Committee Member Fees and Expenses
|
60
|
|
|
5.
|
Releases and Insurance Availability
|
60
|
|
B.
|
2016 Settlement
|
60
|
|
C.
|
Evaluation of the Plan Settlement under Section 1123 and Rule 9019
|
62
|
VIII.
|
SUMMARY OF CHAPTER 11 PLAN
|
64
|
|
A.
|
Administrative Claims, Priority Claims, and Statutory Fees
|
65
|
|
|
1.
|
Administrative Claims
|
65
|
|
|
2.
|
Professional Compensation Claims
|
66
|
|
|
3.
|
Priority Tax Claims
|
67
|
|
|
4.
|
ABL DIP Facility Claims
|
68
|
|
|
5.
|
Term DIP Facility Claims
|
68
|
|
|
6.
|
Intercompany DIP Facility Claims
|
69
|
|
|
7.
|
Statutory Fees
|
69
|
|
B.
|
Classification and Treatment of Claims and Interests
|
69 |
|
|
1.
|
Summary of Classification
|
70
|
|
|
2.
|
Treatment of Claims and Interests
|
71
|
|
|
3.
|
Voting of Claims
|
79
|
|
|
4.
|
No Substantive Consolidation
|
79
|
|
|
5.
|
Acceptance by Impaired Classes
|
79 |
|
|
6.
|
Special Provision Governing Unimpaired Claims
|
80
|
|
|
7.
|
Elimination of Vacant Classes
|
80
|
|
|
8.
|
Consensual Confirmation
|
80
|
|
|
9.
|
Confirmation Pursuant to Sections 1129(a)(10) and 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code
|
80
|
|
|
10.
|
Controversy Concerning Impairment or Classification
|
81
|
|
|
11.
|
Subordinated Claims
|
81
|
|
|
12.
|
2016 Term Loan Claims
|
81
|
|
|
13.
|
Intercompany Interests
|
81
|
|
C.
|
Means for Implementation of the Plan
|
81
|
|
|
1.
|
Sources of Consideration for Plan Distributions
|
81
|
|
|
2.
|
Restructuring Transactions
|
86
|
|
|
3.
|
Corporate Existence
|
87
|
|
|
4.
|
Vesting of Assets in the Reorganized Debtors
|
88 |
|
|
5.
|
Cancellation of Existing Indebtedness and Securities
|
88
|
|
|
6.
|
Corporate Action
|
89
|
|
|
7.
|
New Organizational Documents
|
90
|
|
|
8.
|
Directors and Officers of the Reorganized Debtors
|
90
|
|
|
9.
|
Employment Obligations
|
91
|
|
|
10.
|
Qualified Pension Plans
|
92
|
|
|
11.
|
Retiree Benefits
|
92
|
|
|
12.
|
Key Employee Incentive/Retention Plans
|
92
|
|
|
13.
|
Effectuating Documents; Further Transactions
|
92
|
|
|
14.
|
Management Incentive Plan
|
93
|
|
|
15.
|
Exemption from Certain Taxes and Fees
|
93
|
|
|
16.
|
Indemnification Provisions
|
94
|
|
|
17.
|
Preservation of Causes of Action
|
94
|
|
|
18.
|
GUC Trust and PI Settlement Fund
|
95
|
|
|
19.
|
Restructuring Expenses
|
96 |
|
D.
|
The GUC Trust
|
97
|
|
|
1.
|
Establishment of the GUC Trust
|
97
|
|
|
2.
|
The GUC Administrator
|
97
|
|
|
3.
|
Certain Tax Matters
|
98
|
|
E.
|
PI Settlement Fund
|
98
|
|
|
1.
|
Establishment of the PI Settlement Fund
|
98
|
|
|
2.
|
The PI Claims Administrator
|
99
|
|
|
3.
|
Certain Tax Matters
|
|
99
|
|
F.
|
Treatment of Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases
|
99
|
|
|
1.
|
Assumption and Rejection of Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases
|
99
|
|
|
2.
|
Claims Based on Rejection of Executory Contracts or Unexpired Leases
|
100
|
|
|
3.
|
Cure of Defaults for Assumed Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases
|
101
|
|
|
4.
|
Pre-existing Obligations to the Debtors under Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases
|
102
|
|
|
5.
|
Insurance Policies
|
102
|
|
|
6.
|
Indemnification Provisions
|
103
|
|
|
7.
|
Modifications, Amendments, Supplements, Restatements, or Other Agreements
|
103
|
|
|
8.
|
Reservation of Rights
|
104
|
|
|
9.
|
Nonoccurrence of Effective Date
|
104
|
|
|
10.
|
Contracts and Leases Entered Into After the Petition Date
|
104
|
|
G.
|
Provisions Governing Distributions
|
104
|
|
|
1.
|
Timing and Calculation of Amounts to Be Distributed
|
104
|
|
|
2
|
Distributions on Account of Obligations of Multiple Debtors
|
105
|
|
|
3.
|
Disbursing Agent
|
105
|
|
|
4.
|
Rights and Powers of Disbursing Agent
|
105
|
|
|
5.
|
Delivery of Distributions and Undeliverable or Unclaimed Distributions
|
105
|
|
|
6.
|
Manner of Payment
|
108
|
|
|
7.
|
Registration or Private Placement Exemption
|
108
|
|
|
8.
|
Compliance with Tax Requirements
|
110
|
|
|
9.
|
No Postpetition or Default Interest on Claims
|
110
|
|
|
10.
|
Allocations
|
110
|
|
|
11.
|
Setoffs and Recoupment
|
110
|
|
|
12.
|
Claims Paid or Payable by Third Parties
|
111
|
|
|
13.
|
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate
|
112
|
|
H.
|
Procedures for Resolving Contingent, Unliquidated, and Disputed Claims
|
112
|
|
|
1.
|
Resolution of Disputed Claims
|
112
|
|
|
2.
|
Disallowance of Claims
|
114
|
|
|
3.
|
Amendments to Proofs of Claim
|
114
|
|
|
4.
|
No Distributions Pending Allowance
|
114
|
|
|
5.
|
Distributions After Allowance
|
115
|
|
|
6.
|
No Interest
|
115
|
|
I.
|
Settlement, Release, Injunction, and Related Provisions
|
115
|
|
|
1.
|
Compromise and Settlement of Claims, Interests, and Controversies
|
115
|
|
|
2.
|
Discharge of Claims and Termination of Interests
|
116
|
|
|
3.
|
Release of Liens
|
116
|
|
|
4.
|
Releases by the Debtors
|
117
|
|
|
5.
|
Releases by the Releasing Parties
|
118
|
|
|
6.
|
Exculpation
|
120
|
|
|
7.
|
Injunction
|
121
|
|
|
8.
|
Term of Injunctions or Stays
|
122
|
|
|
9.
|
Recoupment
|
122
|
|
|
10.
|
Protection Against Discriminatory Treatment
|
122
|
|
|
11.
|
Direct Insurance Claims
|
122
|
|
|
12.
|
Qualified Pension Plans
|
122
|
|
|
13.
|
Regulatory Activities
|
123
|
|
J.
|
Conditions Precedent to Consummation of the Plan
|
123
|
|
|
1.
|
Conditions Precedent to Consummation of the Effective Date
|
123
|
|
|
2.
|
Waiver of Conditions
|
124
|
|
|
3.
|
Effect of Failure of Conditions
|
124
|
|
K.
|
Modification, Revocation, or Withdrawal of the Plan
|
125
|
|
|
1.
|
Modification and Amendments
|
125
|
|
|
2.
|
Effect of Confirmation on Modifications
|
125
|
|
|
3.
|
Revocation or Withdrawal of Plan
|
125
|
|
L.
|
Retention of Jurisdiction
|
126
|
|
M.
|
Miscellaneous Provisions
|
129
|
|
|
1.
|
Immediate Binding Effect
|
129
|
|
|
2.
|
Substantial Consummation
|
129
|
|
|
3.
|
Further Assurances
|
129
|
|
|
4.
|
Statutory Committee and Cessation of Fee and Expense Payment
|
129
|
|
|
5.
|
Reservation of Rights
|
130
|
|
|
6.
|
Successors and Assigns
|
130
|
|
|
7.
|
Notices
|
130
|
|
|
8.
|
Term of Injunctions or Stays
|
132
|
|
|
9.
|
Entire Agreement
|
132
|
|
|
10.
|
Exhibits
|
132
|
|
|
11.
|
Severability of Plan Provisions
|
132
|
|
|
12.
|
Votes Solicited in Good Faith
|
133
|
|
|
13.
|
Closing of Chapter 11 Cases
|
133
|
|
|
14.
|
Waiver or Estoppel
|
133
|
|
|
15.
|
Deemed Acts
|
133
|
IX.
|
VALUATION OF THE DEBTORS
|
133
|
X.
|
TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS AND CONSEQUENCES UNDER FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
|
134
|
|
A.
|
Bankruptcy Code Exemptions from Securities Act Registration Requirements
|
134
|
|
|
1.
|
Securities Issued in Reliance on Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code
|
134
|
|
|
2.
|
Subsequent Transfers of New Securities Issued under Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code
|
136
|
|
|
3.
|
Subsequent Transfers of New Securities Issued under Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code to Affiliates
|
137
|
|
B.
|
Private Placement Exemption from Securities Act Registration Requirements
|
137
|
|
|
1.
|
Issuance of Securities in a Private Placement under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act
|
137
|
|
|
2.
|
Subsequent Transfers of Securities issued in a Private Placement under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act
|
138
|
XI.
|
CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE PLAN
|
140
|
|
A.
|
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for the U.S. Debtors and the Reorganized Holdings
|
142
|
|
|
1.
|
Newco Acquisition
|
142
|
|
|
2.
|
Restructuring in Place
|
143
|
|
B.
|
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to Certain U.S. Holders of Certain Allowed Claims
|
147
|
|
|
1.
|
Consequences of the Exchange to U.S. Holders of Allowed 2016 Term Loan Claims and Allowed 2020 Term B-3 Loan Claims.
|
147
|
|
|
2.
|
Consequences of the Exchange to U.S. Holders of Allowed 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims.
|
149
|
|
|
3.
|
Consequences of the Exchange to U.S. Holders of Allowed 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims.
|
151
|
|
|
4.
|
Consequences of the Exchange to U.S. Holders of Allowed Unsecured Notes Claims.
|
153
|
|
|
5
|
U.S. Holders Who Hold Claims In Multiple Classes.
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Distributions Attributable to Accrued Interest (and OID).
|
154
|
|
|
7.
|
Market Discount.
|
155
|
|
|
8.
|
Issue Price of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans.
|
156
|
|
|
9.
|
Limitation on Use of Capital Losses.
|
156
|
|
C.
|
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the GUC Trust and PI Settlement Fund
|
157
|
|
|
1.
|
The GUC Trust
|
157
|
|
|
2.
|
PI Settlement Fund
|
160
|
|
D.
|
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of Ownership and Disposition of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans.
|
161
|
|
|
1.
|
Characterization of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans.
|
161
|
|
|
2.
|
Qualified Stated Interest.
|
162
|
|
|
3.
|
Original Issue Discount.
|
162
|
|
|
4.
|
Sale, Taxable Exchange or other Taxable Disposition.
|
163
|
|
|
5.
|
Bond Premium.
|
164
|
|
E.
|
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Ownership and Disposition of New Common Stock, and New Warrants.
|
164
|
|
|
1.
|
Dividends on New Common Stock
|
164
|
|
|
2.
|
Exercise or Lapse of a New Warrant; Possible Constructive Distributions
|
165
|
|
|
3.
|
Sale, Redemption, or Repurchase of New Common Stock or a New Warrant
|
166
|
|
|
4.
|
Equity Subscription Rights
|
166
|
|
F.
|
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to Certain Non-U.S. Holders of Allowed Claims
|
167
|
|
|
1.
|
Gain Recognition
|
167
|
|
|
2.
|
Payments of Interest (Including Accrued Interest on Claims)
|
168
|
|
|
3.
|
Ownership of New Common Stock and New Warrants
|
169
|
|
|
4.
|
Sale, Redemption, or Repurchase of New Common Stock and New Warrants
|
169
|
|
|
5.
|
FATCA
|
170
|
|
G.
|
Information Reporting and Back-Up Withholding
|
171
|
XII.
|
CERTAIN RISK FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED
|
171
|
|
A.
|
Certain Restructuring Law Considerations
|
172
|
|
|
1.
|
Effect of Chapter 11 Cases
|
172
|
|
|
2.
|
The Debtors May Not Be Able to Confirm the Plan
|
172
|
|
|
3.
|
Non-Consensual Confirmation
|
172
|
|
|
4.
|
Risk of Timing or Non-Occurrence of Effective Date
|
172
|
|
|
5.
|
Risk of Termination of Restructuring Support Agreement, Backstop Commitment Agreement, or the Debt Commitment Letter
|
173
|
|
|
6.
|
The Allocation of the Committee Settlement Amounts May be Successfully Challenged
|
173
|
|
|
7.
|
Conversion into Chapter 7 Cases
|
174 |
|
|
8.
|
The DIP Facilities May Be Insufficient to Fund the Debtors’ Business Operations, or May Be Unavailable if the Debtors Do Not Comply with the
Final DIP Order or DIP Credit Agreements
|
174
|
|
|
9.
|
Impact of the Chapter 11 Cases on the Debtors
|
174
|
|
|
10.
|
The Plan Is Based upon Assumptions the Debtors Developed That May Prove Incorrect and Could Render the Plan Unsuccessful
|
175 |
|
|
11.
|
Projections, Estimates, and Other Forward-Looking Statements Are Not Assured, and Actual Results May Vary
|
175
|
|
|
12.
|
The Allowed Amount of Claims and the Estimated Percentage of Recoveries May Differ from Current Estimates
|
175
|
|
|
13.
|
Parties-in-Interest May Object to the Debtors’ Classification of Claims and Interests
|
176
|
|
|
14.
|
The Consenting Unsecured Noteholder Recovery May Not Be Approved
|
176
|
|
|
15.
|
Releases, Injunctions, and Exculpations Provisions May Not Be Approved
|
176
|
|
|
16.
|
The Debtors May Fail to Obtain the Proceeds of the Exit Facilities or the Equity Rights Offering, and the Backstop Commitment Agreement May
Terminate
|
177
|
|
|
17.
|
The Debtors May Seek to Amend, Waive, Modify, or Withdraw the Plan at Any Time Before Confirmation
|
177
|
|
|
18.
|
Reorganized Debtors May Be Adversely Affected by Future Claims
|
177
|
|
B.
|
Risks Relating to the Debtors’ and Reorganized Debtors’ Businesses
|
178 |
|
|
1.
|
Post-Effective Date Indebtedness
|
177
|
|
|
2.
|
Risks Associated with the Debtors’ Businesses and Industry
|
179
|
|
C.
|
Risk Factors Relating to Securities to Be Issued under the Plan Generally
|
180
|
|
|
1.
|
Public Market for Securities
|
180
|
|
|
2.
|
Potential Dilution
|
181 |
|
|
3.
|
Significant Holders
|
181
|
|
|
4.
|
Equity Interests Subordinated to the Reorganized Debtors’ Indebtedness
|
181
|
|
|
5.
|
No Intention to Pay Dividends
|
181
|
|
D.
|
Additional Factors
|
181
|
|
|
1.
|
Debtors Have No Duty to Update
|
181
|
|
|
2.
|
No Representations Outside This Disclosure Statement Are Authorized
|
181
|
|
|
3.
|
No Legal or Tax Advice Is Provided by this Disclosure Statement
|
182
|
|
|
4.
|
No Representation Made
|
182
|
|
|
5.
|
Certain Tax Consequences
|
182
|
XIII.
|
SOLICITATION AND VOTING PROCEDURES
|
182
|
|
A.
|
Voting Instructions and Release Opt-Out or Opt-In Elections
|
182
|
|
B.
|
Voting Record Date
|
183 |
|
C.
|
Distribution of Consenting Unsecured Noteholder Recovery
|
183 |
|
D.
|
Voting Deadline
|
184 |
|
E.
|
Ballots Not Counted
|
184 |
XIV.
|
CONFIRMATION OF PLAN
|
185 |
|
A.
|
Confirmation Hearing
|
185 |
|
B.
|
Objections to Confirmation
|
185 |
|
C.
|
Requirements for Confirmation of Plan
|
188 |
|
|
1.
|
Requirements of Section 1129(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.
|
188 |
|
|
2.
|
Additional Requirements for Non-Consensual Confirmation
|
191 |
|
D.
|
Summary of Release Provisions
|
192 |
|
|
1.
|
Debtor Releases
|
193
|
|
|
2.
|
Third Party Releases
|
194 |
XV.
|
ALTERNATIVES TO CONFIRMATION AND CONSUMMATION OF THE PLAN
|
195 |
|
A.
|
Alternative Plan of Reorganization
|
196 |
|
B.
|
Sale under Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code
|
196 |
|
C.
|
Liquidation under Chapter 7 or Applicable Non-Bankruptcy Law
|
196 |
XVI.
|
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
|
197 |
EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT A:
|
Joint Plan of Reorganization of Revlon, Inc. and Its Debtor Affiliates Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
|
EXHIBIT B:
|
Restructuring Support Agreement
|
EXHIBIT C:
|
Corporate Structure Chart
|
EXHIBIT D:
|
Valuation Analysis
|
EXHIBIT E:
|
Liquidation Analysis
|
EXHIBIT F:
|
Financial Projections
|
Revlon, Inc. (“Holdings”) and certain of its affiliates, as debtors and debtors in
possession in the above-captioned cases (collectively, the “Debtors” and together with their non-debtor affiliates, the “Company”
or “Revlon”) are sending you this document and the accompanying materials (collectively, this “Disclosure Statement”) because
you are a Holder of a Claim or Interest whose rights may be affected by the First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization of Revlon, Inc. and Its Debtor Affiliates Pursuant to Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code, dated February 21, 2023, as the same may be amended from time to time (the “Plan”). The Plan is attached hereto as Exhibit A.2
The purpose of this Disclosure Statement is to provide Holders of Claims or Interests, who are
entitled to vote on the Plan, with adequate information regarding the (i) Debtors’ history, businesses, and these Chapter 11 Cases, (ii) Plan, (iii) Plan Settlement, (iv) rights of interested parties pursuant to the Plan, and (v) other information
necessary to enable Holders entitled to vote on the Plan to make an informed judgment as to whether to vote to accept or reject, and how to make elections with respect to the Plan.
Since the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, the Debtors and their advisors have engaged the Debtors’ key stakeholders regarding various possible
restructuring alternatives to effectuate a value-maximizing restructuring transaction and create a sustainable capital structure to position the Debtors for long-term success. The Debtors’ discussions with their stakeholders were ultimately
successful. After extensive negotiations, on December 19, 2022, the Debtors, the Consenting BrandCo Lenders, and the Creditors’ Committee, entered into the initial Restructuring Support Agreement (the “Original
Restructuring Support Agreement”). The Debtors and the Consenting BrandCo Lenders then pursued intense and active negotiations with the Debtors’ largest objecting constituency—the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders. Following weeks of
negotiations in January and February 2023, the Debtors, the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders, the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders, and the Creditors’ Committee reached an agreement on the terms of a settlement in principle (the “2016 Settlement”) that provides for a global resolution of the significant litigation issues in these Chapter 11 Cases. Pursuant to the terms of the 2016 Settlement, members of the Ad Hoc
Group of 2016 Lenders are now party to the Restructuring Support Agreement, as amended and restated on February 21, 2023, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
The Debtors, the Consenting BrandCo Lenders, the Consenting 2016 Lenders, and the Creditors’
Committee believe that the restructuring reflected in the Plan is the best available option for the Debtors’ stakeholders, Estates, and go-forward businesses. Through the restructuring, the Debtors will create a sustainable capital
structure that positions the Company for success in the demanding beauty industry. The Debtors believe that the Plan results in appropriate leverage and liquidity to enable the Company to execute on its Business Plan and capture new market
opportunities on a go-forward basis. The financial and operational restructuring provided for in the Plan affords the Company a “fresh start” and provides a foundation for the long-term health of its business.
2 |
All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan.
|
The Plan gives effect to the transactions described in the Restructuring Support Agreement. Among other benefits, the Plan:
|
• |
reduces the Company’s pro forma indebtedness by $2.7 billion versus its existing capital structure (including the DIP Facilities);
|
|
• |
capitalizes the Company with $1.8 billion of expected debt financing under the Exit Facilities, which will be used, among other things, to fund plan
distributions;
|
|
• |
provides for an Equity Rights Offering in the amount of up to $670 million for the purchase of New Common Stock of the Reorganized Debtors, which is backstopped
by the Equity Commitment Parties, the proceeds of which will be used, among other things, to fund plan distributions;
|
|
• |
provides the Reorganized Debtors with a minimum cash balance as of the Effective Date of $75 million;
|
|
• |
provides for the discharge and cancellation of Interests in Holdings and certain Claims on the Effective Date, and the issuance of New Common Stock to Holders of
applicable Allowed Claims on the Effective Date;
|
|
• |
provides substantial cash distributions to Holders of Allowed General Unsecured Claims and the issuance of New Warrants to Holders of Allowed Unsecured Notes
Claims, in each case, subject to acceptance of the Plan by the relevant Class or Holders, as more fully described below;
|
|
• |
provides for a global and integrated compromise and settlement of all disputes, including, without limitation, the Financing Transactions Litigation Claims,
between and among the Debtors, the Creditors’ Committee, the Consenting BrandCo Lenders, the Consenting 2016 Lenders, and other stakeholders in these Chapter 11 Cases; and
|
|
• |
has the support of the Creditors’ Committee, the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders, and the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders.
|
The Debtors strongly believe that the Plan is in the best interests of the Debtors’ Estates, represents the Debtors’ best
available alternative, and provides for a value-maximizing transaction.
|
B. |
Who Is Entitled to Vote
|
Under the Bankruptcy Code, only holders of claims or interests in “impaired” classes are entitled to vote on the plan (unless,
for reasons discussed in more detail below, such holders are deemed to reject the plan pursuant to section 1126(g) of the Bankruptcy Code). Under section 1124 of the Bankruptcy Code, a class of claims or interests is deemed to be “impaired” unless
(i) the plan leaves unaltered the legal, equitable, and contractual rights to which such claim or interest entitles the holder thereof or (ii) notwithstanding any legal right to an accelerated payment of such claim or interest, the plan, among other
things, cures all existing defaults (other than defaults resulting from the occurrence of bankruptcy events) and reinstates the maturity of such claim or interest as it existed before the default.
There are eight (8) creditor groups entitled to vote on the Plan whose acceptances of the Plan are being solicited: OpCo Term
Loan Claims (Class 4), 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims (Class 5), 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims (Class 6), Unsecured Notes Claims (Class 8), Talc Personal Injury Claims (Class 9(a)), Non-Qualified Pension Claims (Class 9(b)), Trade Claims (Class 9(c)), and
Other General Unsecured Claims (Class 9(d)).
THE PLAN PROVIDES THAT THE FOLLOWING HOLDERS OF CLAIMS AND INTERESTS WILL GRANT THE RELEASES IN THE PLAN:
|
• |
all Holders of Claims that are deemed Unimpaired, presumed to accept the Plan, and do not elect to opt-out of the Third-Party Releases;
|
|
• |
all Holders of Claims entitled to vote on the Plan that vote to accept the Plan;
|
|
• |
all Holders of Claims entitled to vote on the Plan that abstain from voting on the Plan and do not elect on their Ballot to opt-out of the Third-Party Releases;
|
|
• |
all Holders of Claims entitled to vote on the Plan who vote to reject the Plan but do not elect on their Ballot to opt-out of the Third-Party Releases;
|
|
• |
all Holders of Claims that are deemed to reject the Plan and do not elect to opt-out of the Third-Party Releases; and
|
|
• |
all Holders of Interests in Holdings that elect to opt-in to the Third-Party Releases contained in the Plan.
|
The Debtors have concluded that the Third-Party Releases are justified in light of the facts and circumstances of these Chapter
11 Cases. Excluded Parties are not granted the Third-Party Releases. “Excluded Parties” consist of, collectively, all Entities that are liable for Talc Personal Injury Claims in respect of Jean Nate or other products produced by the Debtors, other
than the Debtors and any current or former officer, director, authorized agent, or employee of the Debtors. For the avoidance of doubt, any insurer of the Debtors that may be liable for Talc Personal Injury Claims and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
and its Affiliates are Excluded Parties.
|
C. |
Estimated Recoveries under the Plan
|
The table below summarizes: (i) the treatment of Claims and Interests under the Plan; (ii) which Classes are Impaired by the
Plan; (iii) which Classes are entitled to vote on the Plan; and (iv) the estimated amount of Claims per Class. The table is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Plan. A more detailed summary of the terms and provisions of
the Plan is provided in Article VIII of this Disclosure Statement. A detailed discussion of the analysis underlying the estimated recoveries, including the assumptions underlying such analysis, is provided in the Liquidation Analysis (as defined
below) set forth in Article IX of this Disclosure Statement and attached as Exhibit E hereto.
FOR A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE DEBTORS’ CLASSIFICATION AND TREATMENT OF CLAIMS AND INTERESTS, REFERENCE SHOULD BE MADE TO THE
PLAN.
Class No.
|
Type of Claim
|
Treatment
|
Estimated Amount of Claims
|
Impairment / Voting
|
1
|
Other Secured
Claims
|
On the Effective Date, or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, each Holder of an Allowed Other Secured Claim shall receive, in full
and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement, release, and discharge of such Claim, at the option of the Debtor against which such Allowed Other Secured Claim is asserted (with the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or
delayed) of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders): (i) payment in full in cash; (ii) delivery of the collateral securing such Claim and payment of any interest required under section 506(b) of the Bankruptcy Code; (iii) Reinstatement of
such Claim; or (iv) such other treatment rendering such Claim Unimpaired in accordance with section 1124 of the Bankruptcy Code.
|
N/A
|
Unimpaired; presumed to accept
|
2
|
Other Priority
Claims
|
On the Effective Date, or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, except to the extent that a Holder of an Allowed Other Priority
Claim and the Debtor against which such Allowed Other Priority Claim is asserted (with the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders) agree to less favorable treatment for
such Holder, each Holder of an Allowed Other Priority Claim shall receive, in full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement, release, and discharge of such Claim, at the option of the Debtor against which such Allowed Other Priority
Claim is asserted (with the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders): (i) payment in full in cash or (ii) such other treatment rendering such Claim Unimpaired in
accordance with section 1124 of the Bankruptcy Code.
|
N/A
|
Unimpaired; presumed to accept
|
3
|
FILO ABL
Claims
|
On the Effective Date, or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, each Holder of an Allowed FILO ABL Claim shall receive, in full and
final satisfaction, compromise, settlement, release, and discharge of such Claim, payment in full in cash.
|
$56.9 million3
|
Unimpaired; presumed to accept
|
4
|
OpCo Term
Loan Claims
|
On the Effective Date, or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, each Holder of an Allowed OpCo Term Loan Claim shall receive, in
full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement, release, and discharge of such Claim, (i) such Holder’s Pro Rata share (determined based on such Holder’s Non-Class 4 Equity Electing Claims as a percentage of all Non-Class 4 Equity
Electing Claims) of Cash in the amount of $56 million or (ii) if such Holder makes or is deemed to make the Class 4 Equity Election, such Holder’s Pro Rata share (determined based on such Holder’s Class 4 Equity Electing Claims as a
percentage of all Class 4 Equity Electing Claims) of 18% of (a) the New Common Stock issued on the Effective Date, prior to and subject to dilution by any New Common Stock issued in connection with the Equity Rights Offering (including, for
the avoidance of doubt, any New Common Stock issued pursuant to the Backstop Commitment Agreement), in connection with any MIP Awards, and/or upon the exercise of the New Warrants and (b) the Equity Subscription Rights.
|
$877.6 million
|
Impaired; entitled to vote
|
3
|
The
estimated FILO ABL Claims amount is based on the Proof of Claim (#4551) filed by Alter Domus (US) LLC, in its capacity as administrative agent, and the Debtors’ assumed April 30, 2023 date of emergence from these Chapter 11 Cases. This
estimate is subject to fluctuating LIBOR and/or SOFR.
|
5
|
2020 Term B-1
Loan Claims
|
On the Effective Date, each Holder of an Allowed 2020 Term B‑1 Loan Claim shall receive, in full and final satisfaction, compromise,
settlement, release, and discharge of such Claim, either (i) a principal amount of Take-Back Term Loans equal to such Holder’s Allowed 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claim or (ii) an amount of Cash equal to the principal amount of Take-Back Term Loans
that otherwise would have been distributable to such Holder under clause (i).
|
$1,093.7 million4
|
Impaired; entitled to vote
|
6
|
2020 Term B-2
Loan Claims
|
On the Effective Date, or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, each Holder of an Allowed 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claim shall receive, in
full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement, release, and discharge of such Claim, such Holder’s Pro Rata share of 82% of (a) the New Common Stock issued on the Effective Date, prior to and subject to dilution by any New Common Stock
issued in connection with the Equity Rights Offering (including, for the avoidance of doubt, any New Common Stock issued pursuant to the Backstop Commitment Agreement), in connection with any MIP Awards, and/or upon the exercise of the New
Warrants and (b) the Equity Subscription Rights.
|
$946.8 million
|
Impaired; entitled to vote
|
7
|
BrandCo Third
Lien Guaranty
Claims
|
Holders of BrandCo Third Lien Guaranty Claims shall receive no recovery or distribution on account of such Claims. On the Effective Date,
all BrandCo Third Lien Guaranty Claims will be canceled, released, extinguished, and discharged, and will be of no further force or effect.
|
$3.0 million
|
Impaired; deemed to reject
|
8
|
Unsecured
Notes Claims
|
On the Effective Date, or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, each Holder of an Allowed Unsecured Notes Claim shall receive:
(i) if Class 8 votes to accept the Plan and the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are satisfied, in full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement, release, and discharge of such Claim, such Holder’s Pro Rata share
of the Unsecured Notes Settlement Distribution; or
|
$441.4 million
|
Impaired; entitled to vote
|
4
|
This
estimate is subject to fluctuating LIBOR and/or SOFR through the Debtors’ assumed April 30, 2023 date of emergence.
|
|
|
(ii) if Class 8 votes to reject the Plan or the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are not satisfied, no recovery or distribution on account of such Claim and all Unsecured Notes Claims shall be canceled, released,
extinguished, and discharged, and of no further force or effect; provided that each Consenting Unsecured Noteholder shall receive 50% of such
Holder’s Pro Rata share of the Unsecured Notes Settlement Distribution (the “Consenting Unsecured Noteholder Recovery”); provided, further, that if the Bankruptcy Court finds that such Consenting Unsecured Noteholder Recovery is improper, there shall be no such distribution to Consenting Unsecured
Noteholders under the Plan.
All distributions to Holders of Class 8 Unsecured Notes Claims shall be made to (or in a manner reasonably approved by) the Unsecured Notes
Indenture Trustee for further distribution to Holders of Unsecured Notes Claims in accordance with the Unsecured Notes Indenture. In addition to the foregoing, the Debtors shall pay the unpaid fees and expenses of the Unsecured Notes
Indenture Trustee as of the Effective Date of the Plan to the extent included in the definition of Restructuring Expenses.
|
|
|
9(a)
|
Talc Personal
Injury Claims
|
As soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective Date in accordance with the Talc PI Distribution Procedures, each Holder of an Allowed
Talc Personal Injury Claim shall receive:
(i) if Class 9(a) votes to accept the Plan and the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are satisfied, in full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement, release, and discharge of such Claim, such Holder’s Pro Rata
share (as determined in accordance with the Talc PI Distribution Procedures) of the Talc Personal Injury Settlement Distribution; or
(ii) if Class 9(a) votes to reject the Plan or the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are not satisfied, no recovery or distribution on account of such Claim, and all Talc Personal Injury Claims shall be canceled,
released, extinguished, and discharged, and of no further force or effect.
|
$50-150 million
|
Impaired; entitled to vote
|
9(b)
|
Non-Qualified
Pension Claims
|
On the Effective Date, or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, each Holder of an Allowed Non-Qualified Pension Claim shall receive:
(i) if Class 9(b) votes to accept the Plan and the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are satisfied, in full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement, release, and discharge of such Claim, cash in an amount equal to
such Holder’s Pro Rata share of the Pension Settlement Distribution; or
(ii) if Class 9(b) votes to reject the Plan or the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are not satisfied, no recovery or distribution on account of such Claim and all Non-Qualified Pension Claims shall be canceled,
released, extinguished, and discharged, and of no further force or effect.
|
$50-60 million
|
Impaired; entitled to vote
|
9(c)
|
Trade Claims
|
On the Effective Date, or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, each Holder of an Allowed Trade Claim shall receive:
(i) if Class 9(c) votes to accept the Plan and the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are satisfied, in full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement, release, and discharge of such Claim, such Holder’s Pro Rata
share of the Trade Settlement Distribution; or
(ii) if Class 9(c) votes to reject the Plan or the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are not satisfied, no recovery or distribution on account of such Claim, and all Trade Claims shall be canceled, released, extinguished,
and discharged, and of no further force or effect.
|
$60-80 million
|
Impaired; entitled to vote
|
9(d)
|
Other General
Unsecured
Claims
|
On the Effective Date, or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, each Holder of an Allowed Other General Unsecured Claim shall
receive:
(i) if Class 9(d) votes to accept the Plan and the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are satisfied, in full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement, release, and discharge of such Claim, such Holder’s Pro Rata
share of the Other GUC Settlement Distribution; or
(ii) if Class 9(d) votes to reject the Plan or the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are not satisfied, no recovery or distribution on account of such Claim and all Other General Unsecured Claims shall be canceled,
released, extinguished, and discharged, and of no further force or effect.
|
$42-62 million5
|
Impaired; entitled to vote
|
10
|
Subordinated
Claims
|
Holders of Subordinated Claims shall receive no recovery or distribution on account of such Claims. On the Effective Date, all Subordinated
Claims will be canceled, released extinguished, and discharged, and will be of no further force or effect.
|
N/A
|
Impaired; deemed to reject
|
11
|
Intercompany
Claims and
Interests
|
On the Effective Date, unless otherwise provided for under the Plan, each Intercompany Claim and/or Intercompany Interest shall be, at the
option of the Debtors (with the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders) either (i) Reinstated or (ii) canceled and released.
All Intercompany Claims held by any BrandCo Entity against any OpCo Debtor or by any OpCo Debtor against any BrandCo Entity shall be deemed
settled pursuant to the Plan Settlement, and shall be canceled and released on the Effective Date.
|
N/A
|
Unimpaired; presumed to accept or Impaired; deemed to
reject
|
12
|
Interests in
Holdings
|
Holders of Interests (other than Intercompany Interests) shall receive no recovery or distribution on account of such Interests. On the
Effective Date, all Interests (other than Intercompany Interests) will be canceled, released extinguished, and discharged, and will be of no further force or effect.
|
N/A
|
Impaired; deemed to reject
|
5
|
The
Debtors’ advisors estimated the range of total Claims in Class 9(d) by examining all Claims filed that would fall into such class. The estimates were calculated by reviewing the amounts asserted by such Claims, and comparing certain
Claims to the amounts recorded in the Debtors’ books and records. Certain categories of claims that were assessed include, but are not limited to, claims relating to leased real property, sales and use tax, and environmental claims.
The Debtors and their advisors also considered potential contract rejection claims, and included an estimated amount for such claims based on an assessment of the types of contracts that the Debtors are party to and the estimated costs
of such contracts. The Debtors did not include any material estimate for Claims related to the use of hair straighteners and/or relaxers in Class 9(d) because the Debtors believe that such claims are without merit. Counsel to the hair
relaxer-related claimants who have appeared in this proceeding believe the claims have merit.
|
II. |
OVERVIEW OF THE COMPANY’S OPERATIONS
|
The Company is a global leader in the beauty industry, with a diverse portfolio of brands, including the iconic Revlon and
Elizabeth Arden brands, spanning multiple beauty segments. The Company’s portfolio as of the Petition Date consisted of over 20 key brands associated with thousands of products sold in over 100 countries worldwide. The Company’s leading position in
the global beauty industry is a result of its extensive array of beauty offerings, including color cosmetics, fragrances, hair color, hair care, skin care, beauty tools, men’s grooming products, deodorants, and other beauty care products, which it
develops, manufactures, sells, and markets across the globe through a variety of distribution channels.
The origins of the Revlon brand date back to 1932, when Charles Revson, Joseph Revson, and Charles Lachman created the first
opaque nail polish formulated with pigments. New colors were developed each season to align with women’s fashion trends, and in 1939, the Company launched a range of lipsticks. What followed were years of significant growth and innovation. In
1961, the Company launched its Super Lustrous franchise, establishing the Company as a leader in bold color, and in 1991, the Company launched the ColorStay franchise, a breakthrough in longwear lip color.
Today, the Company is still synonymous with a bold, red lip, and the brand continues to innovate within its iconic Super Lustrous
and ColorStay franchises. The Company has achieved several firsts with regard to breaking cultural norms to promote its long standing values of diversity and inclusion. The Company was the first beauty company to feature an African American model
in its advertising, with Naomi Sims in 1970. When the brand launched its iconic Charlie fragrance in 1973, the advertising, featuring a woman in pants, was groundbreaking in its depiction of women’s empowerment. The Company has always been a brand
that promotes diversity, from its “Most Unforgettable Woman in the World” campaign in the 1980s to today’s “Live Boldly” campaign, which celebrates women and the transformative power of beauty products.
The Company acquired Elizabeth Arden in 2016, which became a prominent brand on par with Revlon. The Elizabeth Arden brand—which
is comprised of an extensive portfolio including, among other things, products under the Elizabeth Arden name brand and designer and celebrity fragrances—has a similarly rich and storied history.
Ms. Arden opened her first Red Door salon on Fifth Avenue in 1910 as the retreat of choice for luxury services ranging from
massages to hair styling. Ms. Arden introduced eye makeup to America, was the first to create travel-sized beauty products, was the first in the cosmetics industry to employ traveling saleswomen, and was the first to begin commercial beauty
tutorials. Ms. Arden was frequently at the forefront of history, including in 1912, when she marched with the suffragettes. Many suffragettes wore red lipstick she supplied as a symbol of independence, strength, and solidarity. In 1946, Ms. Arden
was the first businesswoman, and only the second woman, to be featured on the cover of Time magazine. Today, the Elizabeth Arden brand continues to deliver
high-quality product innovation and support Elizabeth Arden’s legacy of empowering women all around the world.
The Revlon and Elizabeth Arden portfolio of products and brands feature numerous household names. The Debtors’ brand equity and
strong customer relationships enable them to offer a wide range of services to their customers. With a collective history dating back over a century, the Debtors intend to remain at the forefront of beauty products across the globe.
The Company conducts its business through its operating subsidiary, Debtor Revlon Consumer Products Corporation (“
RCPC”), and its subsidiaries. The Company’s headquarters are in New York, New York. The Company is a multinational enterprise with worldwide operations, including material business operations in
North America, Asia-Pacific, Europe, and South Africa.
The Debtors employ 2,744 people, of whom 2,315 are full-time and 429 are part-time employees.
Delivering quality products across the world, and through various beauty channels, remains one of the most critical elements of
success in the Company’s industry. Brand recognition in multiple sectors of the beauty industry establishes customer familiarity with the Revlon name and an understanding of its permanence in the industry. To that end, the Debtors have concentrated
on multiple business segments, each with a focus on particular types of customers. The Company’s operations are generally organized into the following reportable segments: (i) Revlon, (ii) Elizabeth Arden, (iii) Portfolio, and (iv) Fragrances.
The Company’s Revlon segment includes cosmetics, hair color, hair care, and beauty tools. These products are sold in the mass
retail channel, large-volume retailers, chain drug and food stores, e-commerce sites, department stores, professional hair and nail salons, one-stop shopping beauty retailers, and specialty cosmetics stores in the U.S. and internationally.
Among the various key franchises within the Revlon segment are Revlon ColorStay, Revlon Super Lustrous, Revlon ColorSilk, and
Revlon Professional, as well as various beauty tools, including nail, eye, manicure and pedicure grooming tools, eye lash curlers, and a full line of makeup brushes under the Revlon brand name. For its Revlon segment, the Company uses various
digital marketing, television, and other advertising to reach customers. Women including Halle Berry, Ciara, Gwen Stefani, Gal Gadot, Ashley Graham, Sofia Carson, Jessica Jung, Adwoa Aboah, Eniola Abioro, and Megan Thee Stallion have all been Revlon
Brand Ambassadors in recent years.
Elizabeth Arden operates in market segments beyond Revlon and is sold in prestige retailers and specialty stores. Elizabeth
Arden includes prestige fragrances, skin care, and color cosmetics.
The Elizabeth Arden segment markets, distributes, and sells fragrances, skin care, and color cosmetics primarily to prestige
retailers, department and specialty stores, perfumeries, boutiques, e-commerce sites, the mass retail channel, travel retailers, and distributors. It also makes direct sales to consumers via its e-commerce business. Moreover, with the acquisition
of Elizabeth Arden, Revlon also propelled its digital and e-commerce footprint in China, where the Elizabeth Arden brand was already strong.
The Company focuses on generating strong retailer and consumer demand across its key Elizabeth Arden brands. These brands
include Elizabeth Arden Ceramide, Prevage, Eight Hour, SUPERSTART, Visible Difference, and Skin Illuminating in the Elizabeth Arden skin care brands, and Elizabeth Arden White Tea, Elizabeth Arden Red Door, Elizabeth Arden 5th Avenue, and Elizabeth
Arden Green Tea in Elizabeth Arden fragrances. The Company uses social media and other digital mediums, including television and magazines, to market the Elizabeth Arden brand to customers.
The Company’s Portfolio segment focuses on premium, specialty, and mass consumer products primarily found in mass retail
locations, hair and nail salons, and professional salon distributors. The segment includes brands such as: Almay and SinfulColors in color cosmetics; American Crew in men’s grooming products; CND in nail polishes, gel nail color, and nail
enhancements; Cutex in nail care products; and Mitchum in antiperspirant deodorants.
The Portfolio segment also includes a multicultural hair care line consisting of Creme of Nature, Lottabody, and Roux brand hair
care products, which are sold in both professional salons and by retailers, primarily in the U.S.
The Company’s Fragrance segment involves the development, marketing, and distribution of certain owned and licensed fragrances.
The Company holds the number one position in the U.S. mass fragrance market, marketing these products to retailers in the U.S. and internationally, including prestige retailers, specialty stores, e-commerce sites, the mass retail channel, travel
retailers, and other international retailers. Its fragrances include owned and licensed brands such as: (i) Juicy Couture, John Varvatos, and AllSaints in prestige fragrances; (ii) Britney Spears, Elizabeth Taylor, Christina Aguilera, and Jennifer
Aniston in celebrity fragrances; and (iii) Curve, Giorgio Beverly Hills, Ed Hardy, Charlie, Lucky Brand, ‹PS›, Alfred Sung, Halston, Geoffrey Beene, and White Diamonds in mass fragrances.
The Company’s principal customers as of year-end 2021 for its mass retail products, prestige products, and fragrances include
large-volume retailers and chain drug stores, including: well-known retailers such as Walmart, CVS, Target, Kohl’s, Walgreens, TJ Maxx, and Marshalls, department stores such as Macy’s, Dillard’s, Ulta, Belk, and Sephora in the U.S.; Shoppers Drug
Mart in Canada; A.S. Watson & Co. retail chains in Asia Pacific and Europe; Walgreens Boots Alliance in the U.S. and the U.K.; Debenhams and Tesco in the U.K.; as well as a range of specialty stores, perfumeries, and boutiques such as The Perfume
Shop, Hudson’s Bay, Myer, Douglas, and various international and travel retailers such as Nuance, Heinemann, and World Duty Free throughout various international regions, and e-commerce retailers such as Tmall in China.
Many of the Debtors’ customers rely on individuals going into retail shops and directly purchasing products. The Debtors also
maintain e-commerce websites where customers can purchase products, and have third-party contracts with e-commerce companies, such as Amazon, where customers purchase products through those companies. As is customary in the industry, however, none
of the Company’s major customers are contractually obligated to continue purchasing products from the Company in the future.
|
1.
|
The Debtors’ Corporate Structure
|
Holdings is the Debtors’ ultimate parent company and issuer of the Debtors’ publicly traded equity securities. Holdings wholly owns RCPC, which is
also a Debtor and the borrower under the Term DIP Facility Credit Agreement, BrandCo Credit Agreement, 2016 Credit Agreement, ABL DIP Facility Credit Agreement, and ABL Facility Credit Agreement, and the issuer under the Unsecured Notes Indenture.
Exhibit C attached hereto sets forth the Company’s organizational structure as of the Petition Date, including both the Debtors and certain legal entities within the
Company’s corporate family that did not file for chapter 11 (the “Non-Debtor Entities”). The other entities in the Company’s corporate family serve a variety of purposes, including, among
other things, as operating entities and intellectual property holding companies. Substantially all of the Debtors are parties to, and/or have guaranteed, one or more of the Term DIP Facility Credit Agreement, BrandCo Credit Agreement, 2016 Credit
Agreement, ABL DIP Facility Credit Agreement, ABL Facility Credit Agreement, and Unsecured Notes Indenture.
|
2.
|
Non-Debtor Affiliates, Joint Ventures, and Partnerships
|
The Non-Debtor Entities, Debtor PPI Two Corporation, Debtor Revlon (Puerto Rico) Inc., and Debtor RML, LLC are not party to, and
have not guaranteed, the Term DIP Facility Credit Agreement, BrandCo Credit Agreement, 2016 Credit Agreement, ABL DIP Facility Credit Agreement, ABL Facility Credit Agreement, or the Unsecured Notes Indenture. As further discussed below in Article
III of this Disclosure Statement, certain Non-Debtor Entities whose direct parents are Debtors, however, have pledged their equity interests in their non-Debtor direct subsidiaries as collateral under at least one of the Term DIP Facility Credit
Agreement, BrandCo Credit Agreement, 2016 Credit Agreement, ABL DIP Facility Credit Agreement, and ABL Facility Credit Agreement.
|
E. |
Board, Directors, and Officers
|
The composition of the post-Effective Date board of directors or managers of the Reorganized Debtors will be disclosed, to the
extent known, prior to the Confirmation Hearing.
The Board of Holdings is currently comprised of ten (10) directors (the “Directors”), including: Mr. Paul Aronzon, Mr. Scott Beattie, Mr. Alan Bernikow, Ms. Kristin Dolan, Ms. Cristiana Falcone, Ms. Ceci Kurzman, Mr. Victor Nichols, Ms. Debra Perelman, Mr. Ronald O. Perelman, and Mr. Barry F.
Schwartz.
To facilitate an efficient and independent governance process in connection with these Chapter 11 Cases, the Debtors established
at the outset of these Chapter 11 Cases (i) a restructuring committee (the “Restructuring Committee”) of the Board, comprised of five (5) Directors: Mr. Paul Aronzon, Mr.
Scott Beattie, Mr. Alan Bernikow, Mr. Victor Nichols, and Mr. Barry F. Schwartz, and (ii) a conflicts committee of the Board (the “Conflicts Committee”), comprised of four
(4) members, all of whom are independent Directors: Mr. Paul Aronzon, Mr. Alan Bernikow, Mr. Scott Beattie, and Mr. Victor Nichols.
Additionally, the Debtors recognized from the outset that the plan of reorganization would need to address complex inter-Debtor
issues and potential inter-Debtor claims, such as the allocation of reorganization value between the BrandCo Entities6 and the Non-BrandCo Entities, alleged claims
related to the BrandCo Transaction, and potential claims, if any, that the Debtors may have against insiders. To fully investigate and independently assess these issues and claims, the Debtors established an investigation committee (the “Investigation Committee”), comprised of an independent director, as its sole member. Mr. Paul Aronzon is the sole member of the Investigation Committee.
The following table sets forth the names of Revlon’s principal executive officers and their current positions:
6
|
The “BrandCo Entities” are collectively, each of (a) Beautyge I, (b) Beautyge II, LLC, (c) BrandCo Almay 2020 LLC, (d) BrandCo Charlie 2020 LLC,
(e) BrandCo CND 2020 LLC, (f) BrandCo Curve 2020 LLC, (g) BrandCo Elizabeth Arden 2020 LLC, (h) BrandCo Giorgio Beverly Hills 2020 LLC, (i) BrandCo Halston 2020 LLC, (j) BrandCo Jean Nate 2020 LLC, (k) BrandCo Mitchum 2020 LLC,
(l) BrandCo Multicultural Group 2020 LLC, (m) BrandCo PS 2020 LLC, and (n) BrandCo White Shoulders 2020 LLC.
|
|
|
|
Debra Perelman
|
|
President & Chief Executive Officer
|
Robert M. Caruso
|
|
Chief Restructuring Officer
|
Matt Kvarda
|
|
Interim Chief Financial Officer
|
Ely Bar-Ness
|
|
Chief Human Resources Officer
|
Thomas Cho
|
|
Chief Supply Chain Officer
|
Keyla Lazardi
|
|
Chief Scientific Officer
|
Andrew Kidd
|
|
EVP, General Counsel
|
Martine Williamson
|
|
Chief Marketing Officer
|
|
3.
|
BrandCo Restructuring Officer – Steven Panagos
|
In recognition of potential inter-debtor issues between the BrandCo Entities and Non-BrandCo Entities, including the allocation
of value between the two sets of Debtors, the Debtors appointed Mr. Steven Panagos as the independent officer of each of the BrandCo Entities on the Petition Date. Since the Petition Date, Mr. Panagos and his independent advisors have regularly
attended meetings of the Restructuring Committee. Mr. Panagos’s advisors and the Debtors’ other chapter 11 professionals hold weekly calls to ensure that Mr. Panagos, on behalf of the BrandCo Entities and their stakeholders, remains fully informed
of developments in these Chapter 11 Cases.
III. |
PREPETITION CAPITAL STRUCTURE
|
On the Petition Date, Revlon had the following outstanding funded debt obligations:
Instrument / Facility
|
|
Principal Outstanding
|
|
ABL Facility
|
|
$
|
289,000,000
|
|
BrandCo Facilities
|
|
$
|
1,878,019,220
|
|
2016 Term Loan Facility8
|
|
$
|
872,424,572
|
|
Unsecured Notes
|
|
$
|
431,300,000
|
|
Foreign ABTL Facility
|
|
$
|
75,000,000
|
|
Total Indebtedness
|
|
$
|
3,545,743,792
|
|
As of the Petition Date, there was approximately $289 million outstanding under that certain Asset-Based Revolving Credit
Agreement, dated as of September 7, 2016 (as modified from time to time, the “ABL Facility Credit Agreement” and, the senior secured asset-based credit facilities
thereunder, the “ABL Facility”), by and among RCPC and certain subsidiaries of RCPC, as borrowers (the “ABL
Facility Borrowers”), Holdings, the ABL Agents, and the lenders party thereto from time to time (the “ABL Lenders”).
The ABL Facility consisted of (i) $109 million of Tranche A revolving loans (the “ABL Tranche A Revolving Loans”), (ii) $130 million of senior secured second-in, second-out term loan facility (the “SISO Term Loans”), and
(iii) $50 million of “first-in, last-out” Tranche B term loans (the “FILO ABL Term Loans”).
Pursuant to (i) that certain ABL Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of September 7, 2016 (as amended), among RCPC, as
borrower, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, and MidCap Funding IV Trust (“MidCap”), as collateral agent, (ii) that certain Holdings ABL Guarantee and Pledge
Agreement, dated as of September 7, 2016, among Holdings, and MidCap, as collateral agent, and (iii) certain other security documents, the ABL Facility was guaranteed by certain of the domestic and foreign Debtors (together with the ABL Facility
Borrowers and Holdings, the “ABL Loan Parties”), and was secured on (a) a first-priority basis by liens on certain assets of the ABL Loan Parties, including accounts
receivable, cash, inventory, deposit accounts, and securities accounts (subject to certain limited exclusions), instruments (subject to certain limited exclusions), chattel paper, interests in material owned real property (including fixtures),
equipment, and the proceeds and products of the foregoing (collectively, the “ABL First Priority Collateral”), and (b) a second-priority basis by liens on substantially all
of the ABL Loan Parties’ assets not constituting ABL First Priority Collateral (subject to certain customary exclusions), including equity pledges of 100% of the interests in domestic subsidiaries and 66% of the voting interests in first-tier foreign
subsidiaries, intellectual property (excluding the Specified Brands7), general intangibles, and the proceeds and products of the foregoing (collectively, the “Term Loan Priority Collateral”).
Subsequent to the Petition Date, as part of the DIP financing, the ABL Tranche A Revolving Loans and SISO Term Loans were
refinanced on a dollar-for-dollar basis by the ABL DIP Facility. As of the date hereof, only the FILO ABL Term Loans remain outstanding in the amount of $50 million.
|
B. |
2016 Term Loan Facility
|
As of the Petition Date, and subject to the resolution of claims relating to the Mistaken Payment (as defined below), there was
approximately $872 million outstanding under that certain Term Credit Agreement, dated as of September 7, 2016 (as modified from time to time, the “2016 Credit Agreement”
and, the senior secured term loan facility thereunder, the “2016 Term Loan Facility” and, the loans thereunder the “2016 Term Loans”), by and among RCPC, as borrower, Holdings, Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent (“Citibank”), and the
lenders party thereto from time to time (collectively, the “2016 Term Loan Lenders”).
7
|
The “Specified Brands” refer to Elizabeth Arden (including the related skincare sub-brands Visible Difference, Ceramide, Superstart, Prevage, Eight Hour,
and Skin Illuminating), certain portfolio brands, including American Crew, Almay, CND, Mitchum, and four Multicultural Group brands (namely, Creme of Nature, Lottabody, Roux, and Fanci-Full), and certain owned fragrance brands including
Charlie, Curve, Giorgio Beverly Hills, Halston, Jean Naté, Paul Sebastian, and White Shoulders.
|
Pursuant to (i) that certain Term Loan Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of September 7, 2016 (as amended), among
RCPC, as borrower, and Citibank, as collateral agent, (ii) that certain Holdings Term Loan Guarantee and Pledge Agreement, dated as of September 7, 2016, among Holdings, as grantor, and Citibank, as collateral agent, and (iii) certain other security
documents, the 2016 Term Loan Facility is guaranteed by the guarantors under the ABL Facility, and is secured on (i) a first-priority basis by liens on the Term Loan Priority Collateral and (ii) a second-priority basis by liens on the ABL First
Priority Collateral, in each case, pari passu with the liens securing the BrandCo Facilities (collectively, the “2016 Term Loan Liens”).
As of the Petition Date, there was approximately $1.88 billion in principal amount outstanding under that certain BrandCo Credit
Agreement, dated as of May 7, 2020 (as modified from time to time, the “BrandCo Credit Agreement,” and the closing date of such agreement, the “BrandCo Facilities Closing Date”), among RCPC, as borrower, Holdings, Jefferies Finance LLC (“Jefferies”), as
administrative agent and collateral agent, and the lenders party thereto from time to time (the “BrandCo Lenders”).
Pursuant to the BrandCo Credit Agreement, the BrandCo Lenders provided the Company with (i) a senior secured term loan facility
in an aggregate principal amount as of the Petition Date, of $938,986,931 (the “First Lien BrandCo Facility” and the loans thereunder, the “2020 Term B-1 Loans”); (ii) a senior secured term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount as of the Petition Date, of $936,052,001 (the “Second Lien BrandCo Facility” and the loans thereunder, the “2020 Term B-2 Loans”); and (iii) a senior secured term loan facility in an aggregate
principal amount as of the Petition Date, of $2,980,287 (the “Third Lien BrandCo Facility” and the loans thereunder, the “2020 Term B-3 Loans” and, together with the 2020 Term B-1 Loans and the 2020 Term B-2 Loans, the “BrandCo Facilities”).
Pursuant to (i) that certain Term Loan Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of May 7, 2020, among RCPC, as borrower, the
subsidiary guarantors party thereto, and Jefferies, as pari passu collateral agent, (ii) that certain Holdings Term Loan Guarantee and Pledge Agreement, dated
as of May 7, 2020, between Holdings and Jefferies, as pari passu collateral agent, and (iii) certain other security documents, the BrandCo Facilities are
guaranteed by the guarantors under the 2016 Term Loan Facility and the ABL Facility and are secured on (i) a first-priority basis (pari passu with the 2016 Term
Loan Liens) by liens on the Term Loan Priority Collateral, and (ii) a second-priority basis (pari passu with the 2016 Term Loan Liens) by liens on the ABL First
Priority Collateral.
In addition, pursuant to (i) that certain First Lien BrandCo Guarantee and Security Agreement, that certain Second Lien BrandCo
Guarantee and Security Agreement, and that certain Third Lien BrandCo Guarantee and Security Agreement, each dated as of May 7, 2020, among the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and Jefferies, as administrative agent and first lien collateral
agent, second lien collateral agent, or third lien collateral agent, as applicable, (ii) that certain First Lien BrandCo Stock Pledge Agreement, that certain Second Lien BrandCo Stock Pledge Agreement, and that certain Third Lien BrandCo Stock Pledge
Agreement, each dated as of May 7, 2020, among RCPC, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, and Jefferies, as first lien collateral agent, second lien collateral agent, or third lien collateral agent, as applicable, and (iii) certain other security
documents, the BrandCo Facilities are guaranteed by the BrandCo Entities, which are not obligors with respect to the 2016 Term Loan Facility or the ABL Facility, and that hold certain intellectual property assets related to the Specified Brands, and
are secured by first-priority liens (with respect to the 2020 Term B-1 Loans), second priority liens (with respect to the 2020 B-2 Loans) and third priority liens (with respect to the 2020 Term B-3 Loans) on certain assets that are not collateral for
the 2016 Term Loan Facility or ABL Facility, including (a) substantially all assets of the BrandCo Entities, including 100% of the equity interests in the BrandCo Entities that own the Specified Brands, and (b) 34% of the equity of certain first-tier
foreign subsidiaries (the “Foreign Collateral” and, collectively, with the assets of the BrandCo Entities, each of which exclusively secure the BrandCo Facility, the “BrandCo Collateral”).
The BrandCo Entities were established as special purpose entities to hold the Specified Brands and, as part of the transactions
carried out in connection with the BrandCo Facilities, the BrandCo Entities licensed the Specified Brands, pursuant to licensing agreements, to RCPC, which in turn sub-licensed the Specified Brands to certain other Non-BrandCo Entities.
As part of the business deal associated with the BrandCo Facilities, RCPC pays a monthly royalty to the BrandCo Entities of 10%
of the net sales of products made with their intellectual property. In 2021, RCPC paid the BrandCo Entities approximately $94 million in royalties.
|
D. |
Foreign Asset-Based Term Loan
|
As of the Petition Date, there was approximately $75 million outstanding under that certain Asset-Based Term Loan Credit
Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2021 (as amended, supplemented, or otherwise modified, the “Foreign ABTL Credit Agreement,” and the asset-based term loan facility
thereunder, the “Foreign ABTL Facility”), by and among Revlon Finance LLC, as the borrower (the “Foreign
ABTL Borrower”), certain guarantors party thereto (collectively, with the Foreign ABTL Borrower, the “Foreign ABTL Loan Parties”), the lenders party thereto,
and Blue Torch Finance LLC (“Blue Torch”), as administrative agent and collateral agent. The obligations under the Foreign ABTL Facility were secured on a first-priority
basis by (i) liens on the equity of each Foreign ABTL Loan Party (other than the subsidiaries of RCPC organized in Mexico) and (ii) certain assets of the guarantors of the Foreign ABTL Facility, including inventory, accounts receivable, material bank
accounts, and material intercompany indebtedness. None of the Foreign ABTL Loan Parties is a Debtor or an obligor under any of the ABL Facility, 2016 Term Loan Facility, BrandCo Facilities, or Unsecured Notes.
On or about the Petition Date, Revlon used proceeds of the Term DIP Facility to fully repay the Foreign ABTL Facility.
As of the Petition Date, there was approximately $431.3 million of unsecured note obligations consisting of the 6.25% Senior
Notes due 2024 (the “Unsecured Notes”) issued and outstanding pursuant to that certain Unsecured Notes Indenture, dated August 4, 2016, by and among RCPC, as issuer, and
U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as successor to U.S. Bank National Association, as indenture trustee (the “Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee”). The Unsecured
Notes are senior, unsecured obligations of RCPC, and are guaranteed on a senior, unsecured basis by the guarantors under the 2016 Term Loan Facility and the ABL Facility, excluding Holdings and the foreign Debtors that are party to the ABL Facility
Credit Agreement and 2016 Credit Agreement.
In 1985, MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc. (together, with certain of its affiliates other than the Company, “MacAndrews & Forbes”) acquired a majority of the Company and, a year later, took it private. The Company remained a wholly-owned subsidiary of MacAndrews & Forbes until
1996, when approximately 15% of the Company was sold in an initial public offering. The Company began trading on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker
symbol “REV.”
Revlon remains an indirect majority-owned subsidiary of MacAndrews & Forbes. As of the Petition Date, Revlon had
approximately 54,254,019 shares of class A common stock (the “Class A Common Stock”), of which MacAndrews & Forbes owned approximately 85.2%, and which was listed on the
NYSE under the symbol “REV.” As further discussed below in Article V of this Disclosure Statement, since the Petition Date, Revlon’s common stock was suspended and delisted, and the Company’s Class A Common Stock began trading exclusively on the OTC
market on October 21, 2022, under the symbol “REVRQ.”
IV. |
KEY EVENTS LEADING TO COMMENCEMENT OF CHAPTER 11 CASES
|
Prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Debtors, like many other companies in the beauty industry, had experienced a
prolonged period of declining customer demand. This general downturn worsened considerably during the COVID-19 pandemic, and although the Company has more recently experienced a rebound in sales and a turnaround in demand, it now faces challenges
from supply chain disruptions and liquidity constraints that pose a substantial challenge for its ongoing operations.
|
A. |
Elizabeth Arden Acquisition
|
In September 2016, Revlon acquired Elizabeth Arden in a deal that increased the prestige of the Revlon name globally, and
bolstered its growth potential in the industry (the “Elizabeth Arden Acquisition”). The addition of Elizabeth Arden, already an iconic name in its own right, opened the
door for the Company’s entry into new market segments and prestige retailers and specialty stores, and brought prestige fragrances, skin care, and color cosmetics alongside the Revlon brand name. With Elizabeth Arden, Revlon is uniquely positioned
to compete in multiple markets in the beauty landscape, giving customers the choice of a full suite of products that range from beauty tools and deodorants to top of the line cosmetics and skin care.
The financing for the Elizabeth Arden Acquisition brought additional funding to the Company and enabled it to repay certain of
Revlon’s and Elizabeth Arden’s then-existing facilities. Specifically, in connection with the Elizabeth Arden Acquisition, Debtor RCPC entered into the 2016 Term Loan Facility (which refinanced existing term loans and provided additional funds to
finance the Elizabeth Arden Acquisition) and ABL Facility, each facility as discussed in Article III above, and completed the issuance of the Unsecured Notes. RCPC used proceeds from these facilities and approximately $126.7 million of cash on hand
to fund the Elizabeth Arden Acquisition, which included the refinancing of over $570 million of then-outstanding Elizabeth Arden debt and preferred equity obligations.
|
B. |
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic
|
In March 2020, governmental authorities in the United States and around the world imposed stay-at-home orders, and non-essential
businesses were ordered closed in an effort to abate the spread of the COVID-19 virus. The Company immediately experienced a general decline in sales due to the imposition of mask mandates, quarantines, travel and transportation restrictions, import
and export restrictions, and the closures of retail locations and office spaces, all of which would contribute to a general slowdown in the global economy. There was a significant decline in air travel and consumer traffic in key shopping and
tourist areas around the globe, which also adversely affected the Company’s travel retail business. In North America, the Company’s prestige channel was the hardest hit as department stores closed.
Consumer purchases of certain of the Company’s key cosmetic products decreased significantly during this time. Individuals that
typically visited professional hair and nail salons, one-stop shopping beauty retailers, department stores, or similar cosmetic stores where the Debtors’ products are sold could not do so due to mandated closures and shelter-in-place orders.
Additionally, many consumers wearing masks wore less makeup. Measures imposed by governmental authorities, such as shelter-in-place orders, in the U.S. and elsewhere, and the zero-COVID policy in China, caused significant disruptions to the
Company’s sales and supply chains, as described in detail in Article IV.F below, in the regions most impacted by COVID-19, including Asia and North America. The supply chain and production disruptions continued to impact the Company through the
Petition Date.
Due in part to these issues, the Company experienced declines in net sales and profits. In the first quarter of 2020, the
negative impact of COVID-19 contributed to $54 million of estimated negative impacts to net sales and $186 million of operating losses (compared to $23 million in 2019). Net sales also decreased in each business segment, primarily due to the impact
of the pandemic.
|
C. |
Citibank Wire Transfer Litigation
|
Prior to and since the Petition Date, Citibank has served as the administrative agent for the 2016 Term Loans. In that role,
Citibank distributed payments made by the Company to the 2016 Term Loan Lenders. An interest payment of $7.8 million was to be paid on August 11, 2020 (the “August 2020 Interest
Obligation”), and Revlon appropriately transferred the funds necessary to pay the August 2020 Interest Obligation to Citibank so that Citibank could remit the funds to the 2016 Term Loan Lenders.
On August 11, 2020, Citibank mistakenly paid not only the August 2020 Interest Obligation with Revlon’s funds, but also, using
its own funds, paid the full outstanding principal remaining on the 2016 Term Loans in an amount of approximately $894 million (such excess payment, the “Mistaken Payment”).
When it realized its error, Citibank promptly sent recall notices to the 2016 Term Loan Lenders, informing them that the Mistaken
Payment was made in error and that all funds paid to them on August 11, 2020, above their share of the August 2020 Interest Obligation were not owed under the 2016 Credit Agreement. Citibank requested that the 2016 Term Loan Lenders remit their
portion of the Mistaken Payment promptly.
Many 2016 Term Loan Lenders returned their share of the Mistaken Payment to Citibank. However, 2016 Term Loan Lenders that
collectively held approximately $500 million in loans (such 2016 Term Loan Lenders, the “Mistaken Payment Lenders”) declined to return the funds.
On August 17, 2020, less than one week after the Mistaken Payment, Citibank filed the first of three suits against the Mistaken
Payment Lenders in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “District Court”), seeking the return of their share of the Mistaken Payment (the “Citibank Wire Transfer Litigation”).8 Citibank argued that the Mistaken Payment Lenders had no
right to the Mistaken Payment, while the defendants claimed, among other things, they were owed the money and had no notice that the payments were a mistake at the time they were made, which entitled them to keep the money under New York state law.
A bench trial was held in the Citibank Wire Transfer Litigation in December 2020 before the Honorable Jesse M. Furman in the
District Court. On February 16, 2021, Judge Furman issued a decision in favor of the Mistaken Payment Lenders.
Citibank appealed the District Court decision in favor of the Mistaken Payment Lenders to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Second Circuit (the “Second Circuit”). The appeal (Case No. 21-487-cv) was fully briefed on July 22, 2021, and argued before the Second Circuit on September 29, 2021.
As discussed in Article V below, during the course of these Chapter 11 Cases, the Second Circuit vacated the District Court’s
decision, and held that the Mistaken Payment Lenders were not entitled to retain the Mistaken Payment. However, prior to the Second Circuit’s decision, the Mistaken Payment contributed to substantial uncertainty regarding important aspects of the
Debtors’ capital structure, including who controlled a majority of the outstanding 2016 Term Loans. The uncertainty engendered by the Mistaken Payment caused the Company significant and unprecedented difficulty in negotiating with its creditors and
stakeholders to effectuate a restructuring.
8
|
Citibank ultimately filed three lawsuits against different Mistaken Payment Lenders. These suits were consolidated in In re Citibank August 11, 2020 Wire Transfers, Case No. 1:20-cv-06539-JMF (S.D.N.Y. 2021).
|
|
D. |
Prepetition Financing Efforts
|
Beginning in 2019, and continuing through shortly before the commencement of these Chapter 11 Cases, the Debtors explored and
implemented a variety of financing and other corporate transactions to address their capital structure.
In August 2019, RCPC entered into a senior secured term loan facility in an initial aggregate principal amount of $200 million
among certain affiliated funds, investment vehicles, or accounts managed or advised by Ares Management LLC, as lender, (the “2019 Term Loan Facility”), and Wilmington Trust,
National Association, as administrative and collateral agent. The net proceeds from the 2019 Term Loan Facility were used for general corporate purposes. The 2019 Term Loan Facility and the existing 2016 Term Loan Facility shared the same
guarantors and collateral, except that the 2019 Term Loan Facility was also secured by a first-priority lien on certain intellectual property associated with the American Crew brand (the “Additional
Collateral”) and was guaranteed by the entities established to hold such Additional Collateral.
On the BrandCo Facilities Closing Date, RCPC used a portion of the proceeds from the BrandCo Facilities to fully prepay the
entire amount outstanding under its 2019 Term Loan Facility.
|
2.
|
2020 Refinancing Efforts
|
Beginning in late 2019, Revlon began to seek additional financing to refinance outstanding unsecured notes (as well as the 2019
Term Loan Facility) and avoid a possible springing maturity on certain of Revlon’s senior secured indebtedness. Revlon’s need for additional financing became more acute in the Spring of 2020 as the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic began to negatively
impact its business.
|
a.
|
The BrandCo Facilities and UMB Bank Litigation
|
As noted, in early 2020 the Company faced a significant risk related to the upcoming maturity on its 5.75% Senior Notes due 2021
pursuant to that certain Indenture, dated as of February 13, 2013, among RCPC, as issuer, the guarantors party thereto, and the Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee (the “2021 Unsecured
Notes”), which, if left outstanding on November 15, 2020, could have caused the maturities of the Debtors’ other funded debt, including the ABL Facility, 2016 Term Loan Facility, and Foreign ABTL Facility to “spring” forward to that
same date. These potential debt maturities created a substantial risk that the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019, to be issued in March 12, 2020, would include a qualification from the Company’s
auditor as to the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern. This qualification would have resulted in an event of default under the 2016 Term Loan Facility and the ABL Facility, and cross-defaults across the Company’s capital structure.
To address this issue, the Company entered into negotiations with (i) Jefferies to syndicate sufficient financing to refinance
the 2021 Unsecured Notes and (ii) an ad hoc group of lenders under the 2016 Term Loan Facility (the “Initial Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders”) regarding a potential refinancing
of the 2016 Term Loans and the provision of additional financing to refinance the 2021 Unsecured Notes.
On February 13, 2020, the Initial Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders made a financing proposal to the Debtors that included many of the
features of the BrandCo Facilities, including a new money facility secured by an exclusive first lien on the BrandCo Collateral, as well as pari passu liens on
the remainder of the collateral securing the 2016 Term Loans. The proposal also included a refinancing of the 2016 Term Loans held by the members of the Initial Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders.
On March 9, 2020, as the deadline for filing the Company’s annual financial statements approached and prior to consummating a
transaction with the Initial Ad Hoc Group, the Debtors entered into a commitment letter (the “Jefferies Commitment Letter”) with Jefferies, pursuant to which Jefferies
committed to provide senior secured term loan facilities in an aggregate principal amount of up to $850 million (the “Jefferies Facilities”). The proceeds of the Jefferies
Facilities were expected to be used: (i) to repay in full indebtedness outstanding under the 2021 Unsecured Notes and the 2019 Term Loan Facility (the “Jefferies Refinancing”);
(ii) to pay fees and expenses in connection with the Jefferies Facilities and the Jefferies Refinancing; and (iii) to the extent of any excess, for general corporate purposes.
With the risk of a going concern qualification in its 2020 financial statements addressed by the Jefferies Commitment Letter, the
Company continued negotiations with the Initial Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders. However, in mid-March of 2020, the emerging COVID-19 pandemic began to affect the Debtors’ operations and the broader economy, and several members of the Initial Ad Hoc
Group of 2016 Lenders (the “Objecting Lenders”) left the group and entered into a lock-up agreement to block any transaction proposed by the remaining members of the Initial
Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders (the “Supporting Lenders”).
On April 14, 2020, the Company entered into a financing commitment letter with the Supporting Lenders to provide the BrandCo
Facilities. All 2016 Term Loan Lenders were offered the opportunity to participate in the financing based on their holdings of 2016 Term Loans. However, the Objecting Lenders refused to participate in the financing and continued their efforts to
block any transaction.
By April 23, 2020, the effects of the pandemic were placing great stress on the Company’s business. With the prospects for a new
money financing transaction uncertain and limited availability under the ABL Facility, the Company entered into a new $65 million incremental revolving facility under the 2016 Term Loan Facility (the “2016 Incremental Revolver”) provided by the Supporting Lenders to give the Company immediate access to incremental liquidity.
On May 1, 2020, the Supporting Lenders—who then held the majority of loans outstanding under the 2016 Term Loan Facility—and the
Company agreed to the terms of the BrandCo Facilities, and on May 7, 2020, the BrandCo Facilities closed. As described in Article III above, the BrandCo Facilities involved three new secured loan facilities: (i) the First Lien BrandCo Facility used
to retire the 2019 Term Loan Facility and, subsequently, the 2016 Incremental Revolver, and to cancel a portion of the Company’s outstanding 2021 Unsecured Notes, and for general corporate purposes (including funding operations during the pandemic);
(ii) the Second Lien BrandCo Facility, consisting of roll-up loans issued to participants in the new money financing in exchange for an equivalent amount of 2016 Term Loans, and which effectively gave Revlon a two-year extension of the maturity of
those loans; and (iii) the Third Lien BrandCo Facility for lenders that did not provide new money loans but consented to the amendment of the 2016 Credit Agreement.
To establish the BrandCo Facilities, the Debtors exercised their rights under the 2016 Credit Agreement, with the approval of the
then-Required Lenders (as defined in the 2016 Credit Agreement), to transfer the Specified Brands from the Debtors obligated on the 2016 Term Loan Facility to the BrandCo Entities. The BrandCo Entities then pledged their assets, including the
Specified Brands, as collateral solely securing the BrandCo Facilities.
The Objecting Lenders, purporting to represent the “Required Lenders” (as defined in the 2016 Credit Agreement) sought to replace
Citibank with a successor agent, claiming Citibank disregarded its duties as the lenders’ agent in connection with the closing of the BrandCo Facilities, and on June 19, 2020, UMB Bank, National Association (“UMB Bank”) was appointed as the purported successor agent under the 2016 Credit Agreement.
On August 12, 2020, UMB, purporting to act in its alleged capacity as successor administrative agent to Citibank under the 2016
Credit Agreement, acting at the direction of the Objecting Lenders that purported to represent “Required Lenders” under the 2016 Credit Agreement, prior to the closing of the BrandCo Facilities, filed a complaint in the Southern District of New York
against Revlon, Citibank, Jefferies, the BrandCo Lenders, and others, alleging, among other things, that transactions giving rise to the BrandCo Facilities had breached the 2016 Credit Agreement and fraudulently transferred assets to the BrandCo
Entities. The Company and other defendants disputed those claims, but they were never adjudicated because UMB Bank, acting at the direction of certain of the Objecting Lenders, withdrew that complaint on November 9, 2020, without ever serving any of
the defendants, purportedly because Citibank had mistakenly repaid the subject Objecting Lenders in full.
|
b.
|
The Exchange Transactions
|
In the summer of 2020 and following the closing of the BrandCo Facilities, the Debtors considered possible out-of-court exchange
transactions and open market purchase transactions relating to the 2021 Unsecured Notes. The Debtors launched an exchange offer for the 2021 Unsecured Notes in late July 2020 that was not successful and was allowed to expire on September 14, 2020.
During this time, the Debtors and their advisors engaged with an ad hoc group of BrandCo Lenders (the “Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders”) regarding, among other things, the
terms of an exchange offer for the 2021 Unsecured Notes. As a result, the Debtors and certain of the BrandCo Lenders entered into that certain Transaction Support Agreement, dated September 28, 2020 (the “TSA”), pursuant to which the TSA parties thereto agreed to support an exchange of the 2021 Unsecured Notes for (i) cash, (ii) up to $75 million of newly issued 2020 Term B-2 Loans, and (iii) up to $50 million of
FILO ABL Term Loans, among other things. Additionally, the TSA contained a closing condition that the Debtors maintain not less than $175 million of liquidity, after reducing available liquidity by the aggregate principal amount of 2021 Unsecured
Notes that would remain outstanding after the contemplated exchange.
On September 29, 2020, the Company commenced a second exchange offer for the 2021 Unsecured Notes (the “Second Exchange Offer”). On October 23, 2020, after extensive engagement with certain holders of the 2021 Unsecured Notes, the Company amended the Second Exchange Offer to incentivize holders of
the 2021 Unsecured Notes to participate. Pursuant to the amended Second Exchange Offer, for each $1,000 principal amount of 2021 Unsecured Notes, each noteholder was offered, at
its option, (i) an aggregate amount of $325 in cash or (ii) a combination of (1) an aggregate amount of $250 in cash, plus (2) such tendering noteholder’s
share of $50 million of FILO ABL Term Loans and $75 million of 2020 Term B-2 Loans. Upon the expiration of the Second Exchange Offer on November 10, 2020, approximately 68.8%, or $236 million, of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the
2021 Unsecured Notes were validly tendered and not withdrawn.
RCPC then (i) cancelled the tendered 2021 Unsecured Notes accepted for exchange, (ii) irrevocably instructed the trustee under
the 2021 Unsecured Notes indenture to redeem on November 13, 2020 (the “Redemption Date”), the remaining $106.8 million of 2021 Unsecured Notes at a cash purchase price
equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus interest accrued to, but not including, the Redemption Date, and (iii) irrevocably deposited a total of
approximately $108.8 million of cash with the trustee under the 2021 Unsecured Notes indenture to effect such redemption. As a result, the 2021 Unsecured Notes were discharged in full, effective on November 13, 2020.
|
3.
|
Helen of Troy License Agreement
|
On December 22, 2020, certain of the Company’s subsidiaries and Helen of Troy Limited (“Helen of Troy”) entered into a Trademark License Agreement (the “HOT License Agreement”) to combine and revise the existing
licenses that were in place between the parties. The HOT License Agreement granted Helen of Troy the exclusive right to use the “Revlon” brand in connection with the manufacture, display, advertising, promotion, labeling, sale, marketing, and
distribution of certain hair and grooming products until December 31, 2060 (with three additional 20-year automatic renewal periods), in exchange for a one-time, upfront cash payment of $72.5 million.
|
4.
|
March 2021 Refinancing Efforts
|
During March 2021, the Company extended one, and refinanced another, of its then-maturing debt facilities. First, on March 2,
2021, the Company refinanced its prior foreign ABTL facility, with the new Foreign ABTL Facility funded by Blue Torch, as the collateral agent, administrative agent, and lender. The refinancing upsized the Foreign ABTL Facility from $50 million to
$75 million and extended the maturity from July 2021 to March 2, 2024. The proceeds of the transaction were used for the refinancing and to fund the Company’s ongoing liquidity needs.
Second, on March 8, 2021, Debtor RCPC entered into Amendment No. 7 to the ABL Facility (“Amendment No. 7”). Amendment No. 7, among other things, (i) extended the maturity date applicable to the ABL Tranche A Revolving Loans under the ABL Facility from September 7, 2021, to June 8, 2023, (ii)
reduced the commitments under the ABL Tranche A Revolving Loans from $400 million to $300 million, and (iii) established the SISO Term Loans in the original principal amount of $100 million.
|
5.
|
Further Amendment of ABL Facility
|
On May 7, 2021, RCPC entered into Amendment No. 8 to the ABL Facility (“Amendment No. 8”). Under Amendment No. 8, among other things: (i) the maturity date applicable to the ABL Tranche A Revolving Loans and SISO Term Loans was extended from June 8, 2023, to May 7, 2024, subject to a springing
maturity to the earlier of: (x) 91 days prior to the maturity of the 2016 Term Loans on September 7, 2023, to the extent such term loans are then outstanding, and (y) the earliest stated maturity of the FILO ABL Term Loans, to the extent such term
loans are then outstanding; (ii) the commitments under the ABL Tranche A Revolving Loans were reduced from $300 million to $270 million; and (iii) the commitments under the SISO Term Loans were upsized from $100 million to $130 million. At the same
time, the Company also entered into a successor agent appointment and agency transfer agreement pursuant to which MidCap succeeded Citibank as the collateral agent and administrative agent for the ABL Facility.
|
6.
|
Increase of Borrowing Base under the ABL Facility and Foreign ABTL Facility
|
On March 30, 2022, the Foreign ABTL Borrower entered into a first amendment to the Foreign ABTL Credit Agreement with Blue Torch
to temporarily increase the borrowing base thereunder by $7 million for one year.
On March 31, 2022, RCPC entered into Amendment No. 9 (“Amendment
No. 9”) to the ABL Facility. Amendment No. 9, among other things, temporarily increased the ABL Facility borrowing base by up to $25 million until the earlier of (i) September 29, 2022, and (ii) the occurrence of an event of default
or payment default. During this period, Amendment No. 9 also established a reserve against availability under the ABL Facility in the amount of $10 million until June 29, 2022, and $15 million thereafter (resulting in a net liquidity increase of $15
million until June 29, 2022, and $10 million thereafter until the end of the amendment period).
|
7.
|
At the Market Public Equity Offering
|
On April 25, 2022, Holdings entered into an equity distribution agreement with Jefferies LLC, as sales agent, pursuant to which
Holdings could have offered and sold shares of common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $25 million through Jefferies LLC (the “ATM Program”). Holdings
filed a prospectus supplement with the SEC in connection with the ATM Program on April 25, 2022. As a result of quickly changing market conditions and related issues affecting the Company during this period that are described herein, Holdings did
not sell any shares under the ATM Program.
The Company has engaged in substantial cost-cutting measures since 2018, when it first implemented an optimization program
designed to streamline the Company’s operations, reporting structures, and business processes, with the objective of maximizing productivity and improving profitability, cash flows, and liquidity. Beginning in March 2020, the Company had to adjust
its optimization efforts due to the COVID-19 related liquidity strain on the Company. As a result, it began to focus on, among other things: (i) reducing brand support (commercial spend on licensed products) in response to an abrupt decline in
retail store traffic; (ii) monitoring the Company’s sales and order flow and periodically scaling down operations and cancelling promotional programs in response to reduced demand; (iii) closely managing cash flow and liquidity and prioritizing cash
to minimize COVID-19’s impact on the Company’s production capabilities; and (iv) pursuing various organizational measures designed to reduce costs with respect to employee compensation.
When the first wave of COVID-19 impacts dissipated, the Company refocused on its ongoing restructuring program, the Revlon Global
Growth Accelerator (“RGGA”). The program was originally intended to continue through 2023, but was extended by an additional year in March 2022 to run through 2024. There
are three major initiatives under RGGA: (i) creating strategic growth, which includes boosting organic sales growth behind the Company’s strategic pillars of brands, markets, and channels; (ii) driving operating efficiencies and cost savings for
margin improvement and to fuel revenue growth; and (iii) enhancing capabilities of employees to promote transformational change. The RGGA achieved its cash target in 2021, and is projected to deliver further reductions in cost through 2024.
During the first quarter of 2022, the Company also implemented a mitigation plan that included reductions in commercial
investments, proactive management of pricing to address inflation, reduction of discretionary department head counts, and targeted reductions in capital spend. This program, too, was intended to help provide the Company with sufficient liquidity to
bridge through COVID-19 impacts.
|
F. |
Market Conditions and Industry Headwinds
|
Despite all of the Company’s efforts to manage its financial position and liquidity, in the months leading up to the Chapter 11
Cases, the Company’s operations were negatively impacted in several key ways.
First and foremost, global supply chain disruptions significantly challenged the Company’s ability to manufacture products and
bring them to market. The Company’s supply chain is complex, not least because the Company produces and sells over 8,000 stock keeping units. Many of the Company’s cosmetics products require between 35 to 40 different ingredients and components to
manufacture, and a failure to secure any one of those components will prevent manufacturing and distribution for the entire product. For example, one tube of Revlon lipstick requires 35 to 40 raw materials and component parts, each of which is
critical to bringing the product to market. With shortages of necessary ingredients across the Company’s portfolio, competition for any available materials is steep. Because many of the Company’s competitors had more cash on hand, they had been
able to build more inventory in advance, invest in stocking up on components and raw materials, provide cash in advance, or pay a premium where needed to secure additional supplies. The Company’s liquidity challenges had caused it to fall behind on
vendor payments, resulting in some of their vendors refusing to ship supplies on credit beginning around Spring 2022 and requiring cash in advance and/or prepayment on future orders before shipping any goods. Both increased prepayments and increased
credit holds put immense pressure on the Company’s cash and liquidity position. In previous years, vendors typically would have worked with the Company on payment plans or ways to avoid credit holds, but competition for components and raw materials
was so fierce in the period leading up to the Petition Date that suppliers were easily finding alternative purchasers. Even in instances where the Company had a valid purchase order with a vendor, many vendors had decommitted and declined to fill
the order when presented with a higher or better offer by a third party. This forced the Company to buy materials on the spot market, where costs were significantly higher. These supply chain issues also increased lead times for the Company to
bring its products to market. Ultimately, the Company spent money on supplies that it could not convert into saleable goods because it lacked the additional ingredients needed to manufacture a given product.
Second, shipping, freight, and logistics issues also delayed the Company’s ability to bring products to market, and imposed
additional costs on the Company. Many of the Company’s raw materials are sourced from China, as the Company has over 40 suppliers in the country providing approximately 1,200 items (components, raw materials, and finished goods). Since the onset of
the COVID-19 pandemic, China has followed a “zero-COVID” policy, which imposes lockdowns in areas where even a handful of COVID cases are detected. These lockdowns often shut down manufacturing capabilities and restrict transportation in and from
the affected areas, which creates strain on the Company’s supply chain, especially because the timing and length of these lockdowns cannot be predicted in advance. The transportation freeze led to both truck shortages and, at times, the closure of
entire ports. Not only did lockdowns sometimes prevent the Company from obtaining timely goods at all, but when they were able to obtain substitute goods, they were often forced to pay higher prices. All of this also increased costs for shipping,
given the decrease in supply as a result of the lockdowns. For example, in 2019, the Company paid approximately $2,000 per container to get freight out of China and products would typically ship from China to the United States in four to six weeks.
As of the Petition Date, the Company was paying approximately $8,000 per container and shipments to the United States were taking twice as long.
In addition to the effects described above, the Company’s inability to convert raw materials into finished goods drastically
reduced the Company’s ability to borrow under the ABL Facility. The borrowing base under that facility was calculated based on specified “advance rates” against the liquidation value of, among other things, certain eligible inventory (including,
among other things, raw materials, work-in-process inventory, and finished goods) and accounts receivable. Advance rates with respect to certain borrowing base assets are lower in the earlier stages of the production cycle—raw materials have a lower
advance rate than work-in-process inventory, which have a lower advance rate than finished goods, which have a lower advance rate than the receivables generated when such finished goods are sold. Therefore, the earlier in the production cycle the
Company experienced delays, the lower the advance rates the Company was able to obtain on its borrowing base assets.
Third, labor shortages and rising labor costs globally affected the Company, both in its manufacturing and transportation of
goods. Suppliers were working with smaller labor forces; the trucking industry was also suffering a decline in available drivers—both of which resulted in increased costs, delays, and difficulties obtaining products. The Company also was dealing
with these issues internally, as it sought to maintain a sufficient workforce in the face of low unemployment rates and significantly rising wages.
Fourth, inflation was rising at such a pace that the Company had difficulties passing its increased costs onto customers. Due to
market standards and contractual provisions with retailers, within the U.S. market the Company could increase prices only about one to two times in a given calendar year. Within the international market, however, the Company could typically only
increase prices once at the beginning of the year—if prices were not raised at the outset, it was nearly impossible for the Company to do so later. Therefore,
the Company had only been able to increase prices by approximately 3% to 4% in the U.S. market and an average of approximately 1% in the international markets.
The cumulative result of these challenges was that the Company was unable to deliver sufficient quantities of goods to its key
retail customers; the Company was unable to procure supplies it needed, it could not deliver in-demand products to customers, and it faced its customers replacing it with competitors due to its inability to meet “on-time, in full” deliveries of its
products, just as the Company was beginning to prepare for the critical holiday sales period. This state of affairs was unsustainable.
|
G. |
Preparation for Commencement of Chapter 11 Proceedings
|
In the midst of the significant liquidity and operational issues facing its business, the Company had to determine whether to use
its dwindling liquidity to make upcoming interest payments of approximately $11 million on is 2016 Term Loan Facility and approximately $38 million on the BrandCo Facilities. Beginning in May 2022, the Company engaged Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton
& Garrison LLP (“Paul, Weiss”), its existing counsel on various corporate and litigation matters, and PJT Partners LP (“PJT”), as its investment banker, to evaluate certain in- and out-of-court financing transactions, as well as extensive contingency planning, including the preparation and prosecution of these Chapter 11 Cases. In
May and June 2022, the Company and its advisors engaged with the BrandCo Lenders, ABL Lenders, 2016 Term Loan Lenders, and holders of Unsecured Notes and their advisors, in constructive formal and informal discussions. During these discussions, the
Company responded to multiple rounds of high-priority diligence requests on an expedited timeline and proposed financings and transaction structures to bridge its liquidity needs out of court. However, a significant number of the Company’s lenders
were not willing to pursue any such transactions out of court. The Company then pivoted to preparation for an in-court restructuring, with debtor-in-possession financing to be provided by the BrandCo Lenders and ABL Lenders.
As the Debtors’ focus turned toward an in-court restructuring, the boards of directors of Holdings and RCPC determined that it
was in the Debtors’ best interests to make several governance changes throughout the Company, each of which were approved and implemented on June 15, 2022: (i) appointment of Robert M. Caruso as the Chief Restructuring Officer to each of the to-be
Debtors to assist with the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases and to provide management services; (ii) appointment to the Board of Mr. D.J. (Jan) Baker as an independent and disinterested director with significant restructuring experience; (iii)
formation of the Restructuring Committee; (iv) formation of the Conflicts Committee; (v) formation of the Investigation Committee; and (vi) appointment of Steve Panagos as the independent Restructuring Officer of each of the BrandCo Entities.9
Ultimately, with the goal of maximizing value for the benefit of all stakeholders, the Debtors elected to commence these Chapter
11 Cases on June 15 and June 16, 2022, to obtain funding for operations, stabilize their businesses, conserve and manage liquidity, and effect a comprehensive, value-maximizing restructuring.
V. |
EVENTS DURING CHAPTER 11 CASES
|
The Debtors have been, and intend to continue, operating their businesses in the ordinary course during the Chapter 11 Cases as
they had been prior to the Petition Date, subject to the supervision of the Bankruptcy Court.
|
A. |
Commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases
|
The Debtors filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on June 15, 2022, i.e., the Petition Date. The filing of the petitions commenced the Chapter 11 Cases, at which time the Debtors were afforded the benefits, and became subject to
the limitations of the Bankruptcy Code. Since the Petition Date, the Debtors have continued to operate their businesses as debtors-in-possession pursuant to sections 1107(a) and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code.
|
B. |
First and Second Day Operational Pleadings
|
Beginning on the Petition Date, the Debtors filed various motions and pleadings with the Bankruptcy Court in the form of “first
day” pleadings to facilitate the Debtors’ smooth transition into chapter 11.
On June 16 and 17, 2022 (the “First Day Hearings”),
and July 22, 2022 (the “Second Day Hearing”), the Bankruptcy Court held hearings to consider the first day pleadings on an interim and final basis, respectively. On July 28
and 29 and August 1, 2022, the Bankruptcy Court held a hearing to consider the request for DIP Financing on a final basis (the “Final DIP Hearing”). The operational first
day relief sought by the Debtors and approved by the Bankruptcy Court is summarized below.
1. DIP Financing. The Debtors filed a motion (the “DIP Motion”) [Docket No. 28] with the Bankruptcy
Court to obtain authorization for the Debtors, among other things, to enter into postpetition financing (the Term DIP Facility, ABL DIP Facility, and Intercompany DIP Facility (collectively, the “DIP Facilities”)), to use their prepetition secured lenders’ cash collateral, and to provide adequate protection to those lenders. At the First Day Hearings, the Debtors obtained access to over $375 million of
postpetition debtor-in-possession financing on an emergency interim [Docket No. 70] basis. At the Final DIP Hearing, the Bankruptcy Court approved the DIP Motion on a final [Docket No. 330] basis (the “Final DIP Order”), providing approximately $1 billion of postpetition financing to the Debtors. These funds were deployed to quickly stabilize the Debtors’ businesses, including by beginning the long, ongoing
process of restarting their supply chain through vendor negotiations. Among other critical uses, these funds were also used to refinance the Debtors’ Foreign ABTL Facility and allowed the Debtors to fund the administrative costs of these Chapter 11
Cases. The refinancing of the Foreign ABTL Facility, and the negotiated forbearance that preceded it, enabled the Debtors to maintain the substantial value of their non-debtor foreign affiliates by avoiding local law liquidation processes that may
have been triggered by an event of default and acceleration of that loan. Over the course of the next month, the Debtors engaged with their stakeholders, including the Creditors’ Committee, to negotiate and then litigate the Final DIP Order.
9 |
On January 12, 2023, Mr. Aronzon was elected as a Director of the Board, effective immediately,
and appointed as a member of the Restructuring Committee and as an alternate member of the Investigation Committee. On February 17, 2023, Mr. Baker notified Holdings of his resignation from the Board, effective immediately. Upon
effectiveness of Mr. Baker’s resignation, Mr. Aronzon became the sole member of the Investigation Committee.
|
Under the Final DIP Order, the Debtors provide certain forms of adequate protection to certain of their prepetition secured
lenders, including, among other things, (i) operation within a specified budget (subject to certain permitted variances); (ii) compliance with financial reporting requirements; (iii) provision of adequate protection liens; (iv) superpriority
administrative claims under section 507(b) of the Bankruptcy Code; (v) adequate protection payments equal to cash interest accrued since the last prepetition interest payment; (vi) payment of certain professional fees and expenses; and (vii)
completion of the case within certain milestones.
2. Cash Management. The Debtors filed a motion to enable them to continue using their existing cash management system and existing bank accounts (the “Cash Management Motion”) [Docket No. 7]. To lessen the impact of the Chapter 11 Cases on the Debtors’ businesses, it was vital that the Debtors keep their cash management
system in place and be authorized to pay related fees. At the First Day Hearing and, after the Debtors filed a certificate of no objection prior to the Second Day Hearing, the Bankruptcy Court approved the Cash Management Motion on an interim
[Docket No. 74] and final [Docket No. 266] basis, respectively.
3. Vendors. The Debtors filed a motion seeking authority to pay certain prepetition amounts owing to certain critical vendors, including domestic and foreign vendors, import
claimant vendors, lien claimant vendors, creditors of Elizabeth Arden (UK) Ltd., and section 503(b)(9) creditors (the “Vendors Motion”) [Docket No. 9]. At the First Day
Hearing and after the Debtors filed a certificate of no objection prior to the Second Day Hearing, the Bankruptcy Court approved the Vendors Motion on an interim [Docket No. 68] and final [Docket No. 263] (the “Final Vendors Order”) basis, respectively. Pursuant to the Final Vendors Order, the Debtors were authorized to pay prepetition claims of critical trade creditors up to an aggregate amount of $79.4 million. As
of November 25, 2022, the Debtors have paid their vendors approximately $69.3 million pursuant to the Final Vendors Order.
4. Customer Programs. The Debtors filed a motion seeking authority to continue to honor certain customer programs in the ordinary course after the Petition Date and to pay certain
prepetition amounts in connection therewith (the “Customer Programs Motion”) [Docket No. 13]. At the First Day Hearing and after the Debtors filed a certificate of no
objection prior to the Second Day Hearing, the Bankruptcy Court approved the Customer Programs Motion on an interim [Docket No. 81] and final [Docket No. 260] basis, respectively.
5. Wages. The Debtors filed a motion seeking authority to pay or otherwise honor certain employee wages and benefits, subject to certain limitations (the “Wages Motion”) [Docket No. 8]. At the First Day Hearing and after the Debtors filed a certificate of no objection prior to the Second Day Hearing, the Bankruptcy Court approved
the Wage Motion on an interim [Docket No. 69] and final [Docket No. 276] basis, respectively.
6. Taxes. The Debtors filed a motion seeking authority to pay all prepetition taxes and related fees, including all taxes and fees subsequently determined upon audit, or otherwise,
to be owed for periods prior to the Petition Date (the “Taxes Motion”) [Docket No. 10]. At the First Day Hearing and after the Debtors filed a certificate of no objection
prior to the Second Day Hearing, the Bankruptcy Court approved the Taxes Motion on an interim [Docket No. 77] and final [Docket No. 264] basis, respectively.
7. Insurance. The Debtors filed a motion seeking authority to continue their existing insurance policies on an uninterrupted basis during the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases and
to pay all amounts arising thereunder or in connection therewith (the “Insurance Motion”) [Docket No. 12]. At the First Day Hearing and after the Debtors filed a
certificate of no objection prior to the Second Day Hearing, the Bankruptcy Court approved the Insurance Motion on an interim [Docket No. 78] and final [Docket No. 261] basis, respectively.
8. Surety
Bonds. The Debtors filed a motion seeking authority to continue providing and renewing their surety bonds on an uninterrupted basis during the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases and to pay all amounts arising thereunder or in connection
therewith (the “Surety Bonds Motion”) [Docket No. 14]. At the First Day Hearing and after the Debtors filed a certificate of no objection prior to the Second Day Hearing,
the Bankruptcy Court approved the Surety Bonds Motion on an interim [Docket No. 80] and final [Docket No. 262] basis, respectively.
Prior to the Petition Date, CNA Surety and its subsidiaries and affiliates, including, but not limited to, Continental Casualty
Company, American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, The Continental Insurance Company, Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, Western Surety Company, and/or Firemen's Insurance
Company of Newark, New Jersey, and their successors and assigns, and any person or company joining with any of them in executing any Bond at its request (collectively, “CNA”)
issued certain surety bonds on behalf of certain of the Debtors (collectively, the “CNA Bonds” and, each individually, a “CNA Bond”). The CNA Bonds were issued pursuant to certain existing indemnity agreements, and/or other related agreements by and between CNA, on the one hand, and certain of the Debtors, their affiliates, and/or
certain non-Debtors, as applicable (the “CNA Bond Principals”), on the other hand (collectively, the “CNA
Indemnity Agreements”). The Debtors and CNA have been in discussions regarding the post-Effective Date treatment of the CNA Bonds, the CNA Indemnity Agreements, CNA’s collateral, and related matters, including, but not limited to, the
potential replacement by a different surety of the CNA Bonds or the assumption of the CNA Bonds. CNA, the Debtors, the CNA Bond Principals, and all parties-in-interest expressly reserve all rights, remedies, and defenses regarding the treatment of
the CNA Bonds, the CNA Indemnity Agreements, and related matters, which issues may be addressed as part of the Plan confirmation process. Additionally, nothing in this paragraph or the actions described herein constitutes an admission by the Debtors
that any CNA Bonds or CNA Indemnity Agreements are executory or the validity of any Claim (if any) thereunder.
9. Utilities. The Debtors filed a motion seeking the entry of an order (i) prohibiting certain utility companies from altering, refusing, or discontinuing utility services on
account of prepetition invoices, (ii) determining that the Debtors have provided each utility company with “adequate assurance of payment,” and (iii) establishing procedures for the determination of additional Adequate Assurance (as defined therein)
and authorizing the Debtors to provide such Adequate Assurance (the “Utilities Motion”) [Docket No. 11]. At the First Day Hearing and after the Debtors filed a certificate
of no objection prior to the Second Day Hearing, the Bankruptcy Court approved the Utilities Motion on an interim [Docket No. 85] and final [Docket No. 265] basis, respectively.
10. NOL Motion. The Debtors filed a motion seeking to establish certain procedures to govern the trading in (and the ability to take worthless stock deductions with respect
to) the Debtors’ existing common stock to and, if certain conditions are met, certain Claims preserve the Debtors’ tax attributes, including net operating losses (the “NOL Motion”)
[Docket No. 32]. At the First Day Hearing and at the Second Day Hearing, the Bankruptcy Court approved the NOL Motion on an interim [Docket No. 82] and final [Docket No. 324] basis, respectively.
11. Foreign Representative Motion. The Debtors filed a motion seeking to allow Holdings to act as the foreign representative of the Debtors in the recognition proceeding
commenced in Canada pursuant to the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36 (as amended, the “CCAA”) (the “Foreign Representative Motion”) [Docket No. 15]. At the First Day Hearing, the Bankruptcy Court approved the Foreign Representative Motion [Docket No. 73].
|
C. |
Canadian Recognition Proceeding
|
On June 20, 2022, these Chapter 11 Cases were recognized in Canada in a proceeding commenced before the Ontario Superior Court of
Justice (Commercial List) (the “Canadian Court”) pursuant to the CCAA (the “Canadian Recognition Proceeding”).
Recognition of the Chapter 11 Cases was sought to provide for a stay of proceedings against the Debtors in Canada, to keep Canadian creditors informed regarding the Chapter 11 Cases, and to seek to bind Canadian creditors to orders issued in the
Chapter 11 Cases for which recognition is sought in Canada.
The orders issued by the Canadian Court on June 20, 2022, August 24, 2022, and September 21, 2022, among other things: (i)
recognized the Chapter 11 Cases as “foreign main proceedings” under the CCAA; (ii) stayed all existing proceedings against the Debtors in Canada; (iii) appointed KSV Restructuring Inc., as information officer, to report to the Canadian Court,
creditors, and other stakeholders in Canada on the status of the Chapter 11 Cases; (iv) recognized certain interim and finals orders entered by the Bankruptcy Court permitting the Debtors to, among other things, continue operating their respective
businesses during the course of the Chapter 11 Cases, obtain postpetition financing, and employ certain professionals; (v) recognized the Bankruptcy Court’s order approving the Debtors’ key employee retention plan; and (vi) recognized the Bankruptcy
Court’s order establishing the Claims Bar Date and Governmental Bar Date (each as defined below).
Should the Plan be confirmed, and the Confirmation Order entered by the Bankruptcy Court, the Debtors intend to seek an order
from the Canadian Court in the Canadian Recognition Proceeding recognizing the Confirmation Order in Canada.
|
D. |
Milestones for Chapter 11 Cases
|
The DIP Credit Agreements (as modified by the Final DIP Order and as amended on November 13, 2022) and the Restructuring Support
Agreement include certain milestones that relate to the occurrence of key events in the Chapter 11 Cases. Although the Debtors will request that the Bankruptcy Court grant the relief described below by the applicable dates, there can be no assurance
that the Bankruptcy Court will grant such relief, or will grant such relief by the timeline required by the milestones. Other than as noted below, the failure to meet the milestones described below will result in a default under the DIP Credit
Agreements and the Restructuring Support Agreement, unless altered or waived by the DIP Lenders or the Consenting BrandCo Lenders, as applicable.
#
|
Milestone
|
Applicable Date
|
1
|
Debtors commence Chapter 11 Cases
|
June 15, 2022
(Milestone met)
|
2
|
Debtors file a motion seeking interim approval of the DIP Facilities
|
June 16, 2022
(Milestone met)
|
3
|
The Bankruptcy Court approves the DIP Facilities on an interim basis
|
June 17, 2022
(Milestone met)
|
4
|
The Bankruptcy Court approves the DIP Facilities on a final basis
|
August 2, 2022
(Milestone met)
|
5
|
The Debtors enter into a Restructuring Support Agreement
|
December 19, 2022
(Milestone extended from November 15, 2022; extended milestone met)
|
6
|
The Debtors file a Plan and Disclosure Statement10
|
February 21, 2023
|
7
|
The Bankruptcy Court enters the Disclosure Statement Order
|
February 22, 2023
(Milestone extended from February 14, 2023)
|
10
|
The initial Restructuring Support Agreement included a December 14, 2022 milestone for filing the Plan and Disclosure Statement. This
milestone was extended to December 23, 2022 and met. The amended and restated Restructuring Support Agreement includes a February 21, 2023 milestone for filing an amended Plan and amended Disclosure Statement.
|
#
|
Milestone
|
Applicable Date
|
8
|
The Bankruptcy Court enters the Backstop Order11
|
February 22, 2023
(Milestone extended from February 14, 2023)
|
9
|
The Debtors commence the solicitation of votes to accept or reject the Plan
|
February 27, 2023
(Milestone extended from February 20, 2023)
|
10
|
The Bankruptcy Court enters a Confirmation Order
|
April 4, 2023
|
11
|
The Effective Date of a Plan has occurred
|
April 18, 2023
|
|
E. |
Procedural and Administrative Motions
|
To facilitate the smooth administration of the Chapter 11 Cases, the Debtors sought, and the Bankruptcy Court granted, the
following procedural and administrative orders at the First Day Hearings:
|
• |
Order (A) Directing Joint Administration of Chapter 11 Cases and (B) Granting
Related Relief dated June 16, 2022 [Docket No. 51];
|
|
• |
Order (I) Authorizing and Approving the Appointment of Kroll Restructuring
Administration, LLC as Claims and Noticing Agent to the Debtors and (II) Granting Related Relief dated June 17, 2022 [Docket No. 66];
|
|
• |
Order (I) Extending Time to File Schedules of Assets and Liabilities,
Schedules of Current Income and Expenditures, Schedules of Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases, Statements of Financial Affairs, and Rule 2015.3 Financial Reports, and (II) Granting Related Relief dated June 17, 2022 [Docket No.
83];
|
|
• |
Order (I) Authorizing the Debtors to (A) Prepare a List of Creditors in Lieu
of Submitting a Formatted Mailing Matrix and (B) File a Consolidated List of the Debtors’ 50 Largest Unsecured Creditors, (II) Authorizing the Debtors to Redact Certain Personal Identification Information for Individual Creditors, (III)
Approving the Form and Manner of Notifying Creditors of Commencement of these Chapter 11 Cases, and (IV) Granting Related Relief dated June 17, 2022 [Docket No. 75]; and
|
11 |
Entry into the Backstop Order is a milestone only under the Restructuring Support Agreement and not under the DIP Credit Agreements.
|
|
• |
Order (A) Establishing Certain Notice, Case Management, and Administrative
Procedures and (B) Granting Related Relief 12 [Docket No. 279].
|
Additionally, during the course of these Chapter 11 Cases, the following administrative motions have been filed and granted by
the Court:
1. Ordinary Course Professionals. In the ordinary course of business, the Debtors employ
professionals to render a wide variety of counsel related to matters such as corporate counseling, litigation, compliance, tax and accounting matters, intellectual property, real estate, and other services for the Debtors in relation to issues that
have a direct and significant impact on the Debtors’ day-to-day operations. To maintain the uninterrupted functioning of the Debtors in these Chapter 11 Cases, it is essential that the Debtors continue the employment of these ordinary course
professionals. Accordingly, the Debtors filed a motion authorizing procedures for the retention and compensation of these ordinary course professionals and authorization to compensate such professionals without the need to file individual fee
applications [Docket No. 147], which the Court granted at the Second Day Hearing [Docket No. 277].
2. Retention Applications. The Debtors filed the following applications to retain certain professionals to facilitate the Debtors’ discharge of their duties as
debtors-in-possession under the Bankruptcy Code, all of which have been granted.
|
• |
Paul, Weiss as attorneys for the Debtors [Docket No. 253];
|
|
• |
PJT as the Debtors’ investment banker [Docket No. 248];
|
|
• |
Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC (“A&M”) to provide a Chief Restructuring
Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer, and Certain Additional Personnel [Docket Nos. 249, 753];
|
|
• |
Kroll Restructuring Administration, LLC, as administrative advisor to the Debtors [Docket No. 250];
|
|
• |
Petrillo Klein & Boxer, LLP (“Petrillo”), as special counsel to the Debtors’
investigation committee [Docket No. 251];
|
|
• |
Alan Gover (“Gover”), as special counsel to the Debtors’ investigation committee
[Docket No. 254];
|
12 |
As modified on July 25, 2022 by the Revised Order (A) Establishing Certain Notice, Case
Management, and Administrative Procedures and (B) Granting Related Relief [Docket No. 279] (such procedures, the “Case Management Procedures”).
|
|
• |
Teneo Capital LLC (“Teneo”), as financial advisor to the Debtors’ investigation
committee [Docket No. 526];
|
|
• |
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, as special counsel for international issues to the Debtors [Docket No. 527];
|
|
• |
MoloLamken LLP, as special litigation counsel and conflicts counsel for the Debtors [Docket No. 258];
|
|
• |
Kaplan Rice LLP, as special litigation counsel to the Debtors [Docket No. 1013];
|
|
• |
Ropes & Gray LLP, as special counsel to the BrandCo Entities [Docket No. 255];
|
|
• |
Huron Consulting Services LLC, as financial advisor to the BrandCo Entities [Docket No. 256];
|
|
• |
KPMG LLP , as auditor, tax compliance advisor, tax consultant, and advisor to the Debtors [Docket No. 252];
|
|
• |
KPMG LLP (UK), as auditor to the Debtors [Docket No. 525];
|
|
• |
Deloitte Tax LLP, as tax advisor to the Debtors [Docket No. 520];
|
|
• |
Deloitte LLP, as Canadian indirect tax compliance, indirect tax consultant, and advisor to the Debtors [Docket No. 521];
|
|
• |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, as accounting advisor to the Debtors [Docket No. 523]; and
|
|
• |
Kroll, LLC, as valuation advisor to the Debtors [Docket Nos. 519 & 1251].
|
3. Interim Compensation Procedures Order. The Debtors filed a motion to establish a process for the monthly allowance and payment of compensation and the reimbursement of expenses
for those professionals whose services are authorized by the Bankruptcy Court (the “Interim Compensation Procedures Motion”) [Docket No. 145]. The Bankruptcy Court granted
the Interim Compensation Procedures Motion after the Debtors filed a certificate of no objection prior to the Second Day Hearing [Docket No. 259].
4. De Minimis Procedures Order. The Debtors filed motions to establish a process for authorization of (i) the sale of de minimis assets, (ii) the abandonment of de minimis assets,
and (iii) the settlement of de minimis claims (the “De Minimis Procedures Motions”) [Docket Nos. 338, 339]. The Bankruptcy Court granted the De Minimis Procedures Motions
after the Debtors filed a certificate of no objection [Docket Nos. 517, 518]. On October 4, 2022, the Debtors filed a Notice of Sale of Assets to Reed TMS
[Docket No. 773] with respect to the sale of fourteen (14) trailers owned by Debtor Beautyge U.S.A., Inc. located in Jacksonville, Florida. The parties signed a bill of sale on October 24, 2022, with a purchase price of $21,000.00, and the trailers
were removed from the Debtors’ property on October 30, 2022. On November 11, 2022, the Debtors filed a Notice of Sale of De Minimis Assets to Mayfair Acquisitions,
LLC [Docket No. 964] with respect to the sale of real property located at 2210 Melson Avenue, Jacksonville, Florida 32254, owned by Debtor Roux Laboratories, Inc. The sale is anticipated to close no later than March 2023, with a purchase
price of $13.75 million.
5. Bar Date Motion. The Debtors filed a motion to establish a bar date by which creditors must file claims (the “Bar
Date Motion”) [Docket No. 536]. The Bankruptcy Court approved the Bar Date Motion after the Debtors filed a certificate of no objection [Docket No. 536]. The Bar Date Motion established October 24, 2022 at 5:00 p.m., prevailing
Eastern Time (the “Claims Bar Date”) and December 12, 2022 at 5:00 p.m., prevailing Eastern Time (the “Governmental
Bar Date”), as the deadlines by which non-governmental claimants and governmental claimants, respectively, must file a proof of claim in these Chapter 11 Cases. In addition, with respect to any claims arising from the Debtors’
rejection of executory contracts and unexpired leases, the order established the later of (i) the Claims Bar Date or the Governmental Bar Date, as applicable, and (ii) 5:00 p.m. (prevailing Central Time) on the date that is 30 days following entry of
the order approving the Debtors’ rejection of the applicable executory contract or unexpired lease as the rejection damages bar date. As an accommodation to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the “PBGC”) for administrative convenience, each proof of claim filed by the PBGC on its own behalf or on behalf of Revlon’s pension plans under joint administration case number for these Chapter 11 Cases (Case No.
22-10760 (DSJ)) shall, at the time of its filing, be deemed to constitute the filing of such proof of claim in all of the cases jointly administered in these Chapter 11 Cases. As of the Claims Bar Date, approximately 5,400 proofs of claim have been
filed against the Debtors, and as of the Governmental Bar Date, approximately 300 additional proofs of claim have been filed against the Debtors.
6. Removal of Action Deadline Extension Motion. The Debtors filed a motion extending the period within which the Debtors may remove actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1452 and
Bankruptcy Rules 9006 and 9027 through and including the effective date of any plan of reorganization in these Chapter 11 Cases (the “Removal of Action Deadline Extension Motion”)
[Docket No. 699]. The Bankruptcy Court approved the Removal of Action Deadline Extension Motion after the Debtors filed a certificate of no objection [Docket No. 752].
7. Exclusivity Extension Motion. With the Debtors’ statutory exclusive 120- day period to file a chapter 11 plan set to expire on October 13, 2022, the Debtors filed a motion
requesting an order extending their exclusive right to file a chapter 11 plan by 125 days through and including February 15, 2023, and to solicit votes thereon by 125 days through and including April 17, 2023 [Docket No. 860]. However, after
negotiations with the Creditors’ Committee, the ad hoc group of certain Holders of 2016 Term Loan Claims (the “Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders”), and the Ad Hoc Group of
BrandCo Lenders, the Debtors agreed to modify their requested relief by seeking to extend each exclusive period to January 19, 2023, and filed a revised proposed order reflecting the amended request with the Bankruptcy Court reflecting the same
[Docket No. 920]. The Bankruptcy Court approved this modified proposed order, extending the deadlines for filing a chapter 11 plan and voting thereon to January 19, 2023, after the Debtors filed a certificate of no objection [Docket No. 924]. On
January 5, 2023, the Debtors filed a second motion requesting an order extending their exclusive rights to file a chapter 11 plan and solicit votes thereon by 110 days through and including May 9, 2023 [Docket No. 1287].
8. Lease Rejection Deadline Extension Motion. The Debtors filed a motion extending by 90 days the initial 210-day period after the Petition Date within which the Debtors
must assume or reject unexpired leases of nonresidential real property (the “Lease Rejection Deadline Extension Motion”) [Docket No. 861]. The Bankruptcy Court approved the
Lease Rejection Deadline Extension Motion, extending the deadline to April 11, 2023, after the Debtors filed a certificate of no objection [Docket No. 925].
9. Omnibus Claims Objection Procedures Motion. The Debtors filed a motion to establish omnibus claims objection procedures and satisfaction procedures (the “Omnibus Claims Objection Procedures Motion”) [Docket No. 1014]. The Bankruptcy Court approved the Omnibus Claims Objection Procedures Motion after the Debtors filed a
certificate of no objection [Docket No. 1117].
1. Key Employee Retention Plan Motion. The Debtors filed a motion seeking approval of a key employee
retention plan (the “Key Employee Retention Plan Motion”) [Docket No. 116]. After the Second Day Hearing, the Bankruptcy Court approved the Key Employee Retention Plan
Motion [Docket No. 281] over the objection of the U.S. Trustee and with the support of the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders and the Creditors’ Committee.
2. Key Employee Incentive Plan Motion. The Debtors filed a motion seeking approval for a key employee
incentive plan (the “Key Employee Incentive Plan Motion”) [Docket No. 366]. After a hearing on the Key Employee Incentive Plan Motion on September 14, 2022, the Bankruptcy
Court approved the Key Employee Incentive Plan Motion [Docket No. 705] over the objection of the U.S. Trustee and with the support of the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders and the Creditors’ Committee.
3. First, Second, and Third Rejection Motions. The Debtors have filed three motions seeking to reject
certain unexpired leases (the “Rejection Motions”) [Docket Nos. 146, 363, 1015]. The Bankruptcy Court approved the Rejection Motions after the Debtors filed certificates of
no objection, respectively [Docket Nos. 257, 528, 1118].
4. Minority Equity Committee Motion. On August 9, 2022, an ad hoc group of Revlon equityholders filed a
motion seeking appointment of an official committee of minority stockholders (the “Minority Equity Committee Motion”) [Docket No. 348]. Several parties objected to the
Minority Equity Committee Motion, including the Debtors [Docket No. 492], the Creditors’ Committee [Docket No. 494], and the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders [Docket No.
493]. The ad hoc group of Revlon equityholders filed a reply to those objections [Docket No. 522]. After a hearing on the Minority Equity Committee Motion on August 24, 2022, the Bankruptcy Court denied the Minority Equity Committee Motion [Docket
No. 538].
PBGC is the wholly owned United States government corporation and agency created under Title IV of ERISA to
administer the federal pension insurance program and to guarantee the payment of certain pension benefits upon termination of a pension plan covered by Title IV of ERISA. Debtor RCPC sponsors the Qualified Pension Plans, which are covered by Title
IV of ERISA. PBGC asserts that the other Debtors are members of RCPC’s controlled group, as defined in 29 U.S.C. § 1301(a)(14).
PBGC has filed proofs of claim against each of the Debtors asserting: (i) estimated contingent claims,
subject to termination of the Qualified Pension Plans during the bankruptcy proceeding, for unfunded benefit liabilities in the amount of approximately $97,100,000 on behalf of the Revlon Employees’ Retirement Plan and $17,000,000 on behalf of The
Revlon-UAW Pension Plan; (ii) unliquidated claims for unpaid required minimum contributions owed to the Qualified Pension Plans; and (iii) unliquidated claims for unpaid statutory premiums, if any, owed to PBGC on behalf of the Qualified Pension
Plans. PBGC asserts that these claims, if any, would be entitled to priority under 11 U.S.C. §§ 507(a)(2), (a)(8), and/or (a)(5), as applicable, in unliquidated amounts.
Additionally, PBGC estimates that the amount of termination premium liability that PBGC asserts would arise
after the Effective Date relating to a termination of both Qualified Pension Plans would total approximately $28,290,000 in the aggregate. The Debtors and Reorganized Debtors reserve all rights relating to any asserted liability, including the
validity, priority, and/or amount of all such claims.
Under the Plan, the Reorganized Debtors will continue and assume the Qualified Pension Plans subject to
ERISA, the Tax Code, and any other applicable law, including (i) the minimum funding standards in 26 U.S.C. §§ 412, 430, and 29 U.S.C. §§ 1082, 1083 and (ii) premiums under 29 U.S.C. §§ 1306 and 1307. As such, PBGC agrees that all proofs of claim
filed by PBGC shall be deemed withdrawn on the Effective Date.
On July 19, 2022, the Debtors attended a meeting of their creditors pursuant to section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code and addressed
inquiries from the U.S. Trustee and certain creditors regarding, among other topics, the Debtors’ operations and finances, and other issues related to these Chapter 11 Cases. This meeting was continued pending the filing of the Debtors’ Schedules of
Assets and Liabilities and Statements of Financial Affairs, and concluded on August 22, 2022.
|
I. |
Appointment of Committee
|
On June 24, 2022, William K. Harrington, United States Trustee for Region 2, appointed the Creditors’ Committee pursuant to
section 1102(a) of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 121]. The initial members of the Creditors’ Committee were:
|
• |
U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association as successor to U.S. Bank National Association;
|
|
• |
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation;
|
|
• |
Quotient Technology, Inc.;
|
|
• |
Eric Biljetina, as independent executor of the estate of Jolynne Biljetina; and
|
On or about August 30, 2022, Quotient Technology, Inc. left the Creditors’ Committee. Also, following the appointment of the
Creditors’ Committee, Catherine Poulton became deceased and David Poulton has taken her place on the Creditors’ Committee as the representative of her estate.
On or about June 29, 2022, the Creditors’ Committee retained Brown Rudnick LLP as its legal counsel and Province, LLC as
financial advisor. On or about July 8, 2022, the Creditors’ Committee retained Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc. as investment banker. The Bankruptcy Court approved the retentions of Brown Rudnick LLP [Docket No. 531], Province, LLC [Docket No. 530],
and Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc. [Docket No. 529].
|
J. |
NYSE Delisting Decision
|
On June 16, 2022, the Company received a letter from the staff of NYSE Regulation, Inc. that it had determined to commence
proceedings to delist the Class A Common Stock of the Company from the NYSE in light of the Company’s disclosure on June 15, 2022, that it and certain of its subsidiaries had commenced voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11. The
Company appealed the NYSE’s delisting decision in a timely manner and the NYSE completed its review on October 13, 2022. On October 20, 2022, the NYSE informed the Company, and publicly announced its determination following such appeal, that the
Company’s Class A Common Stock is no longer suitable for listing on the NYSE and that the NYSE suspended trading in the Company’s Class A Common Stock after market close on October 20, 2022. On October 21, 2022, the NYSE applied to the SEC pursuant
to Form 25 to remove Class A Common Stock of the Company from listing and registration on the NYSE at the opening of business on November 1, 2022. As a result of the suspension and delisting, the Company’s Class A Common Stock began trading
exclusively on the OTC market on October 21, 2022, under the symbol “REVRQ.”
|
K. |
Schedules and Statements
|
On August 13, 2022, the Debtors filed their Schedules of Assets and Liabilities and Statements of Financial Affairs [Docket Nos.
375–425]. The Debtors filed amended Schedules of Assets and Liabilities on October 23, 2022 [Docket Nos. 907–913] and January 27, 2023 [Docket Nos. 1410–1415].
|
L. |
Stakeholder Engagement
|
The Debtors’ corporate and capital structures, their operations, the events giving rise to these Chapter 11 Cases, the relief
requested by the Debtors over the course of these Chapter 11 Cases, and the formulation of their Plan are each extraordinarily complex subjects. To bring their stakeholders up to speed, maintain a full and fair flow of information, and drive these
cases to a value-maximizing conclusion as efficiently as possible, the Debtors and their advisors have worked continuously to share information with their substantial stakeholders. Among other things, the Debtors have hosted (i) an in-person meeting
with the members of the Creditors’ Committee to provide them with background on the Debtors and these Chapter 11 Cases on August 1, 2022, (ii) an in-person meeting with the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders’ advisors to discuss plan structure and
timing issues on September 8, 2022, (iii) an in-person meeting of advisors to the Creditors’ Committee, the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders, the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders, and the Debtors’ controlling shareholder on September 28, 2022, to present
a complex and detailed claims waterfall model, discuss potential litigation outcomes and risks, and provide an overview of the performance outlook for Q4 2022, (iv) over 90 regularly scheduled calls and meetings, and numerous additional informal
calls, with advisors of key stakeholders to ensure that they remain fully informed regarding developments in these Chapter 11 Cases, (v) numerous calls with, and follow-up informal diligence provided to, the U.S. Trustee to address concerns regarding
the relief requested during the course of these Chapter 11 Cases, and (vi) a data room that has been made available to 145 advisors from 23 different firms representing all major stakeholders, containing approximately 2,000 documents, consisting of
approximately 70,000 pages, related to, among other things, the Debtors’ financial condition and projections, historical performance, postpetition financing transactions, historical financing transactions, and compensation programs. The Debtors’
advisors have also responded or are working to respond to over 400 information requests to date from major creditor constituencies, while concurrently receiving and evaluating multiple third-party inbound proposals for M&A transactions, sale
transactions, and other opportunities, all in addition to discovery produced in connection with the Creditors’ Committee’s investigation, as described in Article VII.A below, and the 2016 Lenders’ Adversary Proceeding, as described in Article V.O
below.
In addition, the Debtors and their professionals address numerous informal questions, concerns, and issues raised on an almost
daily basis by current and former employees, vendors, customers, individual creditors, equityholders, and other parties in interest to ensure that they have access to resources necessary to understand the bankruptcy process and to protect their
interests in connection therewith. Among other things, the Debtors have established a hotline for their retirees, established and rolled out communications plans for various constituencies, and established a general information center hotline with
domestic and international numbers available on the Revlon bankruptcy website maintained by their claims agent.
On February 7, 2023, the Debtors entered into confidentiality agreements with certain members of the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo
Lenders and the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders in connection with discussions regarding a possible global settlement of issues concerning the Chapter 11 Cases, including the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders’ objections to the Disclosure
Statement and Plan filed on December 23, 2022 and the 2016 Lenders’ Adversary Proceeding. Over the following weeks, multiple virtual and in-person meetings were held among both principals and advisors to the Debtors, the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo
Lenders, and the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders. These time-intensive efforts required multiple adjournments of the hearing to consider approval of the Disclosure Statement. Ultimately, on February 17, 2023, the Debtors, the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo
Lenders, and the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders agreed in principle on terms of the 2016 Settlement. The principle terms of the 2016 Settlement were filed on February 21, 2023 with the SEC on Form 8-K,13 and are discussed further herein.
|
M. |
Certain Postpetition Efforts to Stabilize and Improve Operations
|
As discussed above, at the outset of these Chapter 11 Cases, the Debtors obtained, and consensually resolved objections related
to, operational relief that has enabled the Debtors to stabilize and continue operating their businesses in the ordinary course. Among other things, this relief provided the Debtors with a basis to negotiate agreements with their critical vendors to
pay a portion of prepetition claims in exchange for consistent postpetition supply and the re-establishment of trade credit. In the months since the Petition Date, the Debtors have successfully reached commercial agreements with approximately 450
individual suppliers and have executed 198 individual trade agreements across that group. These trade agreements have extended average trade credit from 15 days on the Petition Date, to approximately 55 days as of the date hereof. Together with
other operational efforts, these agreements have assisted the Debtors in restarting their supply chain and have substantially improved their trade credit and liquidity position. While a substantial majority of critical suppliers have been addressed
to date, vendor negotiations remain ongoing.
Additionally, the commencement of these Chapter 11 Cases negatively impacted the Debtors’ employees, many of whom have
historically been eligible for stock-based incentive and retentive compensation programs. Not only did these employees lose access to postpetition stock awards, but their existing stock awards lost retentive and incentivizing value as a result of
the commencement of these cases. Through substantial negotiation with their stakeholders, including the Creditors’ Committee and the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders, the Debtors were able to address this significant problem on a largely consensual
basis through the implementation of their key employee retention and incentive plans. The Debtors also worked to consensually provide extensive informal discovery to the U.S. Trustee in connection with these programs prior to litigating the U.S.
Trustee’s objections thereto.
As of the Petition Date, the Debtors were also party to numerous executory contracts and unexpired leases. As part of their
restructuring efforts, the Debtors, in consultation with their advisors, have undertaken, and continue to undertake, a review of their executory contracts and unexpired leases for potential rejection, renegotiation, or assumption.
13 |
Copies of any document filed with or submitted to the SEC may be obtained by visiting the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov.
|
Finally, in connection with the process to develop and negotiate the Plan, the Debtors’ management team, in consultation with the
Debtors’ advisors, developed a long-term Business Plan that identifies several opportunities to strategically invest in the Debtors’ businesses to increase revenues and/or reduce costs on a go-forward basis. A summary of the Business Plan was filed
on December 19, 2022 with the SEC on Form 8-K.
|
N. |
Independent Investigation
|
|
1.
|
Creation and Purpose of the Investigation Committee
|
On June 15, 2022, by unanimous resolutions, the Board approved and established an Investigation Committee, comprised of an
independent director as its sole member, who has extensive experience as a restructuring professional, as the sole member, to carry out the Debtors’ self-investigation duties under Sections 1106(a)(3), 1106(a)(4), and 1107(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.
Pursuant to these resolutions, the Board delegated to the Investigation Committee all of the power and authority of the Board to (a) perform and any all internal audits, reviews and investigations of the Company and its subsidiaries, (b) perform any
and all work necessary to complete a special review being conducted by outside counsel (and originally commenced under the supervision of the Audit Committee of the Board) of the Company’s governance, financial transactions, and business operations
to assess the potential viability of legal claims that may be brought by various parties against the Board or the Company’s controlling shareholder, (c) evaluate the appropriateness and necessity of any releases in a potential chapter 11 filing and
plan of reorganization by the Company, and (d) take any and all other actions incident or ancillary to the foregoing or otherwise as the Investigation Committee determined to be advisable, appropriate, convenient, or necessary to the performance of
its duties and the discharge of its responsibilities. On the Petition Date, the Board also provided authority for the Investigation Committee to draw upon appropriate resources, at the expense of the Company, to conduct its work and discharge its
responsibilities, including resources necessary to retain independent counsel and advisors.
|
2.
|
Investigation Committee’s Scope of Work
|
To carry out the mandate and responsibilities of the Investigation Committee, the Investigation Committee retained Petrillo and
Gover as its counsel (“Investigation Committee Counsel”), which retention was approved by the Court on July 21, 2022, nunc pro tunc to the Petition Date. Thereafter, to assist Investigation Committee Counsel in their work, the Investigation Committee authorized the retention of Teneo as financial advisor to the
Investigation Committee, which retention was approved by the Court on August 23, 2022, nunc pro tunc to July 18, 2022. Investigation Committee Counsel also
retained three subject experts concerning, respectively, bank and leveraged finance, supply chain management, and Delaware corporate law and governance.
In regular consultation with the Investigation Committee, Investigation Committee Counsel has conducted a factual investigation,
and reviewed and analyzed applicable federal and state law. The factual examination included interviews of current and former officers and directors of the Debtors, and two representatives of the control shareholder of the Debtors, review of the
deposition testimony in the investigation by the Creditors’ Committee, and review of internal and public documents and records of the Debtors, along with other relevant data sources. The Investigation Committee’s factual and legal work incorporated
the input of Teneo and the above-referenced subject matter experts. As part of its work, the Investigation Committee studied and considered certain prepetition transactions of the Debtors, and the positions of chapter 11 constituencies concerning
the same, including the petitioners in the filed adversary action. In its review and collection of documents, the Investigation Committee principally employed a more-than six-year look-back period, also consulting earlier dated materials concerning
the Company where appropriate.
In carrying out its mandate, the Investigation Committee undertook to be as transparent as possible with the Creditors’
Committee. Thus, Investigation Committee Counsel and counsel to the Creditors’ Committee shared information as each deemed appropriate. The Investigation Committee also relied on the assistance of the Debtors and Debtors’ external and internal
counsel to locate and provide requested discovery and received their full cooperation. Likewise, the Investigation Committee received the full cooperation of the officers and directors and control shareholder representatives whom it interviewed.
On the basis of (a) an investigation of the relevant facts (including transactions that have been the subject of challenges,
since settled), which included multiple witness interviews, an assessment of discovery conducted by the Creditors’ Committee, and the review of the Company’s public filings, certain documents, records and data of the Company, public information
concerning the Debtor’s industry and market, and publications of ratings agencies and financial media, and (b) a review and analysis, as applied to the facts found by the investigation, of the controlling law, the Investigation Committee, with the
assistance of the Investigation Committee Counsel and certain retained subject matter advisors, has concluded that the Company’s Board, management, and MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated, its indirect controlling shareholder, satisfied their
respective fiduciary duties. As a result, the Investigation Committee has found no basis for a claim on behalf of the Debtors against any of these parties.
|
O. |
Significant Litigation Related to the 2016 Term Loan Facility and BrandCo Facilities
|
|
1.
|
The Citibank Second Circuit Decision
|
As discussed above, Citibank appealed the District Court decision in favor of the Mistaken Payment Lenders to the Second Circuit.
Following the Petition Date, on September 8, 2022, the Second Circuit vacated the District Court’s decision, held that the
Mistaken Payment Lenders were not entitled to retain the Mistaken Payment, and remanded the case to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with its ruling. The Second Circuit subsequently denied the Mistaken Payment Lenders’ motion
for an en banc rehearing of the September 8 decision. On remand, the District
Court ordered the parties submit a joint letter addressing the Second Circuit’s decision.
On December 1, 2022, Citibank and the Mistaken Payment Lenders submitted a joint letter informing the District Court that the
parties have been discussing a “consensual resolution” of the Citibank Wire Transfer Litigation that would avoid the need for further litigation. The joint letter indicates that the material terms of the resolution would provide that (i) the Mistaken
Payment Lenders will return to Citibank the amounts mistakenly paid to them on August 11, 2020, in connection with the 2016 Term Loans, along with any accrued interest, and (ii) Citibank will transfer to the Mistaken Payment Lenders the interest and
amortization payments paid to Citibank on account of the 2016 Term Loans.
On December 16, 2022, Citibank and the Mistaken Payment Lenders submitted another joint letter informing the District Court that
all of the Mistaken Payment Lenders have signed agreements with Citibank, which, if performed, will terminate the Citibank Wire Transfer Litigation. The parties also reported that approximately three-quarters of the Mistaken Payments have been
returned to Citibank, and Citibank will be returning coupon interest and principal amortization amounts to the Mistaken Payment Lenders that have returned the Mistaken Payments. On December 19, 2022, the District Court entered an order dismissing
the Citibank Wire Transfer Litigation, having been advised by the parties that all claims asserted have been settled. The order of dismissal was without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within sixty days of the date of the order if the
settlements among the parties are not consummated, and such period has expired. All Mistaken Payments have been returned to Citibank.
|
2.
|
The Citibank Subrogation Adversary Proceeding
|
Before the Second Circuit’s decision and with the status of the Citibank Litigation against the Mistaken Payment Lenders pending,
to resolve its status as creditor in these Chapter 11 Cases, on August 12, 2022, Citibank initiated an adversary proceeding (Adv. Pro. No. 22-01134 (DSJ)) (the “Citibank Adversary
Proceeding”) seeking a declaratory judgment that it was subrogated to the rights of the 2016 Term Loan Lenders whose 2016 Term Loans it mistakenly repaid in 2020. Upon the filing of the Citibank Adversary Proceeding, the Debtors
prepared to respond to the complaint and worked cooperatively with the Creditors’ Committee and the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders (each of whom the Debtors permitted to, and did, intervene), as well as the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders, in
coordinating the Debtors’ planned response. Following the Second Circuit’s decision regarding the Mistaken Payment, the Debtors agreed with Citibank to stay the Citibank Adversary Proceeding and are working to resolve the Citibank Adversary
Proceeding prior to the Confirmation Hearing.
|
3.
|
Challenges to the BrandCo Transaction and 2016 Lenders’ Adversary Proceeding
|
At the onset of the Chapter 11 Cases, the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders and the Creditors’ Committee indicated their view that the
prepetition establishment of the BrandCo Facilities was an avoidable fraudulent conveyance and a breach of the 2016 Credit Agreement. The Final DIP Order provided the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders and the Creditors’ Committee until October 31, 2022
to bring challenges to stipulations set forth in the Final DIP Order with respect to the BrandCo Facilities. As further discussed below in Article VII of this Disclosure Statement, such challenge deadline was extended for the Creditors’ Committee to
December 19, 2022 prior to execution of the Restructuring Support Agreement, and was further extended subject to sections 2, 6.01, and 6.02 of the Restructuring Support Agreement.
On October 31, 2022, certain of the 2016 Term Loan Lenders (the “2016
Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint in the Bankruptcy Court (“2016 Lenders’ Complaint,” and such proceeding, the “2016 Lenders’ Adversary Proceeding”) against the Debtors, Jefferies, and the BrandCo Lenders challenging the BrandCo Transaction.14 In
the 2016 Lenders’ Complaint, the 2016 Plaintiffs ask the Bankruptcy Court to unwind the BrandCo Transaction and restore the 2016 Term Loan Facility agent’s first-priority liens on all BrandCo intellectual property.
The 2016 Plaintiffs’ Complaint alleged that the BrandCo Transaction was invalid because:
|
(i) |
The Debtors lacked the necessary consents from a majority of the 2016 Term Loan Lenders. Specifically, the 2016 Plaintiffs argue that the 2016 Incremental
Revolver was prohibited because (a) there was an outstanding default under the 2016 Credit Agreement because the 2019 Term Loan Facility and the transactions contemplated thereby constituted an impermissible sale-leaseback, (b) it breached
the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and (c) it required the consent of the applicable Majority Facility Lenders (as defined in the 2016 Credit Agreement); and
|
|
(ii) |
The transfer of the BrandCo intellectual property in 2020 was an impermissible sale-leaseback.
|
The 2016 Plaintiffs sought a variety of equitable remedies intended to “unwind” the BrandCo Transaction, including (i) a
declaratory judgement that each component of the BrandCo Transaction is void ab initio, (ii) specific performance of the 2016 Credit Agreement and the 2016
Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, (iii) recission of the BrandCo Transaction, (iv) injunctive relief directing the return of the BrandCo intellectual property to RCPC, the release of the liens securing the BrandCo Facilities, and the restoration of
the 2016 Term Loan Facility agent’s first-priority liens on the BrandCo intellectual property, (iv) equitable subordination of the BrandCo Lenders’ claims to those of the 2016 Lenders, (v) imposition of a constructive trust, and (vi) solely as to the
non-Debtor defendants, monetary damages. The 2016 Plaintiffs’ Complaint alleged supplemental claims against the BrandCo Entities, Jefferies, the BrandCo Lenders, and others based on the same underlying theories. Such claims included claims of
unjust enrichment, conversion, and tortious interference.
On December 5, 2022, in response to the 2016 Lenders’ Complaint, the Debtors filed a motion to dismiss, asking the Bankruptcy
Court to dismiss the 2016 Plaintiffs’ claims against the Debtors on the bases that: (i) such claims are derivative and the 2016 Plaintiffs lack standing to pursue them, (ii) such claims are not permissible under New York law or the Bankruptcy Code,
(iii) entering into the 2019 Term Loan Facility did not violate the 2016 Credit Agreement, and (iv) such claims fail to state viable tort or quasi-contract claims under New York law. Jefferies and the BrandCo Lenders also filed motions to dismiss
the 2016 Lenders’ Complaint.
14 |
AIMCO CLO 10 Ltd., et al. v. Revlon, Inc. et al., Adv. Pro. No. 22-01167 (DSJ) (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y Oct. 31, 2022).
|
On the same day, the Debtors also filed an Answer and Counterclaim in response to the 2016 Lenders’ Complaint, in which the
Debtors requested a declaratory judgment that, among other things, the 2016 Plaintiffs are not entitled to the relief they are seeking in connection with the 2019 Term Loan Facility, the BrandCo Transaction, or any other equitable relief under New
York Law and the Bankruptcy Code. In addition, the Debtors objected to the proofs of claim filed by the 2016 Plaintiffs against all Debtors on account of (i) all of the funded debt claims arising out of the 2016 Credit Agreement and (ii) all causes
of action that arise from, in connection with, or are related to 2016 Plaintiffs’ interest in the 2016 Term Loan Facility, and asserted that such claims should be disallowed and expunged.
A hearing on the defendants’ motion to dismiss was held on February 2, 2023, and on February 14, 2023, the Court granted the
motion to dismiss as to all claims against the Debtors and all of the Complaint’s claims for equitable relief. With respect to the non-Debtor defendants, the Court directed all parties to file letters on or before February 15, 2023 concerning
whether the standing grounds on which the Court’s decision is based apply to the remaining causes of action as against the non-Debtor defendants, and the parties filed such letters on the Court’s docket on February 15, 2023. A trial was scheduled to
begin on March 6, 2023, but is currently anticipated to be stayed until Plan Confirmation, at which point the Debtors anticipate that the Adversary Proceeding will be dismissed with prejudice through the Confirmation Order and/or a separate Order of
the Court entered on the Adversary Proceeding’s docket.
The Debtors and their advisors have responded to inquiries from parties potentially interested in purchasing all or substantially
all of the Debtors’ assets. To date, the Debtors have entered into non-disclosure agreements with, and circulated confidential information to seven prospective purchasers. Four parties have thus far provided written or verbal indications of
interest subject to diligence. The Debtors have provided the prospective purchasers with access to a data room containing additional diligence materials, and the Debtors have had presentations between their management team and the prospective
purchasers. Ultimately, the Debtors have concluded that none of the indications of interest have culminated in an offer that provides more value to the Estate than the reorganization contemplated by the Plan.
|
Q. |
Development of the Debtors’ Business Plan
|
The Company’s management and its advisors began the process of developing the Company’s Business Plan in early July 2022 with the
goals of: (i) developing baseline financial projections for FY 2023 through FY 2026 and (ii) evaluating a range of potential strategic initiatives to increase revenue and decrease costs. Dedicated teams at the Company were tasked to develop detailed
business plans for FY 2023 and FY 2024 that addressed both brand and regional performance. The business plans underwent rigorous review by the management team and the Company’s advisors, including various follow-up meetings and analyses to review
underlying assumptions, strategies, and trends. Upon finalizing the FY 2023 and FY 2024 business plans, the management team and its advisors developed higher-level financial forecasts for FY 2025 and FY 2026 that considered projected industry growth
rates and performance levels trending off of the FY 2024 projections. Between mid-September 2022 and mid-October 2022, the Company’s management team presented initial versions of the Business Plan to the Restructuring Committee, and at each stage,
the members of the Restructuring Committee asked questions and provided feedback to assess the assumptions, analyses, and forecasts presented. After a detailed review of the Business Plan and engagement with management and the advisors, the
Restructuring Committee determined it was in the best interests of the Company to recommend to the full Board to approve the Business Plan and the Board approved the Business Plan on October 19, 2022.
In late October 2022, the Debtors presented the initial version of the Business Plan to the advisors for the Creditors’ Committee
and the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders. On November 9, 2022, the Company entered into confidentiality agreements with members of the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders, which permitted the parties to review materials summarizing the Business Plan.
Those summary materials were filed with the SEC on Form 8-K on December 19, 2022. Although the Debtors offered to restrict members of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders to provide them with the same evaluation materials, the Ad Hoc Group of 2016
Lenders declined to sign confidentiality agreements to receive such information at that time.
Prior to the Petition Date, certain individuals asserted tort claims against the Debtors in connection with alleged personal
injury suffered through use of the Debtors’ cosmetics and personal care products. These include certain claims relating to “Jean Nate” branded products containing talcum powder, an ingredient allegedly contaminated with asbestos and allegedly
associated with mesothelioma and other maladies. The Debtors maintain that these claims are meritless. Personal injury claims relating to talc-containing products are treated in the Plan in Class 9(a). Any claims for indemnification by contract
counterparties of the Debtors related to Talc Personal Injury Claims are treated in the Plan in Class 9(d).
The Debtors currently sell, and have in the past sold, chemical hair straightening or relaxing products, including under their
“Creme of Nature” brand. Numerous cases have been filed in courts across the country on behalf of plaintiffs alleging personal injury and/or wrongful death claims relating to certain hair relaxer products. On January
23, 2023, a hearing was held before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) regarding the potential consolidation and transfer of the hair relaxer claims into MDL Case No.
3060; In re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability. On February 6, 2023, the JPML signed an order consolidating hair relaxer cases into the
Northern District of Illinois. The Debtors believe that the alleged claims concerning chemical hair straightening or relaxing products they currently sell or have sold in the past are meritless. Counsel to the hair relaxer-related claimants who
have appeared in this proceeding believe the claims have merit.
The Debtors are aware of other alleged product liability claims or potential claims relating to the use of products they currently sell or have sold
in the past, including but not limited to certain alleged claims concerning chemical hair straightening or relaxing products, which were raised following the publication of a study in the fall of 2022. The Debtors believe that the alleged claims
concerning chemical hair straightening or relaxing products they currently sell or have sold in the past are meritless. The Debtors’ analysis of the availability of insurance coverage for such claims is ongoing. These and other non-talc personal
injury Claims, including indemnification Claims arising therefrom, to the extent allowed, are treated in the Plan as Class 9(d) Other General Unsecured Claims. The Plan does not provide for a channeling injunction in respect of such Claims.
Specific procedures for evaluating any Claims arising from alleged chemical hair straightening or relaxing products-related injuries, if any, will be included in the Plan Supplement. Further, the Debtors have engaged in discussions with counsel to
the hair-relaxer related personal injury claimants, and the Debtors reserve the right to amend the Plan, with the consent of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders and the Creditors’ Committee (solely to the extent provided under the Restructuring
Support Agreement) without further notice to incorporate any potential agreement with the hair-relaxer personal injury claimants, including treating such Claims in a new separate Class prior to the Confirmation Hearing. The consideration provided
to Holders of Unsecured Notes Claims and General Unsecured Claims (Classes 8 and 9(a)-(d)) under the Plan is part of the comprehensively negotiated and integrated Plan Settlement, as described in Section VII hereof. Absent the Plan Settlement,
Holders of Unsecured Notes Claims General Unsecured Claims would not be entitled to a recovery under the Plan.
To date, the Debtors have not been able to recover under their insurance policies for liabilities and costs related to Talc
Personal Injury Claims, if any, with the exception of certain policies issued by predecessors to Bedivere Insurance Company, which filed for insolvency protection under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania. The
Reorganized Debtors will retain the Debtors’ right to continue to pursue all recoveries available under their applicable insurance policies in respect of any and all valid Claims, including Talc Personal Injury Claims and hair relaxer-related
Claims, if any, and any future claims that may not be discharged under the Plan, to the fullest extent that such coverage is available.
Under the Plan, the Reorganized Debtors will retain the Debtors’ rights under insurance policies. The Debtors are not releasing their insurers, nor
waiving any of the rights under their insurance policies. Holders of covered personal injury claims will retain preexisting rights, if any, to pursue direct action against insurers for coverage, and any such rights are unaffected by the Debtors’
bankruptcy.
WHERE TO FIND ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION: Holdings and RCPC currently file annual reports with, and submit other information to, the SEC. Copies of any document filed with or submitted to the SEC may be obtained by visiting the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov.
VI. |
RESTRUCTURING SUPPORT AGREEMENT15
|
On December 19, 2022, the Debtors, the Consenting BrandCo Lenders, and the Creditors’ Committee entered into the Original
Restructuring Support Agreement, and on December 23, 2022, the Debtors filed the initial Plan and Disclosure Statement in accordance therewith. Thereafter, the Debtors engaged in negotiations with the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders, the Ad Hoc Group
of BrandCo Lenders, and the Creditors’ Committee. On February 21, 2023, the Debtors entered into the amended and restated Restructuring Support Agreement to memorialize the 2016 Settlement with the Consenting BrandCo Lenders, the Consenting 2016
Lenders, and the Creditors’ Committee. On February 21, 2023, the Debtors filed this Disclosure Statement and the amended Plan, which documents the terms of the Restructuring Transactions contemplated by the amended and restated Restructuring Support
Agreement. The Debtors believe the Restructuring Transactions contemplated by the Plan will significantly reduce the Debtors’ funded-debt obligations, result in a stronger balance sheet for the Debtors, and maximize value for all stakeholders.
15 |
The following summary is provided for illustrative purposes only and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Restructuring Support Agreement. In the event of any
inconsistency between this summary and the Restructuring Support Agreement, the Restructuring Support Agreement will control in all respects.
|
|
A. |
Development of the Restructuring Support Agreement
|
Following the presentation of the Debtors’ Business Plan summary, the Debtors engaged in negotiations with certain key
stakeholders, including the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders and the Creditors’ Committee, regarding a possible reorganization premised upon, among other things, a new-money investment in the Debtors’ businesses pursuant to a rights offering, and a
substantial deleveraging of the Company. Negotiations continued throughout the autumn of 2022 in good faith regarding the terms of a plan of reorganization, which culminated with the execution of the Original Restructuring Support Agreement on
December 19, 2022.
Beginning in mid-January 2023, the Debtors and the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders pursued negotiations with the Ad Hoc Group of
2016 Lenders, the members of which were not parties to the Original Restructuring Support Agreement. Following weeks of negotiations in January and February 2023, the Debtors, the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders, the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders,
and the Creditors’ Committee reached the 2016 Settlement, as described herein. Pursuant to the terms of the 2016 Settlement, members of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders are now party to the Restructuring Support Agreement, as amended and restated on
February 21, 2023, and have agreed to support the Plan.
The Restructuring Support Agreement provides that each Consenting BrandCo Lender and each Consenting 2016 Lender, among other
things, will commit to vote each of their Claims and/or Interests to accept the Plan, and grant the releases set forth in the Plan.
|
B. |
Certain Key Terms of the Restructuring Support Agreement and Restructuring Transactions
|
|
1.
|
Debtors’ Fiduciary Out Provision
|
The Restructuring Support Agreement contains a broad fiduciary out for the Debtors. This provision provides that the Debtors, in
the exercise of their fiduciary duties, are not required to take any action or refrain from taking any action to the extent the Debtors determine, after consulting with counsel, that taking or failing to take such action would be inconsistent with
applicable Law or their fiduciary obligations under applicable Law, including based on the results of the Independent Investigation, provided that counsel to
the Debtors shall notify counsel to each other Party to the Restructuring Support Agreement not later than two (2) Business Days following such determination to take or not take action, in each case, in a manner that would result in a breach of the
Restructuring Support Agreement, and upon receipt of such notice, the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders may terminate the Restructuring Support Agreement in accordance with its terms.
The Debtors are to provide the advisors to the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders, the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Lenders, and the
Creditors’ Committee, and any other
party determined by the
Debtors, with (x) regular updates as to the status and
progress of any
Alternative Restructuring Proposals and (y) reasonable responses to any reasonable information requests related to any
Alternative
Restructuring Proposals. At this time, the Debtors have not received any actionable proposals and do not anticipate the occurrence of an Alternative Restructuring Transaction.
The Original Restructuring Support Agreement also contained a “Go-Shop” provision (that has
now expired) for the benefit of the Debtors, subject to certain conditions and restrictions, that allowed the Debtors to:
|
(i) |
prior to the execution of the Backstop Commitment Agreement (which occurred on January 17, 2023), in a manner consistent with the initial Restructuring Support
Agreement, solicit, facilitate, and engage in discussions or negotiations with third-party bidders with respect to Alternative Restructuring Proposals (as defined in the Restructuring Support Agreement), and ultimately enter into definitive
documentation or consummate an Alternative Restructuring Proposal if the Board determined to do so in the exercise of its fiduciary duties (and the Debtors were obligated to notify counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders and the
Creditors’ Committee within one (1) calendar day of the taking of formal corporate action or signing definitive agreements, and upon receipt of such notice with respect to an Alternative Restructuring Proposal that was not an Acceptable
Alternative Transaction, the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders were able to terminate the Restructuring Support Agreement in accordance with its terms); and
|
|
(ii) |
from and after the execution of the Backstop Commitment Agreement, continue to conclusion any ongoing discussions with interested parties and respond to any
inbound indications of interest, but no longer solicit Alternative Restructuring Proposals (or inquiries or indications of interest with respect thereto). If any Debtor determined, in the exercise of its fiduciary duties, to accept or pursue
an Alternative Restructuring Proposal, including an Acceptable Alternative Transaction, including by making any written or oral proposal or counterproposal with respect thereto, the Debtors was required to notify counsel to the Ad Hoc Group
of BrandCo Lenders and the Creditors’ Committee within two (2) Business Days following such determination and/or proposal or counterproposal. If the Debtors gave notice regarding an Alternative Restructuring Proposal that was not an
Acceptable Alternative Transaction, the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders had the ability to terminate the Restructuring Support Agreement in accordance with its terms, provided that they notified the Debtors that they did not support the Alternative Restructuring Proposal and would intend to credit bid their claims as an alternative.
|
|
2.
|
Creditors’ Committee’s Fiduciary Out
|
The Restructuring Support Agreement also contains a broad fiduciary out for the Creditors’ Committee. Similar to the Debtors’
broad fiduciary out, such provision provides that the Creditors’ Committee, or any member thereof, is not required to take any action or refrain from taking any action to the extent the Creditors’ Committee or such member thereof, determines, after
consulting with counsel, that taking or failing to take such action would be inconsistent with applicable Law or its fiduciary obligations under applicable Law, including based on the results of the Independent Investigation, provided that counsel to the Creditors’ Committee must notify counsel to each other Party to the Restructuring Support Agreement not later than two (2) Business
Days following such determination to take or not take action, in each case, in a manner that would result in a breach of the Restructuring Support Agreement, and upon receipt of such notice, the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders may terminate the
Restructuring Support Agreement as to the Creditors’ Committee in accordance with its terms. Upon any such termination of the Restructuring Support Agreement as to the Creditors’ Committee, the Consenting BrandCo Lenders’ and Consenting 2016 Lenders’
obligations to the Creditors’ Committee in respect of the Committee Settlement Terms (as defined below) shall terminate and the Challenge Period for the Creditors’ Committee shall automatically expire.
|
3.
|
Backstop Commitment Agreement, Equity Rights Offering, and Alternative Financing Commitments
|
|
a.
|
Equity Rights Offering and Backstop Commitment Agreement
|
Pursuant to the Restructuring Support Agreement and the Plan, the Debtors shall conduct an equity rights offering (the “Equity Rights Offering”) in an aggregate amount of $670 million (the “Aggregate Rights Offering Amount”),
subject to the Excess Liquidity Cutback, at a 30% discount to Plan Equity Value (as defined in the Plan). As set forth in the Restructuring Term Sheet attached to the Original Restructuring Support Agreement, 70% of the Aggregate Rights Offering
Amount (or $469 million, subject to the Excess Liquidity Cutback) (the “Subscription Amount”) will be raised by soliciting commitments from Eligible Holders (as defined in
the Plan), while 30% (or $201 million, subject to the Excess Liquidity Cutback) (the “Direct Allocation Amount”) will be reserved for purchase by the Equity Commitment
Parties.
On January 17, 2023, as contemplated by the Original Restructuring Support Agreement, the Debtors entered into a backstop
commitment agreement with certain of the Consenting BrandCo Lenders, and on February 21, 2023, the Debtors, certain of the Consenting BrandCo Lenders and certain of the Consenting 2016 Lenders (collectively, the “Equity Commitment Parties”) entered into an amended and restated backstop commitment agreement (the “Backstop Commitment Agreement”).
Pursuant to the Backstop Commitment Agreement, each of the Equity Commitment Parties has agreed to backstop, severally and not jointly and subject to the terms and conditions in the Backstop Commitment Agreement, the Aggregate Rights Offering
Amount. The Backstop Commitment Agreement provides that (i) each of the Equity Commitment Parties will, subject to the terms and conditions in the Backstop Commitment Agreement, purchase its agreed percentage (the “Backstop Commitment Percentage”) of the New Common Stock (as defined in the Plan) representing the unsubscribed portion of the Subscription Amount, (ii) each of the Equity Commitment Parties will, subject
to the terms and conditions in the Backstop Commitment Agreement, purchase its agreed percentage of the New Common Stock representing the Direct Allocation Amount, and (iii) each of the Equity Commitment Parties will, subject to the terms and
conditions in the Backstop Commitment Agreement, subscribe for, and at the Closing purchase, the New Common Stock offered to such Equity Commitment Party in connection with the Equity Rights Offering. As consideration for entering into the Backstop
Commitment Agreement, each Equity Commitment Party will receive, upon the closing of the Equity Rights Offering, its Backstop Commitment Percentage of a 12.5% Equity Commitment Premium on the $670 million Aggregate Rights Offering Amount, which
amount shall be payable in the form of New Common Stock at a price per share calculated at a 30% discount to Plan Equity Value. If the Backstop Commitment Agreement is terminated, then under certain conditions set forth in the Backstop Commitment
Agreement, the Equity Commitment Parties are entitled to receive an Equity Termination Premium of $83.75 million in cash (representing 12.5% of the $670 million Aggregate Rights Offering Amount).
To the extent that, as of the Closing Date (as defined under the Backstop Commitment Agreement), the sum of (i) unrestricted cash
and cash equivalents of the loan parties under the First Lien Exit Facilities and (ii) undrawn availability under the Exit ABL Facility (excluding the effect of any temporarily increased advance rates under the Exit ABL Facility that will not remain
in effect through the maturity date of such facility), exceeds $285.0 million (such excess, “Excess Liquidity”), then such Excess Liquidity will be applied, on a dollar for
dollar basis, first, to reduce the aggregate amount of the Equity Rights Offering on a dollar for dollar basis to not less than $650 million; second, in an amount of up to $12.0 million to pay the Debt Commitment Premium and Funding Discount (as defined in the Debt Commitment Letter) (on a ratable basis)
in cash; third, to further reduce the aggregate amount of the Equity Rights Offering on a dollar for dollar basis to not less than $625 million; fourth, to reduce the amount of the Incremental New Money Facility on a dollar for dollar basis such that the aggregate amount of the First Lien Exit Facilities is
no less than $1.275 billion; and fifth, 50% of any remaining Excess Liquidity to further reduce the amount of the Incremental New Money Facility and 50% of any
remaining Excess Liquidity to further reduce the amount of the Equity Rights Offering (collectively, the “Excess Liquidity Cutback”).
The shares of New Common Stock that will be issued to the Equity Commitment Parties under the Backstop Commitment Agreement
(other than the New Common Stock issued in payment of the Backstop Commitment Premium) will be issued in a private placement exempt from registration under Section 5 of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) and/or Regulation D thereunder and
will constitute “restricted securities” for purposes of the Securities Act. In the Backstop Commitment Agreement, the Equity Commitment Parties will be required to make representations and warranties as to their sophistication and suitability to
participate in the private placement.
The procedures and instructions for exercising the Equity Subscription Rights will be set forth in the Equity Rights Offering
Procedures, which shall be attached to the Backstop Order. The Equity Rights Offering Procedures will be incorporated herein by reference and should be read in conjunction with this Disclosure Statement in formulating a decision as to whether to
exercise the Equity Subscription Rights. The price per share of New Common Stock issued pursuant to the Equity Rights Offering shall be determined based on a 30% discount to Plan Equity Value.
TO PARTICIPATE IN THE EQUITY RIGHTS OFFERING, EACH ELIGIBLE HOLDER MUST COMPLETE ALL THE STEPS OUTLINED IN THE
EQUITY RIGHTS OFFERING PROCEDURES. IF ALL OF THE STEPS OUTLINED IN THE EQUITY RIGHTS OFFERING PROCEDURES ARE NOT COMPLETED BY THE SUBSCRIPTION EXPIRATION DEADLINE OR THE BACKSTOP FUNDING DEADLINE, AS APPLICABLE, THE ELIGIBLE HOLDER SHALL BE DEEMED TO
HAVE FOREVER AND IRREVOCABLY RELINQUISHED AND WAIVED ITS RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE EQUITY RIGHTS OFFERING.
|
b.
|
Debt Commitment Letter and Incremental New Money Facility
|
On January 17, 2023, as contemplated by the Original Restructuring Support Agreement, the Debtors entered into an agreement (the
“Debt Commitment Letter”), with certain of the Consenting BrandCo Lenders under the Restructuring Support Agreement (the “Debt Commitment Parties”), pursuant to which the Debt Commitment Parties committed to fund up to $200 million in net cash proceeds to RCPC in connection with a new senior secured first lien term loan facility (the “Incremental New Money Facility”). As consideration for entering into the Debt Commitment Letter, the Debt Commitment Parties will receive a Debt
Commitment Premium of $6 million (representing 3.00% on their $200 million commitment amount) payable in-kind in the form of additional loans added under the Incremental New Money Facility. If the Debt Commitment Letter is terminated, then under
certain conditions set forth in the Debt Commitment Letter, the Debt Commitment Parties are entitled to receive a Debt Termination Premium of $6 million (representing 3.00% of the $200 commitment amount) in lieu of the Debt Commitment Premium.
The Restructuring Support Agreement provides that each Consenting Lender agrees to, if reasonably requested by counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of
BrandCo Lenders, execute and deliver any documentation reasonably requested by counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders necessary to evidence such
Consenting Lender’s, election under
section 1111(b)(2) of the
Bankruptcy Code for such
Consenting Lender’s 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims and OpCo Term Loan Claims, as applicable (the “
1111(b) Election”) prior to the conclusion of the Confirmation Hearing. Making the 1111(
b) Election requires Holders of at least two-thirds in amount and more
than one-half in number of Allowed Claims in Classes 4 and 6 to vote in favor of the 1111(b) Election. Irrespective of whether the 1111(b) Election is made by either Class 4 or Class 6, neither Class will receive any additional recovery other
than what is provided for under the Plan for Class 4 or Class 6, as applicable, on account of deficiency claims held by the Holder of Claims in such Classes.
|
5.
|
Consenting 2016 Lenders’ Support for Dismissal of Adversary Proceeding
|
The Restructuring Support Agreement provides that each Consenting 2016 Lender that is a 2016 Plaintiff consent to and cooperate with the Debtors and
the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders in causing the entry of the Adversary Stay and Dismissal Order, (ii) at the hearing on the Disclosure Statement, cause counsel for the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Term Loan Lenders to make an oral request for entry
of the Adversary Stay and Dismissal Order, and (iii) support the entry of the Adversary Stay and Dismissal Order by the Bankruptcy Court and deliver all consents necessary thereto.
|
6.
|
Additional Consenting 2016 Lender Obligations
|
The Restructuring Support Agreement provides that Consenting 2016 Lenders will not, directly or indirectly, and not direct any other Entity to (i)
investigate, assert, prosecute, or support, directly or indirectly, including by filing any document in support of, propounding discovery in support of, advocating to the Bankruptcy Court in favor of, or transferring material work product (whether
in writing or orally) in furtherance of another’s support of, any Settled Litigation or any other litigation or objection inconsistent in any way with the Consummation of the Plan; or (ii) seek payment from the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors
for any fees relating to any of the foregoing, other than as expressly permitted by the Restructuring Support Agreement.
|
7.
|
Obligations to Support Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Confirmation Order
|
The Restructuring Support Agreement provides that the Debtors, Consenting BrandCo Lenders, and Consenting 2016 Lenders will each support inclusion in the Confirmation Order of (i)
findings of fact and conclusions of law acceptable to the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders that all claims and causes of action asserted in the Adversary Proceeding are Estate Causes of Action and released under the Plan, (ii) an injunction
acceptable to the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders barring any Person from pursuing any such claims or causes of action or any other claims arising out of or related to the facts and circumstances alleged in the Adversary Proceeding, and (iii) a
bar order prohibiting the assertion by any party that is not a Released Party of any claim for indemnity or contribution against any Released Party arising out of or reasonably flowing from the claims or allegations in any claim that is released as
against the Released Parties under the Plan, in each case to be binding and final from and after the Plan Effective Date.
Pursuant to section 1123(b)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code and Rule 9019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the Plan
contains and effects global and integrated compromises and settlements, including the 2016 Settlement (collectively, the “Plan Settlement”) of all actual and potential
disputes between and among the Company Entities (including, for clarity, between and among the BrandCo Entities, on the one hand, and the Non-BrandCo Entities, on the other hand), the Creditors’ Committee, the Consenting BrandCo Lenders, and the
Consenting 2016 Lenders and all other disputes that might impact creditor recoveries, including, without limitation, any and all issues relating to:
|
(i) |
the allocation of the economic burden of repayment of the ABL DIP Facility and Term DIP Facility and/or payment of adequate protection obligations provided
pursuant to the Final DIP Order among the Debtors;
|
|
(ii) |
any and all disputes that might be raised impacting the allocation of value among the Debtors and their respective assets, including any and all disputes related
to the Intercompany DIP Facility; and
|
|
(iii) |
any and all other Settled Claims, including all claims arising in respect of the Debtors’ historical financing transactions, including the 2019 Transaction and
the BrandCo Transaction.
|
Upon Confirmation of the Plan, the Plan Settlement shall be binding upon all creditors and all other parties in interest pursuant
to section 1141(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.
The Plan Settlement shall not include any Intercompany Claims or Intercompany Interests that the Debtors elect to Reinstate, for
tax efficiency or similar purposes, in accordance with the Plan.
The Plan Settlement is supported by the Investigation Committee’s investigation, as discussed above.
|
A. |
Creditors’ Committee Investigation and Settlement
|
Since the Petition Date, the Debtors have worked cooperatively with the Creditors’ Committee to accommodate and respond to its
discovery requests and have made document productions and depositions available to other major constituents in these Chapter 11 Cases to ensure equal distribution of information. As of the date of this Disclosure Statement, the Debtors have produced
over 277,000 pages of discovery, and have conducted, and prepared witnesses, for several depositions in connection with the Creditors’ Committee’s investigation. The Creditors’ Committee also obtained significant document discovery from other
relevant parties and took depositions of those parties.
Pursuant to section 5.01(b) of the Restructuring Support Agreement, a letter from the Creditors’ Committee is included in the
Solicitation Materials for Holders of General Unsecured Claims and Unsecured Notes Claims, recommending such Holders to vote to accept the Plan and grant the releases contained in the Plan.
The Final DIP Order established a challenge period (that expired, except for the Creditors’ Committee, on October 31, 2022) for
all parties in interest with requisite standing to bring challenges, or seek standing to bring challenges on behalf of the Debtors’ estates (including asserting or prosecuting estate-held actions such as preferences, fraudulent transfers, and other
avoidance power claims), among other things, in respect of the Debtors’ historical financing transactions, including the BrandCo Transaction, against the ABL Agents and the lenders party to the ABL Facility Credit Agreement, the BrandCo Agent and the
lenders party to the BrandCo Credit Agreement, or their respective representatives. To enable the Creditors’ Committee to complete its investigation, and to attempt to reach a consensual resolution of potential challenges to the 2019 Transaction,
the BrandCo Transaction, and other potential disputes in these Chapter 11 Cases, the BrandCo Lenders, and the ABL Agent agreed to extend the Creditors’ Committee’s challenge deadline under the Final DIP Order, from October 31, 2022 through December
19, 2022 prior to execution of the Restructuring Support Agreement. Pursuant to section 2 of the Restructuring Support Agreement, the BrandCo Agent consented to extend the Creditors’ Committee’s challenge period through the earlier of the UCC
Settlement Waiver Date and the date that is five (5) days following the UCC Settlement Termination Date (each as defined in the Restructuring Support Agreement). In the event of a breach of section 6.01 (a) of the Restructuring Support Agreement,
subject to section 6.02 of the Restructuring Support Agreement, the Creditors’ Committee’s challenge period will be deemed to have been extended through the date which is five (5) days following the date of expiration of a cure period and the failure
of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders to cure such breach.
The following are the additional material terms of the Plan Settlement with respect to the Creditors’ Committee and the Holders
of General Unsecured Claims and Unsecured Notes Claims that it represents (the “Committee Settlement Terms”):
Under the Restructuring Support Agreement and subject to section 6.01 thereof, in exchange for the distributions under the Plan
to Classes 8 and 9(a)–(d) and certain other commitments set forth in the Restructuring Support Agreement, the Creditors’ Committee agreed not to directly or indirectly, and not to direct any other Entity to: (i) object to, delay, impede, or take any
other action to interfere with, delay, or impede the acceptance, consummation, or implementation of any Alternative Restructuring Proposal sought, solicited, filed, supported, voted in favor of, negotiated, formulated, prepared or otherwise
prosecuted by the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders that provides for Equivalent GUC Treatment; or (ii) (A) investigate, assert, prosecute, or support, directly or indirectly, including by filing any document in support of, propounding discovery in
support of, advocating to the Bankruptcy Court in favor of, or transferring material work product (whether in writing or orally) in furtherance of another’s support of (except but solely to the extent the Creditors’ Committee is required by
applicable Law to disclose any such work product that is not entitled to protection from discovery), (I) any challenge to the amount, validity, perfection, enforceability, priority, or extent of, or seek avoidance, disallowance, subordination, or
recharacterization of, any portion of any Claim of, or security interest or continuing lien granted to or for the benefit of, any Holder of a 2020 Term Loan Claim, or the BrandCo Agent; (II) any action for preferences, fraudulent transfers or
conveyances, other avoidance power claims or any other claims, counterclaims or causes of action, objections, contests, or defenses against any Holder of a 2020 Term Loan Claim, BrandCo Agent, or BrandCo Entity; (III) any other Challenge (as defined
in the Final DIP Order) against any Holder of a 2020 Term Loan Claim, BrandCo Agent, 2016 Agent, or any Claims or liens thereof; or (IV) any other Financing Transactions Litigation Claims (collectively, “Settled Litigation”) or (B) seek payment for any fees relating to any of the foregoing, other than as expressly permitted by the Restructuring Support Agreement.
Members of Class 8 that vote in favor of the Plan will recover a partial recovery even if Class 8 as a whole votes against the
Plan if the Court approves such distribution. Courts have held that classic death trap provisions that apply to the entire class do not per se violate the Bankruptcy Code as such provisions comport with “the Bankruptcy Code’s overall policy of
fostering consensual plans of reorganization,” are fair and equitable, and do not amount to a bad faith solicitation of votes. See, e.g., In re Zenith Electronics
Corp., 241 B.R. 92, 105 (Bankr. D. Del. 1999) (approving a death trap provision that gave bondholders nothing if they rejected the plan and a pro rata share of debentures if they accepted). This “partial” death trap structure is intended to
foster a global settlement and ensure that Class 8 Holders of Unsecured Notes Claims might recover something on account of their Claims. This was an integral part of the Plan Settlement requested by the Creditors’ Committee and certain of its
members, including the Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee, and the Debtors included this construct in the Plan provided that such treatment was not found to be improper by the Court.
As discussed in Section VIII.C., the Plan Settlement is the result of hard-fought, good faith negotiations among the Debtors, the
Creditors’ Committee, the Consenting BrandCo Lenders, and the Consenting 2016 Lenders. As part of such negotiations, the Consenting BrandCo Lenders agreed to an adjustment of the distributable value otherwise available to Holders of 2020 Term Loan
Claims under the Plan to allocate the cost of the GUC Settlement Amount to Holders of 2020 Term Loan Claims. Accordingly, the distributions to be made to Holders of 2020 Term Loan Claims under the Plan reflect a reduction in the distributable value
to which such Holders would otherwise be entitled, and absent the Plan Settlement, Holders of 2020 Term Loan Claims would be entitled to the value made available to Classes 9(a) through 9(d) under the Plan.
The percentage of the New Common Stock outstanding on the Effective Date represented by shares of New Common Stock issued under
the Plan will be diluted by the New Common Stock issued upon exercise of the New Warrants.
Other material terms of the Committee Settlement Terms with respect to distributions under the Plan (in addition to the GUC Trust
discussed below) are as follows:
|
• |
Cash Settlement Amount:
|
|
o |
(i) If Classes 9(a), 9(b), 9(c), and/or 9(d) accept the Plan and the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions16 are satisfied, Holders of Claims in
the accepting Classes shall be entitled to their pro rata portion of the GUC Settlement Amount, which GUC Settlement Amount consists of $44 million in aggregate amount of cash to be allocated among such Classes, as follows: 17
|
|
◾ |
Class 9(a) Talc Personal Injury Claims: 36.10%
|
|
◾ |
Class 9(b) Non-Qualified Pension Claims: 19.86%
|
|
◾ |
Class 9(c) Trade Claims: 25.27%
|
|
◾ |
Class 9(d) Other General Unsecured Claims: 18.77%
|
16
|
The “Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions” consist of the following conditions (unless otherwise waived by the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders): (i) the BrandCo
Settlement Termination Date shall not have occurred and (ii) the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders shall have not sent a Breach Notice that remains uncured and that, with the passage of time, would result in the occurrence of the BrandCo
Settlement Termination Date.
|
17
|
The allocated amounts in Classes 9(a)-9(d) are based on the Debtors’ estimate of the amount of Claims in such Classes as of December 13, 2022.
|
|
o |
(ii) If any such Classes vote to reject the Plan or the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are not satisfied, Holders of Claims in such rejecting Classes
shall receive no recoveries under the Plan on account of such Claims and the Reorganized Debtors shall retain the cash consideration otherwise distributable to such rejecting Class.
|
|
• |
Contract Rejection Damages Top-Up: In addition to the above, an amount
equal to 13% of the amount of any Allowed Contract Rejection Damages Claims above $50 million is to be distributed to Class 9(d) Other General Unsecured Claims only if such Class accepts the Plan and the Creditors’ Committee Settlement
Conditions are satisfied.
|
|
o |
(i) If Class 8 Unsecured Notes Claims accepts the Plan and the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are satisfied, Holders of Claims in such Class shall
each receive their Pro Rata share of the New Warrants;
|
|
o |
(ii) If Class 8 does not accept the Plan or the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are not satisfied, (a) Holders of such Claims that do not accept the
Plan will receive no recoveries on account of such Claims, and (b) Holders of such Claims that vote to accept the Plan on account of their Unsecured Notes Claim, and who do not, directly or indirectly, object to, or otherwise impede, delay,
or interfere with, solicitation, acceptance, Confirmation, or Consummation of the Plan will, subject to the Bankruptcy Court’s approval, receive 50% of what they would have recovered if Class 8 had accepted the Plan (the “Consenting Unsecured Noteholder Recovery”); provided that if the Bankruptcy
Court finds that the Consenting Unsecured Noteholder Recovery is improper, there shall be no such distribution to Consenting Noteholders under the Plan.
|
|
• |
Qualified Pensions: To be reinstated.
|
|
• |
Retained Preference Action Net Proceeds: If such classes accept the
Plan and the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are satisfied, Classes 9(a)–(d) shall receive their allocated portion, as set forth in the Plan, of any cash and cash equivalent proceeds of Retained Preference Actions recovered by the
GUC Trust (on its own behalf and on behalf of the PI Settlement Fund) less any amounts required to fund any and all costs, expenses, fees, taxes,
disbursements, debts, or obligations incurred from the operation and administration of the GUC Trust or the PI Settlement Fund, as discussed below, including in connection with the prosecution or settlement of Retained Preference Actions, and
all compensation, costs, and fees of the GUC Administrator, the PI Claims Administrator, and any professionals retained by the GUC Trust and the PI Settlement Fund. Any portion of such proceeds allocable to a Class of General Unsecured Claims
that votes to reject the Plan will be remitted to the Reorganized Debtors. If none of class 9(a)-(d) vote to accept the Plan or the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are not satisfied, the Reorganized Debtors will retain the Retained
Preference Actions and all proceeds thereof.
|
|
2.
|
Claims Administration, GUC Trust, and PI Settlement Fund
|
For the purpose of administering General Unsecured Claims and allocating the distributions under the Committee Settlement Terms,
the Plan provides for the establishment of the GUC Trust in accordance with the GUC Trust Agreement and the PI Settlement Fund in accordance with the PI Settlement Fund Agreement, in each case on the Effective Date and solely in the event that
applicable Classes of General Unsecured Claims vote to accept the Plan and the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are satisfied. In such event, on the Effective Date, in accordance with the Plan Settlement, the GUC Trust Assets shall vest in
the GUC Trust, and/or the PI Settlement Fund Assets shall vest in the PI Settlement Fund, in each case free and clear of all Claims, Interests, liens, and other encumbrances.
Any Estate Causes of Action arising under section 547 of the Bankruptcy Code, and any recovery action related thereto under
section 550 of the Bankruptcy Code, against a vendor of the Debtors (other than any critical vendor reasonably designated by the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors) (a “Retained
Preference Action”) shall be transferred to the GUC Administrator as agent for the GUC Trust and PI Settlement Fund.
All GUC Trust/PI Fund Operating Expenses shall be payable solely from a reserve to be established solely to pay the GUC Trust/PI
Settlement Fund Operating Expenses, which reserve shall be (i) funded (A) by the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, in an amount equal to $4 million (which amount may be increased by up to $1 million by the Bankruptcy Court for good
cause shown by the GUC Administrator) less the aggregate amount of fees and expenses of members of the Creditors’ Committee paid as Restructuring Expenses in
excess of $500,000, and (B) from proceeds of Retained Preference Actions recovered by the GUC Trust (on its own behalf and as agent for the PI Settlement Fund), (ii) held by the GUC Trust in a segregated account and administered by the GUC
Administrator on and after the Effective Date, and (iii) allocated as between the GUC Trust and the PI Settlement Fund by the GUC Administrator and PI Claims Administrator in their discretion from time to time.
|
3.
|
Consenting BrandCo Lenders’ Continuing Support
|
As set forth in section 6.01(a) of the Restructuring Support Agreement, the Consenting BrandCo Lenders have agreed (i) that they
will use commercially reasonable efforts to support confirmation of Plan and/or any Alternative Restructuring Proposal supported by the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders to provide for treatment of each class of Creditors’ Committee Constituent
Claims that is not economically less favorable to holders in each such class than the treatment contemplated for such class under the Plan; and (ii) that they will not, without the Creditors’ Committee’s consent, support any Alternative Restructuring
Proposal that would offer or likely result in treatment of any class of Creditors’ Committee Constituent Claims that is less favorable to the holders of such class than the Equivalent GUC Treatment of such class contemplated under the Plan. In the
event of a breach by the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders of their obligations under section 6.01(a) of the Restructuring Support Agreement, the Creditors’ Committee may exercise the remedies set forth in section 6.02(c) of the Restructuring
Support Agreement, which include seeking specific performance and/or seeking standing to prosecute (and, if standing is granted, prosecuting) a UCC BrandCo Challenge (as defined in the Restructuring Support Agreement) in respect to the Settled
Litigation.
|
4.
|
Creditors’ Committee Member Fees and Expenses
|
The professional fees and expenses of the individual members of the Creditors Committee (including the Unsecured Notes Indenture
Trustee’s fees and expenses) will be paid as Restructuring Expenses up to a total cap of $1,250,000 (amounts above $500,000 will reduce the $4 million cap on GUC Trust/PI Settlement Fund Operating Expenses costs dollar-for-dollar), consistent with
sections 363(b), 1123(b)(6), and 1129(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rule 9019 and, with respect to the Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee’s fees and expenses, consistent with the terms of the Unsecured Notes Indenture.
|
5.
|
Releases and Insurance Availability
|
As provided by the Committee Settlement Terms, the Released Parties under the Plan exclude all Entities liable for Talc Personal
Injury Claims in respect of Jean Nate products and other products produced by the Debtors, other than the Debtors and any current or former officer, director, authorized agent, or employee of the Debtors. For the avoidance of doubt, any insurer of
the Debtors that may be liable for Talc Personal Injury Claims and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and its Affiliates shall be not be a Released Party under the Plan; Holders of Talc Personal Injury Claims retain any preexisting rights of recovery
directly against such insurers, if any. Under the Plan, any historical insurance policies will be retained by the Reorganized Debtors and will be available to satisfy any claims not discharged in these Chapter 11 Cases, to the extent covered under
such policies and applicable non-bankruptcy law.
As discussed above, on February 17, 2023, the Debtors, the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders, the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders, and
the Creditors’ Committee agreed to the terms of the 2016 Settlement. The material terms of the 2016 Settlement, as contemplated under the Restructuring Support Agreement and the Plan, are as follows:
1. Dismissal of the Adversary Proceeding and Withdrawal of Objections. In
consideration for the benefits described below, Consenting 2016 Lenders that are Plaintiffs in the Adversary Proceeding have agreed to stay the Adversary Proceeding and hold such litigation in abeyance until the Effective Date at which time the
Adversary Proceeding will be dismissed with prejudice. Additionally, the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders agreed to withdraw their various objections to the Disclosure Statement, Exclusivity Extension Motion, and Backstop Motion.
2. Equity Rights Offering and Backstop Commitment Agreement. The Aggregate Rights Offering Amount has been
increased from $650 million to $670 million (subject to the Excess Liquidity Cutback). The Equity Commitment Parties that are not members of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders collectively have committed to backstop 82% of the Equity Rights
Offering and in return will receive 82% of the Equity Commitment Premium and the Direct Allocation Amount. The Equity Commitment Parties that are members of the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders have collectively committed to backstop 18% of the Equity
Rights Offering and in return will receive 18% of the Equity Commitment Premium and the Direct Allocation Amount.
3. BrandCo
B-1 and B-2 Recovery
a. 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claim Recovery. $20 million of the adequate protection payments payable to Holders of 2020 Term B-1 Loans on March 8, 2023 under
the Final DIP Order will be deferred to the earlier of the termination of the Restructuring Support Agreement and the Plan Effective Date, and then waived under the Plan upon the Effective Date.
b. 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claim Recovery. Holders of 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims will receive 82% of the New Common Stock issued under the Plan as well as the
82% of the Equity Subscription Rights in connection with the Equity Rights Offering.
4. 2016 Term Loan and 2020 Term B-3 Loan Recovery. Holders of OpCo Term Loan Claims (2016 Term Loan Claims and 2020 Term B-3 Loan Claims against
the OpCo Debtors) will be given the option to elect to receive (i) their pro rata share of cash on the Effective Date in the aggregate amount of $56 million or (ii) at their election, their pro rata share of 18% of the New Common Stock and 18% of
the Equity Subscription Rights in connection with the Equity Rights Offering; provided that Holders of no more than $334 million of OpCo Term Loan Claims can elect to
receive cash.
5. Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders Professionals’ Fees. Under the 2016 Settlement, the
Debtors have agreed to reimburse the fees and expenses incurred by the advisors to the 2016 Term Loan Lender Group Advisors through the date of the Restructuring Support Agreement up to $11 million (excluding fees and expenses previously paid by
the Debtors prior to the date of the Restructuring Support Agreement), plus up to an additional
$350,000 per month on a go-forward basis (prorated for any partial months) on the terms set forth in the Restructuring Support Agreement.
6. Dilution of New Common Stock by Warrants. New Common Stock issued under the Plan is subject to dilution by the
New Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the New Warrants issued to Holders of Class 8 Unsecured Notes.
7. Committee Settlement Terms. The 2016 Settlement does not alter the treatment of General Unsecured Claims in Class 9(a) through (d) contemplated by the Committee Settlement Terms
discussed above.
8. Governance. The New Organizational Documents shall provide for the following
minority protections (which shall not be subject to amendment other than with the consent of holders of at least two-thirds of the then-issued and outstanding shares of New Common Stock and as to which the New Organizational Documents will
provide equivalent rights to all equivalent sized holders of New Common Stock): (i) annual audited and quarterly financial statements by Reorganized Holdings, as well as a quarterly management call, including a Q&A; (ii) no transfer
restrictions other than restrictions on transfers to competitors, customary drag-along and tag-along rights (in connection with a transfer of a majority of the then-outstanding New Common Stock), and other customary transfer restrictions
(including restrictions on transfers that are not in compliance with applicable law or would require Reorganized Holdings to register securities or to register as an “investment company”), but in any event will not include any right of first
refusal or right of first offer; and (iii) customary pro rata preemptive rights in connection with equity issuances for cash (subject to customary carve outs) for accredited investor holders of New Common Stock above a specified threshold
(which threshold shall be determined to provide such preemptive rights to approximately ten (10) holders as of the Effective Date).
|
C. |
Evaluation of the Plan Settlement under Section 1123 and Rule 9019
|
The Plan Settlement (encompassing both the Committee Settlement Terms and the 2016 Settlement) embodied in the Plan is a key
element of the Plan, is the result of hard-fought, good faith negotiations, and resolves a host of complex issues in these Chapter 11 Cases. After careful consideration of the potential claims by, between, among, and/or against the Debtors, and
after months of engagement with key creditor constituencies, including the Creditors’ Committee, the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders, and the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders, each of the Debtors have determined that the Plan Settlement is fair,
equitable, and in the best interest of their Estates. The Plan Settlement is supported by substantial analysis and negotiations by the Debtors, the Creditors’ Committee, the Consenting BrandCo Lenders, and the Consenting 2016 Lenders. The Plan
Settlement was also considered and approved by the full Board and the Restructuring Committee, which includes disinterested and independent directors, some of which were and are independently advised and represented. Further, in recognition of
potential inter-debtor issues between the BrandCo Entities and Non-BrandCo Entities, including the allocation of value between the two sets of Debtors and the settlement of intercompany Claims, Mr. Panagos, as independent officer of each of the
BrandCo entities, and his independent advisors have regularly attended meetings of the Restructuring Committee. Mr. Panagos’s advisors and the Debtors’ other chapter 11 professionals have weekly calls to ensure that Mr. Panagos, on behalf of the
BrandCo Entities and their stakeholders, remains fully informed of developments in these Chapter 11 Cases, including the Plan Settlement. Mr. Panagos independently analyzed and approved the Plan Settlement on behalf of the BrandCo Entities.
Accordingly, the Debtors collectively support the Plan Settlement.
Under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9019, any settlement of claims of or against the Debtors is subject to approval by the
Bankruptcy Court. Further, because the Plan Settlement is an essential element of the Plan, approval of the Plan Settlement by the Bankruptcy Court is a necessary precondition to Confirmation and Consummation of the Plan. In TMT Trailer Ferry, the U.S. Supreme Court outlined the standards for courts to use in evaluating proposed settlements by debtors in bankruptcy. The key function of
courts in that circumstance, the Court explained, is “to compare the terms of the compromise with the likely rewards of litigation.” Protective Committee for
Independent Stockholders of TMT Trailer Ferry, Inc. v. Anderson, 390 U.S. 414, 425 (1968). Following the Supreme Court’s decision in TMT Trailer Ferry, the Second Circuit outlined certain factors to be considered by courts evaluating whether to approve settlements proposed by a debtor in
bankruptcy proceedings:
|
i. |
The balance between the litigation’s possibility of success and the settlement’s future benefits;
|
|
ii. |
The likelihood of complex and protracted litigation, “with its attendant expense, inconvenience, and delay,” including the difficulty in collecting on the
judgement;
|
|
iii. |
“[T]he paramount interests of the creditors,” including each affected class’s relative benefits “and the degree to which creditors either do not object to or
affirmatively support the proposed settlement”;
|
|
iv. |
Whether other parties in interest support the settlement;
|
|
v. |
The “competency and experience of counsel” supporting, and “[t]he experience and knowledge of the bankruptcy court judge” reviewing, the settlement;
|
|
vi. |
“[T]he nature and breadth of releases to be obtained by officers and directors”; and
|
|
vii. |
“[T]he extent to which the settlement is the product of arm’s length bargaining.”
|
In re Iridium Operating LLC, 478 F.3d 452, 462 (2d Cir.
2007).
The Debtors believe the benefits of the Plan Settlement are significant. In particular, with respect to each of the Iridium factors:
First, the balance between
the litigation’s possibility of success and the settlement's benefits weighs in favor of the Plan Settlement. The Debtors have reached a compromise of the complex and unique issues in these chapter 11 cases, paving the way to emergence. In
evaluating the reasonableness of the Plan Settlement, the Debtors and their advisors carefully analyzed multiple factors, including (a) the amount of the Debtors’ total enterprise value allocable to the OpCo Debtors and the BrandCo Entities, (b)
the respective rights and obligations of the OpCo Debtors and the BrandCo Entities with respect to repayment of the Term DIP Facility and other obligations, including Administrative Claims, (c) the respective rights of the Holders of 2020 Term
B-1 Loan Claims, 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims, 2020 Term B-3 Loan Claims, and 2016 Term Loan Claims, and (d) the risks associated with complex and protracted litigation. In conducting this analysis, the Debtors and their advisors also carefully
analyzed the proper allocation of certain costs, including allocation of the entire GUC Settlement Amount fully to the Holders of 2020 Term Loan Claims. The distributions provided under the Plan to Class 4 (OpCo Term Loan Claims), on the one
hand, and to Class 5 (2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims) and Class 6 (2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims), on the other hand, are based on such analysis. The Debtors and the Restructuring Committee concluded that the Plan Settlement was reasonable in light of
their assessment of the claims being released and the value provided in exchange therefor, and, moreover, the significant benefits to the Debtors’ overall value from a global resolution of all potential litigation regarding value among the
Debtors’ creditors.
Second, the likelihood of complex and
protracted litigation, with its attendant expense, inconvenience, and delay weighs in favor of the Plan Settlement. As courts have recognized in assessing Rule 9019 settlements, a litigation claim is only as valuable as it is collectible. With the
resolution of the Creditor Committee’s potential challenge, the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders’ objections, and the Adversary Proceeding, among other things, all estate-held causes of action (including causes of action to avoid or otherwise unwind the
Debtors’ previous financing transactions) arising in respect of the Debtors’ previous financing transactions will be resolved. This clarity in respect of the Debtors’ prepetition capital structure serves as the basis for the series of integrated
transactions and compromises embodied in the Plan.
Third, the paramount interests of the
creditors is served by the Plan Settlement. Creditors are well-served by the Plan Settlement because, in addition to being supported by the Debtors’ major constituencies, the Plan Settlement provides the Debtors with a confirmable path to emerge
from Chapter 11. Emergence from these Chapter 11 Cases with the funding provided by the Plan will set the Reorganized Debtors up for success, to the benefit of creditors and all stakeholders.
Fourth, parties in interest support
the Plan Settlement. The Plan Settlement is supported by three of the Debtors’ most important stakeholder groups: (i) the Consenting BrandCo Lenders, (ii) Consenting 2016 Lenders, and (iii) the Creditors’ Committee, which owes a fiduciary duty to
unsecured creditors. This extraordinary creditor support is the most convincing evidence that the Plan Settlement reflects the best available resolution for all parties-in-interest and is in the “paramount interests of the creditors.” Iridium, 478 F.3d at 462.
Fifth, the Plan Settlement is
supported by competent and experienced counsel and will be reviewed by an experienced and knowledgeable Court. The key parties-in-interest, including the Debtors, the Consenting BrandCo Lenders, Consenting 2016 Lenders, and the Creditors’ Committee,
have been represented by skilled and experienced bankruptcy practitioners, including (i) Paul, Weiss, (ii) PJT, (iii) A&M, (iv) Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, (v) Centerview Partners, (vi) Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, (vii) Moelis
& Company, (viii) Brown Rudnick LLP, and (ix) Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc. These Chapter 11 Cases are also presided over by the Court.
Sixth, the nature and breadth of
releases to be obtained by officers and directors are reasonable and were necessary components of the global settlement. The proposed releases are reasonable in light of the complex issues in these Chapter 11 Cases and the great benefit they will
provide to the Debtors on a go-forward basis.
Seventh, the Plan Settlement is the
product of arm’s length bargaining. The Plan Settlement is supported by substantial analysis, diligence, and negotiations by the Debtors, the Creditors’ Committee, the Consenting BrandCo Lenders, and the Consenting 2016 Lenders. The Plan Settlement
was also considered and approved by the full Revlon, Inc. Board of Directors and its Restructuring Committee, which included disinterested and independent directors, some of which were and are independently advised and represented.
Accordingly, the Plan Settlement should be approved pursuant to section 1123 of the Bankruptcy Code and Federal Rule of
Bankruptcy Procedures Rule 9019, including for the reasons to be set forth in the Debtors’ brief in connection with Confirmation of the Plan, which shall be filed on the Bankruptcy Court’s docket prior to the Confirmation Hearing.
VIII. |
SUMMARY OF CHAPTER 11 PLAN
|
THE FOLLOWING SUMMARIZES SOME OF THE SIGNIFICANT ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN. THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO THE MORE DETAILED INFORMATION SET FORTH IN THE PLAN.
|
|
A. |
Administrative Claims, Priority Claims, and Statutory Fees
|
In accordance with section 1123(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, Administrative Claims and Priority Tax Claims have not been
classified and, thus, are excluded from the Classes of Claims and Interests set forth in Article III of the Plan.
Except with respect to Administrative Claims that are Professional Compensation Claims, and except to the extent that a Holder of
an Allowed Administrative Claim and the Debtor against which such Allowed Administrative Claim is asserted (with the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders) agree to less
favorable treatment for such Holder, each Holder of an Allowed Administrative Claim, other than an Allowed Professional Compensation Claim, shall be paid in full in Cash in full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement, release, and discharge
of such Administrative Claim on (a) the later of: (i) on or as soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective Date if such Administrative Claim is Allowed as of the Effective Date; (ii) on or as soon as reasonably practicable after the date such
Administrative Claim is Allowed; (iii) the date such Allowed Administrative Claim becomes due and payable, or as soon thereafter as is practicable or (b) at such time and upon such terms as set forth in a Final Order of the Bankruptcy Court, as
applicable; provided, however, that Allowed Administrative Claims
that arise in the ordinary course of the Debtors’ business shall be paid in the ordinary course of business (or as otherwise approved by the Bankruptcy Court) in accordance with the terms and subject to the conditions of any agreements governing,
instruments evidencing, or other documents relating to such transactions
A notice setting forth the Administrative Claims Bar Date will be Filed on the Bankruptcy Court’s docket and served with the
notice of entry of the Confirmation Order and shall be available by downloading such notice from the website of the Debtors’ claims and noticing agent at https://cases.ra.kroll.com/Revlon or the Bankruptcy Court’s website at http://www.nysb.uscourts.gov. No other notice of the Administrative Claims Bar Date will be provided. Except as otherwise provided in Article II.A and Article II.B of the
Plan, requests for payment of Administrative Claims that accrued on or before the Effective Date (other than Professional Compensation Claims) must be Filed and served on the Reorganized Debtors pursuant to the procedures specified in the
Confirmation Order and the notice of entry of the Confirmation Order no later than the Administrative Claims Bar Date. Holders of Administrative Claims that are
required to, but do not, File and serve a request for payment of such Administrative Claims by such date shall be forever barred, estopped, and enjoined from asserting such Administrative Claims against the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors or
their respective property or Estates and such Administrative Claims shall be deemed discharged as of the Effective Date. If for any reason any such Administrative Claim is incapable of being forever barred and discharged, then the Holder of such
Claim shall not have recourse to any property of the Reorganized Debtors to be distributed pursuant to the Plan. Objections to such requests for payment of an Administrative Claim, if any, must be Filed and served on the Reorganized
Debtors and the requesting party no later than the Claims Objection Deadline
|
2.
|
Professional Compensation Claims
|
|
a. |
Professional Fee Escrow Account
|
As soon as reasonably practicable after the Confirmation Date, and no later than one (1) Business Day prior to the Effective
Date, the Debtors shall establish the Professional Fee Escrow. On the Effective Date, the Debtors shall fund the Professional Fee Escrow with Cash in the amount of the aggregate Professional Fee Escrow Amount for all Professionals. The Professional
Fee Escrow shall be maintained in trust for the Professionals and for no other Entities until all Allowed Professional Compensation Claims have been irrevocably paid in full to the Professionals pursuant to one or more Final Orders of the Bankruptcy
Court. No Liens, Claims, or interests shall encumber the Professional Fee Escrow or Cash held on account of the Professional Fee Escrow in any way. Such funds shall not be considered property of the Estates, the Debtors, or the Reorganized Debtors,
subject to the release of Cash to the Reorganized Debtors from the Professional Fee Escrow in accordance with Article II.B.2 of the Plan; provided, however, that the Reorganized Debtors shall have a reversionary interest in the excess, if any, of the amount of the Professional Fee Escrow over the aggregate
amount of Allowed Professional Compensation Claims of the Professionals to be paid from the Professional Fee Escrow. When such Allowed Professional Compensation Claims have been paid in full, any remaining amount in the Professional Fee Escrow shall
promptly be paid to the Reorganized Debtors without any further action or Order of the Bankruptcy Court.
|
b. |
Final Fee Applications and Payment of Professional Compensation Claims
|
All final requests for payment of Professional Compensation Claims shall be Filed no later than the day that is the first
Business Day that is forty-five (45) calendar days after the Effective Date. Such requests shall be Filed with the Bankruptcy Court and served as required by the Interim Compensation Order and the Case Management Procedures, as applicable. After
notice and a hearing in accordance with the procedures established by the Bankruptcy Code and any applicable Bankruptcy Court orders, the Allowed amounts of such Professional Compensation Claims shall be determined by the Bankruptcy Court. The
Allowed amount of Professional Compensation Claims owing to the Professionals, after taking into account any prior payments to and retainers held by such Professionals, shall be paid in full in Cash to such Professionals from funds held in the
Professional Fee Escrow as soon as reasonably practicable following the date when such Claims are Allowed by a Final Order. To the extent that funds held in the Professional Fee Escrow are unable to satisfy the Allowed amount of Professional
Compensation Claims owing to the Professionals, each Professional shall have an Allowed Administrative Claim for any such deficiency, which shall be satisfied by the Reorganized Debtors in the ordinary course of business in accordance with Article
II.B.2 of the Plan and notwithstanding any obligation to File Proofs of Claim or requests for payment on or before the Administrative Claims Bar Date. After all Professional Compensation Claims have been paid in full, the escrow agent shall promptly
return any excess amounts held in the Professional Fee Escrow, if any, to the Reorganized Debtors, without any further action or Order of the Bankruptcy Court.
|
c. |
Professional Fee Escrow Amount
|
The Professionals shall estimate their Professional Compensation Claims before and as of the Effective Date, taking into account
any prior payments, and shall deliver such estimate to the Debtors no later than five (5) Business Days prior to the anticipated Effective Date; provided, however, that such estimate shall not be considered an admission or representation with respect to the fees and expenses of such Professional that are the subject
of a Professional’s final request for payment of Professional Compensation Claims Filed with the Bankruptcy Court and such Professionals are not bound to any extent by such estimates. If a Professional does not provide an estimate, the Debtors may
estimate a reasonable amount of unbilled fees and expenses of such Professional, taking into account any prior payments; provided, however, that such estimate shall not be considered an admission with respect to the fees and expenses of such Professional that are the subject of a Professional’s final request for
payment of Professional Compensation Claims Filed with the Bankruptcy Court and such Professionals are not bound to any extent by such estimates. The total amount so estimated shall be utilized by the Debtors to determine the Professional Fee Escrow
Amount.
|
d. |
Post-Confirmation Date Fees and Expenses
|
From and after the Confirmation Date, the Debtors or Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, shall, in the ordinary course of
business and without any further notice to or action, order, or approval of the Bankruptcy Court, pay in Cash the legal, professional, or other fees and expenses of Professionals that have been formally retained in accordance with sections 327, 363,
or 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code before the Confirmation Date. Upon the Confirmation Date, any requirement that Professionals comply with sections 327 through 331, 363, and 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code or the Interim Compensation Order in seeking
retention for services rendered after such date shall terminate, and the Debtors may employ and pay any Professional in the ordinary course of business without any further notice to or action, order, or approval of the Bankruptcy Court. For the
avoidance of doubt, nothing in the foregoing or otherwise in the Plan shall modify or affect the Debtors’ obligations under the Final DIP Order, including in respect of the Approved Budget (as defined in the Final DIP Order), prior to the Effective
Date.
On the Effective Date, or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, except to the extent that a Holder of an Allowed Priority
Tax Claim and the Debtor against which such Allowed Priority Tax Claim is asserted (with the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders) agree to less favorable treatment for such
Holder, in exchange for and in full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement, release, and discharge of each Allowed Priority Tax Claim, each Holder of an Allowed Priority Tax Claim due and payable on or before the Effective Date shall receive,
in the discretion of the applicable Debtor (with the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed) of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders) or Reorganized Debtor, one of the following treatments: (1) Cash in an amount equal to
the amount of such Allowed Priority Tax Claim, plus interest at the rate determined under applicable nonbankruptcy law and to the extent provided for by
section 511 of the Bankruptcy Code, payable on or as soon as practicable following the Effective Date; (2) Cash in an aggregate amount of such Allowed Priority Tax Claim payable in installment payments over a period of time not to exceed five (5)
years after the Petition Date, pursuant to section 1129(a)(9)(C) of the Bankruptcy Code, plus interest at the rate determined under applicable nonbankruptcy law and to the extent provided for by section 511 of the Bankruptcy Code; or (3) such other
treatment as may be agreed upon by such Holder and the Debtors, or otherwise determined by an order of the Bankruptcy Court.
|
4.
|
ABL DIP Facility Claims
|
Except to the extent that the Debtors (with the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) of the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders) and a Holder of an Allowed ABL DIP Facility Claim agree to a less favorable treatment, each Allowed ABL DIP Facility Claim, as well as any other fees, interest, or other obligations owing to third parties under
the ABL DIP Facility Credit Agreement and/or the DIP Orders, shall receive, in full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement, release, and discharge of such Claim, payment in full in Cash by the Debtors on the Effective Date, or as reasonably
practicable thereafter, in accordance with the terms of the ABL DIP Facility Credit Agreement and the DIP Orders, and contemporaneously with the foregoing payment, the ABL DIP Facility shall be deemed canceled (other than with respect to ABL DIP
Facility Claims constituting contingent obligations of the Debtors that are not yet due and payable), all Liens on property of the Debtors and the Reorganized Debtors arising out of or related to the ABL DIP Facility shall automatically terminate,
and all collateral subject to such Liens shall be automatically released, in each case without further action by the ABL DIP Facility Agent or the ABL DIP Facility Lenders and all guarantees of the Debtors and Reorganized Debtors arising out of or
related to the ABL DIP Facility Claims (other than any ABL DIP Facility Claims constituting contingent obligations of the Debtors that are not yet due and payable) shall be automatically discharged and released, in each case without further action by
the ABL DIP Facility Agent or the ABL DIP Facility Lenders pursuant to the terms of the ABL DIP Facility. The ABL DIP Facility Agent and the ABL DIP Facility Lenders shall take all actions to effectuate and confirm such termination, release, and
discharge as reasonably requested by the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors. From and after entry of the Confirmation Order, the Debtors or Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, shall, without any further notice to or action, order or approval of the
Bankruptcy Court or any other party, pay in Cash the legal, professional and other fees and expenses of the ABL DIP Facility Agent and the SISO ABL DIP Facility Agent in accordance with the Final DIP Order, but without any requirement that the
professionals of the ABL DIP Facility Agent or SISO Term Loan Agent comply with the review procedures set forth therein.
|
5.
|
Term DIP Facility Claims
|
Except to the extent that the Debtors (with the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) of the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders) and a Holder of an Allowed Term DIP Facility Claim agree to a less favorable treatment, each Allowed Term DIP Facility Claim, as well as any other fees, interest, or other obligations owing to third parties under
the Term DIP Facility Credit Agreements and/or the DIP Orders, shall receive, in full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement, release, and discharge of such Claim, payment in full in Cash by the Debtors on the Effective Date, in accordance
with the terms of the Term DIP Facility Credit Agreement and the DIP Orders, and contemporaneously with the foregoing payment, the Term DIP Facility shall be deemed canceled (other than with respect to Term DIP Facility Claims constituting contingent
obligations of the Debtors that are not yet due and payable), all Liens on property of the Debtors and the Reorganized Debtors arising out of or related to the Term DIP Facility shall automatically terminate, and all collateral subject to such Liens
shall be automatically released, in each case without further action by the Term DIP Facility Agent or the Term DIP Facility Lenders and all guarantees of the Debtors and Reorganized Debtors arising out of or related to the Term DIP Facility Claims
(other than any Term DIP Facility Claims constituting contingent obligations of the Debtors that are not yet due and payable) shall be automatically discharged and released, in each case without further action by the Term DIP Facility Agent or the
Term DIP Facility Lenders pursuant to the terms of the Term DIP Facility. The Term DIP Facility Agent and the Term DIP Facility Lenders shall take all actions to effectuate and confirm such termination, release, and discharge as reasonably requested
by the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors. From and after entry of the Confirmation Order, the Debtors or Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, shall, without any further notice to or action, order or approval of the Bankruptcy Court or any other
party, pay in Cash the legal, professional and other fees and expenses of the Term DIP Facility Agent and the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders in accordance with the Final DIP Order, but without any requirement that the professionals of the Term DIP
Facility Agent or Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders comply with the review procedures set forth therein.
|
6.
|
Intercompany DIP Facility Claims
|
On the Effective Date, the Intercompany DIP Facility Claims shall be satisfied pursuant to the distributions provided under the
Plan on account of Claims against the BrandCo Entities.
On the Effective Date, the Intercompany DIP Facility shall be deemed canceled, all Liens on property of the Debtors and the
Reorganized Debtors arising out of or related to the Intercompany DIP Facility shall automatically terminate, and all collateral subject to such Liens shall be automatically released, in each case without further action by the Intercompany DIP
Facility Lenders, and all guarantees of the Debtors and Reorganized Debtors arising out of or related to the Intercompany DIP Facility shall be automatically discharged and released, in each case without further action by the Intercompany DIP
Facility Lenders pursuant to the terms of the Intercompany DIP Facility.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Plan, subject to Article XIV.M of the Plan, on the Effective Date, the
Debtors shall pay, in full in Cash, any fees due and owing to the U.S. Trustee at the time of Confirmation. Thereafter, subject to Article XIV.M of the Plan, each applicable Reorganized Debtor shall pay all U.S. Trustee fees due and owing under
section 1930 of the Judicial Code in the ordinary course until the earlier of (1) the entry of a final decree closing the applicable Reorganized Debtor’s Chapter 11 Case, or (2) the Bankruptcy Court enters an order converting or dismissing the
applicable Reorganized Debtor’s Chapter 11 Case. Any deadline for filing Administrative Claims or Professional Compensation Claims shall not apply to U.S. Trustee fees.
|
B. |
Classification and Treatment of Claims and Interests
|
Pursuant to sections 1122 and 1123 of the Bankruptcy Code, set forth below is a designation of Classes of Claims and Interests.
All Claims and Interests, except for Claims addressed in Article II of the Plan, are classified in the Classes set forth in Article III of the Plan. A Claim or Interest is classified in a particular Class only to the extent that the Claim or
Interest qualifies within the description of that Class and is classified in other Classes to the extent that any portion of the Claim or Interest qualifies within the description of such other Classes. A Claim against a Debtor also is classified in
a particular Class for the purpose of receiving distributions pursuant to the Plan only to the extent that such Claim is an Allowed Claim in that Class and has not been paid, released, or otherwise satisfied before the Effective Date. With respect
to the treatment of all Claims and Interests as forth in Article III.C hereof, the consent rights of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders to settle or otherwise compromise Claims are as set forth in the Restructuring Support Agreement
|
1.
|
Summary of Classification
|
The classification of Claims and Interests against each Debtor (as applicable) pursuant to the Plan is as set forth below. The
Plan shall apply as a separate Plan for each of the Debtors, and the classification of Claims and Interests set forth in the Plan shall apply separately to each of the Debtors. All of the potential Classes for the Debtors are set forth in Article
III of the Plan. Certain of the Debtors may not have Holders of Claims or Interests in a particular Class or Classes, and such Classes shall be treated as set forth in Article III.H of the Plan.
The following chart summarizes the classification of Claims and Interests pursuant to the Plan:18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other Secured Claims
|
|
Unimpaired
|
|
Not Entitled to Vote (Deemed to Accept)
|
2
|
|
Other Priority Claims
|
|
Unimpaired
|
|
Not Entitled to Vote (Deemed to Accept)
|
3
|
|
FILO ABL Claims
|
|
Unimpaired
|
|
Not Entitled to Vote (Deemed to Accept)
|
4
|
|
OpCo Term Loan Claims
|
|
Impaired
|
|
Entitled to Vote
|
5
|
|
2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims
|
|
Impaired
|
|
Entitled to Vote
|
6
|
|
2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims
|
|
Impaired
|
|
Entitled to Vote
|
7
|
|
BrandCo Third Lien Guaranty Claims
|
|
Impaired
|
|
Not Entitled to Vote (Deemed to Reject)
|
8
|
|
Unsecured Notes Claims
|
|
Impaired
|
|
Entitled to Vote
|
18 |
The information in the table is provided in summary form and is qualified in its entirety by Article III.C of the Plan.
|
9(a)
|
|
Talc Personal Injury Claims
|
|
Impaired
|
|
Entitled to Vote
|
9(b)
|
|
Non-Qualified Pension Claims
|
|
Impaired
|
|
Entitled to Vote
|
9(c)
|
|
Trade Claims
|
|
Impaired
|
|
Entitled to Vote
|
9(d)
|
|
Other General Unsecured Claims
|
|
Impaired
|
|
Entitled to Vote
|
10
|
|
Subordinated Claims
|
|
Impaired
|
|
Not Entitled to Vote (Deemed to Reject)
|
11
|
|
Intercompany Claims and Interests
|
|
Unimpaired / Impaired
|
|
Not Entitled to Vote (Presumed to Accept / Deemed to Reject)
|
12
|
|
Interests in Holdings
|
|
Impaired
|
|
Not Entitled to Vote (Deemed to Reject)
|
|
2.
|
Treatment of Claims and Interests
|
Subject to Article VIII of the Plan, to the extent a Class contains Allowed Claims or Interests with respect to a particular
Debtor, each Holder of an Allowed Claim or Allowed Interest, as applicable, shall receive under the Plan the treatment described below in full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement, release, and discharge of and in exchange for such Holder’s
Allowed Claim or Allowed Interest, except to the extent different treatment is agreed to by the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors and the Holder of such Allowed Claim or Allowed Interest, as applicable.
|
a. |
Class 1 – Other Secured Claims
|
|
i.
|
Classification: Class 1 consists
of all Other Secured Claims.
|
|
ii. |
Treatment: On the Effective Date, or as soon as reasonably practicable
thereafter, except to the extent that a Holder of an Allowed Other Secured Claim and the Debtor against which such Allowed Other Secured Claim is asserted agree to less favorable treatment for such Holder, each Holder of an Allowed Other
Secured Claim shall receive, at the option of the Debtor against which such Allowed Other Secured Claim is asserted (with the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders), in
full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement, release, and discharge of such Claim, either:
|
|
(A) |
payment in full in Cash;
|
|
(B) |
delivery of the collateral securing such Claim and payment of any interest required under section 506(b) of the Bankruptcy Code;
|
|
(C) |
Reinstatement of such Claim; or
|
|
(D) |
such other treatment rendering such Allowed Other Secured Claim Unimpaired in accordance with section 1124 of the Bankruptcy Code.
|
|
iii. |
Voting: Class 1 is Unimpaired under the Plan. Each Holder of a Class
1 Other Secured Claim is conclusively presumed to have accepted the Plan pursuant to section 1126(f) of the Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, each Holder of a Class 1 Other Secured Claim is not entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan.
|
|
b. |
Class 2 – Other Priority Claims
|
|
i. |
Classification: Class 2 consists of all Other Priority Claims.
|
|
ii. |
Treatment: On the Effective Date, or as soon as reasonably practicable
thereafter, except to the extent that a Holder of an Allowed Other Priority Claim and the Debtor against which such Allowed Other Priority Claim is asserted (with the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) of the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders) agree to less favorable treatment for such Holder, each Holder of an Allowed Other Priority Claim shall receive, at the option of the Debtor against which such Allowed Other Priority Claim is asserted
(with the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders), in full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement, release, and discharge of such Claim, either:
|
|
(A) |
payment in full in Cash; or
|
|
(B) |
such other treatment rendering such Allowed Other Priority Claim Unimpaired in accordance with section 1124 of the Bankruptcy Code.
|
|
iii. |
Voting: Class 2 is Unimpaired under the Plan. Each Holder of a Class
2 Other Priority Claim is conclusively presumed to have accepted the Plan pursuant to section 1126(f) of the Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, each Holder of a Class 2 Other Priority Claim is not entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan.
|
|
c. |
Class 3 FILO ABL Claims
|
|
i. |
Classification: Class 3 consists of all FILO ABL Claims.
|
|
ii. |
Treatment: On the Effective Date, or as soon as reasonably practicable
thereafter, each Holder of an Allowed FILO ABL Claim shall receive, in full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement, release, and discharge of such Claim, payment in full in Cash.
|
|
iii. |
Voting: Class 3 is Unimpaired under the Plan. Each Holder of a Class
3 FILO ABL Claim is conclusively presumed to have accepted the Plan pursuant to section 1126(f) of the Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, each Holder of a Class 3 FILO ABL Claim is not entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan.
|
|
d. |
Class 4 – OpCo Term Loan Claims
|
|
i. |
Classification: Class 4 consists of all OpCo Term Loan Claims.
|
|
ii. |
Allowance: On the Effective Date, the OpCo Term Loan Claims shall be
Allowed as follows:
|
|
(A) |
the 2016 Term Loan Claims against the OpCo Debtors shall be Allowed in the aggregate amount of the 2016 Term Loan Claims Allowed Amount;
|
|
(B) |
the 2020 Term B-3 Loan Claims against the OpCo Debtors shall be Allowed in the aggregate amount of the 2020 Term B-3 Loan Claims Allowed Amount.
|
|
iii. |
Treatment: On the Effective Date, or as soon as reasonably practicable
thereafter, each Holder of an Allowed OpCo Term Loan Claim shall receive, in full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement, release, and discharge of such Claim, (i) such Holder’s Pro Rata share (determined based on such Holder’s
Non-Class 4 Equity Electing Claims as a percentage of all Non-Class 4 Equity Electing Claims) of Cash in the amount of $56 million or (ii) if such Holder makes or is deemed to make the Class 4 Equity Election, such Holder’s Pro Rata share
(determined based on such Holder’s Class 4 Equity Electing Claims as a percentage of all Class 4 Equity Electing Claims) of the Class 4 Equity Distribution.
|
|
iv. |
Voting: Class 4 is Impaired under the Plan. Therefore, each Holder of
a Class 4 OpCo Term Loan Claim is entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan.
|
|
e. |
Class 5 – 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims
|
|
i. |
Classification: Class 5 consists of all 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims.
|
|
ii. |
Allowance: The 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims shall be Allowed in the
aggregate amount of the 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims Allowed Amount.
|
|
iii. |
Treatment: On the Effective Date, each Holder of an Allowed 2020 Term
B-1 Loan Claim shall receive, in full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement, release, and discharge of such Claim, either (i) a principal amount of Take-Back Term Loans equal to such Holder’s Allowed 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claim or (ii)
an amount of Cash equal to the principal amount of Take-Back Term Loans that otherwise would have been distributable to such Holder under clause (i).
|
|
iv. |
Voting: Class 5 is Impaired under the Plan. Therefore, each Holder of
a Class 5 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claim is entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan.
|
|
f. |
Class 6 – 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims
|
|
i. |
Classification: Class 6 consists of all 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims.
|
|
ii. |
Allowance: The 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims shall be Allowed in the
aggregate amount of the 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims Allowed Amount.
|
|
iii. |
Treatment: On the Effective Date, or as soon as reasonably practicable
thereafter, each Holder of an Allowed 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claim shall receive, in full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement, release, and discharge of such Claim, such Holder’s Pro Rata share of the Class 6 Equity Distribution.
|
|
iv. |
Voting: Class 6 is Impaired under the Plan. Therefore, each Holder of
a Class 6 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claim is entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan.
|
|
g. |
Class 7 – BrandCo Third Lien Guaranty Claims
|
|
i. |
Classification: Class 7 consists of all BrandCo Third Lien Guaranty
Claims.
|
|
ii. |
Allowance: The BrandCo Third Lien Guaranty Claims shall be Allowed in
the aggregate amount of the 2020 Term B-3 Loan Claims Allowed Amount.
|
|
iii. |
Treatment: Holders of BrandCo Third Lien Guaranty Claims shall receive
no recovery or distribution on account of such Claims. On the Effective Date all BrandCo Third Lien Guaranty Claims will be canceled, released, extinguished, and discharged, and will be of no further force or effect.
|
|
iv.
|
Voting: Class 7 is Impaired under the Plan. Each Holder of a Class 7 BrandCo Third
Lien Guaranty Claim is conclusively presumed to have rejected the Plan pursuant to section 1126(g) of the Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, each Holder of a Class 7 BrandCo Third Lien Guaranty Claim is not entitled to vote to accept or reject
the Plan..
|
|
h. |
Class 8 – Unsecured Notes Claims
|
|
i. |
Classification: Class 8 consists of all Unsecured Notes Claims.
|
|
ii. |
Allowance: The Unsecured Notes Claims shall be Allowed in the
aggregate amount of the Unsecured Notes Claims Allowed Amount.
|
|
iii. |
Treatment: On the Effective Date, or as soon as reasonably practicable
thereafter, each Holder of an Allowed Unsecured Notes Claim shall receive:
|
|
(A) |
if Class 8 votes to accept the Plan and the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are satisfied, in full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement,
release, and discharge of such Claim, such Holder’s Pro Rata share of the Unsecured Notes Settlement Distribution; or
|
|
(B) |
if Class 8 votes to reject the Plan or the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are not satisfied, no recovery or distribution on account of such Claim,
and all Unsecured Notes Claims shall be canceled, released, extinguished, and discharged, and of no further force or effect; provided that each
Consenting Unsecured Noteholder shall receive such Holder’s Consenting Unsecured Noteholder Recovery; provided, further that if the Bankruptcy Court finds that such Consenting Unsecured Noteholder Recovery is improper, there shall be no such distribution to Consenting Unsecured Noteholders under
the Plan.
|
|
iv. |
Voting: Class 8 is Impaired under the Plan. Therefore, each Holder of
a Class 8 Unsecured Notes Claim is entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan.
|
|
i. |
Class 9(a) – Talc Personal Injury Claims
|
|
i. |
Classification: Class 9(a) consists of all Talc Personal Injury
Claims.
|
|
ii. |
Treatment: As soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective Date
in accordance with the PI Claims Distribution Procedures, each Holder of an Allowed Talc Personal Injury Claim shall receive:
|
|
(A) |
(1) if Class 9(a) votes to accept the Plan and the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are satisfied, in full and final satisfaction, compromise,
settlement, release, and discharge of such Claim, such Holder’s Pro Rata share (as determined in accordance with the PI Claims Distribution Procedures) of the Talc Personal Injury Settlement Distribution distributable from the PI Settlement
Fund; or
|
(2) if Class 9(a) votes to reject the Plan or the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are not satisfied, no recovery or
distribution on account of such Claim, and all Talc Personal Injury Claims shall be canceled, released, extinguished, and discharged, and of no further force or effect.
|
iii. |
Voting: Class 9(a) is Impaired under the Plan. Therefore, each Holder
of a Class 9(a) Talc Personal Injury Claim is entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan.
|
|
j. |
Class 9(b) – Non-Qualified Pension Claims
|
|
i. |
Classification: Class 9(b) consists of all Non-Qualified Pension
Claims.
|
|
ii. |
Treatment: On the Effective Date, or as soon as reasonably practicable
thereafter, each Holder of an Allowed Non-Qualified Pension Claim shall receive:
|
|
(A) |
if Class 9(b) votes to accept the Plan and the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are satisfied, in full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement,
release, and discharge of such Claim, such Holder’s Pro Rata share of the Pension Settlement Distribution; or
|
|
(B) |
if Class 9(b) votes to reject the Plan or the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are not satisfied, no recovery or distribution on account of such Claim,
and all Non-Qualified Pension Claims shall be canceled, released, extinguished, and discharged and of no further force or effect.
|
|
iii. |
Voting: Class 9(b) is Impaired under the Plan. Therefore, each Holder
of a Class 9(b) Non-Qualified Pension Claim is entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan.
|
|
k. |
Class 9(c) – Trade Claims
|
|
i. |
Classification: Class 9(c) consists of all Trade Claims.
|
|
ii. |
Treatment: On the Effective Date, or as soon as reasonably practicable
thereafter, each Holder of an Allowed Trade Claim shall receive:
|
|
(A) |
if Class 9(c) votes to accept the Plan and the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are satisfied, in full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement,
release, and discharge of such Claim, such Holder’s Pro Rata share of the Trade Settlement Distribution; or
|
|
(B) |
if Class 9(c) votes to reject the Plan or the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are not satisfied, no recovery or distribution on account of such Claim,
and all Trade Claims shall be canceled, released, extinguished, and discharged, and of no further force or effect.
|
|
iii. |
Voting: Class 9(c) is Impaired under the Plan. Therefore, each Holder
of a Class 9(c) Trade Claim is entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan.
|
|
l. |
Class 9(d) – Other General Unsecured Claims
|
|
i. |
Classification: Class 9(d) consists of all Other General Unsecured
Claims.
|
|
ii. |
Treatment: On the Effective Date, or as soon as reasonably practicable
thereafter, each Holder of an Allowed Other General Unsecured Claim shall receive:
|
|
(A) |
if Class 9(d) votes to accept the Plan and the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are satisfied, in full and final satisfaction, compromise, settlement,
release, and discharge of such Claim, such Holder’s Pro Rata share of the Other GUC Settlement Distribution; or
|
|
(B) |
if Class 9(d) votes to reject the Plan or the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are not satisfied, no recovery or distribution on account of such Claim
and all Other General Unsecured Claims shall be canceled, released, extinguished, and discharged, and of no further force or effect.
|
|
iii. |
Voting: Class 9(d) is Impaired under the Plan. Therefore, each Holder
of a Class 9(d) Other General Unsecured Claim is entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan.
|
|
m. |
Class 10 – Subordinated Claims
|
|
i. |
Classification: Class 10 consists of all Subordinated Claims.
|
|
ii. |
Treatment: Holders of Subordinated Claims shall receive no recovery or
distribution on account of such Claims. On the Effective Date, all Subordinated Claims will be canceled, released, extinguished, and discharged, and will be of no further force or effect.
|
|
iii. |
Voting: Class 10 is Impaired under the Plan. Each Holder of a Class
10 Subordinated Claim is conclusively presumed to have rejected the Plan pursuant to section 1126(g) of the Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, each Holder of a Class 10 Subordinated Claim is not entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan.
|
|
n. |
Class 11 – Intercompany Claims and Interests
|
|
i. |
Classification: Class 11 consists of all Intercompany Claims and
Interests.
|
|
ii. |
Treatment: On the Effective Date, unless otherwise provided for under
the Plan, each Intercompany Claim and/or Intercompany Interest shall be, at the option of the Debtors (with the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders) either (A)
Reinstated or (B) canceled and released. All Intercompany Claims held by any BrandCo Entity against any OpCo Debtor or by any OpCo Debtor against any BrandCo Entity shall be deemed settled pursuant to the Plan Settlement, and shall be
canceled and released on the Effective Date.
|
|
iii. |
Voting: Holders of Intercompany Claims and Interests are either
Unimpaired under the Plan, and such Holders of Intercompany Claims and Interests are conclusively presumed to have accepted the Plan pursuant to section 1126(f) of the Bankruptcy Code, or Impaired under the Plan, and such Holders of
Intercompany Claims are conclusively presumed to have rejected the Plan pursuant to section 1126(g) of the Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, Holders of Class 11 Intercompany Claims and Interests are not entitled to vote to accept or reject the
Plan.
|
|
o.
|
Class 12 – Interests in Holdings
|
|
i. |
Classification: Class 12 consists of all Interests other than
Intercompany Interests.
|
|
ii. |
Treatment: Holders of Interests (other than Intercompany Interests)
shall receive no recovery or distribution on account of such Interests. On the Effective Date, all Interests (other than Intercompany Interests) will be canceled, released, extinguished, and discharged, and will be of no further force or
effect.
|
|
iii. |
Voting: Class 12 is Impaired under the Plan. Each Holder of a Class
12 Interest is conclusively presumed to have rejected the Plan pursuant to section 1126(g) of the Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, each Holder of a Class 12 Interest in Holdings is not entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan.
|
Each Holder of a Claim in an Impaired Class that is entitled to vote on the Plan as of the record date for voting on the Plan
pursuant to Article III of the Plan shall be entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan as provided in the Disclosure Statement Order or any other order of the Bankruptcy Court.
|
4.
|
No Substantive Consolidation
|
Although the Plan is presented as a joint plan of reorganization, the Plan does not provide for the substantive consolidation of
the Debtors’ Estates, and on the Effective Date, the Debtors’ Estates shall not be deemed to be substantively consolidated for any reason. Except as expressly provided herein, nothing in the Plan or the Disclosure Statement shall constitute or be
deemed to constitute an admission that any one or all of the Debtors is subject to or liable for any Claims against any other Debtor. A Claim against multiple Debtors will be treated as a separate Claim against each applicable Debtor’s Estate for
all purposes, including voting and distribution; provided, however,
that no Claim will receive value in excess of one hundred percent (100.0%) of the Allowed amount of such Claim or Interest under the Plans for all such Debtors.
|
5.
|
Acceptance by Impaired Classes
|
Pursuant to section 1126(c) of the Bankruptcy Code, and except as otherwise provided in section 1126(e) of the Bankruptcy Code,
an Impaired Class of Claims shall have accepted the Plan if Holders of at least two-thirds in dollar amount and more than one-half in number of the Claims of such Class entitled to vote that actually vote on the Plan have voted to accept the Plan.
OpCo Term Loan Claims (Class 4), 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims (Class 5), 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims (Class 6), Unsecured Notes Claims (Class 8), Talc Personal Injury Claims (Class 9(a)), Non-Qualified Pension Claims (Class 9(b)), Trade Claims (Class
9(c)), and Other General Unsecured Claims (Class 9(d)) are Impaired, and the votes of Holders of Claims in such Classes will be solicited. If a Class contains Holders of Claims eligible to vote and no Holders of Claims eligible to vote in such Class
vote to accept or reject the Plan, the Plan shall be presumed accepted by the Holders of such Claims in such Class.
|
6.
|
Special Provision Governing Unimpaired Claims
|
Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, nothing under the Plan shall affect the Debtors’ or the Reorganized Debtors’ rights
regarding any Unimpaired Claims, including, all rights regarding legal and equitable defenses to, or setoffs or recoupments against, any such Unimpaired Claims.
|
7.
|
Elimination of Vacant Classes
|
Any Class of Claims or Interests that, with respect to any Debtor, does not have a Holder of an Allowed Claim or Interest or a
Claim or Interest temporarily Allowed by the Bankruptcy Court solely for voting purposes as of the date of the Confirmation Hearing shall be deemed eliminated from the Plan with respect to such Debtor for purposes of (a) voting to accept or reject
the Plan and (b) determining acceptance or rejection of the Plan by such Class pursuant to section 1129(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code.
|
8.
|
Consensual Confirmation
|
The Plan shall be deemed a separate chapter 11 plan for each Debtor. To the extent that there is no rejecting Class of Claims in
the chapter 11 plan of any Debtor, such Debtor shall seek Confirmation of its plan pursuant to section 1129(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.
|
9.
|
Confirmation Pursuant to Sections 1129(a)(10) and 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code
|
Section 1129(a)(10) of the Bankruptcy Code shall be satisfied for purposes of Confirmation by acceptance of the Plan by at least
one Impaired Class of Claims. The Debtors shall seek Confirmation pursuant to section 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code with respect to any rejecting Class of Claims.
|
10.
|
Controversy Concerning Impairment or Classification
|
If a controversy arises as to whether any Claims or Interests or any Class of Claims or Interests is Impaired or is properly
classified under the Plan, the Bankruptcy Court shall, after notice and a hearing, resolve such controversy at the Confirmation Hearing.
Except as expressly provided in the Plan, the allowance, classification, and treatment of all Allowed Claims and Interests and
the respective distributions and treatments under the Plan take into account and conform to the relative priority and rights of the Claims and Interests in each Class in connection with any contractual, legal, and equitable subordination rights
relating thereto, whether arising under general principles of equitable subordination, section 510 of the Bankruptcy Code, or otherwise, and any other rights impacting relative lien priority and/or priority in right of payment, and any such rights
shall be released pursuant to the Plan, including, as applicable, pursuant to the Plan Settlement. Pursuant to section 510 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Reorganized Debtors, subject to the reasonable consent of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders,
reserve the right to re-classify any Allowed Claim or Interest in accordance with any contractual, legal, or equitable subordination relating thereto.
|
12.
|
2016 Term Loan Claims
|
Any 2016 Term Loan Claim asserted against any BrandCo Entity shall be Disallowed.
|
13.
|
Intercompany Interests
|
Intercompany Interests, to the extent Reinstated, are being Reinstated to maintain the existing corporate structure of the
Debtors. For the avoidance of doubt, any Interest in non‑Debtor Affiliates owned by a Debtor shall continue to be owned by the applicable Reorganized Debtor.
|
C. |
Means for Implementation of the Plan
|
|
1.
|
Sources of Consideration for Plan Distributions
|
The Reorganized Debtors shall fund distributions under the Plan, as applicable with: (a) the Exit Facilities; (b) the issuance
and distribution of New Common Stock; (c) the Equity Rights Offering; (d) the issuance and distribution of New Warrants; and (e) Cash on hand.
Each distribution and issuance referred to in Article III of the Plan shall be governed by the terms and conditions set forth in
Article III of the Plan applicable to such distribution or issuance and by the terms and conditions of the instruments or other documents evidencing or relating to such distribution or issuance, which terms and conditions shall bind each Entity
receiving such distribution or issuance; provided that, to the extent that a term of the Plan conflicts with the term of any such instruments or other
documents, the terms of the Plan shall govern.
On the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtors or their non-Debtor Affiliates, as applicable, shall enter into the applicable
Exit Facilities Documents for (a) either (i) the First Lien Exit Facilities, consisting of the Take-Back Facility and the Incremental New Money Facility, or (ii) the Third-Party New Money Exit Facility, (b) the Exit ABL Facility, and (c) unless
otherwise agreed to by the Debtors and the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders, the New Foreign Facility. All Holders of Class 5 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims shall be deemed to be a party to, and bound by, the First Lien Exit Facilities Documents,
regardless of whether such Holder has executed a signature page thereto. Confirmation of the Plan shall be deemed approval of the Exit Facilities and the Exit Facilities Documents, all transactions contemplated thereby, and all actions to be taken,
undertakings to be made, and obligations to be incurred by the Reorganized Debtors in connection therewith, and authorization of the Reorganized Debtors to enter into, execute, and deliver the Exit Facilities Documents and such other documents as may
be required to effectuate the treatment afforded by the Exit Facilities. On the Effective Date, all of the Liens and security interests to be granted by the Reorganized Debtors in accordance with the Exit Facilities Documents (a) shall be deemed to
be granted, (b) shall be legal, binding, and enforceable Liens on, and security interests in, the collateral granted thereunder in accordance with the terms of the Exit Facilities Documents, (c) shall be deemed perfected on the Effective Date without
the need for the taking of any further filing, recordation, approval, consent, or other action, and (d) shall not be enjoined or subject to discharge, impairment, release, avoidance, recharacterization or subordination (including equitable
subordination) for any purposes whatsoever and shall not constitute preferential transfers or fraudulent conveyances under the Bankruptcy Code or any applicable non-bankruptcy law. The Reorganized Debtors and the persons and entities granted such
Liens and security interests shall be authorized to make all filings and recordings, and to obtain all governmental approvals, consents, and take any other actions necessary to establish and perfect such Liens and security interests under the
provisions of the applicable state, federal, or other law that would be applicable in the absence of the Plan and the Confirmation Order (it being understood that perfection shall occur automatically by virtue of the entry of the Confirmation Order
and any such filings, recordings, approvals, and consents shall not be required), and the Reorganized Debtors shall thereafter cooperate to make all other filings and recordings that otherwise would be necessary under applicable law to give notice of
such Liens and security interests to third parties.
|
b. |
Issuance and Distribution of New Common Stock
|
On the Effective Date, the shares of New Common Stock shall be issued by Reorganized Holdings as provided for in the Description
of Transaction Steps pursuant to, and in accordance with, the Plan and, in the case of the New Common Stock, the Equity Rights Offering Documents. All Holders of Allowed Claims entitled to distribution of New Common Stock under the Plan, as
applicable, or pursuant to the Equity Rights Offering Documents shall be deemed to be a party to, and bound by, the New Shareholders’ Agreement, if any, regardless of whether such Holder has executed a signature page thereto.
All of the New Common Stock (including the New Common Stock issued in connection with the Equity Rights Offering, including, for
the avoidance of doubt, any New Common Stock issued pursuant to the Backstop Commitment Agreement and/or upon the exercise of the New Warrants) shall be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid, and non-assessable. Each distribution and issuance
of New Common Stock under the Plan shall be governed by the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan applicable to such distribution or issuance and by the terms and conditions of the New Organizational Documents and other instruments evidencing or
relating to such distribution or issuance, including the Equity Rights Offering Documents, as applicable, which terms and conditions shall bind each Entity receiving such distribution or issuance. For the avoidance of doubt, the acceptance of New
Common Stock by any Holder of any Claim or Interest shall be deemed as such Holder’s agreement to the applicable New Organizational Documents, as may be amended or modified from time to time following the Effective Date in accordance with their
terms.
To the extent practicable, as determined in good faith by the Debtors and the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders, the
Reorganized Debtors shall: (a) emerge from these Chapter 11 Cases as non-publicly reporting companies on the Effective Date and not be subject to SEC reporting requirements under Sections 12 or 15 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise; (b) not be
voluntarily subjected to any reporting requirements promulgated by the SEC; except, in each case, as otherwise may be required pursuant to the New Organizational Documents, the Exit Facilities Documents or applicable law; (c) not be required to list
the New Common Stock on a U.S. stock exchange; (d) timely file or otherwise provide all required filings and documentation to allow for the termination and/or suspension of registration with respect to SEC reporting requirements under the Exchange
Act prior to the Effective Date; and (e) make good faith efforts to ensure DTC eligibility of securities issued in connection with the Plan (other than any securities required by the terms of any agreement to be held on the books of an agent and not
in DTC), including but not limited to the New Warrants.
|
c. |
Equity Rights Offering
|
The Debtors shall distribute the Equity Subscription Rights to the Equity Rights Offering Participants as set forth in the Plan,
the Backstop Commitment Agreement, and the Equity Rights Offering Procedures. Pursuant to the Backstop Commitment Agreement and the Equity Rights Offering Procedures, the Equity Rights Offering shall be open to all Equity Rights Offering
Participants. Equity Rights Offering Participants shall be entitled to participate in the Equity Rights Offering up to a maximum amount of each Eligible Holder’s Pro Rata share of the Aggregate Rights Offering Amount (or, if applicable, the Adjusted
Aggregate Rights Offering Amount). Equity Rights Offering Participants shall have the right to purchase their allocated shares of New Common Stock at the ERO Price Per Share.
The Equity Rights Offering will be backstopped, severally and not jointly, by the Equity Commitment Parties pursuant to the
Backstop Commitment Agreement. 30% of the New Common Stock to be sold and issued pursuant to the Equity Rights Offering shall be reserved for the Equity Commitment Parties (the “Reserved
Shares”) pursuant to the Backstop Commitment Agreement, at the ERO Price Per Share.
Equity Subscription Rights that an Equity Rights Offering Participant has validly elected to exercise shall be deemed issued and
exercised on or about (but in no event after) the Effective Date. Upon exercise of the Equity Subscription Rights pursuant to the terms of the Backstop Commitment Agreement and the Equity Rights Offering Procedures, Reorganized Holdings shall be
authorized to issue the New Common Stock issuable pursuant to such exercise.
Pursuant to the Backstop Commitment Agreement, if after following the procedures set forth in the Equity Rights Offering
Procedures, there remain any unexercised Equity Subscription Rights, the Equity Commitment Parties shall purchase, severally and not jointly, their applicable portion of the New Common Stock associated with such unexercised Equity Subscription Rights
in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Backstop Commitment Agreement, at the ERO Price Per Share. As consideration for the undertakings of the Equity Commitment Parties in the Backstop Commitment Agreement, the Reorganized
Debtors will pay the Backstop Commitment Premium to the Equity Commitment Parties on the Effective Date in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Backstop Commitment Agreement.
All shares of New Common Stock issued upon exercise of the Equity Commitment Parties’ own Equity Subscription Rights and in
connection with the Backstop Commitment Premium will be issued in reliance upon Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code to the extent permitted under applicable law. The Reserved Shares and the shares of New Common Stock that are not subscribed for by
holders of Equity Subscription Rights in the Equity Rights Offering and that are purchased by the Equity Commitment Parties in accordance with their backstop obligations under the Backstop Commitment Agreement (the “Unsubscribed Shares”) will be issued in a private placement exempt from registration under Section 5 of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) and/or Regulation D thereunder and will constitute
“restricted securities” for purposes of the Securities Act. In the Backstop Commitment Agreement, the Equity Commitment Parties will be required to make representations and warranties as to their sophistication and suitability to participate in the
private placement.
Entry of the Confirmation Order shall constitute Bankruptcy Court approval of the Equity Rights Offering (including the
transactions contemplated thereby, and all actions to be undertaken, undertakings to be made, and obligations to be incurred by Reorganized Holdings in connection therewith). On the Effective Date, as provided in the Description of Transaction
Steps, the rights and obligations of the Debtors under the Backstop Commitment Agreement shall vest in the Reorganized Debtors, as applicable.
At the Aggregate Rights Offering Amount, the shares of New Common Stock offered pursuant to the Equity Rights Offering (for the
avoidance of doubt, not including any shares of New Common Stock issued in connection with the Backstop Commitment Premium) will represent approximately 60.6% of the New Common Stock outstanding on the Effective Date (subject to a downward ratable
adjustment to account for the difference (if any) between the Aggregate Rights Offering Amount and the Adjusted Aggregate Right Offerings Amount), subject to dilution by the issuance of shares of New Common Stock (a) reserved for the MIP Awards, and
(b) on account of the exercise of the New Warrants.
On the Effective Date (or earlier in the case of termination of the Backstop Commitment Agreement), the Backstop Commitment
Premium (which shall be an administrative expense) shall be distributed or paid to the Equity Commitment Parties under and as set forth in the Backstop Commitment Agreement and the Backstop Order. The shares of New Common Stock issued in satisfaction
of the Backstop Commitment Premium will represent approximately 7.6% of the New Common Stock outstanding on the Effective Date, subject to dilution by the issuance of shares of New Common Stock (a) reserved for the MIP Awards, and (b) on account of
the exercise of the New Warrants.
Each holder of Equity Subscription Rights that receives New Common Stock as a result of exercising the relevant Equity
Subscription Rights shall be subject to the provisions applicable to such holders of New Common Stock as set forth in Article IV.A.2 of the Plan.
The Cash proceeds of the Equity Rights Offering shall be used by the Debtors or Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, to (a) make
distributions pursuant to the Plan, (b) fund working capital, and (c) fund general corporate purposes.
|
d. |
Issuance and Distribution of New Warrants19
|
To the extent all or any portion of the New Warrants are required to be issued pursuant to the Plan, Reorganized Holdings shall
issue such New Warrants on the Effective Date in accordance with the New Warrant Agreement and distribute them in accordance with the Plan. The Debtors, the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders, and the Creditors’ Committee shall work in good faith
to render such New Warrants DTC eligible. All of the New Common Stock issued upon exercise of the New Warrants issued pursuant to the Plan shall, when so issued and upon payment of the exercise price in accordance with the terms of the New Warrants,
be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid, and non-assessable.
|
e. |
General Unsecured Creditor Recovery
|
On the Effective Date, or with respect to the GUC Settlement Top Up Amount and any increase to the GUC Trust/PI Fund Operating
Reserve, after the Effective Date, solely to the extent the applicable Classes of General Unsecured Claims are entitled to distributions in accordance with the Plan, the GUC Trust shall be vested with the GUC Trust Assets and the PI Settlement Fund
shall be vested with the PI Settlement Fund Assets. Except as provided to the contrary in this Plan, (a) the GUC Trust shall make distributions to Classes 9(b), (c) and (d) to Holders of Allowed Claims in such Classes in accordance with the
treatment set forth in the Plan for such Classes and (b) the PI Settlement Fund shall make distributions to Class 9(a) holders of Allowed Claims in such Class in accordance with the terms of this Plan. From time to time following the Effective Date,
the GUC Administrator, shall (x) receive for the account of the GUC Trust the Retained Preference Action Net Proceeds allocable to Classes 9(b), (c) and (d), and shall make distributions to the GUC Trust Beneficiaries in accordance with the GUC Trust
Agreement, and (y) shall receive for the account of the PI Settlement Fund and transfer or cause to be transferred to the PI Settlement Fund the Retained Preference Action Net Proceeds allocable to Class 9(a) for distribution by the PI Settlement
Fund to Holders of Allowed Talc Personal Injury Claims in accordance with the PI Settlement Fund Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, (a) if the GUC Trust is established in accordance with the Plan, the GUC Administrator shall have the sole power
and authority to pursue the Retained Preference Actions in the capacity as trustee of the GUC Trust and as agent for and on behalf of the PI Settlement Fund and (b) in the event that any, but not all, of Classes 9(a), (b), (c), or (d) votes to reject
the Plan, (i) the GUC Administrator shall receive the Retained Preference Action Net Proceeds for the account of each such Class that votes to accept the Plan in the amount allocable to each such Class, and shall make distributions therefrom (and/or,
in the case of Class 9(a), shall transfer or cause to be transferred to the PI Settlement Fund for distribution) ratably to Holders of Claims in each such Class and (ii) the Reorganized Debtors shall receive the Retained Preference Action Net
Proceeds in the amount allocable to each such Class that votes to reject the Plan. The GUC Administrator shall have responsibility for reconciling General Unsecured Claims (other than Talc Personal Injury Claims), including asserting any objections
thereto and the PI Claims Administrator shall have responsibility for reconciling the Talc Personal Injury Claims, including asserting any objections thereto; provided
that the Debtors, with the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders and in consultation with the Creditors’ Committee, or the Reorganized Debtors, in consultation with the GUC
Administrator and/or the PI Claims Administrator, as applicable, may elect to administer, dispute, object to, compromise, or otherwise resolve any such Class 9 Claim.
19 |
U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, in its capacity as Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee, filed the Limited Objection of U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Unsecured Notes Trustee to Debtors’ Motion for an Order Approving (I) the Adequacy of the
Disclosure Statement, (II) Solicitation and Voting Procedures with Respect to Confirmation of the Plan, (III) the Form of Ballots and Notices in Connection Therewith, and (IV) the Scheduling of Certain Dates with Respect Thereto [Docket No. 1388], expressing concern with the deadline to disclose the terms of the New Warrant Agreement and its proximity to the Voting Deadline. To address this issue, the
Debtors will provide the form of the New Warrant Agreement to the Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee for distribution to Holders of Unsecured Notes Claims at least seven (7) days prior to the filing of the Plan Supplement.
|
The Debtors or Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, shall use Cash on hand, if any, to fund distributions to certain Holders of
Claims. All Excess Liquidity will be applied in accordance with the First Lien Exit Facilities Term Sheet; provided that, in the event the Reorganized Debtors
enter into the Third-Party New Money Exit Facility, (i) all Excess Liquidity will be applied to reduce the Aggregate Rights Offering Amount, and (ii) for the avoidance of doubt, the Debt Commitment Premium shall be paid in Cash as an Administrative
Claim and “Excess Liquidity” will be calculated after giving effect to the payment thereof.
|
2.
|
Restructuring Transactions
|
On the Effective Date, the applicable Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors shall enter into any transactions and shall take any
actions as may be necessary or appropriate to effectuate the Restructuring Transactions, including to establish Reorganized Holdings and, if applicable, to transfer assets of the Debtors to Reorganized Holdings or a subsidiary thereof. The
applicable Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors will take any actions as may be necessary or advisable to effect a corporate restructuring of the overall corporate structure of the Debtors, in the Description of Transaction Steps, or in the Definitive
Documents, including the issuance of all securities, notes, instruments, certificates, and other documents required to be issued pursuant to the Plan, one or more intercompany mergers, consolidations, amalgamations, arrangements, continuances,
restructurings, conversions, dissolutions, transfers, liquidations, or other corporate transactions, in each case, subject to the consent of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders and, solely to the extent required under the Restructuring Support
Agreement, the Creditors’ Committee and the Required Consenting 2016 Lenders.
The actions to implement the Restructuring Transactions may include: (a) the execution and delivery of appropriate agreements or
other documents of merger, amalgamation, consolidation, restructuring, conversion, disposition, transfer, arrangement, continuance, dissolution, sale, purchase, or reorganization containing terms that are consistent with the terms of the Plan and
that satisfy the applicable requirements of applicable law and any other terms to which the applicable parties may agree; (b) the execution and delivery of appropriate instruments of transfer, assignment, assumption, or delegation of any asset,
property, right, liability, duty, debt, or obligation on terms consistent with the terms of the Plan and having other terms for which the applicable parties agree; (c) the filing of the New Organizational Documents and any appropriate certificates or
articles of incorporation, formation, reincorporation, merger, consolidation, conversion, amalgamation, arrangement, continuance, or dissolution pursuant to applicable law; (d) the execution and delivery of the Equity Rights Offering Documents and
any documentation related to the Exit Facilities; (e) if applicable, all transactions necessary to provide for the purchase of substantially all of the assets or Interests of any of the Debtors by one or more Entities to be wholly owned by
Reorganized Holdings, which purchase, if applicable, may be structured as a taxable transaction for United States federal income tax purposes; (f) the settlement, reconciliation, repayment, cancellation, discharge, and/or release, as applicable, of
Intercompany Claims consistent with the Plan; and (g) all other actions that the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors determine to be necessary, including making filings or recordings that may be required by applicable law in connection with the Plan.
For purposes of consummating the Plan and the Restructuring Transactions, none of the transactions contemplated in Article IV.B
of the Plan shall constitute a change of control under any agreement, contract, or document of the Debtors
Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, the Description of Transaction Steps, or any agreement, instrument, or other document
incorporated in the Plan or the Plan Supplement, on the Effective Date, each Debtor shall continue to exist after the Effective Date as a Reorganized Debtor and as a separate corporation, limited liability company, partnership, or other form of
entity, as the case may be, with all the powers of a corporation, limited liability company, partnership, or other form of entity, as the case may be, pursuant to the applicable law in the jurisdiction in which each applicable Debtor is incorporated
or formed and pursuant to the respective certificate of incorporation and bylaws (or other analogous formation or governing documents) in effect before the Effective Date, except to the extent such certificate of incorporation and bylaws (or other
analogous formation or governing documents) are amended by the Plan or otherwise amended in accordance with applicable law; provided that the Debtors and the
Consenting BrandCo Lenders shall engage in good faith to execute mutually acceptable amendments with respect to the current ownership and licensing of all intellectual property owned by the Debtors and any additional transactions or considerations
related thereto. To the extent such documents are amended, such documents are deemed to be amended pursuant to the Plan and require no further action or approval (other than any requisite filings required under applicable state, federal, or foreign
law).
|
4.
|
Vesting of Assets in the Reorganized Debtors
|
Except as otherwise provided in the Plan or any agreement, instrument, or other document incorporated in the Plan, the Plan
Supplement or the Confirmation Order, on the Effective Date, pursuant to sections 1141(b) and (c) of the Bankruptcy Code, all property (including all interests, rights, and privileges related thereto) in each Estate, all Causes of Action, and any
property acquired by any of the Debtors pursuant to the Plan, including Interests held by the Debtors in any non-Debtor Affiliates, shall vest in the applicable Reorganized Debtor, free and clear of all Liens, Claims, charges, encumbrances, or other
interests, unless expressly provided otherwise by the Plan or Confirmation Order, subject to and in accordance with the Plan, including the Description of Transaction Steps. On and after the Effective Date, except as otherwise provided in the Plan
or the Confirmation Order, each Reorganized Debtor may operate its business and may use, acquire, or dispose of property and compromise or settle any Claims, Interests, or Causes of Action without supervision or approval by the Bankruptcy Court and
free of any restrictions of the Bankruptcy Code or the Bankruptcy Rules. Without limiting the foregoing, the Reorganized Debtors may pay the charges that they incur on or after the Confirmation Date for professional fees, disbursements, expenses, or
related support services without application to the Bankruptcy Court, but subject in all respect to the Final DIP Order and the Plan.
|
5.
|
Cancellation of Existing Indebtedness and Securities
|
Except as otherwise expressly provided in the Plan, the Confirmation Order, or any agreement, instrument, or other document
entered into in connection with or pursuant to the Plan or the Restructuring Transactions, on the Effective Date, (1) all notes, bonds, indentures, certificates, securities, shares, equity securities, purchase rights, options, warrants, convertible
securities or instruments, credit agreements, collateral agreements, subordination agreements, intercreditor agreements, or other instruments or documents directly or indirectly evidencing, creating, or relating to any indebtedness or obligations of,
or ownership interest in, the Debtors, or giving rise to any Claims against or Interests in the Debtors or to any rights or obligations relating to any Claims against or Interests in the Debtors (except with respect to such agreements, certificates,
notes, or other instruments or documents evidencing indebtedness or obligation of or ownership interest in the Debtors that is specifically Reinstated, amended and Reinstated, or entered into pursuant to the Plan), including, without limitation, the
2016 Credit Agreement, the ABL Facility Credit Agreement, the BrandCo Credit Agreement and the Unsecured Notes Indenture shall be canceled without any need for a Holder to take further action with respect thereto, and the duties and obligations of
all parties thereto, including the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, and any non-Debtor Affiliates, thereunder or in any way related thereto shall be deemed satisfied in full, canceled, released, discharged, and of no force or effect
and (2) the obligations of the Debtors or Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, pursuant, relating, or pertaining to any agreements, certificates of designation, bylaws, or certificate or articles of incorporation or similar documents governing the
notes, bonds, indentures, certificates, securities, shares, purchase rights, options, warrants, or other instruments or documents evidencing or creating any indebtedness or obligation of or Interests in the Debtors (except with respect to such
agreements, certificates, notes, or other instruments or documents evidencing indebtedness or obligation of or ownership interest in the Debtors that is specifically Reinstated, amended and Reinstated, or entered into pursuant to the Plan),
including, without limitation, the 2016 Credit Agreement, the ABL Facility Credit Agreement, the BrandCo Credit Agreement and the Unsecured Notes Indenture shall be released and discharged in exchange for the consideration provided hereunder.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Confirmation, or the occurrence of the Effective Date, any such document or instrument that governs the rights, claims, or remedies of the Holder of a Claim or Interest shall continue in effect solely for purposes of
(1) enabling Holders of Allowed Claims to receive distributions under the Plan as provided herein and subject to the terms and conditions of the applicable governing document or instrument as set forth therein, and (2) allowing and preserving the
rights of each of the applicable agents and indenture trustees to (a) make or direct the distributions in accordance with the Plan as provided herein and (b) assert or maintain any rights for indemnification (including on account of the 2016 Agent
Surviving Indemnity Obligations) the applicable agent or indenture trustee may have arising under, and due pursuant to the terms of, the applicable governing document or instrument; provided that, subject to the treatment provisions of Article III of the Plan, no such indemnification may be sought from the Debtors, the Reorganized Debtors, or any Released Party. For the avoidance of doubt, nothing
in this Plan shall, or shall be deemed to, alter, amend, discharge, limit, or otherwise impair the 2016 Agent Surviving Indemnity Obligations on or after the Effective Date, and any such obligation (whenever arising) survives Confirmation,
Consummation, and the occurrence of the Effective Date, in each case in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of the 2016 Credit Agreement and regardless of the discharge and release of all Claims of the 2016 Agent against the
Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors. On the Effective Date, each holder of a certificate or instrument evidencing a Claim that is discharged by the Plan shall be deemed to have surrendered such certificate or instrument in accordance with the
applicable indenture or agreement that governs the rights of such holder of such Claim. Such surrendered certificate or instrument shall be deemed canceled as set forth in, and subject to the exceptions set forth in Article IV.E of the Plan.
Notwithstanding anything in Article IV.E of the Plan, the Unsecured Notes Indenture shall remain in effect solely with respect to
the right of the Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee to make Plan distributions in accordance with the Plan and to preserve the rights and protections of the Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee with respect to the Holders of Unsecured Notes Claims,
including the Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee’s charging lien and priority rights. Subject to the distribution of Class 8 Plan consideration delivered to it in accordance with the Unsecured Notes Indenture at the expense of the Reorganized
Debtors, the Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee shall have no duties to Holders of Unsecured Notes Claims following the Effective Date of the Plan, including no duty to object to claims or treatment of other creditors.
On the Effective Date, or as soon thereafter as is reasonably practicable, all actions contemplated by the Plan shall be deemed
authorized and approved in all respects, including: (1) execution and entry into each of the Exit Facilities; (2) approval of and entry into the New Organizational Documents; (3) issuance and distribution of the New Securities, including pursuant to
the Equity Rights Offering; (4) selection of the directors and officers for the Reorganized Debtors; (5) implementation of the Restructuring Transactions contemplated by the Plan; (6) adoption or assumption, if and as applicable, of the Employment
Obligations; (7) the formation or dissolution of any Entities pursuant to and the implementation of the Restructuring Transactions and performance of all actions and transactions contemplated by the Plan, including the Description of Transaction
Steps; (8) the rejection, assumption, or assumption and assignment, as applicable, of Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases; and (9) all other actions contemplated by the Plan (whether to occur before, on, or after the Effective Date). All
matters provided for herein involving the corporate structure of the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, or any corporate, limited liability company, or related action required by the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors in connection herewith shall be
deemed to have occurred and shall be in effect in accordance with the Plan, including the Description of Transaction Steps, without any requirement of further action by the shareholders, members, directors, or managers of the Debtors or Reorganized
Debtors, and with like effect as though such action had been taken unanimously by the shareholders, members, directors, managers, or officers, as applicable, of the Debtors or Reorganized Debtors. Before, on, or after the Effective Date, the
appropriate officers of the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, shall be authorized to issue, execute, and deliver the agreements, documents, securities, and instruments contemplated under the Plan (or necessary or desirable to effect
the transactions contemplated under the Plan) in the name of and on behalf of the Reorganized Debtors. The authorizations and approvals contemplated by Article IV.S.3 of the Plan shall be effective notwithstanding any requirements under
non-bankruptcy law.
|
7.
|
New Organizational Documents
|
On or promptly after the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtors will file their applicable New Organizational Documents with the applicable
Secretaries of State and/or other applicable authorities in their respective states or jurisdictions of incorporation or formation in accordance with the corporate laws of such respective states or jurisdictions of incorporation or formation.
Pursuant to section 1123(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code, the New Organizational Documents will prohibit the issuance of non-voting equity securities of Reorganized Holdings. After the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtors may amend and restate their
respective New Organizational Documents or otherwise restructure their legal Entity forms, without supervision or approval by the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with applicable non-bankruptcy law.
The New Organizational Documents shall provide for the following minority protections (which shall not be subject to amendment other than with the
consent of holders of at least two-thirds of the then-issued and outstanding shares of New Common Stock and as to which the New Organizational Documents will provide equivalent rights to all equivalent sized holders of New Common Stock): (1) annual
audited and quarterly financial statements by Reorganized Holdings, as well as a quarterly management call, including a Q&A, (2) no transfer restrictions other than restrictions on transfers to competitors, customary drag-along and tag-along
rights (in connection with a transfer of a majority of the then-outstanding New Common Stock), and other customary transfer restrictions (including restrictions on transfers that are not in compliance with applicable law or would require Reorganized
Holdings to register securities or to register as an “investment company”), but in any event will not include any right of first refusal or right of first offer, and (3) customary pro rata preemptive rights in connection with equity issuances for
cash (subject to customary carve outs) for accredited investor holders of New Common Stock above a specified threshold (which threshold shall be determined to provide such preemptive rights to approximately ten (10) holders as of the Effective Date.
|
8.
|
Directors and Officers of the Reorganized Debtors
|
As of the Effective Date, the term of the current members of the boards of directors of each Debtor shall expire, and the New
Boards shall be appointed in accordance with the New Organizational Documents of each Reorganized Debtor.
The members of the Reorganized Holdings Board immediately following the Effective Date shall be determined and selected by the
Required Consenting 2020 B-2 Lenders.
Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, the Confirmation Order, the Plan Supplement, or the New Organizational Documents, the
officers of the Debtors immediately before the Effective Date, as applicable, shall serve as the initial officers of the Reorganized Debtors on the Effective Date.
Pursuant to section 1129(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors will disclose in the Plan Supplement the identity and
affiliations of any Person proposed to serve on the initial Reorganized Holdings Board and New Subsidiary Boards, to the extent known at the time of Filing, as well as those Persons that will serve as an officer of Reorganized Holdings or other
Reorganized Debtor. To the extent any such director or officer is an “insider” as such term is defined in section 101(31) of the Bankruptcy Code, the nature of any compensation to be paid to such director or officer will also be disclosed. Each
such director and officer shall serve from and after the Effective Date pursuant to the terms of the New Organizational Documents and may be replaced or removed in accordance with such New Organizational Documents.
|
9.
|
Employment Obligations
|
Except as otherwise expressly provided in the Plan or the Plan Supplement, the Reorganized Debtors shall honor the Employment
Obligations (1) existing and effective as of the Petition Date, (2) that were incurred or entered into in the ordinary course of business prior to the Effective Date, or (3) as otherwise agreed to between the Debtors and the Required Consenting
BrandCo Lenders on or prior to the Effective Date. Additionally, on the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtors shall assume (1) the existing CEO Employment Agreement as amended by the CEO Employment Agreement Term Sheet, and (2) the Revlon
Executive Severance Pay Plan as amended by the Executive Severance Term Sheet, in each case, as adopted in accordance with, the Restructuring Support Agreement, and such assumed agreements shall supersede and replace any existing executive severance
plan for directors and above and the chief executive officer employment agreement.
To the extent that any of the Employment Obligations are executory contracts, pursuant to sections 365 and 1123 of the Bankruptcy
Code, each of them shall be deemed assumed as of the Effective Date and assigned to the applicable Reorganized Debtor. For the avoidance of doubt, the foregoing shall not (a) limit, diminish, or otherwise alter the Reorganized Debtors’ defenses,
claims, Causes of Action, or other rights with respect to the Employment Obligations, or (b) impair the rights of the Debtors or Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, to implement the Management Incentive Plan in accordance with its terms and
conditions and to determine the Employment Obligations of the Reorganized Debtors in accordance with their applicable terms and conditions on or after the Effective Date, in each case consistent with the Plan.
On the Effective Date, the Debtors shall assume all collective bargaining agreements.
The Confirmation Order shall approve the Enhanced Cash Incentive Program and the Global Bonus Program. As soon as practicable
following the Effective Date (but no later than 21 days after the Effective Date, absent any ordinary course administrative delay), the Reorganized Debtors shall implement (1) the Enhanced Cash Incentive Program, and (2) the Global Bonus Program, in
each case, in accordance with the Plan and the Restructuring Support Agreement. At its first meeting after the Effective Date, which shall be held as soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective Date, but in any case no later than 21 days
after the Effective Date, absent any ordinary course administrative delay, that is not caused for purposes of circumventing this requirement by any equity holder or any member of the Reorganized Holdings Board other than the Debtors’ chief executive
officer, in connection with the establishment of the Reorganized Holdings Board, the Reorganized Holdings Board shall approve, adopt, and affirm, as applicable, the implementation of the Enhanced Cash Incentive Program and the Global Bonus Program as
of the Effective Date.
|
10.
|
Qualified Pension Plans
|
On the Effective Date, the Debtors shall assume the Qualified Pension Plans in accordance with the terms of the Qualified Pension
Plans and the relevant provisions of ERISA and the IRC.
All proofs of claim filed by PBGC shall be deemed withdrawn on the Effective Date.
From and after the Effective Date, the Debtors shall assume and continue to pay all Retiree Benefit Claims in accordance with
applicable law.
|
12.
|
Key Employee Incentive/Retention Plans
|
On the Effective Date, the Debtors shall pay, to KEIP and KERP participants, as applicable, (a) all KERP amounts earnable for the
quarter in which the Effective Date occurs prorated for the period from the first day of such quarter through and including the Effective Date, (b) all KEIP amounts (including any catch-up amounts) earned by the KEIP participants based on the
Debtors’ good faith estimates of performance for the quarter in which the Effective Date occurs prorated for the period from the first day of such quarter through and including the Effective Date, and (c) all KEIP amounts (including any catch-up
amounts) earned by the KEIP participants for quarters ending prior to the quarter in which the Effective Date occurs but which remain unpaid based on the Debtors’ good faith estimates of performance for such quarters, with such estimates to be
subject to the approval of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders, with such approval not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed.
Except as set forth in Article IV.L of the Plan, the KEIP and KERP programs shall terminate effective as of the Effective Date
and any clawback rights provided for under the KEIP or the KERP shall be released.
|
13.
|
Effectuating Documents; Further Transactions
|
On, before, or after (as applicable) the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtors, the officers of the Reorganized Debtors, and
members of the New Boards are authorized to and may issue, execute, deliver, file, or record such contracts, securities, instruments, releases, and other agreements or documents and take such actions as may be necessary or appropriate to effectuate,
implement, and further evidence the terms and conditions of the Plan, the Restructuring Transactions, the New Organizational Documents, the Exit Facilities Documents, and the securities issued pursuant to the Plan, including the New Securities, and
any and all other agreements, documents, securities, filings, and instruments relating to the foregoing in the name of and on behalf of the Reorganized Debtors, without the need for any approvals, authorization, or consents except those expressly
required pursuant to the Plan. The authorizations and approvals contemplated by Article IV of the Plan shall be effective notwithstanding any requirements under non-bankruptcy law.
|
14.
|
Management Incentive Plan
|
By no later than January 1, 2024, the Reorganized Holdings Board shall implement the Management Incentive Plan that provides for
the issuance of options and/or other equity-based compensation to the management and directors of the Reorganized Debtors in accordance with the Plan.
7.5% of the New Common Stock, on a fully diluted basis, shall be reserved for issuance in connection with the Management
Incentive Plan. The participants in the Management Incentive Plan, the allocations and form of the options and other equity-based compensation to such participants (including the amount of the allocations and the timing of the grant of the options
and other equity-based compensation), and the terms and conditions of such options and other equity-based compensation (including vesting, exercise prices, base values, hurdles, forfeiture, repurchase rights, and transferability) shall be determined
by the Reorganized Holdings Board; provided that one-half of the MIP Equity Pool shall be awarded to participants under the Management Incentive Plan upon
implementation no later than January 1, 2024.
|
15.
|
Exemption from Certain Taxes and Fees
|
To the fullest extent permitted by section 1146(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, any transfers (whether from a Debtor to a Reorganized
Debtor or to any other Person) of property pursuant to the Plan shall not be subject to any stamp tax, document recording tax, conveyance fee, intangibles, or similar tax, mortgage tax, real estate transfer tax, personal property transfer tax,
mortgage recording tax, sales or use tax, Uniform Commercial Code filing or recording fee, regulatory filing or recording fee, or other similar tax or governmental assessment in the United States, and the Confirmation Order shall direct and be deemed
to direct the appropriate state or local governmental officials or agents to forgo the collection of any such tax or governmental assessment and to accept for filing and recordation instruments or other documents pursuant to such transfers of
property without the payment of any such tax or governmental assessment. Such exemption specifically applies, without limitation, to (a) the creation, modification, consolidation, or recording of any mortgage, deed of trust, Lien, or other security
interest, or the securing of additional indebtedness by such or other means, (b) the making or assignment of any lease or sublease, (c) any Restructuring Transaction authorized by the Plan, and (d) the making or delivery of any deed or other
instrument of transfer under, in furtherance of, or in connection with the Plan, including: (i) any merger agreements; (ii) agreements of consolidation, restructuring, disposition, liquidation, or dissolution; (iii) deeds; (iv) bills of sale; (v)
assignments executed in connection with any Restructuring Transaction occurring under the Plan; or (vi) the other Definitive Documents.
|
16.
|
Indemnification Provisions
|
On and as of the Effective Date, consistent with applicable law, the Indemnification Provisions in place as of the Effective Date
(whether in the bylaws, certificates of incorporation or formation, limited liability company agreements, other organized documents, board resolutions, indemnification agreements, employment contracts, or otherwise) for current and former directors,
officers, managers, employees, attorneys, accountants, investment bankers, and other professionals of the Debtors, as applicable, shall be assumed by the Reorganized Debtors (and any such Indemnification Provisions in place as to any Debtors that are
to be liquidated under the Plan shall be assigned to and assumed by an applicable Reorganized Debtor), deemed irrevocable, and will remain in full force and effect and survive the effectiveness of the Plan unimpaired and unaffected, and each of the
Reorganized Debtors’ New Organizational Documents will provide for the indemnification, defense, reimbursement, exculpation, and/or limitation of liability of, and advancement of fees and expenses to the Debtors’ and the Reorganized Debtors’ current
and former directors, officers, employees, agents, managers, attorneys, and other professionals, at least to the same extent as such documents of each of the respective Debtors on the Petition Date but in no event greater than as permitted by law,
against any Causes of Action. None of the Reorganized Debtors shall amend and/or restate its respective New Organizational Documents, on or after the Effective Date to terminate, reduce, discharge, impair or adversely affect in any way (1) any of
the Reorganized Debtors’ obligations referred to in the immediately preceding sentence or (2) the rights of such current and former directors, officers, employees, agents, managers, attorneys, and other professionals.
|
17.
|
Preservation of Causes of Action
|
In accordance with section 1123(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Reorganized Debtors shall retain and may enforce all rights to
commence and pursue, any and all Retained Causes of Action (except, if the GUC Trust is established in accordance with the Plan, the GUC Trust may enforce all rights to commence and pursue Retained Preference Actions), whether arising before or after
the Petition Date, including but not limited to any actions specifically enumerated in the Plan Supplement, and the Reorganized Debtors’ rights to commence, prosecute, or settle such Retained Causes of Action shall be preserved notwithstanding the
occurrence of the Effective Date. If the GUC Trust is established in accordance with the Plan, the GUC Trust (on its own behalf and, if the PI Settlement Fund is established in accordance with the Plan, as agent for the PI Settlement Fund) shall
retain and may enforce all rights to commence and pursue any Retained Preference Actions, and the GUC Trust’s rights to commence, prosecute, or settle such Retained Preference Actions shall be preserved notwithstanding the occurrence of the Effective
Date. For the avoidance of doubt, the preservation of Retained Causes of Action described in the preceding sentence includes, but is not limited to, the Debtors’ rights to (1) assert any and all counterclaims, crossclaims, claims for contribution
defenses, and similar claims in response to such or Causes of Action, (2) object to Administrative Claims, (3) object to other Claims, and (4) subordinate Claims, other than the Causes of Action released by the Debtors pursuant to the releases and
exculpations contained in the Plan, including in Article XI of the Plan, which shall be deemed released and waived by the Debtors and Reorganized Debtors as of the
Effective Date.
The Reorganized Debtors may pursue such Retained Causes of Action, as appropriate, in accordance with the best interests of the
Reorganized Debtors, in their respective discretion. The GUC Trust, if established, may pursue Retained Preference Actions and objections to General Unsecured Claims in accordance with the best interests of the GUC Trust and the PI Settlement Fund.
No Entity may rely on the absence of a specific reference in the Plan, the Plan Supplement, or the Disclosure Statement to any Cause of Action against them as any
indication that the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors or the GUC Trust, as applicable, will not pursue any and all available Retained Causes of Action. The Debtors and the Reorganized Debtors expressly reserve all rights to prosecute any and all
Retained Causes of Action against any Entity. The GUC Trust expressly reserves all rights to prosecute any and all Retained Preference Actions in accordance with the Plan. Unless any Cause of Action against an Entity is expressly waived,
relinquished, exculpated, released, compromised, or settled in the Plan or a Final Order of the Bankruptcy Court, the Reorganized Debtors and, solely with respect to Retained Preference Actions and the allowance or disallowance of General Unsecured
Claims, the GUC Trust, as applicable, expressly reserve all and shall retain the applicable Retained Causes of Action, for later adjudication, and, therefore no preclusion doctrine, including the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, issue
preclusion, claim preclusion, estoppel (judicial, equitable, or otherwise), or laches, shall apply to such Retained Causes of Action upon, after, or as a consequence of the Confirmation or Consummation.
The applicable Reorganized Debtor, through its authorized agents or representatives, shall retain and may exclusively enforce any
and all Retained Causes of Action. The Reorganized Debtors shall have the exclusive right, authority, and discretion to determine and to initiate, file, prosecute, enforce, abandon, settle, compromise, release,
withdraw, or litigate to judgment any such Retained Causes of Action except as otherwise expressly provided in the Plan and to decline to do any of the foregoing without the consent or approval of any third party or further notice to or action,
order, or approval of the Bankruptcy Court.
|
18.
|
GUC Trust and PI Settlement Fund
|
On the Effective Date, solely in the event that any Class of General Unsecured Claims votes to accept the Plan and the Creditors’ Committee Settlement
Conditions are satisfied, the GUC Trust shall be established in accordance with the GUC Trust Agreement. The GUC Trust Agreement shall be (a) drafted by the Creditors’ Committee and (b) in substantially the form included in the Plan Supplement.
On the Effective Date, solely in the event that Class 9(a) votes to accept the Plan and the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are satisfied,
the PI Settlement Fund shall be established in accordance with the terms of the PI Settlement Fund Agreement and the Plan. The PI Settlement Fund Agreement shall be (a) drafted by the Creditors’ Committee and (b) in substantially the form included
in the Plan Supplement.
On the Effective Date, or with respect to the GUC Settlement Top Up Amount and any increase to the GUC Trust/PI Fund Operating Reserve, after the
Effective Date, in accordance with the Plan, the GUC Trust Assets shall vest in the GUC Trust and the PI Settlement Fund Assets shall vest in the PI Settlement Fund, as applicable, free and clear of all Claims, Interests, liens, and other
encumbrances. For the avoidance of doubt, any portion of the GUC Settlement Total Amount allocable to any Class of General Unsecured Claims that votes to reject the Plan shall be retained by the Reorganized Debtors. Additional assets may vest in
the GUC Trust and the PI Settlement Fund from time to time after the Effective Date in the event that an additional GUC Settlement Top Up Amount becomes due, or in the event that additional assets are added to the GUC Trust/PI Fund Operating Reserve
pursuant to the Plan.
The GUC Trust or PI Settlement Fund, as applicable, shall have the sole power and authority to: (1) receive and hold the GUC Trust Assets and the
PI Settlement Fund Assets, as the case may be; (2) administer, dispute, object to, compromise, or otherwise resolve all General Unsecured Claims in any Class of General Unsecured Claims that votes to accept the Plan; provided that the Debtors, with the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed) of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders and in consultation with the Creditors’ Committee, or
the Reorganized Debtors, in consultation with the GUC Administrator or PI Claims Administrator, as applicable, may elect to administer, dispute, object to, compromise, or otherwise resolve any such Claim (other than a Talc Personal Injury Claim);
(3) make distributions in accordance with the Plan to Holders of Allowed General Unsecured Claims in any Class that votes to accept the Plan; and (4) in the case of the GUC Trust only, on its own behalf and acting as agent for the PI Settlement
Fund, commence and pursue the Retained Preference Actions, and manage and administer any proceeds thereof in accordance with the Plan.
The GUC Administrator, the PI Claims Administrator, and their respective counsel shall be selected by the Creditors’ Committee and disclosed in the
Plan Supplement prior to commencement of the Confirmation Hearing. The identity of the GUC Administrator, the PI Claims Administrator, and their respective counsel, and the terms of their compensation shall be reasonably acceptable to the Debtors
and the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders. In furtherance of and consistent with the purpose of the GUC Trust or PI Settlement Fund, as applicable, and the Plan, the GUC Administrator and/or PI Claims Administrator, as applicable, shall: (1)
have the power and authority to perform all functions on behalf of the GUC Trust or PI Settlement Fund, as applicable; (2) undertake, with the cooperation of the Reorganized Debtors, all administrative responsibilities that are provided in the Plan
and the GUC Trust Agreement or PI Settlement Fund Agreement, as applicable, including filing the applicable operating reports and administering the closure of the Chapter 11 Cases, which reports shall be delivered to the Reorganized Debtors; (3) be
responsible for all decisions and duties with respect to the GUC Trust or PI Settlement Fund, as applicable, and the GUC Trust Assets and the PI Settlement Fund Assets, as applicable; (4) in the case of the GUC Administrator and the PI Claims
Administrator, allocate the GUC Trust/PI Fund Operating Reserve between the GUC Trust and the PI Settlement Fund in their discretion from time to time, and administer such funds in accordance with the terms of the Plan, the GUC Trust Agreement, and
the PI Settlement Fund Agreement; and (5) in all circumstances and at all times, act in a fiduciary capacity for the benefit and in the best interests of the beneficiaries of the GUC Trust or PI Settlement Fund Agreement, as applicable, in
furtherance of the purpose of the GUC Trust and PI Settlement Fund Agreement and in accordance with the Plan and the GUC Trust Agreement or PI Settlement Fund Agreement, as applicable.
All expenses (including taxes) of the PI Settlement Fund shall be GUC Trust/PI Fund Operating Expenses and shall be payable solely from the GUC
Trust/PI Fund Operating Reserve.
|
19.
|
Restructuring Expenses
|
The Restructuring Expenses incurred, or estimated to be incurred, up to and including the Effective Date shall be paid in full in
Cash on the Effective Date (to the extent not previously paid during the course of the Chapter 11 Cases on the dates on which such amounts would be required to be paid under the Term DIP Credit Agreement, the DIP Orders, or the Restructuring Support
Agreement) without the requirement to file a fee application with the Bankruptcy Court, without the need for time detail, and without any requirement for review or approval by the Bankruptcy Court or any other party. All Restructuring Expenses to be
paid on the Effective Date shall be estimated prior to and as of the Effective Date and such estimates shall be delivered to the Debtors at least two (2) Business Days before the anticipated Effective Date; provided that such estimates shall not be considered to be admissions or limitations with respect to such Restructuring Expenses. In addition, the Debtors and the Reorganized Debtors (as
applicable) shall continue to pay, when due, pre- and post-Effective Date Restructuring Expenses, whether incurred before, on or after the Effective Date. For the avoidance of doubt, the payment of the fees and expenses of the Unsecured Notes
Indenture Trustee pursuant to Article IV.T of the Plan shall be deemed to be part of the treatment of Class 8 and not by reason of the Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee’s membership on the Committee. For the further avoidance of doubt, the payment
of the fees and expenses (including, but not limited to attorney’s fees) of the other members of the Creditors’ Committee was an integral part of the global settlement reached between the Creditors’ Committee, the Ad Hoc Group of Brandco Lenders, and
the Debtors regarding the treatment of General Unsecured Claims pursuant to the Plan.
|
1.
|
Establishment of the GUC Trust
|
On the Effective Date, solely in the event that any Class of General Unsecured Claims votes to accept the Plan and the Creditors’
Committee Settlement Conditions are satisfied, the GUC Trust shall be established in accordance with the terms of the GUC Trust Agreement and the Plan. The GUC Trust Agreement shall be (a) drafted by the Creditors’
Committee and (b) in substantially the form included in the Plan Supplement.
The GUC Trust shall be established to liquidate the GUC Trust Assets and make distributions in accordance with the Plan, Confirmation Order, and GUC Trust Agreement,
and in accordance with Treasury Regulations Section 301.7701-4(d), with no objective to continue or engage in the conduct of a trade or business, except to the extent reasonably necessary to, and consistent with, the liquidating purpose of the GUC
Trust. The GUC Trust shall be structured to qualify as a “liquidating trust” within the meaning of Treasury Regulations section 301.7701-4(d) and in compliance with Revenue Procedure 94-45, and thus, as a “grantor trust” within the meaning of
Sections 671 through 679 of the Tax Code. Accordingly, the GUC Trust Beneficiaries shall be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes (i) as direct recipients of undivided interests in the GUC Trust Assets (other than to the extent the GUC
Trust Assets are allocable to Disputed Claims) and as having immediately contributed such assets to the GUC Trust, and (ii) thereafter, as the grantors and deemed owners of the GUC Trust and thus, the direct owners of
an undivided interest in the GUC Trust Assets (other than such GUC Trust Assets that are allocable to Disputed Claims).
The identity of the GUC Administrator shall be disclosed in the Plan Supplement prior to entry of the Confirmation Order on the docket of the Chapter 11 Cases.
The GUC Administrator shall file tax returns for the GUC Trust as a grantor trust pursuant to Treasury Regulations Section 1.671-4(a) and in
accordance with the Plan. The GUC Trust’s items of taxable income, gain, loss, deduction, and/or credit (other than such items is respect of any assets allocable to, or retained on account of, Disputed Claims) will be allocated to each holder in
accordance with their relative ownership of GUC Trust Interests.
As soon as possible after the Effective Date, the GUC Administrator shall make a good faith valuation of the GUC Trust Assets and such valuation shall
be used consistently by all parties for all U.S. federal income tax purposes.
The GUC Administrator may request an expedited determination of taxes under section 505(b) of the Bankruptcy Code for all tax returns filed by or on
behalf of the GUC Trust for all taxable periods through the dissolution thereof. Nothing in Article V.C of the Plan shall be deemed to determine, expand or contract the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court under section 505 of the Bankruptcy Code.
The GUC Administrator (1) may timely elect to treat any GUC Trust Assets allocable to Disputed Claims as a “disputed ownership fund” governed by
Treasury Regulations Section 1.468B-9, and (2) to the extent permitted by applicable law, shall report consistently for state and local income tax purposes. If a “disputed ownership fund” election is made, all parties (including the GUC
Administrator and the holders of GUC Trust Interests) shall report for U.S. federal, state, and local income tax purposes consistently with the foregoing. The GUC Administrator shall file all income tax returns with respect to any income
attributable to a “disputed ownership fund” and shall pay the U.S. federal, state, and local income taxes attributable to such disputed ownership fund based on the items of income, deduction, credit, or loss allocable thereto. The Reorganized
Debtors and the GUC Administrator shall cooperate to ensure that any distributions made in respect of Claims that are in the nature of compensation for services (including the Non-Qualified Pension Claims) (“Wage Distributions”) are processed through appropriate payroll processing systems or arrangements and are subject to appropriate payroll tax withholding and reporting, and that any applicable payroll taxes associated
therewith are properly remitted to taxing authorities. The Reorganized Debtors and the GUC Trust shall, if so requested by the GUC Trust, cooperate in good faith to agree to such procedures so as to permit such Wage Distributions to be processed
through the Reorganized Debtors’ payroll processing systems (which may, for the avoidance of doubt, be administered by a third party). The employer portion of any payroll taxes applicable to Wage Distributions shall be solely borne by the
Reorganized Debtors; neither the GUC Trust nor the GUC Trust/PI Fund Operating Reserve shall bear any liability for the employer portion of any payroll taxes applicable to Wage Distributions.
|
1.
|
Establishment of the PI Settlement Fund
|
On the Effective Date, solely in the event that Class 9(a) votes to accept the Plan, and the Creditors’ Committee Settlement
Conditions are satisfied, the PI Settlement Fund shall be established in accordance with the terms of the PI Settlement Fund Agreement and the Plan. The PI Settlement Fund Agreement shall be (a) drafted by the Creditors’ Committee and (b) in
substantially the form included in the Plan Supplement. The PI Settlement Fund shall be established to make distributions to Holders of Talc Personal Injury Claims in accordance with the PI Claims Distribution Procedures and the Plan. All expenses
(including taxes) incurred by the PI Settlement Fund shall be recorded on the books and records (and reported on all applicable tax returns) as expenses of the PI Settlement Fund; provided, however, that the PI Settlement Fund shall remit all invoices or other documentation with respect to such expenses for payment to the GUC Administrator and the GUC Administrator shall timely make such payments
on behalf of the PI Settlement Fund solely from the GUC Trust/PI Fund Operating Reserve.
The Bankruptcy Court shall have continuing jurisdiction over the PI Settlement Fund.
|
2.
|
The PI Claims Administrator
|
The identity of the PI Claims Administrator shall be disclosed in the Plan Supplement prior to entry of the Confirmation Order on the docket of the Chapter 11
Cases.
The PI Settlement Fund is intended to be treated, and shall be reported, as a “qualified settlement fund” for U.S. federal income
tax purposes and shall be treated consistently for state and local tax purposes to the extent applicable. The PI Claims Administrator shall be the “administrator” of the PI Settlement Fund within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section
1.468B-2(k)(3).
The PI Claims Administrator shall be responsible for filing all tax returns of the PI Settlement Fund and the payment, out of the
assets of PI Settlement Fund, of any taxes due by or imposed on the PI Settlement Fund.
The PI Claims Administrator may request an expedited determination of taxes under section 505(b) of the Bankruptcy Code for all
tax returns filed by or on behalf of the PI Settlement Fund for all taxable periods through the dissolution thereof. Nothing in Article VI of the Plan shall be deemed to determine, expand or contract the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court under
section 505 of the Bankruptcy Code.
|
F. |
Treatment of Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases
|
|
1.
|
Assumption and Rejection of Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases
|
Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, all Executory Contracts or Unexpired Leases will be deemed assumed as of the Effective
Date, in accordance with the provisions and requirements of sections 365 and 1123 of the Bankruptcy Code, other than those Executory Contracts or Unexpired Leases that: (a) previously were assumed or rejected by the Debtors; (b) are identified on
the Schedule of Rejected Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases; or (c) are the subject of a motion to reject such Executory Contracts or Unexpired Leases, as applicable, that is pending on the Effective Date, regardless of whether the requested
effective date of such rejection is on or after the Effective Date. The assumption or rejection of all executory contracts and unexpired leases in the Chapter 11 Cases or in the Plan shall be determined by the Debtors, with the consent of the
Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders. Entry of the Confirmation Order by the Bankruptcy Court shall constitute approval of such assumptions, assumptions and assignments, and the rejection of the Executory Contracts or Unexpired Leases listed on the
Schedule of Rejected Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases pursuant to sections 365(a) and 1123 of the Bankruptcy Code. Any motions to reject Executory Contracts or Unexpired Leases pending on the Effective Date shall be subject to approval by
the Bankruptcy Court on or after the Effective Date by a Final Order. Each Executory Contract and Unexpired Lease assumed pursuant to Article VII.A of the Plan or by any order of the Bankruptcy Court, which has not been assigned to a third party
prior to the Confirmation Date or such later date as provided in Article VII.A of the Plan, shall revest in and be fully enforceable by the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, in accordance with such Executory Contract and/or Unexpired
Lease’s terms, except as such terms are modified by the provisions of the Plan or any order of the Bankruptcy Court authorizing and providing for its assumption under applicable federal law.
To the maximum extent permitted by law, to the extent any provision in any Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease assumed pursuant
to the Plan restricts or prevents, or purports to restrict or prevent, or is breached or deemed breached by, the assumption of such Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease (including, without limitation, any “change of control” provision), then such
provision shall be deemed modified such that the transactions contemplated by the Plan shall not entitle the non-Debtor party thereto to terminate such Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease or to exercise any other default-related rights with respect
thereto. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan, the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, will have the right to alter, amend, modify, or supplement the Schedule of Rejected Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases,
including by way of adding or removing a particular Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease from the Schedule of Rejected Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases, at any time through and including sixty (60) Business Days after the Effective Date; provided that, after the Confirmation Date, the Debtors may not subsequently reject any Unexpired Lease of nonresidential real property under which any Debtor is
the lessee that was not previously rejected (or subject to a motion to reject) or designated as rejected on the Schedule of Rejected Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases absent consent of the applicable lessor; provided further that, with respect
to any Unexpired Lease subject to a dispute regarding (1) the amount of the Cure Claim, (2) the ability of the Reorganized Debtors or any assignee to provide “adequate assurance of future performance” (within the meaning of section 365 of the
Bankruptcy Code) under such Unexpired Lease to be assumed, if required, or (3) any other matter pertaining to assumption, the Debtors may reject such Unexpired Lease within 30 days following entry of a Final Order of the Bankruptcy Court resolving
such dispute.
|
2.
|
Claims Based on Rejection of Executory Contracts or Unexpired Leases
|
Proofs of Claim with respect to Claims arising from the rejection of Executory Contracts or Unexpired Leases, if any, must be
filed with the Bankruptcy Court or the Voting and Claims Agent and served on the Debtors or Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, by the later of (a) the applicable Claims Bar Date, and (b) thirty (30) calendar days after notice of such rejection is
served on the applicable claimant. Any Claims arising from the rejection of an Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease not Filed within such time shall be automatically Disallowed and forever barred from assertion and shall not be enforceable against
the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, the Estates, or property of the foregoing parties, without the need for any objection by the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, or further notice to, or action, order, or approval of the
Bankruptcy Court or any other Entity, and any Claim arising out of the rejection of the Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease shall be deemed fully satisfied, released, and discharged, including any Claims against any Debtor listed on the Schedules
as unliquidated, contingent or disputed. Allowed Claims arising from the rejection of the Debtors’ Executory Contracts or Unexpired Leases shall be classified as Other General Unsecured Claims and shall be treated in accordance with Article III of
the Plan.
Any and all Proofs of Claim based upon Executory Contracts or Unexpired Leases that have been assumed in the Chapter 11 Cases,
including pursuant to the Confirmation Order, and for which any cure amount has been fully paid or for which the cure amount is $0 pursuant to Article VII of the Plan, shall be deemed Disallowed and expunged as of the Effective Date without the need
for any objection thereto or any further notice to or action, order, or approval of the Bankruptcy Court.
|
3.
|
Cure of Defaults for Assumed Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases
|
Any Cure Claims shall be satisfied, pursuant to section 365(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, by payment of the Cure Claim in Cash on
the Effective Date or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, with such Cure Claim being $0.00 if no amount is listed in the Cure Notice, subject to the limitations described below, or on such other terms as the party to such Executory Contract
or Unexpired Lease may otherwise agree. In the event of a dispute regarding (a) the amount of the Cure Claim, (b) the ability of the Reorganized Debtors or any assignee to provide “adequate assurance of future performance” (within the meaning of
section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code) under the Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease to be assumed, if required, or (c) any other matter pertaining to assumption, the cure payments required by section 365(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code shall only be
made following the entry of a Final Order or orders resolving the dispute and approving the assumption or by mutual agreement between the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, and the applicable counterparty, with the reasonable consent
of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders.
At least fourteen (14) calendar days before the Confirmation Hearing, the Debtors shall distribute, or cause to be distributed,
Cure Notices and proposed amounts of Cure Claims to the applicable Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease counterparties. Any objection by a counterparty to an Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease to a proposed assumption or related cure amount must
be Filed, served, and actually received by the Debtors at least seven (7) calendar days before the Confirmation Hearing. Any such objection to the assumption of an Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease shall be heard by the Bankruptcy Court on or
before the Effective Date, unless a later date is agreed to between the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, on the one hand, and the counterparty to the Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease, on the other hand, or by order of the Bankruptcy Court; provided, however, that any such objection that is timely filed by
Broadstone Rev New Jersey, LLC or 540 Beautyrest Avenue, LLC shall be heard by the Bankruptcy Court on or before the Confirmation Date, unless a later date is agreed to between the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, on the one hand, and Broadstone
Rev New Jersey, LLC or 540 Beautyrest Avenue, LLC, as applicable, on the other hand, or by order of the Bankruptcy Court. Any counterparty to an Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease that fails to object timely to the proposed assumption or cure
amount shall be deemed to have assented to such assumption and/or cure amount.
The Debtors or Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, reserve the right to reject any Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease in
resolution of any cure disputes. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan, if at any time the Bankruptcy Court determines that the Allowed Cure Claim with respect to any Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease is greater than the amount
set forth in the applicable Cure Notice, the Debtors or Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, will have the right, at such time, to add such Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease to the Schedule of Rejected Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases, in
which case such Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease shall be deemed rejected as the Effective Date.
Assumption of any Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease pursuant to the Plan or otherwise shall result in the full release and
satisfaction of any Claims against any Debtor or defaults, whether monetary or nonmonetary, including defaults of provisions restricting a change in control or any bankruptcy-related defaults, arising under any assumed Executory Contract or Unexpired
Lease at any time before the date that the Debtors or Reorganized Debtors assume such Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease; provided that nothing herein shall
prevent the Reorganized Debtors from (1) paying any Cure Claim despite the failure of the relevant counterparty to File such request for payment of such Cure Claim or (2) settling any Cure Claim without any further notice to or action, order, or
approval of the Bankruptcy Court, in each case in clauses (1) or (2), with the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed) of the Required Consenting 2020 B-2 Lenders. Any Proofs of Claim Filed with respect to an Executory
Contract or Unexpired Lease that has been assumed and cured shall be deemed Disallowed and expunged, without further notice to or action, order, or approval of the Bankruptcy Court.
|
4. |
Pre-existing Obligations to the Debtors under Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases
|
Notwithstanding any non-bankruptcy law to the contrary, the Debtors expressly reserve and do not waive any right to receive, or
any continuing obligation of a counterparty to provide, warranties or continued maintenance obligations on goods previously purchased, or services previously received, by the contracting Debtors from counterparties to rejected or repudiated Executory
Contracts and Unexpired Leases. For the avoidance of doubt, the rejection of any Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases pursuant to the Plan or otherwise shall not constitute a termination of pre-existing obligations owed to the Debtors under such
Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases.
Subject in all respects to Articles VIII.L.3 and X.K, all of the Debtors’ insurance policies, including any directors’ and
officers’ insurance policies (including any “tail policies”), and any agreements, documents, or instruments relating thereto, are treated as and deemed to be Executory Contracts under the Plan. On the Effective Date, the Debtors shall be deemed to
have assumed all insurance policies and any agreements, documents, and instruments related thereto. In addition, on and after the Effective Date, none of the Reorganized Debtors shall terminate or otherwise reduce, limit or restrict the coverage
under any of the directors’ and officers’ insurance policies with respect to conduct occurring prior thereto, and all directors and officers of the Debtors who served in such capacity at any time prior to the Effective Date shall be entitled to the
full benefits of any such directors’ and officers’ insurance policy (including any “tail policies”) for the full term of such policy regardless of whether such directors and/or officers remain in such positions after the Effective Date.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Article XI.D and Article X.E of the Plan, all of the Debtors’ current and former officers’ and directors’ rights as beneficiaries of such insurance policies are preserved to the extent set forth in the
Plan.
|
6.
|
Indemnification Provisions
|
Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, on and as of the Effective Date, any of the Debtors’ indemnification rights with
respect to any contract or agreement that is the subject of or related to any litigation against the Debtors or Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, shall be assumed by the Reorganized Debtors and otherwise remain unaffected by the Chapter 11 Cases.
|
7. |
Modifications, Amendments, Supplements, Restatements, or Other Agreements
|
Unless otherwise provided in the Plan or by separate order of the Bankruptcy Court, each Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease
that is assumed shall include (a) all modifications, amendments, supplements, restatements, or other agreements made directly or indirectly by any agreement, instrument or other document that in any manner affect such Executory Contract or Unexpired
Lease, and (b) all Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases related thereto, if any, including easements, licenses, permits, rights, privileges, immunities, options, rights of first refusal, powers, uses, reciprocal easement agreements and any other
interests, unless any of the foregoing agreements has been previously rejected or repudiated or is rejected or repudiated pursuant to an order of the Bankruptcy Court or under the Plan.
Except as otherwise provided by the Plan or by separate order of the Bankruptcy Court, modifications, amendments, supplements,
and restatements to prepetition Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases that have been executed by the Debtors during the Chapter 11 Cases and actions taken in accordance therewith (a) shall not be deemed to alter the prepetition nature of the
Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease, or the validity, priority, or amount of any Claims against any Debtor that may arise in connection therewith, (b) are not and do not create postpetition contracts or leases, (c) do not elevate to administrative
expense priority any Claims of the counterparties to such Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases against any of the Debtors, and (e) do not entitle any Entity to a Claim against any of the Debtors under any section of the Bankruptcy Code on account
of the difference between the terms of any prepetition Executory Contracts or Unexpired Leases and subsequent modifications, amendments, supplements or restatements.
Neither the exclusion nor inclusion of any Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease on the Schedule of Rejected Executory Contracts
and Unexpired Leases or any Cure Notice, nor anything contained in the Plan or the Plan Supplement, shall constitute an admission by the Debtors that any such contract or lease is in fact an Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease or that any
Reorganized Debtor has any liability thereunder. If, prior to the Effective Date, there is a dispute regarding whether a contract or lease is or was executory or unexpired at the time of assumption or rejection, the Debtors, or Reorganized Debtors,
as applicable, shall have forty-five (45) calendar days following entry of a Final Order resolving such dispute to alter their treatment of such contract or lease, including by rejecting such contract or lease nunc pro tunc to the Confirmation Date.
|
9.
|
Nonoccurrence of Effective Date
|
In the event that the Effective Date does not occur, the Bankruptcy Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to any request
to extend the deadline for assuming or rejecting Unexpired Leases pursuant to section 365(d)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code.
|
10.
|
Contracts and Leases Entered Into After the Petition Date
|
Contracts and leases entered into after the Petition Date by any Debtor, including any Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases
assumed by such Debtor, will be performed by the applicable Debtor or Reorganized Debtor liable thereunder in the ordinary course of its business. Accordingly, such contracts and leases (including any assumed Executory Contracts and Unexpired
Leases) that had not been rejected as of the date of Confirmation will survive and remain obligations of the applicable Reorganized Debtor.
|
G. |
Provisions Governing Distributions
|
|
1.
|
Timing and Calculation of Amounts to Be Distributed
|
Unless otherwise provided in the Plan, on the Effective Date (or if a Claim is not an Allowed Claim on the Effective Date, on the
date that such Claim becomes an Allowed Claim), each Holder of an Allowed Claim shall be entitled to receive the full amount of the distributions that the Plan provides for Allowed Claims in each applicable Class. If and to the extent that there are
Disputed Claims, distributions on account of any such Disputed Claims (which will only be made if and when they become Allowed Claims) shall be made pursuant to the provisions set forth in Article IX of the Plan. Except as otherwise expressly
provided in the Plan, Holders of Claims shall not be entitled to interest, dividends, or accruals on the distributions provided for in the Plan, regardless of whether such distributions are delivered on or at any time after the Effective Date. The
Debtors shall have no obligation to recognize any transfer of Claims against any Debtor or privately held Interests occurring on or after the Distribution Record Date. Distributions to Holders of Claims or Interests related to public securities
shall be made to such Holders in exchange for such securities, which shall be deemed canceled as of the Effective Date.
|
2.
|
Distributions on Account of Obligations of Multiple Debtors
|
Any Holder of a Claim that has filed duplicate Claims that are classified under the Plan in the same Voting Class shall be entitled to one distribution on
account of such Claims with respect to such Class.
Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, all distributions under the Plan shall be made by the Disbursing Agent on the Effective
Date or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter. The Disbursing Agent shall not be required to give any bond or surety or other security for the performance of its duties unless otherwise ordered by the Bankruptcy Court.
|
4.
|
Rights and Powers of Disbursing Agent
|
|
a. |
Powers of the Disbursing Agent
|
The Disbursing Agent shall be empowered to: (i) effect all actions and execute all agreements, instruments, and other documents
necessary to perform its duties under the Plan; (ii) make all distributions contemplated hereby; (iii) employ professionals to represent it with respect to its responsibilities; and (iv) exercise such other powers as may be vested in the Disbursing
Agent by order of the Bankruptcy Court, pursuant to the Plan, or as deemed by the Disbursing Agent to be necessary and proper to implement the provisions of the Plan.
|
b. |
Expenses Incurred On or After the Effective Date
|
Except as otherwise ordered by the Bankruptcy Court, the amount of any reasonable fees and out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the
Disbursing Agent on or after the Effective Date (including taxes other than any income taxes) and any reasonable compensation and out-of-pocket expense reimbursement claims (including reasonable and documented attorney fees and expenses) made by the
Disbursing Agent shall be paid in Cash by the Reorganized Debtors; provided that all such expenses, compensation, and reimbursement claims of the GUC
Administrator, the PI Claims Administrator, or the Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee shall be paid from the GUC Trust/PI Fund Operating Reserve.
|
5.
|
Delivery of Distributions and Undeliverable or Unclaimed Distributions
|
|
a. |
Delivery of Distributions
|
|
(i) |
Delivery of Distributions to Holders of Allowed Credit Agreement Claims
|
Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, all distributions under the Plan on account of an Allowed FILO ABL Claim, OpCo Term Loan Claim, 2020 Term
B-1 Loan Claim, or 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claim shall be made by the Reorganized Debtors or the Disbursing Agent, as applicable, to the Holder of record of such Allowed Claim as of the Distribution Record Date (as determined and maintained by the ABL
Agent, 2016 Agent, or BrandCo Agent, as applicable) or as otherwise reasonably directed by such Holder to the Disbursing Agent. For the avoidance of doubt, to the extent permitted by the 2016 Credit Agreement, all distributions under the Plan on
account of an Allowed 2016 Term Loan Claim (other than any Allowed 2016 Term Loan Claim held by a Released Party) shall be subject to, and shall not limit the ability of the 2016 Agent to offset, any 2016 Agent Surviving Indemnity Obligations.
|
(ii)
|
Delivery of Distributions to Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee
|
In the event that Class 8 votes to accept the Plan and the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are satisfied, (i)
distributions to be made to Holders of Allowed Unsecured Notes Claims shall be made to, or at the reasonable direction of, the Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee, which shall transmit or direct the transmission of such distributions to Holders of
Allowed Unsecured Notes Claims, subject to the priority and charging lien rights of the Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee, in accordance with the Unsecured Notes Indenture and the Plan, (ii) the Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee, subject to the
payment of its fees and expenses to the extent set forth in the Plan, shall transfer or direct the transfer of such distributions through the facilities of DTC, and (iii) the Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee shall be entitled to recognize and deal
for all purposes under the Plan with Holders of the Unsecured Notes Claims to the extent consistent with the customary practices of DTC, and all distributions to be made to Holders of Unsecured Notes Claims shall be delivered to the Unsecured Notes
Indenture Trustee in a form that is eligible to be distributed through the facilities of DTC. If Class 8 votes to reject the Plan or the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are not satisfied, distributions in respect of the Consenting
Unsecured Noteholder Recovery shall be made to each Holder of Unsecured Notes Claims that has voted to accept the Plan on account of such Claims and that otherwise qualifies as a Consenting Unsecured Noteholder according to the information provided
on such Holder’s ballot or the applicable master ballot, as applicable, in respect of such vote, and such distributions shall be made at the expense of the Debtors with the assistance of the Voting and Claims Agent and shall be subject to all
charging lien and priority distribution rights of the Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee to the extent provided in the Unsecured Notes Indenture with respect to any unpaid fees and expenses as of the Effective Date.
|
(iii)
|
Delivery of Distributions in General
|
Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, distributions to Holders of Allowed Claims (other than Holders specified in Article
VIII.E.1(a) or (b) of the Plan) or Interests shall be made to Holders of record as of the Distribution Record Date by the Reorganized Debtors or the applicable Disbursing Agent: (A) to the signatory set forth on any of the Proofs of Claim Filed by
such Holder or other representative identified therein (or at the last known addresses of such Holder if no Proof of Claim is Filed or if the Debtors have been notified in writing of a change of address); (B) at the addresses set forth in any written
notices of address changes delivered to the Reorganized Debtors after the date of any related Proof of Claim; (C) at the addresses reflected in the Schedules if no Proof of Claim has been Filed and the Reorganized Debtors have not received a written
notice of a change of address; or (D) on any counsel that has appeared in the Chapter 11 Cases on the Holder’s behalf. The Debtors and the Reorganized Debtors shall not incur any liability whatsoever on account of any distributions under the Plan,
except in the event of gross negligence or willful misconduct, as determined by a Final Order of a court of competent jurisdiction. Subject to Article VIII of the Plan, distributions under the Plan on account of Allowed Claims shall not be subject
to levy, garnishment, attachment, or like legal process, so that each Holder of an Allowed Claim shall have and receive the benefit of the distributions in the manner set forth in the Plan. The Debtors, the Reorganized Debtors, and the Disbursing
Agents, as applicable, shall not incur any liability whatsoever on account of any distributions under the Plan, except in the event of actual fraud, gross negligence, or willful misconduct, as determined by a Final Order of a court of competent
jurisdiction.
|
b. |
Record Date of Distributions
|
As of the close of business on the Distribution Record Date, the various transfer registers for each Class of Claims as
maintained by the Debtors or their respective agents shall be deemed closed, and there shall be no further changes in the record Holders of any Claims. The Disbursing Agent shall have no obligation to recognize any transfer of Claims occurring on or
after the Distribution Record Date. In addition, with respect to payment of any cure amounts or disputes over any cure amounts, neither the Debtors nor the Disbursing Agent shall have any obligation to recognize or deal with any party other than the
non-Debtor party to the applicable Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease as of the Effective Date, even if such non-Debtor party has sold, assigned, or otherwise transferred its Cure Claim. For the avoidance of doubt, the Distribution Record Date
shall not apply to distributions to Holders of Unsecured Notes Claims, the Holders of which shall receive distributions, if applicable, in accordance with Article VIII.D of the Plan.
|
c. |
Special Rules for Distributions to Holders of Disputed Claims
|
Notwithstanding any provision otherwise in the Plan and except as otherwise agreed to by the Reorganized Debtors, on the one
hand, and the Holder of a Disputed Claim, on the other hand, or as set forth in a Final Order, no partial payments and no partial distributions shall be made with respect to a Disputed Claim until all of the Disputed Claim has become an Allowed Claim
or has otherwise been resolved by settlement or Final Order; provided that, if the Reorganized Debtors do not dispute a portion of an amount asserted pursuant
to an otherwise Disputed Claim, the Disbursing Agent may make a partial distribution on account of that portion of such Claim that is not Disputed at the time and in the manner that the Disbursing Agent makes distributions to similarly situated
Holders of Allowed Claims pursuant to the Plan. Any dividends or other distributions arising from property distributed to Holders of Allowed Claims, in a Class and paid to such Holders under the Plan shall also be paid, in the applicable amounts, to
any Holder of a Disputed Claim, in such Class that becomes an Allowed Claim after the date or dates that such dividends or other distributions were earlier paid to Holders of Allowed Claims in such Class.
No partial distributions or payments of fractions of New Securities shall be distributed and no Cash shall be distributed in lieu
of such fractional amounts. When any distribution pursuant to the Plan on account of an Allowed Claim or Interest, as applicable, would otherwise result in the issuance of a number of New Securities that is not a whole number, the actual
distribution of New Securities shall be rounded as follows: (i) fractions of greater than one-half (1/2) shall be rounded to the next higher whole number and (ii) fractions of one-half (1/2) or less than one-half (1/2) shall be rounded to the next
lower whole number with no further payment therefor. The total number of authorized shares of New Securities to be distributed pursuant to the Plan may (at the Debtors’ discretion) be adjusted as necessary to account for the foregoing rounding.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, no Cash payment valued at less than $100.00, in the reasonable discretion of the
Disbursing Agent and the Reorganized Debtors, shall be made to a Holder of an Allowed Claim on account of such Allowed Claim. Such Allowed Claims to which this limitation applies shall be discharged and its Holder forever barred from asserting that
Claim against the Reorganized Debtors or their property.
|
e. |
Undeliverable Distributions and Unclaimed Property
|
In the event that any distribution to any Holder is returned as undeliverable, no distribution to such Holder shall be made
unless and until the Disbursing Agent has determined the then-current address of such Holder, at which time such distribution shall be made to such Holder without interest; provided, however, that such distributions shall be deemed unclaimed property under section 347(b) of the Bankruptcy Code at the expiration
of six (6) months from the later of (a) the Effective Date and (b) the date of the distribution. After such date, all unclaimed property or interests in property shall revert to the Reorganized Debtors automatically and without need for a further
order by the Bankruptcy Court (notwithstanding any applicable federal, provincial, state, or other jurisdiction escheat, abandoned, or unclaimed property laws to the contrary), and the Claim of any Holder to such property or Interest in property
shall be discharged and forever barred. The Reorganized Debtors and the Disbursing Agent shall have no obligation to attempt to locate any Holder of an Allowed Claim other than by reviewing the Debtors’ books and records and the Bankruptcy Court’s
filings.
Checks issued on account of Allowed Claims shall be null and void if not negotiated within one hundred eighty (180) calendar days
from and after the date of issuance thereof. Requests for reissuance of any check must be made directly and in writing to the Disbursing Agent by the Holder of the relevant Allowed Claim within the 180-calendar day period. After such date, the
relevant Allowed Claim (and any Claim for reissuance of the original check) shall be automatically discharged and forever barred, and such funds shall revert to the Reorganized Debtors (notwithstanding any applicable federal, provincial, state, or
other jurisdiction escheat, abandoned, or unclaimed property laws to the contrary).
A distribution shall be deemed unclaimed if a Holder has not: (a) accepted a particular distribution or, in the case of
distributions made by check, negotiated such check; (b) given notice to the Reorganized Debtors of an intent to accept a particular distribution; (c) responded to the Debtors’ or Reorganized Debtors’ requests for information necessary to facilitate a
particular distribution; or (d) taken any other action necessary to facilitate such distribution.
At the option of the Disbursing Agent, any Cash payment to be made hereunder may be made by check, wire transfer, automated
clearing house, or credit card, or as otherwise required or provided in applicable agreements.
|
7.
|
Registration or Private Placement Exemption
|
The New Securities are or may be “securities,” as defined in Section 2(a)(1) of the Securities Act, section 101 of the Bankruptcy
Code, and applicable state securities laws.
|
a. |
Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code
|
Pursuant to section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code, the offer, issuance, and distribution of the New Securities (other than the
Reserved Shares or any Unsubscribed Shares, as described in Article VIII.G.2 of the Plan) by Reorganized Holdings as contemplated by the Plan (including the issuance of New Common Stock upon exercise of the Equity Subscription Rights and/or the New
Warrants) is exempt from, among other things, the registration requirements of Section 5 of the Securities Act and any other applicable U.S. state or local law requiring registration prior to the offering, issuance, distribution or sale of
Securities. The New Securities issued by Reorganized Holdings pursuant to section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code (i) are not “restricted securities” as defined in Rule 144(a)(3) under the Securities Act, and (ii) are freely tradable and transferable by
any initial recipient thereof that (a) is not an “affiliate” of the Reorganized Debtors as defined in Rule 144(a)(1) under the Securities Act, (b) has not been such an “affiliate” within ninety (90) calendar days of such transfer, (iii) has not
acquired the New Securities from an “affiliate” within one year of such transfer and (iv) is not an entity that is an “underwriter” as defined in section 1145(b) of the Bankruptcy Code; provided that transfer of the New Securities may be restricted by the New Organizational Documents, the New Shareholders’ Agreement, if any, and the New Warrant Agreement.
|
b. |
Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act
|
The offer (to the extent applicable), issuance, and distribution of the Reserved Shares and the Unsubscribed Shares shall be
exempt (including with respect to an entity that is an “underwriter” as defined in subsection (b) of section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code) from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) thereof and/or Regulation D thereunder.
Therefore, the Reserved Shares and the Unsubscribed Shares will be “restricted securities” subject to resale restrictions and may be resold, exchanged, assigned, or otherwise transferred only pursuant to registration or an applicable exemption from
registration under the Securities Act and other applicable law. In that regard, each of the Equity Commitment Parties has made customary representations to the Debtors, including that each is an “accredited investor” (within the meaning of Rule
501(a) of the Securities Act) or a qualified institutional buyer (as defined under Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act).
Should the Reorganized Debtors elect on or after the Effective Date to reflect any ownership of the New Securities through the
facilities of DTC, the Reorganized Debtors need not provide any further evidence other than the Plan or the Confirmation Order with respect to the treatment of transfers, exercise, removal of restrictions, or conversion of New Securities under
applicable U.S. federal, state or local securities laws.
DTC shall be required to accept and conclusively rely upon the Plan and Confirmation Order in lieu of a legal opinion regarding
whether the New Securities are exempt from registration and/or eligible for DTC book-entry delivery, settlement and depository services.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan, no Entity (including, for the avoidance of doubt, DTC) may require a legal
opinion regarding the validity of any transaction contemplated by the Plan, including, for the avoidance of doubt, whether the New Common Stock or the New Warrants (or New Common Stock issued upon exercise of the New Warrants) are exempt from
registration and/or eligible for DTC book-entry delivery, settlement and depository services.
|
8.
|
Compliance with Tax Requirements
|
In connection with the Plan, to the extent applicable, the Reorganized Debtors shall comply with all tax withholding and
reporting requirements imposed on them by any Governmental Unit, and all distributions pursuant to the Plan shall be subject to such withholding and reporting requirements. Notwithstanding any provision in the Plan to the contrary, the Reorganized
Debtors and the Disbursing Agent shall be authorized to take all actions necessary or appropriate to comply with such withholding and reporting requirements, including, without limitation, liquidating a portion of the distribution to be made under
the Plan to generate sufficient funds to pay applicable withholding taxes, withholding distributions pending receipt of information, documentation, and certifications necessary to facilitate such distributions, or establishing any other mechanisms
they believe are reasonable or appropriate. All Persons holding Claims against any Debtor shall be required to provide any information necessary for the Reorganized Debtors to comply with all tax withholding and reporting requirements imposed on
them by any Governmental Unit. The Reorganized Debtors reserve the right to allocate any distributions made under the Plan in compliance with applicable wage garnishments, alimony, child support, and other spousal awards, Liens, and encumbrances.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, each Holder of an Allowed Claim shall have the sole and
exclusive responsibility for the satisfaction and payment of any tax obligations imposed by any Governmental Unit on account of such distribution.
|
9.
|
No Postpetition or Default Interest on Claims
|
Unless otherwise specifically provided for in an order of the Bankruptcy Court, the Plan, the Final DIP Order, or the
Confirmation Order, postpetition interest shall not accrue or be paid on any Claims and no holder of a Claim shall be entitled to interest accruing on or after the Petition Date on any such Claim for purposes of distributions under the Plan.
Distributions in respect of Allowed Claims shall be allocated first to the principal amount of such Claims (as determined for
federal income tax purposes) and then, to the extent the consideration exceeds the principal amount of the Claims, to the remaining portion of such Allowed Claim, if any.
|
11.
|
Setoffs and Recoupment
|
The Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors may, but shall not be required to, setoff against or recoup any Allowed Claim and the
distributions to be made pursuant to the Plan on account of such Allowed Claim, any claims, rights, and Causes of Action of any nature whatsoever that the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, may have against the Holder of such Allowed
Claim pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code or applicable nonbankruptcy law, to the extent that such claims, rights, or Causes of Action against such Holder have not been otherwise compromised or settled on or prior to the Effective Date (pursuant to the
Plan or otherwise); provided, however, that the failure of the
Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, to do so shall not constitute a waiver, abandonment or release by the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors of any such Claim they may have against the Holder of such Claim.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan, nothing in the Plan shall modify the rights, if any, of Broadstone Rev New
Jersey, LLC and 540 Beautyrest Avenue, LLC, solely to the extent that either such entity is a counterparty to any Unexpired Lease of nonresidential real property, to assert any right of setoff or recoupment that such party may have under applicable
bankruptcy or non-bankruptcy law, subject to section 553 of the Bankruptcy Code and any other applicable bankruptcy law, including, but not limited to: (1) the ability, if any, of such parties to setoff or recoup a security deposit held pursuant to
the terms of their Unexpired Lease with the Debtors, or any successors to the Debtors, under the Plan; (2) assertion of rights of setoff or recoupment, if any, in connection with Claims reconciliation; or (3) assertion of setoff or recoupment as a
defense, if any, against any claim or action by the Debtors. The Debtors rights with respect thereto are expressly reserved.
|
12.
|
Claims Paid or Payable by Third Parties
|
|
a. |
Claims Paid by Third Parties
|
The Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, shall reduce a Claim against any Debtor, and such Claim (or portion
thereof) shall be Disallowed without a Claim objection having to be Filed and without any further notice to or action, order, or approval of the Bankruptcy Court, to the extent that the Holder of such Claim receives a payment on account of such Claim
from a party that is not a Debtor or a Reorganized Debtor, as applicable. Subject to the last sentence of this paragraph, to the extent a Holder of a Claim receives a distribution on account of such Claim and also receives payment from a party that
is not a Debtor or a Reorganized Debtor, as applicable, on account of such Claim, such Holder shall, within fourteen (14) days of receipt of such payment, repay or return the distribution to the applicable Reorganized Debtor to the extent the
Holder’s total recovery on account of such Claim from the third party and under the Plan exceeds the amount of such Claim as of the date of any such distribution under the Plan. The failure of such Holder to timely repay or return such distribution
shall result in the Holder owing the applicable Reorganized Debtor annualized interest at the Federal Judgment Rate on such amount owed for each Business Day after the fourteen day grace period specified above until the amount is repaid.
|
b. |
Claims Payable by Third Parties
|
No distributions under the Plan shall be made on account of an Allowed Claim that is payable pursuant to one of the Debtors’
insurance policies until the Holder of such Allowed Claim has exhausted all remedies with respect to such insurance policy. To the extent that one or more of the Debtors’ insurers agrees to satisfy in full or in part a Claim against any Debtor, then
immediately upon such insurers’ agreement, the applicable portion of such Claim may be expunged without a Claim objection having to be Filed and without any further notice to or action, order, or approval of the Bankruptcy Court.
|
c. |
Applicability of Insurance Policies
|
Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, distributions to Holders of Allowed Claims shall be in accordance with the provisions
of any applicable insurance policy. Nothing contained in the Plan shall constitute or be deemed a waiver of any Cause of Action that the Debtors, the Reorganized Debtors, or any Person or Entity may hold against any other Entity, including insurers,
under any policies of insurance, nor shall anything contained herein constitute or be deemed a waiver by such insurers of any defenses, including coverage defenses, held by such insurers.
|
13.
|
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate
|
As of the Effective Date, any Claim asserted in a currency other than U.S. dollars shall be automatically deemed converted to the
equivalent U.S. dollar value using the exchange rate on the Petition Date, as quoted at 4:00 p.m. (prevailing Eastern time), midrange spot rate of exchange for the applicable currency as published in the Wall Street Journal, National Edition, on the day after the Petition Date.
|
H. |
Procedures for Resolving Contingent, Unliquidated, and Disputed Claims
|
|
1.
|
Resolution of Disputed Claims
|
After the Effective Date, each of the Reorganized Debtors and, with respect to General Unsecured Claims, the GUC Administrator,
and the PI Claims Administrator, as applicable, shall have and retain any and all rights and defenses such Debtor had with respect to any Claim immediately before the Effective Date. Except as expressly provided in the Plan or in any order entered
in the Chapter 11 Cases before the Effective Date (including the Confirmation Order), no Claim against any Debtor shall become an Allowed Claim unless and until such Claim is deemed Allowed under the Plan or the Bankruptcy Code, or the Bankruptcy
Court has entered a Final Order, including the Confirmation Order (when it becomes a Final Order), in the Chapter 11 Cases allowing such Claim. For the avoidance of doubt, all references in Article IX of the Plan to (a) the GUC Administrator shall
apply only in the event the GUC Trust is created in accordance with the Plan and only with respect to Claims in Classes 9(b), (c), and (d), and (b) the PI Claims Administrator shall apply only in the event the PI Settlement Fund is created in
accordance with the Plan and only with respect to Claims in Class 9(a).
|
b. |
Claims and Interests Administration Responsibilities
|
Except as otherwise specifically provided in the Plan and notwithstanding any requirements that may be imposed pursuant to
Bankruptcy Rule 9019, after the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtors (or any authorized agent or assignee thereof), the GUC Administrator, and the PI Claims Administrator, as applicable, shall have the sole authority to: (i) File, withdraw, or
litigate to judgment objections to Claims against any of the Debtors; (ii) settle or compromise any Disputed Claim without any further notice to or action, order, or approval by the Bankruptcy Court; and (iii) administer and adjust the Claims
Register to reflect any such settlements or compromises without any further notice to or action, order, or approval by the Bankruptcy Court. For the avoidance of doubt, except as otherwise provided in the Plan, from and after the Effective Date,
each Reorganized Debtor, the GUC Administrator, and the PI Claims Administrator, as applicable, shall have and retain any and all rights and defenses that any Debtor had immediately prior to the Effective Date with respect to any Disputed Claim or
Interest.
Before or after the Effective Date, the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, the GUC Administrator, or the PI Claims
Administrator, as applicable, may (but are not required to) at any time request that the Bankruptcy Court estimate any Disputed Claim that is contingent or unliquidated pursuant to section 502(c) of the Bankruptcy Code for any reason, regardless of
whether any party previously has objected to such Claim or whether the Bankruptcy Court has ruled on any such objection, and the Bankruptcy Court shall retain jurisdiction to estimate any such Claim, including during the litigation of any objection
to any Claim or during the appeal relating to such objection. Notwithstanding any provision otherwise in the Plan, a Claim against any Debtor that has been expunged from the Claims Register, but that either is subject to appeal or has not been the
subject of a Final Order, shall be deemed to be estimated at zero dollars, unless otherwise ordered by the Bankruptcy Court. In the event that the Bankruptcy Court estimates any Disputed, contingent or unliquidated Claim, that estimated amount shall
constitute a maximum limitation on such Claim for all purposes under the Plan (including for purposes of distributions), and the relevant Reorganized Debtor may elect to pursue any supplemental proceedings to object to any ultimate distribution on
such Claim; provided, however, that such limitation shall not apply
to Claims against any of the Debtors requested by the Debtors to be estimated for voting purposes only.
Notwithstanding section 502(j) of the Bankruptcy Code, in no event shall any Holder of a Claim that has been estimated pursuant
to section 502(c) of the Bankruptcy Code or otherwise be entitled to seek reconsideration of such estimation unless such Holder has Filed a motion requesting the right to seek such reconsideration on or before fourteen (14) calendar days after the
date on which such Claim is estimated. All of the aforementioned Claims and objection, estimation, and resolution procedures are cumulative and not exclusive of one another. Claims against any of the Debtors may be estimated and subsequently
compromised, settled, withdrawn, or resolved by any mechanism approved by the Bankruptcy Court.
|
d. |
Adjustment to Claims Without Objection
|
Any duplicate Claim or Interest, any Claim against any Debtor that has been paid or satisfied, or any Claim against any Debtor
that has been amended or superseded, canceled, or otherwise expunged (including pursuant to the Plan), may, in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules, be adjusted or expunged (including on the Claims Register, to the extent
applicable) by the Reorganized Debtors, the GUC Administrator, or the PI Claims Administrator, as applicable, without the Reorganized Debtors, the GUC Administrator, or the PI Claims Administrator having to File an application, motion, complaint,
objection, or any other legal proceeding seeking to object to such Claim or Interest and without any further notice to or action, order, or approval of the Bankruptcy Court. Additionally, any Claim or Interest that is duplicative or redundant with
another Claim or Interest against the same Debtor may be adjusted or expunged on the Claims Register at the direction of the Reorganized Debtors, the GUC Administrator, or the PI Claims Administrator, as applicable, without the Reorganized Debtors,
the GUC Administrator, or the PI Claims Administrator having to File an application, motion, complaint, objection, or any other legal proceeding seeking to object to such Claim or Interest and without any further notice to or action, order, or
approval of the Bankruptcy Court.
|
e. |
Time to File Objections to Claims
|
Any objections to Claims against any of the Debtors shall be Filed on or before the Claims Objection Deadline.
|
2.
|
Disallowance of Claims
|
Any Claims against any of the Debtors held by Entities from which property is recoverable under sections 542, 543, 550, or 553 of
the Bankruptcy Code, or that is a transferee of a transfer avoidable under sections 522(f), 522(h), 544, 545, 547, 548, 549, or 724(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, shall be deemed Disallowed pursuant to section 502(d) of the Bankruptcy Code, and Holders
of such Claims may not receive any distributions on account of such Claims until such time as such Causes of Action against that Entity have been settled or a Bankruptcy Court order with respect thereto has been entered and all sums due, if any, to
the Debtors by that Entity have been turned over or paid to the Reorganized Debtors. Subject in all respects to Article IV.P of the Plan, all Proofs of Claims Filed on account of an indemnification obligation to a director, officer, or employee
shall be deemed satisfied and expunged from the Claims Register as of the Effective Date to the extent such indemnification obligation is assumed (or honored or reaffirmed, as the case may be) pursuant to the Plan, without any further notice to or
action, order, or approval of the Bankruptcy Court.
Except as provided in the Plan or otherwise agreed to by the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, the GUC Administrator, or the PI
Claims Administrator as applicable, any and all Proofs of Claim filed after the applicable Claims Bar Date shall be deemed Disallowed and expunged as of the Effective Date without any further notice to or action, order, or approval of the Bankruptcy
Court, and Holders of such Claims may not receive any distributions on account of such Claims, unless on or before the Confirmation Hearing such late Filed Claim has been deemed timely Filed by a Final Order.
|
3.
|
Amendments to Proofs of Claim
|
On or after the Effective Date, except as provided in the Plan or the Confirmation Order, a Proof of Claim or Interest may not be
Filed or amended without the prior authorization of the Bankruptcy Court or the Reorganized Debtors, the GUC Administrator, or the PI Claims Administrator, as applicable, and any such new or amended Proof of Claim Filed shall be deemed Disallowed in
full and expunged without any further action, order, or approval of the Bankruptcy Court; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not apply to Administrative Claims or Professional Compensation Claims.
|
4.
|
No Distributions Pending Allowance
|
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan, if any portion of a Claim against any Debtor is Disputed, or if an
objection to a Claim against any Debtor or portion thereof is Filed as set forth in Article IX of the Plan, no payment or distribution provided under the Plan shall be made on account of such Claim or portion thereof unless and until such Disputed
Claim becomes an Allowed Claim.
|
5.
|
Distributions After Allowance
|
To the extent that a Disputed Claim ultimately becomes an Allowed Claim, distributions (if any) shall be made to the Holder of
such Allowed Claim in accordance with the provisions of the Plan. As soon as practicable after the date that the order or judgment of the Bankruptcy Court allowing any Disputed Claim becomes a Final Order, the Disbursing Agent shall provide to the
Holder of such Allowed Claim the distribution (if any) to which such Holder is entitled under the Plan as of the Effective Date, less any previous distribution (if any) that was made on account of the undisputed portion of such Allowed Claim, without
any interest, dividends, or accruals to be paid on account of such Allowed Claim unless required under applicable bankruptcy law.
Unless otherwise expressly provided by section 506(b) of the Bankruptcy Code or as specifically provided for in the Plan or by
order of the Bankruptcy Court, postpetition interest shall not accrue or be paid on Claims against any of the Debtors, and no Holder of a Claim shall be entitled to interest accruing on or after the Petition Date on any Claim or right. Additionally,
and without limiting the foregoing, interest shall not accrue or be paid on any Disputed Claim with respect to the period from the Effective Date to the date a final distribution is made on account of such Disputed Claim, if and when such Disputed
Claim becomes an Allowed Claim; provided, however, that nothing in
Article IX.F of the Plan shall limit any rights of any Governmental Unit to interest under sections 503, 506(b), 1129(a)(9)(A) or 1129(a)(9)(C) of the Bankruptcy Code or as otherwise provided for under applicable law.
|
I. |
Settlement, Release, Injunction, and Related Provisions
|
|
1.
|
Compromise and Settlement of Claims, Interests, and Controversies
|
Pursuant to section 1123 of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rule 9019, and in consideration for, and as a requirement to
receive, the distributions and other benefits provided pursuant to the Plan, the provisions of the Plan shall constitute a good faith global and integrated compromise and settlement (the “Plan
Settlement”) of all Claims, Interests, and controversies relating to the contractual, legal, and subordination rights that any Holder of a Claim or Interest may have with respect to any Allowed Claim or Interest, or any distribution to
be made on account of such Allowed Claim or Interest, as well as any and all actual and potential disputes between and among the Company Entities (including, for clarity, between and among the BrandCo Entities, on the one hand, and the Non-BrandCo
Entities on the other and including, with respect to each Debtor, such Debtors’ Estate), the Creditors’ Committee, the Consenting BrandCo Lenders, the Consenting 2016 Lenders and each other Releasing Party and all other disputes that might impact
creditor recoveries, including, without limitation, any and all issues relating to (1) the allocation of the economic burden of repayment of the ABL DIP Facility and Term DIP Facility and/or payment of adequate protection obligations provided
pursuant to the Final DIP Order among the Debtors; (2) any and all disputes that might be raised impacting the allocation of value among the Debtors and their respective assets, including any and all disputes related to the Intercompany DIP Facility;
and (3) any and all other Settled Claims, including the Financing Transactions Litigation Claims. The entry of the Confirmation Order shall constitute the Bankruptcy Court’s approval of the Plan Settlement as well as a finding by the Bankruptcy Court
that the Plan Settlement is in the best interests of the Debtors, their Estates, and Holders of Claims and Interests and is fair, equitable, and reasonable. The Plan Settlement is binding upon all creditors and all other parties in interest pursuant
to section 1141(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. In accordance with the provisions of the Plan, pursuant to section 1123 of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rule 9019, without any further notice to or action, order, or approval of the Bankruptcy Court,
after the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtors may compromise and settle Claims against, and Interests in, the Debtors and their Estates and Causes of Action against other Entities.
|
2.
|
Discharge of Claims and Termination of Interests
|
To the extent permitted by section 1141(d) of the Bankruptcy Code, and except as otherwise specifically provided in the Plan, the
Confirmation Order, or in any contract, instrument, or other agreement or document created pursuant to the Plan, the distributions, rights, and treatment that are provided in the Plan shall be in complete satisfaction, discharge, and release,
effective as of the Effective Date, of Claims, Interests, and Causes of Action of any nature whatsoever, including any interest accrued on Claims or Interests from and after the Petition Date, whether known or unknown, against, liabilities of, Liens
on, obligations of, rights against, and Interests in, the Debtors or any of their assets or properties, regardless of whether any property shall have been distributed or retained pursuant to the Plan on account of such Claims and Interests, including
demands, liabilities, and Causes of Action that arose before the Effective Date, any liability (including withdrawal liability) to the extent such Claims or Interests relate to services performed by employees of the Debtors before the Effective Date
and that arise from a termination of employment, any contingent or non-contingent liability on account of representations or warranties issued on or before the Effective Date, and all debts of the kind specified in section 502(g), 502(h), or 502(i)
of the Bankruptcy Code, in each case whether or not: (a) a Proof of Claim based upon such debt or right is Filed or deemed Filed pursuant to section 501 of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) a Claim or Interest based upon such debt, right, or Interest is
Allowed pursuant to section 502 of the Bankruptcy Code; or (c) the Holder of such a Claim or Interest has accepted the Plan. Any default or “event of default” by the Debtors or their Affiliates with respect to any Claim or Interest on account of the
Filing of the Chapter 11 Cases or the Canadian Recognition Proceeding shall be deemed cured (and no longer continuing). The Confirmation Order shall be a judicial determination of the discharge of all Claims and Interests subject to the Effective
Date occurring.
Except as otherwise specifically provided in the Plan, or any other Definitive Document, all mortgages, deeds
of trust, Liens, pledges, or other security interests against any property of the Estates shall be fully released, settled, discharged, and compromised, and all of the right, title, and interest of any holder of such mortgages, deeds of trust, Liens,
pledges, or other security interests against any property of the Estates shall revert to the Reorganized Debtors and their successors and assigns, in each case, without any further approval or order of the Bankruptcy Court and without any action or
filing being required to be made by the Debtors.
In addition, the ABL Agents, BrandCo Agent,
2016 Agent, ABL DIP Facility Agent, and Term DIP Facility Agent shall execute and deliver all documents reasonably requested by the Debtors, the Reorganized Debtors, or the Exit Facilities Agents, as applicable, to evidence the release of such
mortgages, deeds of trust, Liens, pledges, and other security interests and shall authorize the Debtors or Reorganized Debtors to file UCC-3 termination statements or other jurisdiction equivalents (to the extent applicable) with respect thereto.
|
4.
|
Releases by the Debtors
|
Pursuant to section 1123(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, for good and valuable consideration, as of the Effective
Date, each of the Released Parties is unconditionally, irrevocably, generally, individually, and collectively, released, acquitted, and discharged by the Debtors, the Reorganized Debtors, and each of their Estates from any and all Causes of Action,
including any derivative Causes of Action asserted or assertable by or on behalf of a Debtor, Reorganized Debtor, or any of their Estates, any Causes of Action that any Debtor, Reorganized Debtors, or any of their Estates would have been legally
entitled to assert in its own right (whether individually or collectively) or on behalf of the Holder of any Claim against or Interest in a Debtor or other Entity, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, asserted or unasserted, matured or
unmatured, existing or hereafter arising, in law, equity, contract, tort, or otherwise that the Debtors, the Reorganized Debtors, or their Estates (whether individually or collectively) ever had, now has, or thereafter can, shall, or may have, based
on or relating to, or in any manner arising from, in whole or in part: (1) the Debtors, the Debtors’ in- or out-of-court restructuring efforts, intercompany transactions, the Chapter 11 Cases, the Canadian Recognition Proceeding, the purchase, sale,
or rescission of any security of the Debtors, the Plan Settlement, the Settled Claims, the formulation, preparation, dissemination, negotiation, or filing of the Restructuring Support Agreement, the Definitive Documents, the DIP Facilities, the
Equity Rights Offering, the New Common Stock, the New Warrants, the Backstop Commitment Agreement, the Exit Facilities, the Disclosure Statement, or the Plan, including the Plan Supplement; (2) any Restructuring Transaction, contract, instrument,
release, or other agreement or document (including any legal opinion requested by any Entity regarding any transaction, contract, instrument, document, or other agreement contemplated by the Plan or the reliance by any Released Party on the Plan or
the Confirmation Order in lieu of such legal opinion) created or entered into in connection with the Restructuring Support Agreement, the Definitive Documents, the DIP Facilities, the Equity Rights Offering, the New Common Stock, the New Warrants,
the Backstop Commitment Agreement, the Exit Facilities, the Disclosure Statement, or the Plan, including the Plan Supplement; (3) the business or contractual arrangements between any Debtor and any Released Party, whether before or during the
Debtors’ restructuring, or the restructuring of Claims and Interests before or during the Chapter 11 Cases; (4) the subject matter of, or the transactions or events giving rise to, any Claim or Interest that is affected by or classified in the Plan;
(5) the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases or the Canadian Recognition Proceeding, the pursuit of Confirmation, the pursuit of Consummation, the administration and implementation of the Plan, including the issuance or distribution of securities pursuant
to the Plan, or the distribution of property under the Plan or any other related agreement; (6) the Settled Claims; or (7) any other act or omission, transaction, agreement, event, or other occurrence taking place on or before the Effective Date
arising from or relating to any of the foregoing, including, without limitation, the Unsecured Notes Indenture, the ABL Facility Credit Agreement, the 2016 Credit Agreement, or the BrandCo Credit Agreement, and all matters relating thereto.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the foregoing, the releases set forth above shall not release (1)
to the extent that any Causes of Action against the Debtors are not released or discharged pursuant to the Plan, any rights of the Debtors and the Reorganized Debtors to assert any and all counterclaims, crossclaims, offsets, indemnities, claims for
contribution, defenses, and similar claims or other Causes of Action in response to such Causes of Action; provided that such counterclaims, crossclaims,
offsets, indemnities, claims for contribution, defenses, and similar claims or other Causes of Action may not be asserted against any Related Party of the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors to the extent such claims have been released or discharged
pursuant to the Plan, (2) any Causes of Action set forth in the Schedule of Retained Causes of Action, including any Retained Preference Action, (3) any Cause of Action against any Excluded Party, (4) any commercial Cause of Action arising in the
ordinary course of business, such as accounts receivable and accounts payable on account of goods and services being performed, (5) any Cause of Action against a Holder of a Disputed Claim, to the extent such Cause of Action is necessary for the
administration and resolution of such Claim solely in accordance with the Plan, or (6) any post-Effective Date obligations of any party or Entity under the Plan, any Restructuring Transaction, any Definitive Document (including those set forth in the
Plan Supplement), or other document, instrument, or agreement executed to implement the Plan.
Entry of the Confirmation Order shall constitute the Bankruptcy Court’s approval, pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule
9019, of the Debtor Release, which includes by reference each of the related provisions and definitions contained in the Plan, and further, shall constitute the Bankruptcy Court’s finding that the Debtor Release is: (a) essential to the Confirmation
of the Plan; (b) an exercise of the Debtors’ business judgment; (c) in exchange for the good and valuable consideration and substantial contributions provided by the Released Parties; (d) a good faith settlement and compromise of the Causes of Action
released by the Debtor Release; (e) in the best interests of the Debtors and all Holders of Claims and Interests; (f) fair, equitable, and reasonable; (g) given and made after due notice and opportunity for hearing; and (h) a bar to any of the
Debtors, the Reorganized Debtors, and the Estates asserting any Cause of Action released pursuant to the Debtor Release.
|
5.
|
Releases by the Releasing Parties
|
As of the Effective Date, each of the Releasing Parties other than the Debtors is deemed to have expressly,
absolutely, unconditionally, irrevocably, generally, individually, and collectively, released, acquitted, and discharged each of the Released Parties from any and all Causes of Action, including any derivative Causes of Action asserted or assertable
by or on behalf of a Debtor, Reorganized Debtor, or any of their Estates, and any Causes of Action asserted or assertable by or on behalf of the Holder of any Claim or Interest or other Entity, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen,
asserted or unasserted, matured or unmatured, existing or hereafter arising, in law, equity, contract, tort, or otherwise that the Releasing Parties (whether individually or collectively) ever had, now have, or thereafter can, shall, or may have,
based on or relating to, or in any manner arising from, in whole or in part: (1) the Debtors, the Debtors’ in- or out-of-court restructuring efforts, intercompany transactions, the Chapter 11 Cases, the Canadian Recognition Proceeding, the purchase,
sale, or rescission of any security of the Debtors, the BrandCo Entities, the Plan Settlement, the Settled Claims, the formulation, preparation, dissemination, negotiation, or filing of the Restructuring Support Agreement, the Definitive Documents,
the DIP Facilities, the Equity Rights Offering, the New Common Stock, the New Warrants, the Backstop Commitment Agreement, the Exit Facilities, the Disclosure Statement, or the Plan, including the Plan Supplement; (2) any Restructuring Transaction,
contract, instrument, release, or other agreement or document (including any legal opinion requested by any Entity regarding any transaction, contract, instrument, document, or other agreement contemplated by the Plan or the reliance by any Released
Party on the Plan or the Confirmation Order in lieu of such legal opinion) created or entered into in connection with the Restructuring Support Agreement, the Definitive Documents, the DIP Facilities, the Equity Rights Offering, the New Common Stock,
the New Warrants, the Backstop Commitment Agreement, the Exit Facilities, the Disclosure Statement, or the Plan, including the Plan Supplement; (3) the business or contractual arrangements between any Debtor and any Releasing Party, whether before or
during the Debtors’ restructuring, or the restructuring of Claims and Interests before or during the Chapter 11 Cases; (4) the subject matter of, or the transactions or events giving rise to, any Claim or Interest that is affected by or classified in
the Plan; (5) the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases or the Canadian Recognition Proceeding, the pursuit of Confirmation, the pursuit of Consummation, the administration and implementation of the Plan, including the issuance or distribution of securities
pursuant to the Plan, or the distribution of property under the Plan or any other related agreement; (6) the Settled Claims; or (7) any other act or omission, transaction, agreement, event, or other occurrence taking place on or before the Effective
Date arising from or relating to any of the foregoing, including, without limitation, the Unsecured Notes Indenture, the ABL Facility Credit Agreement, the 2016 Credit Agreement, or the BrandCo Credit Agreement, and all matters relating thereto.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the foregoing, the releases set forth above shall not release, prejudice, limit,
impact, or otherwise impair (1) to the extent that any Causes of Action against any Releasing Party are not released or discharged pursuant to the Plan, any rights of such Releasing Party to assert any and all counterclaims, crossclaims, offsets,
indemnities, claims for contribution, defenses, and similar claims in response to such Causes of Action; provided that such counterclaims, crossclaims, offsets, indemnities, claims for contribution, defenses, and similar claims may not be asserted
against the Debtors, the Reorganized Debtors, or any Related Party of the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors to the extent such claims have been released or discharged pursuant to the Plan, (2) any Cause of Action against a Released Party other
than the Debtors, the Reorganized Debtors, or any Related Party of the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors unknown to such Releasing Party as of the Effective Date arising out of actual fraud, gross negligence, or willful misconduct of such Released
Party, (3) any Cause of Action against any Excluded Party, or (4) any post-Effective Date obligations of any party or Entity under the Plan, any Restructuring Transaction, or any Definitive Document (including those set forth in the Plan
Supplement), or other document, instrument, or agreement executed to implement the Plan. For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in the Plan shall, or shall be deemed to, alter, amend, release, discharge, limit, or otherwise impair the 2016 Agent
Surviving Indemnity Obligations as between and among the 2016 Agent, on the one hand, and any Holders of the 2016 Term Loan Claims (other than Released Parties) on the other hand. For the avoidance of doubt, any 2016 Agent Surviving Indemnity
Obligations against a Released Party are expressly released pursuant to the Plan. As used in Article X.E of the Plan, “Related Party” means, in each case in its capacity as such, (a) such Debtor’s or Reorganized Debtor’s current and former
predecessors, successors, subsidiaries, direct and indirect equityholders, funds, portfolio companies, and management companies, and (b) the current and former directors, officers, managers, members, principals, partners, employees, independent
contractors, agents, representatives, managed accounts or funds, management companies, fund advisors, investment advisors, advisory board members, financial advisors, partners (including both general and limited partners), consultants, financial
advisors, attorneys, accountants, investment bankers, and other professionals of the entities set forth in the foregoing clause (a).
Entry of the Confirmation Order shall constitute the Bankruptcy Court’s approval, pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule
9019, of the Third-Party Release, which includes by reference each of the related provisions and definitions contained herein, and, further, shall constitute the Bankruptcy Court’s finding that the Third-Party Release is: (1) essential to the
Confirmation of the Plan; (2) given in exchange for the good and valuable consideration and substantial contributions provided by the Released Parties; (3) a good faith settlement and compromise of the Causes of Action released by the Third-Party
Release; (4) in the best interests of the Debtors and their Estates; (5) fair, equitable, and reasonable; (6) given and made after due notice and opportunity for hearing; and (7) a bar to any of the Releasing Parties asserting any Claim or Cause of
Action released pursuant to the Third-Party Release.
Except as otherwise specifically provided in
the Plan or the Confirmation Order, no Exculpated Party shall have or incur any liability to any person or Entity for, and each Exculpated Party is hereby released and exculpated from, any Cause of Action related to any act or omission in
connection with, relating to, or arising out of, the Debtors’ restructuring efforts, the Chapter 11 Cases, preparation for the Chapter 11 Cases, the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, the Canadian Recognition Proceeding, the Settled Claims, the
formulation, preparation, dissemination, negotiation, filing, or termination of the Restructuring Support Agreement and related transactions, the Disclosure Statement, the Plan (including any term sheets related thereto), the Plan Supplement, the
DIP Facilities, the Equity Rights Offering, the Backstop Commitment Agreement, the Exit Facilities, or any Restructuring Transaction, contract, instrument, release, or other agreement or document (including providing any legal opinion requested by
any Entity regarding any transaction, contract, instrument, document, or other agreement contemplated by the Plan or the reliance by any Exculpated Party on the Plan or the Confirmation Order in lieu of such legal opinion) created or entered into
in connection with any of the foregoing, the funding of the Plan, the occurrence of the Effective Date, the pursuit of Confirmation, the pursuit of Consummation, the administration and implementation of the Plan, including the Definitive Documents,
the issuance of securities pursuant to the Plan, the issuance of the New Common Stock, and the New Warrants pursuant to the Plan, or the distribution of property under the Plan or any other related agreement, except for claims related to any act or
omission that is determined in a Final Order to have constituted actual fraud, gross negligence, or willful misconduct; provided that the foregoing shall not be deemed to release, affect, or limit any post-Effective Date rights or obligations of the Exculpated Parties under the Plan, the Exit
Facilities, any Restructuring Transaction, or any Definitive Document (including those set forth in the Plan Supplement), or other document, instrument, or agreement executed to implement the Plan.
The Exculpated Parties have, and upon Consummation of the Plan shall be deemed to have, participated in good
faith and in compliance with the applicable laws with regard to the solicitation of, and distribution of consideration pursuant to, the Plan and, therefore, are not, and on account of such distributions shall not be, liable at any time for the
violation of any applicable law, rule, or regulation governing the solicitation of acceptances or rejections of the Plan or such distributions made pursuant to the Plan.
Except as otherwise expressly provided in the Plan or for obligations issued or required to be paid pursuant
to the Plan or the Confirmation Order, all Entities that have held, hold, or may hold claims or interests that have been released pursuant to Article X.D or Article X.E of the Plan or discharged pursuant to Article X.B of the Plan, or are subject to
exculpation pursuant to Article X.F of the Plan, shall be permanently enjoined, from and after the Effective Date, from taking any of the following actions against, as
applicable, the Debtors, the Reorganized Debtors, the Exculpated Parties, or the Released Parties: (1) commencing or continuing in any manner any action or other proceeding of any kind on account of or in connection with or with respect to any such
claims or interests; (2) enforcing, attaching, collecting, or recovering by any manner or means any judgment, award, decree, or order against such Entities on account of or in connection with or with respect to any such claims or interests; (3)
creating, perfecting, or enforcing any lien or encumbrance of any kind against such Entities or the property or the estates of such Entities on account of or in connection with or with respect to any such claims or interests; (4) asserting any right
of setoff, subrogation, or recoupment of any kind against any obligation due from such Entities or against the property of such Entities on account of or in connection with or with respect to any such claims or interests unless such Entity has, on or
before the Effective Date, asserted such setoff right in a document filed with the Bankruptcy Court explicitly preserving such setoff, and notwithstanding an indication of a claim or interest or otherwise that such Entity asserts, has, or intends to
preserve any right of setoff pursuant to applicable law or otherwise; and (5) commencing or continuing in any manner any action or other proceeding of any kind on account of or in connection with or with respect to any such claims or interests
released or settled pursuant to the Plan.
|
8.
|
Term of Injunctions or Stays
|
Unless otherwise provided in the Plan or in the Confirmation Order, all injunctions or stays in effect in the Chapter 11 Cases
pursuant to sections 105 or 362 of the Bankruptcy Code or any order of the Bankruptcy Court, and extant on the Confirmation Date (excluding any injunctions or stays contained in the Plan or the Confirmation Order), shall remain in full force and
effect until the Effective Date. All injunctions or stays contained in the Plan or the Confirmation Order shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with their terms.
In no event shall any Holder of a Claim be entitled to recoup such Claim against any Claim, right, or Cause of Action of the
Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, unless such Holder actually has performed such recoupment and provided notice thereof in writing to the Debtors on or before the Confirmation Date, notwithstanding any indication in any Proof of
Claim or otherwise that such Holder asserts, has, or intends to preserve any right of recoupment.
|
10.
|
Protection Against Discriminatory Treatment
|
In accordance with section 525 of the Bankruptcy Code, and consistent with paragraph 2 of Article VI of the United States
Constitution, all Entities, including Governmental Units, shall not discriminate against any Reorganized Debtor, or deny, revoke, suspend, or refuse to renew a license, permit, charter, franchise, or other similar grant to, condition such a grant to,
discriminate with respect to such a grant against, the Reorganized Debtors, or another Entity with whom the Reorganized Debtors have been associated, solely because each Debtor has been a debtor under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, has been
insolvent before the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases (or during the Chapter 11 Cases but before the Debtors are granted or denied a discharge), or has not paid a debt that is dischargeable in the Chapter 11 Cases.
|
11.
|
Direct Insurance Claims
|
Nothing contained in the Plan shall impair or otherwise affect any right of a Holder of a Claim under applicable law, if any, to
assert direct claims solely under any applicable insurance policy of the Debtors or solely against any applicable provider of such policies, if any.
|
12.
|
Qualified Pension Plans
|
Nothing in the Chapter 11 Cases, the Disclosure Statement, the Plan, the Confirmation Order, or any other document filed in the
Chapter 11 Cases shall be construed to discharge, release, limit, or relieve any individual from any claim by the PBGC or the Qualified Pension Plans for breach of any fiduciary duty under ERISA, including prohibited transactions, with respect to the
Qualified Pension Plans, subject to any and all applicable rights and defenses of such parties, which are expressly preserved. PBGC and the Qualified Pension Plans shall not be enjoined or precluded from enforcing such fiduciary duty or related
liability by any of the provisions of the Disclosure Statement, Plan, Confirmation Order, Bankruptcy Code, or other document filed in the Chapter 11 Cases. For the avoidance of doubt, the Reorganized Debtors shall not be released from any liability
or obligation under ERISA, the IRC, and any other applicable law relating to the Qualified Pension Plans.
|
13.
|
Regulatory Activities
|
Notwithstanding any language to the contrary contained in the Disclosure Statement, Plan, or Confirmation Order, no provision shall (1) preclude the SEC or any other
Governmental Unit from enforcing its police or regulatory powers or (2) enjoin, limit, impair, or delay the SEC from commencing or continuing any claims, causes of action, proceedings, or investigations against any non-Debtor person or non-Debtor
entity in any forum.
|
J. |
Conditions Precedent to Consummation of the Plan
|
|
1.
|
Conditions Precedent to Consummation of the Effective Date
|
It is a condition to the Effective Date of the Plan that the following conditions shall have been satisfied or waived pursuant to
the provisions of Article XI.B of the Plan:
a. Confirmation
and all conditions precedent thereto shall have occurred;
b. The
Bankruptcy Court shall have entered the Confirmation Order and the Backstop Order, which shall be Final Orders and in form and substance acceptable to the Debtors and the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders and, in the case of the Confirmation
Order, acceptable to the Creditors’ Committee and the Required Consenting 2016 Lenders, solely to the extent required under the Restructuring Support Agreement;
c. The
Debtors shall have obtained all authorizations, consents, regulatory approvals, or rulings that are necessary to implement and effectuate the Plan;
d. The final
version of the Plan, including all schedules, supplements, and exhibits thereto, including in the Plan Supplement (including all documents contained therein), shall be in form and substance acceptable to the Debtors and the Required Consenting
BrandCo Lenders (except to the extent that specific consent rights are set forth in the Restructuring Support Agreement with respect to certain Definitive Documents, which shall be subject instead to such consent rights), and reasonably acceptable
to the Creditors’ Committee and the Required Consenting 2016 Lenders solely to the extent required under the Restructuring Support Agreement, and consistent with the Restructuring Support Agreement, including any consent rights contained therein;
e. All
Definitive Documents shall have been (or shall, contemporaneously with the occurrence of the Effective Date, be) executed and in full force and effect, and shall be in form and substance consistent with the Restructuring Support Agreement,
including any consent rights contained therein, and all conditions precedent contained in the Definitive Documents shall have been satisfied or waived in accordance with the terms thereof, except with respect to such conditions that by their terms
shall be satisfied substantially contemporaneously with or after Consummation of the Plan;
f. No
Termination Notice or Breach Notice as to the Debtors shall have been delivered by the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders under the Restructuring Support Agreement in accordance with the terms thereof, no substantially similar notices shall have
been sent under the Backstop Commitment Agreement, and neither the Restructuring Support Agreement nor the Backstop Commitment Agreement shall have otherwise been terminated;
g. Adversary Case Number 22-01134 shall
have been resolved in a form and manner satisfactory to the Debtors and the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders and Adversary Case Number 22-01167 shall have been (or shall, concurrently with the occurrence of the Effective Date, be) dismissed
in its entirety with prejudice;
h. All professional fees and expenses of retained professionals that require the Bankruptcy Court’s approval shall have been paid in full or amounts sufficient to pay such fees and
expenses after the Effective Date shall have been placed in the Professional Fee Escrow in accordance with Article II.B of the Plan pending the Bankruptcy Court’s approval of such fees and expenses;
i. All
Restructuring Expenses incurred and invoiced as of the Effective Date shall have been paid in full in Cash;
j. The
Restructuring Transactions shall have been (or shall, contemporaneously with the occurrence of the Effective Date, be) implemented in a manner consistent in all material respects with the Plan and the Restructuring Support Agreement;
k. The Enhanced
Cash Incentive Program and the Global Bonus Program shall be in form and substance acceptable to the Debtors and the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders; and
l. The Debtors
or the Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, shall have obtained directors’ and officers’ insurance policies and entered into indemnification agreements or similar arrangements for the Reorganized Holdings Board, which shall be, in each case,
effective on or by the Effective Date.
The conditions to Consummation set forth in Article XI.A. may be waived by the Debtors, the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders,
and, to the extent required under the Restructuring Support Agreement, the Creditors’ Committee and the Required Consenting 2016 Lenders (except with respect to Article X.A. 12, which may be waived by the Debtors in their sole discretion), and, with
respect to conditions related to the Professional Fee Escrow, the beneficiaries of the Professional Fee Escrow, without notice, leave or order of the Bankruptcy Court or any formal action other than proceeding to confirm or consummate the Plan. The
failure of the Debtors to exercise any of the foregoing rights shall not be deemed a waiver of any other rights, and each such right shall be deemed an ongoing right, which may be asserted at any time.
|
3.
|
Effect of Failure of Conditions
|
If Consummation of the Plan does not occur, the Plan shall be null and void in all respects and nothing contained in the Plan or
the Disclosure Statement shall: (a) constitute a waiver or release of any Claims, Causes of Action, or Interests; (b) prejudice in any manner the rights of such Debtor, any Holder, any Person, or any other Entity; or (c) constitute an admission,
acknowledgement, offer, or undertaking of any sort by such Debtor, any Holder, any Person, or any other Entity.
|
K. |
Modification, Revocation, or Withdrawal of the Plan
|
|
1.
|
Modification and Amendments
|
Subject to certain restrictions and requirements set forth in section 1127 of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rule 3019 (as
well as those restrictions on modifications set forth in the Plan and the Restructuring Support Agreement), the Debtors reserve the right, with the consent of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders, and, solely to the extent required under the
Restructuring Support Agreement, the Creditors’ Committee and the Required Consenting 2016 Lenders, to modify the Plan (including the Plan Supplement), without additional disclosure pursuant to section 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code prior to the
Confirmation Date and seek Confirmation consistent with the Bankruptcy Code and, as appropriate, not resolicit votes on such modified Plan. After the Confirmation Date and before substantial consummation of the Plan, the Debtors may initiate
proceedings in the Bankruptcy Court pursuant to section 1127(b) of the Bankruptcy Code to remedy any defect or omission or reconcile any inconsistencies in the Plan, the Plan Supplement, the Disclosure Statement, or the Confirmation Order, relating
to such matters as may be necessary to carry out the purposes and intent of the Plan; provided that each of the foregoing shall not violate the Restructuring
Support Agreement.
After the Confirmation Date, but before the Effective Date, the Debtors, with the consent (not to be unreasonably withheld,
conditioned, or delayed) of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders, and, solely to the extent required under the Restructuring Support Agreement, the Creditors’ Committee and the Required Consenting 2016 Lenders, and subject to the applicable
provisions of the Restructuring Support Agreement, may make appropriate technical adjustments and modifications to the Plan (including the Plan Supplement) without further order or approval of the Bankruptcy Court; provided that such adjustments and modifications do not materially and adversely affect the treatment of Holders of Claims or Interests.
|
2.
|
Effect of Confirmation on Modifications
|
Entry of a Confirmation Order shall mean that all modifications or amendments to the Plan since the solicitation thereof are
approved pursuant to section 1127(a) of the Bankruptcy Code and do not require additional disclosure or re-solicitation under Bankruptcy Rule 3019.
|
3.
|
Revocation or Withdrawal of Plan
|
The Debtors reserve the right to revoke or withdraw the Plan before the Confirmation Date and to file subsequent plans of
reorganization. If the Debtors revoke or withdraw the Plan, or if Confirmation or Consummation does not occur, then, absent further order of the Bankruptcy Court: (1) the Plan shall be null and void in all respects; (2) any settlement or compromise
not previously approved by Final Order of the Bankruptcy Court embodied in the Plan (including the fixing or limiting to an amount certain of the Claims or Interests or Classes of Claims or Interests), assumption or rejection of Executory Contracts
or Unexpired Leases effected by the Plan, and any document or agreement executed pursuant to the Plan shall be deemed null and void; and (3) nothing contained in the Plan shall: (a) constitute a waiver or release of any Claims or Interests; (b)
prejudice in any manner the rights of such Debtor, any Holder, any Person, or any other Entity; or (c) constitute an admission, acknowledgement, offer, or undertaking of any sort by such Debtor, any Holder, any Person, or any other Entity. For the
avoidance of doubt, the foregoing sentence shall not be construed to limit or modify the rights of the Creditors’ Committee or the Consenting BrandCo Lenders pursuant to Section 6 of the Restructuring Support Agreement.
|
L. |
Retention of Jurisdiction
|
Notwithstanding the entry of the Confirmation Order and the occurrence of the Effective Date, on and after the Effective Date,
except as set forth in the Plan, the Bankruptcy Court shall retain exclusive jurisdiction, to the fullest extent permissible under law, over all matters arising out of, or related to, the Chapter 11 Cases and the Plan pursuant to sections 105(a) and
1142 of the Bankruptcy Code, including jurisdiction to:
1. allow,
disallow, determine, liquidate, classify, estimate, or establish the priority, Secured or unsecured status, or amount of any Claim or Interest, including the resolution of any request for payment of any Administrative Claim and the resolution of
any and all objections to the Secured or unsecured status, priority, amount, or allowance of Claims or Interests, including but not limited to Talc Personal Injury Claims pursuant to the PI Claims Distribution Procedures;
2. decide and
resolve all matters related to the granting and denying, in whole or in part, any applications for allowance of compensation or reimbursement of expenses to Professionals authorized pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code or the Plan;
3. resolve any matters related to: (a) the assumption,
assumption and assignment, or rejection of any Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease to which a Debtor is party or with respect to which a Debtor may be liable, and to hear, determine and, if necessary, liquidate, any Claims against any of the
Debtors arising therefrom, including Cure Claims pursuant to section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) any potential contractual obligation under any Executory Contract or Unexpired Lease that is assumed; (c) the Reorganized Debtors amending,
modifying, or supplementing, after the Effective Date, pursuant to Article VII of the Plan, the Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases to be assumed or rejected or otherwise; and (d) any dispute regarding whether a contract or lease is or was
executory, expired, or terminated;
4. grant any
consensual request to extend the deadline for assuming or rejecting Unexpired Leases pursuant to section 365(d)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code;
5. ensure
that distributions to Holders of Allowed Claims and Interests are accomplished pursuant to the provisions of the Plan;
6. adjudicate,
decide, or resolve: (a) any motions, adversary proceedings, applications, contested or litigated matters, and any other matters, and grant or deny any applications involving a Debtor, or the Estates that may be pending on the Effective Date or
that, pursuant to the Plan, may be commenced after the Effective Date, including but not limited to the Retained Preference Actions; (b) any and all matters related to Causes of Action that may arise in connection with the Consummation,
interpretation, or enforcement of the Plan or any Entity’s obligations incurred in connection with the Plan; and (c) any and all matters related to section 1141 of the Bankruptcy Code;
7. enter and
implement such orders as may be necessary or appropriate to construe, execute, implement, or consummate the provisions of the Plan and all contracts, instruments, releases, indentures, and other agreements or documents created in connection with
the Confirmation Order, the Plan, the Plan Supplement, or the Disclosure Statement;
8. enter and
enforce any order for the sale of property pursuant to sections 363, 1123, or 1146(a) of the Bankruptcy Code;
9. resolve any
cases, controversies, suits, disputes, or Causes of Action that may arise in connection with Consummation, including interpretation or enforcement of the Plan or any Entity’s obligations incurred in connection with the Plan;
10. issue
injunctions, enter and implement other orders, or take such other actions as may be necessary or appropriate to restrain interference by any Entity or Person with Consummation or enforcement of the Plan;
11. hear and
resolve any cases, controversies, suits, disputes, or Causes of Action with respect to the settlements, compromises, discharges, releases, injunctions, exculpations, and other provisions contained in Article X of the Plan and enter such orders as
may be necessary or appropriate to implement such releases, injunctions, and other provisions;
12. resolve any
cases, controversies, suits, disputes, or Causes of Action with respect to the repayment or return of distributions and the recovery of additional amounts owed by the Holder of a Claim for amounts not timely repaid pursuant to Article VIII.L.1 of
the Plan;
13. enter and
implement such orders as are necessary or appropriate if the Confirmation Order is for any reason modified, stayed, reversed, revoked, or vacated;
14. determine
any other matters that may arise in connection with or relate to the Plan, the Plan Supplement, the New Organizational Documents, the Disclosure Statement, the Confirmation Order, or any contract, instrument, release, indenture, or other agreement
or document created in connection with the Plan or the Disclosure Statement; provided that the Bankruptcy Court shall not retain jurisdiction over disputes
concerning documents contained in the Plan Supplement that have a jurisdictional, forum selection, or dispute resolution clause that refers disputes to a different court;
15. adjudicate any
and all disputes arising from or relating to distributions under the Plan or any transactions contemplated therein;
16. consider any
modifications of the Plan, to cure any defect or omission or to reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan, the Disclosure Statement, or any Bankruptcy Court order, including the Confirmation Order, in such a manner as may be necessary to carry out
the purposes and effects thereof;
17. determine
requests for the payment of Claims against any of the Debtors entitled to priority pursuant to section 507 of the Bankruptcy Code;
18. hear and
determine disputes arising in connection with the interpretation, implementation, or enforcement of the Plan, the Confirmation Order or any transactions or payments contemplated hereby or thereby, including disputes arising in connection with the
implementation of the agreements, documents, or instruments executed in connection with the Plan;
19. hear and
determine matters concerning state, local, and federal taxes in accordance with sections 346, 505, 511, and 1146 of the Bankruptcy Code;
20. enforce all
orders, judgments, injunctions, releases, exculpations, indemnifications, and rulings entered in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases with respect to any Person or Entity, and resolve any cases, controversies, suits, or disputes that may arise in
connection with any Person or Entity’s rights arising from or obligations incurred in connection with the Plan;
21. hear and
determine all controversies, suits, and disputes that may relate to, impact upon, or arise in connection with the administration of the GUC Trust or PI Settlement Fund, including but not limited to matters arising under the PI Claims Distribution
Procedures
22. hear and
determine any other matter not inconsistent with the Bankruptcy Code;
23. enter an
order or final decree concluding or closing any of the Chapter 11 Cases;
24. hear and
determine matters concerning exemptions from state and federal registration requirements in accordance with section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code and section 4(a)(2) of, and Regulation D under, the Securities Act;
25. hear and
determine all disputes involving the existence, nature, or scope of the release provisions set forth in the Plan;
26. hear and
determine matters concerning the implementation of the Management Incentive Plan;
27. solely with
respect to actions taken or not taken within the 3-month period immediately following the Effective Date with respect to the Executive Severance Term Sheet, or the 6-month period immediately following the Effective Date with respect to the CEO
Employment Agreement Term Sheet, hear and determine all matters concerning the Executive Severance Term Sheet and CEO Employment Agreement Term Sheet and any modifications thereto in accordance with the Restructuring Support Agreement; and
28. hear and
resolve any cases, controversies, suits, disputes, contested matters, or Causes of Action with respect to the Settled Claims and any objections to proofs of claim in connection therewith.
Nothing in the Plan limits the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court to interpret and enforce the Plan and all contracts,
instruments, releases, indentures, and other agreements or documents created in connection with the Plan, the Plan Supplement, or the Disclosure Statement, without regard to whether the controversy with respect to which such interpretation or
enforcement relates may be pending in any state or other federal court of competent jurisdiction.
If the Bankruptcy Court abstains from exercising, or declines to exercise, jurisdiction or is otherwise without jurisdiction over
any matter arising in, arising under, or related to the Chapter 11 Cases, including the matters set forth in Article XIII of the Plan, the provisions of Article XIII of the Plan shall have no effect on and shall not control, limit, or prohibit the
exercise of jurisdiction by any other court having competent jurisdiction with respect to such matter.
Unless otherwise specifically provided in the Plan or in a prior order of the Bankruptcy Court, the Bankruptcy Court shall have
exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes concerning Claims against the Debtors that arose prior to the Effective Date.
|
M. |
Miscellaneous Provisions
|
|
1.
|
Immediate Binding Effect
|
Subject to Article XI.A of the Plan and notwithstanding Bankruptcy Rules 3020(e), 6004(h), or 7062 or otherwise, upon the
occurrence of the Effective Date, the terms of the Plan and the final versions of the documents contained in the Plan Supplement shall be immediately effective and enforceable and deemed binding upon the Debtors, the Reorganized Debtors, any and all
Holders of Claims or Interests (irrespective of whether their Claims or Interests are deemed to have accepted the Plan), all Entities that are parties to or are subject to the settlements, compromises, releases, discharges, and injunctions described
in the Plan, each Entity acquiring property under the Plan or the Confirmation Order, and any and all non-Debtor parties to Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases with the Debtors and each of their respective heirs executors, administrators,
successors, and assigns.
|
2.
|
Substantial Consummation
|
On the Effective Date, the Plan shall be deemed to be substantially consummated under sections 1101 and 1127(b) of the Bankruptcy
Code.
On or before the Effective Date, the Debtors may File with the Bankruptcy Court such agreements and other documents as may be
necessary or appropriate to effectuate and further evidence the terms and conditions of the Plan. The Debtors or Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, and all Holders receiving distributions pursuant to the Plan and all other parties in interest
shall, from time to time, prepare, execute, and deliver any agreements or documents and take any other actions as may be necessary or advisable to effectuate the provisions and intent of the Plan.
|
4.
|
Statutory Committee and Cessation of Fee and Expense Payment
|
On the Effective Date, any statutory committee appointed in the Chapter 11 Cases, including the Creditors’ Committee, shall
dissolve and members thereof shall be released and discharged from all rights and duties from or related to the Chapter 11 Cases, and the Reorganized Debtors shall no longer be responsible for paying any fees or expenses incurred by the Creditors’
Committee on and after the Effective Date.
Except as expressly set forth in the Plan, the Plan shall have no force or effect unless the Bankruptcy Court enters the
Confirmation Order, and the Confirmation Order shall have no force or effect if the Effective Date does not occur. None of the Filing of the Plan, any statement or provision contained in the Plan, or the taking of any action by any Debtor or any
other Entity with respect to the Plan, the Disclosure Statement, or the Plan Supplement shall be or shall be deemed to be an admission or waiver of any rights of any Debtor or other Entity before the Effective Date.
|
6.
|
Successors and Assigns
|
The rights, benefits, and obligations of any Entity named or referred to in the Plan shall be binding on, and shall inure to the
benefit of, any heir, executor, administrator, receiver, trustee, successor, assign, Affiliate, officer, director, agent, representative, attorney, beneficiary, or guardian, if any, of such Entity.
Any pleading, notice, or other document required by the Plan or the Confirmation Order to be served or delivered shall be served
by first-class or overnight mail:
If to a Debtor or Reorganized Debtor, to:
Revlon, Inc.
55 Water St., 43rd Floor
New York, New York 10041-0004
|
Attention:
|
Andrew Kidd, EVP, General Counsel
Matthew Kvarda, Interim Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Email:
|
Andrew.Kidd@revlon.com
Mkvarda@alvarezandmarsal.com
|
with copies (which shall not constitute notice) to:
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
1285 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10019-6064
|
Facsimile:
|
(212) 757-3990
|
Alice B. Eaton
Kyle J. Kimpler
Robert A. Britton
Brian Bolin
Sean A. Mitchell
Irene Blumberg
|
E-mail:
|
pbasta@paulweiss.com
|
aeaton@paulweiss.com
kkimpler@paulweiss.com
rbritton@paulweiss.com
bbolin@paulweiss.com
smitchell@paulweiss.com
iblumberg@paulweiss.com
If to the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders:
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
450 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10017
|
Facsimile:
|
(212) 701-5331
|
|
Attention:
|
Eli J. Vonnegut
|
Angela M. Libby
Stephanie Massman
|
E-mail:
|
eli.vonnegut@davispolk.com
|
angela.libby@davispolk.com
stephanie.massman@davispolk.com
If to the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders:
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer and Feld LLP
2001 K Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20006-1037
|
Facsimile:
|
(202) 887-4417
|
Kevin Zuzolo
|
E-mail:
|
jsavin@akingump.com
|
kzuzolo@akingump.com
If to the Creditors’ Committee:
Brown Rudnick LLP
Seven Times Square
New York, New York 10036
|
Facsimile:
|
(212) 209-4801
|
|
Attention:
|
Robert J. Stark
|
Bennett S. Silverberg
|
E-mail:
|
rstark@brownrudnick.com
|
bsilverberg@brownrudnick.com
After the Effective Date, in order to continue to receive documents pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2002, an Entity must File a
renewed request to receive documents pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2002. After the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtors are authorized to limit the list of Entities receiving documents pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2002 to those Entities who have
Filed such renewed requests.
|
8.
|
Term of Injunctions or Stays
|
Unless otherwise provided in the Plan or in the Confirmation Order, all injunctions or stays in effect in the Chapter 11 Cases
pursuant to sections 105 or 362 of the Bankruptcy Code or any order of the Bankruptcy Court and extant on the Confirmation Date (excluding any injunctions or stays contained in the Plan or the Confirmation Order) shall remain in full force and effect
until the Effective Date. All injunctions or stays contained in the Plan or the Confirmation Order shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with their terms.
Except as otherwise indicated, the Plan and the Plan Supplement supersede all previous and contemporaneous negotiations,
promises, covenants, agreements, understandings, and representations on such subjects, all of which have become merged and integrated into the Plan.
All exhibits and documents included in the Plan Supplement are incorporated into and are a part of the Plan as if set forth in
full in the Plan. After the exhibits and documents are Filed, copies of such exhibits and documents shall be available upon written request to the Debtors’ counsel at the address above or by downloading such exhibits and documents from the website
of the Debtors’ claims and noticing agent at https://cases.ra.kroll.com/Revlon or the Bankruptcy Court’s website at http://www.nysb.uscourts.gov.
|
11.
|
Severability of Plan Provisions
|
If, before Confirmation, any term or provision of the Plan is held by the Bankruptcy Court to be invalid, void, or unenforceable,
the Bankruptcy Court, at the request of the Debtors, with the consent of the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders, and, solely to the extent required under the Restructuring Support Agreement, the Creditors’ Committee and the Required Consenting 2016
Lenders, shall have the power to alter and interpret such term or provision to make it valid or enforceable to the maximum extent practicable, consistent with the original purpose of the term or provision held to be invalid, void, or unenforceable,
and such term or provision shall then be applicable as altered or interpreted. Notwithstanding any such holding, alteration, or interpretation, the remainder of the terms and provisions of the Plan will remain in full force and effect and will in no
way be affected, impaired, or invalidated by such holding, alteration, or interpretation. The Confirmation Order shall constitute a judicial determination and shall provide that each term and provision of the Plan, as it may have been altered or
interpreted in accordance with the foregoing, is: (1) valid and enforceable pursuant to its terms; (2) integral to the Plan and may not be deleted or modified without the Debtors’ or Reorganized Debtors’ consent, consistent with the terms set forth
herein; and (3) non-severable and mutually dependent.
|
12.
|
Votes Solicited in Good Faith
|
Upon entry of the Confirmation Order, the Debtors shall be deemed to have solicited votes on the Plan in good faith and in
compliance with the Bankruptcy Code and other applicable law, and pursuant to sections 1125(e), 1125, and 1126 of the Bankruptcy Code, and the Debtors, the Consenting BrandCo Lenders, and each of their respective Affiliates, and each of their and
their Affiliates’ agents, representatives, members, principals, shareholders, officers, directors, employees, advisors, and attorneys, in each case solely in their respective capacities as such, shall be deemed to have participated in good faith and
in compliance with the Bankruptcy Code in the offer, issuance, sale, and purchase of New Securities offered and sold under the Plan and any previous plan and, therefore, no such parties, individuals, or the Reorganized Debtors will have any liability
for the violation of any applicable law, rule, or regulation governing the solicitation of votes on the Plan or the offer, issuance, sale, or purchase of the New Securities offered and sold under the Plan or any previous plan.
|
13.
|
Closing of Chapter 11 Cases
|
Upon the occurrence of the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtors shall be permitted to (a) close all of the Chapter 11 Cases
except for one of the Chapter 11 Cases as determined by the Reorganized Debtors, and all contested matters relating to each of the Debtors, including objections to Claims, shall be administered and heard in such Chapter 11 Case, and (b) change the
name of the remaining Debtor and case caption of the remaining open Chapter 11 Case as desired, in the Reorganized Debtors’ sole discretion.
Each Holder of a Claim or an Interest shall be deemed to have waived any right to assert any argument, including the right to
argue that its Claim or Interest should be Allowed in a certain amount, in a certain priority, Secured or not subordinated by virtue of an agreement made with the Debtors or their counsel, or any other Entity, if such agreement was not disclosed in
the Plan, the Disclosure Statement, or papers Filed prior to the Confirmation Date.
Subject to and conditioned on the occurrence of the Effective Date, whenever an act or event is expressed under the Plan to have
been deemed done or to have occurred, it shall be deemed to have been done or to have occurred without any further act by any party by virtue of the Plan and the Confirmation Order.
IX. |
VALUATION OF THE DEBTORS
|
In conjunction with formulating the Plan, the Company determined that it was necessary to estimate the Company’s consolidated
value on a going-concern basis (the “Valuation Analysis”) and then allocate value among the Company’s various subsidiaries. The Valuation Analysis, prepared by PJT, is
attached hereto as Exhibit D.
THE VALUATIONS SET FORTH IN THE VALUATION ANALYSIS REPRESENT ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTABLE VALUE FOR THE COMPANY AND
DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT VALUES THAT COULD BE ATTAINABLE IN THE PUBLIC OR PRIVATE MARKETS.
X. |
TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS AND CONSEQUENCES UNDER FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS
|
No registration statement will be filed under the Securities Act or pursuant to any state securities laws with respect to the
offer and distribution of New Common Stock, Equity Subscription Rights, and New Warrants under or in connection with the Plan. The Debtors believe that the provisions of section 1145(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code and/or section 4(a)(2) of, or
Regulation D under, the Securities Act will exempt the offer, issuance and distribution of the New Securities (including New Common Stock issuable upon exercise or conversion thereof) issued under or in connection with the Plan on account of Allowed
Claims from federal and state securities registration requirements. The Debtors believe that the other shares of New Common Stock that will be issued to the Equity Commitment Parties under the Backstop Commitment Agreement (including those issued on
account of the Backstop Commitment Premium under the Backstop Agreement and those issued in respect of each Equity Commitment Party’s exercise of its own Equity Subscription Rights) will be issued under section 1145(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code. The
New Common Stock issued to affiliates of the Company will be treated as issued pursuant to section 1145(a)(1), but will be subject to the restrictions on resale of securities held by affiliates of an issuer. The offer (to the extent applicable),
issuance and distribution of the Unsubscribed Shares and the Reserved Shares shall be exempt from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) thereof and/or Regulation D thereunder. To the extent issued and distributed in
reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act or Regulation D thereunder, the Unsubscribed Shares and the Reserved Shares will be “restricted securities” subject to resale restrictions and may be resold, exchanged, assigned or otherwise
transferred only pursuant to registration, or an applicable exemption from registration under the Securities Act and other applicable law. Persons to whom the New Securities are issued are also subject to restrictions on resale to the extent they are
deemed an “issuer,” an “underwriter,” or a “dealer” with respect to such New Common Stock, as further described below. In addition to the restrictions referred to below, holders of Restricted Stock will also be subject to the transfer restrictions
contained in the terms thereof, as well as in any Shareholders’ Agreement.
|
A. |
Bankruptcy Code Exemptions from Securities Act Registration Requirements
|
1. Securities Issued in Reliance on Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code. Section 1145(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code exempts the offer and sale of securities under a plan of
reorganization from registration under Section 5 of the Securities Act and state laws if three principal requirements are satisfied:
|
• |
first, the securities must be offered and sold under a plan of
reorganization and must be securities of the debtor, of an affiliate participating in a joint plan with the debtor, or of a successor to the debtor under the plan;
|
|
• |
second, the recipients of the securities must each hold a prepetition
or administrative expense claim against the debtor or an interest in the debtor; and
|
|
• |
third, the securities must be issued entirely in exchange for the
recipient’s claim against or interest in the debtor or such affiliate, or principally in such exchange and partly for cash or other property.
|
The offer, issuance, and distribution under the Plan to holders of Class 4 and Class 6 Claims of the New Common Stock, the Equity
Subscription Rights (and any New Common Stock issued upon exercise of the Equity Subscription Rights, other than any Unsubscribed Shares), are exempt under section 1145(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code because:
|
• |
all of such New Securities are being offered and sold under the Plan and is a security of a successor to the Debtors under the Plan; and
|
|
• |
all of such New Securities are being issued principally in exchange for claims against or interests in the Debtors and partially for cash.
|
The offer, issuance and distribution under the Plan to Equity Commitment Parties of shares of New Common Stock under the Backstop
Commitment Agreement:
|
• |
in respect of the exercise of their own Equity Subscription Rights will be exempt under Section 1145(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code as described above; and
|
|
• |
in respect of the Backstop Commitment Premium payable by the Debtors under the Backstop Commitment Agreement will be exempt under Section 1145(a)(1) of the
Bankruptcy Code as being issued entirely in exchange for administrative claims against the Debtors and therefore exempt under Section 1145(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code.
|
The offer and issuance of the New Warrants under the Plan are exempt under section 1145(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code because:
|
• |
all of the New Warrants are being offered and sold under the Plan and is a security of a successor to the Debtors under the Plan; and
|
|
• |
all of the New Warrants are being issued entirely in exchange for claims against or interests in the Debtors.
|
The issuance of shares of New Common Stock upon subsequent exercise of the New Warrants will be exempt under section 1145(a)(2)
of the Bankruptcy Code.
The exemptions provided for in section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code do not apply to an entity that is deemed an “underwriter” as
such term is defined in section 1145(b) of the Bankruptcy Code. Section 1145(b) of the Bankruptcy Code defines an “underwriter” as one who, except with respect to “ordinary trading transactions” of an entity that is not an “issuer”:
|
• |
purchases a claim against, an interest in, or a claim for administrative expense against, the debtor, with a view to distributing any security received in
exchange for such a claim or interest (“accumulators”);
|
|
• |
offers to sell securities offered under a plan for the holders of such securities (“distributors”);
|
|
• |
offers to buy securities from the holders of such securities, if the offer to buy is (i) with a view to distributing such securities and (ii) made under a
distribution agreement; or
|
|
• |
is an “issuer” with respect to the securities, as the term “issuer” is defined in section 2(a)(11) of the Securities Act, which includes affiliates of the
issuer, defined as persons who are in a relationship of “control” with the issuer.
|
Persons who are not deemed “underwriters” may generally resell the securities they receive that comply with the requirements of
section 1145(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code without registration under the Securities Act or other applicable law. Persons deemed “underwriters” may sell such securities without Securities Act registration only pursuant to exemptions from registration
under the Securities Act and other applicable law.
|
2.
|
Subsequent Transfers of New Securities Issued under
Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code.
|
Section 1145(c) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that securities issued pursuant to section 1145(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code are
deemed to have been issued in a public offering. In general, therefore, resales of, and subsequent transactions in, the New Securities issued under section 1145(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code will be exempt from registration under the Securities Act
pursuant to section 4(a)(1) of the Securities Act, unless the holder thereof is deemed to be an “issuer,” an “underwriter,” or a “dealer” with respect to such securities. For these purposes, an “issuer” includes any “affiliate” of the issuer,
defined as a person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the issuer. “Control,” as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act, means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause
the direction of the management and policies of a person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract, or otherwise.
A “dealer,” as defined in section 2(a)(12) of the Securities Act, is any person who engages either for all or part of his or her
time, directly or indirectly, as agent, broker, or principal, in the business of offering, buying, selling, or otherwise dealing or trading in securities issued by another person. Whether or not any particular person would be deemed to be an
“issuer” (including an “affiliate”) of the Company or an “underwriter” or a “dealer” with respect to any New Securities will depend upon various facts and circumstances applicable to that person.
The New Securities generally may be resold without registration under state securities laws pursuant to various exemptions
provided by the respective laws of those states. However, the availability of such state exemptions depends on the securities laws of each state, and holders of Claims may wish to consult with their own legal advisors regarding the availability of
these exemptions in their particular circumstances.
|
3.
|
Subsequent Transfers of New Securities Issued under
Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code to Affiliates.
|
Any New Securities issued under section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code to affiliates of the Debtors will be subject to restrictions
on resale. Affiliates of the Debtors for these purposes will generally include their directors and officers and their controlling stockholders. While there is no precise definition of a “controlling” stockholder, the legislative history of section
1145 of the Bankruptcy Code suggests that a creditor who owns 10% or more of a class of securities of a reorganized debtor may be presumed to be a “controlling person” of the debtor.
The SEC’s staff has indicated that a “safe harbor” under Rule 144 under the Securities Act is available for the immediate resale
of securities issued under a plan of reorganization to affiliates of the issuing debtor that would otherwise be unrestricted under the Securities Act. The Rule 144 safe harbor should therefore be available for resales of the New Common Stock issued
to affiliates under the Plan. The availability of the Rule 144 safe harbor is conditioned on the public availability of certain information concerning the issuer and imposes on selling stockholders certain volume limitations and certain manner of
sale and notice requirements.
GIVEN THE COMPLEX NATURE OF THE QUESTION OF WHETHER A PARTICULAR PERSON MAY BE AN UNDERWRITER, ISSUER,
AFFILIATE, OR DEALER, THE DEBTORS MAKE NO REPRESENTATIONS CONCERNING THE RIGHT OF ANY PERSON TO TRADE IN SECURITIES TO BE DISTRIBUTED PURSUANT TO OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE PLAN. THE DEBTORS RECOMMEND THAT HOLDERS OF CLAIMS CONSULT THEIR OWN COUNSEL
CONCERNING WHETHER THEY MAY FREELY TRADE SUCH SECURITIES.
|
B. |
Private Placement Exemption from Securities Act Registration Requirements
|
|
1.
|
Issuance of Securities in a Private Placement under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act
|
Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act provides that the issuance of securities by an issuer in transactions not involving a
public offering are exempt from registration under Section 5 of the Securities Act. Regulation D is a non-exclusive safe harbor from registration promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Act. The Reserved Shares and the Unsubscribed Shares
(collectively, the “4(a)(2) Securities”) will be issued in a transaction exempt from registration under Section 5 of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) and/or
Regulation D thereunder. In the Backstop Commitment Agreement, the Equity Commitment Parties will be required to make representations and warranties as to their sophistication and suitability to participate in the private placement and purchase the
4(a)(2) Securities.
The 4(a)(2) Securities will be subject to resale restrictions and may be resold, exchanged, assigned or otherwise transferred
only pursuant to registration, or an applicable exemption from registration, under the Securities Act and other applicable law, as described below.
|
2.
|
Subsequent Transfers of Securities issued in a Private Placement under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act
|
The 4(a)(2) Securities will be deemed “restricted securities” (as defined by Rule 144 of the Securities Act) that may not be
offered, sold, exchanged, assigned or otherwise transferred unless they are registered under the Securities Act, or an exemption from registration under the Securities Act is available. If in the future a Holder of 4(a)(2) Securities decides to
offer, resell, pledge or otherwise transfer any 4(a)(2) Securities, such 4(a)(2) Securities may be offered, resold, pledged or otherwise transferred only (i) in the United States to a person whom the seller reasonably believes is a QIB in a
transaction meeting the requirements of Rule 144A, (ii) outside the United States in a transaction complying with the provisions of Rule 904 under the Securities Act, (iii) pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act
(including the exemption provided by Rule 144) (to the extent the exemption is available), or (iv) pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act, in each of cases (i) through (iv) in accordance with any applicable
securities laws of any state of the United States. Such Holder will, and each subsequent Holder is required to, notify any subsequent acquiror of the 4(a)(2) Securities from it of the resale restrictions referred to above.
Rule 144 provides a limited safe harbor for the public resale of restricted securities (such that the seller is not deemed an
“underwriter”) if certain conditions are met. These conditions vary depending on whether the seller of the restricted securities is an “affiliate” of the issuer. Rule 144 defines an affiliate as “a person that directly, or indirectly through one or
more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, such issuer.”
The Debtors expect that, after the Effective Date, the issuer of the New Securities will not be subject to the reporting
requirements under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. A non-affiliate of an issuer that is not subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and who has not been an affiliate of the issuer during the ninety
(90) days preceding such sale may resell restricted securities after a one-year holding period whether or not there is current public information regarding the issuer.
An affiliate of an issuer that is not subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act may resell
restricted securities after the one-year holding period if at the time of the sale certain current public information regarding the issuer is available. An affiliate must also comply with the volume, manner of sale and notice requirements of Rule
144. First, the rule limits the number of restricted securities (plus any unrestricted securities) sold for the account of an affiliate (and related persons) in any three-month period to the greater of 1% of the outstanding securities of the same
class being sold, or, if the class is listed on a stock exchange, the average weekly reported volume of trading in such securities during the four weeks preceding the filing of a notice of proposed sale on Form 144 or if no notice is required, the
date of receipt of the order to execute the transaction by the broker or the date of execution of the transaction directly with a market maker. Second, the manner of sale requirement provides that the restricted securities must be sold in a broker’s
transaction, directly with a market maker or in a riskless principal transaction (as defined in Rule 144). Third, if the amount of securities sold under Rule 144 in any three month period exceeds 5,000 shares or has an aggregate sale price greater
than $50,000, an affiliate must file or cause to be filed with the SEC three copies of a notice of proposed sale on Form 144, and provide a copy to any exchange on which the securities are traded.
As a result, the Debtors believe that the Rule 144 exemption will not be available with respect to any 4(a)(2) Securities
(whether held by non-affiliates or affiliates) until at least one year after the Effective Date. Accordingly, unless transferred pursuant to an effective registration statement or another available exemption from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act, non-affiliate Holders of 4(a)(2) Securities will be required to hold their 4(a)(2) Securities for at least one year and, thereafter, to sell them only in accordance with the applicable requirements of Rule 144, pursuant to the an
effective registration statement or pursuant to another available exemption from the registration requirements of applicable securities laws.
Each certificate representing, or issued in exchange for or upon the transfer, sale or assignment of, any 4(a)(2) Securities
shall, upon issuance, be stamped or otherwise imprinted with a restrictive legend consistent with the following form:
“THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE WERE ORIGINALLY ISSUED ON [DATE OF ISSUANCE], HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE UNITED STATES
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “ACT”), OR ANY OTHER APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS, AND MAY NOT BE SOLD OR TRANSFERRED IN THE ABSENCE OF AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE ACT OR AN AVAILABLE EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION
THEREUNDER.”
The Reorganized Debtors reserve the right to require certification, legal opinions or other evidence of compliance with Rule 144
as a condition to the removal of such legend or to any resale of the 4(a)(2) Securities. The Reorganized Debtors also reserve the right to stop the transfer of any 4(a)(2) Securities if such transfer is not in compliance with Rule 144, pursuant to an
effective registration statement or pursuant to another available exemption from the registration requirements of applicable securities laws. All persons who receive 4(a)(2) Securities will be required to acknowledge and agree that (a) they will not
offer, sell or otherwise transfer any 4(a)(2) Securities except in accordance with an exemption from registration, including under Rule 144 under the Securities Act, if and when available, or pursuant to an effective registration statement, and (b)
the 4(a)(2) Securities will be subject to the other restrictions described above.
Any Persons receiving restricted securities under the Plan (including the 4(a)(2) Securities) should consult with their own
counsel concerning the availability of an exemption from registration for resale of these securities under the Securities Act and other applicable law.
BECAUSE OF THE COMPLEX, SUBJECTIVE NATURE OF THE QUESTION OF WHETHER A PARTICULAR PERSON MAY BE AN UNDERWRITER
OR AN AFFILIATE AND THE HIGHLY FACT-SPECIFIC NATURE OF THE AVAILABILITY OF EXEMPTIONS FROM REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT, NONE OF THE DEBTORS MAKE ANY REPRESENTATION CONCERNING THE ABILITY OF ANY PERSON TO DISPOSE OF THE 4(A)(2) SECURITIES.
THE DEBTORS RECOMMEND THAT POTENTIAL RECIPIENTS OF THE 4(A)(2) SECURITIES CONSULT THEIR OWN COUNSEL CONCERNING WHETHER THEY MAY FREELY TRADE SUCH SECURITIES AND THE CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH THEY MAY RESELL SUCH 4(A)(2) SECURITIES.
XI. |
CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE PLAN
|
The following discussion summarizes certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the implementation of the Plan to the
Debtors, the Reorganized Holdings, and certain holders of the Allowed 2016 Term Loan Claims, Allowed 2020 Term B-3 Loan Claims, Allowed 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims, Allowed Term B-2 Loan Claims, Allowed Unsecured Notes Claims, Allowed Talc Personal
Injury Claims, Allowed Non-Qualified Pension Claims, Allowed Trade Claims and Allowed Other General Unsecured Claims. This summary is based on the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Tax Code”), the U.S. Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder (“Treasury Regulations”) and administrative and judicial interpretations
and practice, all as in effect on the date of this Disclosure Statement and all of which are subject to change, with possible retroactive effect. Due to the lack of definitive judicial and administrative authority in a number of areas, substantial
uncertainty may exist with respect to some of the tax consequences described below. No opinion of counsel has been sought or obtained with respect to the tax consequences of the Plan described herein. The Debtors have not requested, and do not
intend to request, any ruling or determination from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or any other taxing authority with respect to the tax consequences discussed
herein, and the discussion below is not binding upon the IRS or the courts. No assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a different position than any position discussed herein.
This summary does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to a Holder of an Allowed Claim in
light of its individual circumstances or to a Holder that may be subject to special tax rules (such as Persons who are related to the Debtors within the meaning of the Tax Code, broker-dealers, banks, mutual funds, insurance companies, financial
institutions, thrifts, real estate investment trusts, retirement plans, individual retirement and other tax-deferred accounts, small business investment companies, regulated investment companies, tax-exempt entities, trusts, governmental authorities
or agencies, dealers and traders in securities, subchapter S corporations, partnerships or other entities treated as pass-through vehicles for U.S. federal income tax purposes, controlled foreign corporations, passive foreign investment companies,
U.S. Holders (as defined below) whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, persons who received their Claims as compensation, non‑U.S. Holders (as defined below) that own, actually or constructively, ten percent or more of the total combined
voting power of all classes of stock of Revlon, Inc., dealers in securities or foreign currencies, U.S. expatriates, persons who hold Claims or who will hold the New Common Stock, New Warrants, Equity Subscription Rights or First Lien Take-Back
Facility as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion transaction, or other integrated investment, persons using a mark-to-market method of accounting, Holders of Claims who are themselves in bankruptcy and Holders that prepare an “applicable financial
statement” (as defined in section 451 of the Tax Code).
Additionally, this discussion does not address the implications of the alternative minimum tax, the base erosion and anti-abuse
tax, or the “Medicare” tax on net investment income. Moreover, this summary does not purport to cover all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may apply to the Debtors, the Reorganized Holdings or Holders of Allowed Claims based upon their
particular circumstances. This summary does not discuss any tax consequences of the Plan that may arise under any laws other than U.S. federal income tax law, including under state, local, or non-U.S. tax law. Furthermore, this summary does not
discuss any actions that a Holder may undertake with respect to its Allowed Claims, other than voting such Allowed Claim and receiving the consideration provided under the Plan, or with respect to any actions undertaken by a Holder subsequent to
receiving any consideration under the Plan.
Furthermore, this summary assumes that a Holder of an Allowed Claim holds a Claim only as a “capital asset” (other than an
Allowed Talc Personal Injury Claim, an Allowed Trade Claim, an Allowed Non-Qualified Pension Claim or an Allowed Other General Unsecured Claim) (within the meaning of section 1221 of the Tax Code). This summary also assumes that the various debt and
other arrangements to which any of the Debtors or the Reorganized Holdings are a party will be respected for U.S. federal income tax purposes in accordance with their form. This summary also assumes that the New Warrants will be treated as options
for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and not as stock of the issuer thereof, and that none of the 2016 Term Loan Facility, the 2020 BrandCo Term Loan Facilities and the Unsecured Notes are “contingent payment debt instruments” within the meaning of
Treasury Regulations Section 1.1275-4, other than the tranche of 2020 Term B-2 Loans issued in November, 2020. This summary does not discuss differences in tax consequences to Holders of Claims that act or receive consideration in a capacity other
than any other Holder of a Claim of the same Class or Classes. This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences to Holders (i) whose Claims are Unimpaired or otherwise entitled to payment in full in Cash under the Plan or (ii)
that are deemed to reject the Plan.
For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of a Claim that is: (a) an individual citizen or resident
of the United States for U.S. federal income tax purposes; (b) a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District
of Columbia; (c) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of the source of such income; or (d) a trust (1) if a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the trust’s
administration and one or more U.S. persons have authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (2) that has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be treated as a United States person. For purposes of
this discussion, a “non-U.S. Holder” is any beneficial owner of a Claim that is not a U.S. Holder other than any partnership (or other entity treated as a partnership or other pass-through entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes).
If a partnership (or other entity treated as a partnership or other pass-through entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is
a beneficial owner of a Claim, the tax treatment of a partner (or other owner) of such entity generally will depend upon the status of the partner (or other owner) and the activities of the entity. Partners (or other owners) of partnerships (or other
pass-through entities) that are beneficial owners of a Claim are urged to consult their respective tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Plan.
ACCORDINGLY, THE FOLLOWING SUMMARY OF CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT
A SUBSTITUTE FOR CAREFUL TAX PLANNING AND ADVICE BASED UPON THE INDIVIDUAL CIRCUMSTANCES PERTAINING TO A HOLDER OF A CLAIM. ALL HOLDERS OF CLAIMS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS FOR THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND NON-U.S. TAX CONSEQUENCES
APPLICABLE UNDER THE PLAN, INCLUDING THE IMPACT OF TAX LEGISLATION.
|
A. |
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for the U.S. Debtors and the Reorganized Holdings
|
Each of the Debtors organized in the United States (each such Debtor a “U.S. Debtor” and collectively, the “U.S. Debtors”) is a member of an affiliated group of corporations that files consolidated federal income tax
returns with Holdings as the common parent (such consolidated group, the “Revlon Group”) or an entity disregarded as separate from its owner for U.S. federal income tax
purposes whose business activities and operations are reflected on the consolidated U.S. federal income tax returns of the Revlon Group. The non-U.S. Debtors are not currently directly subject to U.S. federal income tax, and the Debtors expect that
such non-U.S. Debtors will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax immediately following the Restructuring Transactions. The U.S. Debtors estimate that, as of the filing date of the tax returns for the year ended December 31, 2021, the Revlon Group
had consolidated net operating loss carryforwards (“NOL”) of approximately $647,400,604, among other tax attributes (including tax basis in assets), and approximately
$499,544,021 of disallowed business interest expense carryforwards. However, the amount of Revlon Group NOLs and other tax attributes, as well as the application of any limitations thereon, remains subject to review and adjustment, including by the
IRS. As discussed below, the U.S. Debtors’ NOLs and certain other tax attributes are expected to be significantly reduced or eliminated entirely upon implementation of the Plan.
The tax consequences of the implementation of the Plan to the U.S. Debtors will differ depending on how the Restructuring
Transactions are structured for applicable tax purposes including as a taxable sale of the U.S. Debtors’ assets and/or stock to an indirect subsidiary of a newly formed Reorganized Holdings (a “Newco Acquisition”) or as an exchange of restructured interests in Reorganized Holdings for Claims (a “Restructuring in Place”). The U.S. Debtors have
not yet determined whether or not they intend to structure the Restructuring Transactions as a Newco Acquisition, a Restructuring in Place or in another manner. Such decision will depend on, among other things, the magnitude of any anticipated cash
tax liability arising from a Newco Acquisition, the fair market value of any tax basis arising in connection with the same, the anticipated cash tax profile of the U.S. Debtors following implementation of the Plan in the absence of a Newco
Acquisition, and the tax consequences to U.S. Holders of the 2020 Term B-1 Loans or the 2020 Term B-2 Loans.
If the transaction undertaken pursuant to the Plan is structured as a Newco Acquisition, the U.S. Debtors would recognize gain or
loss upon the transfer in an amount equal to the difference between (i) the sum of (x) the fair market value of the New Common Stock, the New Warrants and the Equity Subscription Rights, (y) the fair market value of the First Lien Take-Back Facility
(or, potentially, the “issue price” of the First Lien Take-Back Facility depending on the identity of the issuer thereof, which may be equal to fair market value) and (z) the amount of any other liabilities directly or indirectly assumed by the
acquirer and (ii) the U.S. Debtors’ tax basis in the assets or stock transferred (including any assets deemed transferred, such as by reason of an election to treat a stock transfer as an asset transfer for U.S. federal income tax purposes (via one
or more elections pursuant to Tax Code sections 338(g), 338(h)(10) or 336(e)) or the transfer of the membership interests in a wholly-owned limited liability company that is disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes). In connection with such
transaction U.S. Debtors (or subsidiaries thereof) will be deemed to or will actually liquidate for U.S. federal income tax purposes in a taxable transaction and the U.S. Debtors may recognize additional gain or loss in respect of such liquidations (e.g. in respect of insolvent subsidiaries). Depending on the projected enterprise value relative to the existing tax basis of the assets that would be transferred,
the amount of any gain or loss on such liquidations and the availability of NOLs or other tax attributes to offset any gain on the transfer or liquidations, the U.S. Debtors could be subject to material U.S. federal, state or local income tax
liability, which amount cannot be determined at this time. Reorganized Holdings (and its subsidiaries) would not succeed to any U.S. federal income tax attributes of the U.S. Debtors (such as NOLs, tax credits or tax basis in assets). It is likely
the U.S. Debtors will also recognize COD Income (defined below) with respect to certain Claims, which would be excluded under the Bankruptcy Exception (defined below) as discussed in “Cancellation of Indebtedness Income and Reduction of Tax
Attributes” below.
If an indirect subsidiary of a newly-formed Reorganized Holdings (the “Newco Entities”) purchases assets or stock of the U.S. Debtors pursuant to a Newco Acquisition, such entity will generally take a fair market value basis in the transferred assets or stock. However, if a Newco Acquisition
involves a purchase of stock of a U.S. Debtor, such Debtor will retain its basis in its assets unless the parties make an election pursuant to Tax Code sections 338(g), 338(h)(10) or 336(e) to treat the stock purchase as the purchase of assets.
There is no authority directly on point with respect to a transaction structured as a Newco Acquisition and there is no guaranty that the IRS would not take a position contrary to the U.S. Debtors’ reporting of such Newco Acquisition, which position
may ultimately be sustained by a court.
Although the U.S. Debtors expect a transfer of the stock or assets of the U.S. Debtors to an indirect subsidiary of a newly
formed Reorganized Holdings to be treated as a taxable asset acquisition, there is no assurance that the IRS would not take a contrary position and assert that such transaction is instead a tax-free reorganization. Moreover, it is possible that
Reorganized Holdings may make (or cause its subsidiaries to make) certain elections to cause such transaction to be treated as a tax-free reorganization. If the transfer of the U.S. Debtors’ stock or assets to an indirect subsidiary of a newly formed
Reorganized Holdings were treated as a tax-free reorganization, Reorganized Holdings and its subsidiaries would carry over the tax attributes of the Revlon Group (including tax basis in assets), subject to the required attribute reduction
attributable to the substantial COD Income incurred in connection with emergence and other applicable limitations (as discussed below). If the Restructuring Transactions were treated as a tax-free reorganization, the impact of the associated
Restructuring Transactions to the U.S. Debtors could be materially different from the consequences described herein. The remainder of this disclosure assumes that any sale of the U.S. Debtors’ assets and/or stock to a subsidiary of Reorganized
Holdings in connection with the Restructuring Transaction will be a taxable sale as described above under “—a. “Newco Acquisition”.
|
2.
|
Restructuring in Place
|
|
a.
|
Debt for Equity Exchange
|
If the transactions undertaken pursuant to the Plan are structured as a Restructuring in Place, the New Common Stock, Equity
Subscription Rights and New Warrants will be issued by Reorganized Holdings. In this case, Reorganized Holdings may be Revlon, Inc., as reorganized pursuant to and under the Plan, even though the debt instruments underlying the Claims receiving New
Common Stock, Equity Subscription Rights and New Warrants in the Restructuring Transactions were issued by its subsidiary, RCPC. Accordingly, in such case, the U.S. Debtors may cause the New Common Stock, Equity Subscription Rights and New Warrants
to be issued and contributed (including through one or more successive contributions by intermediate members of the Revlon Group) by such Reorganized Holdings to RCPC, and then exchanged (in addition to the other consideration, if applicable) by RCPC
with Holders of Claims pursuant to the Plan (the “Debt-for-Equity Exchange”). While this transaction will be taxable to the U.S. Debtors, as described in greater detail
below, this transaction may or may not be taxable to the Holders of Claims, depending, for example, on whether such holders are receiving First Lien Take-Back Loans, and depending on the issuer of the First Lien Take-Back Loans. For U.S. federal
income tax purposes, if the Restructuring Transactions are structured as described above and no other relevant elections are made or transactions are undertaken, the Debtors intend to take the position that the Debt-for-Equity Exchange
characterization applies and to treat such transactions as occurring in the order described above (issuance, contribution, and exchange). The tax consequences to the Debtors, the Reorganized Debtors, and Holders of Claims described herein could be
materially different in the event this Debt-for-Equity Exchange characterization is not respected for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or in the event that the Debtors consummate a Restructuring in Place that is different from the transaction
described above. For example, it is also possible that Reorganized Holdings may be RCPC, in which case the New Common Stock, Equity Subscription Rights and New Warrants would be issued by RCPC. It is also possible that RCPC may be converted to a
limited liability company disregarded as separate from Revlon, Inc. for U.S. federal income tax purposes in connection with the Reorganization Transactions. In each case, such a structure may have materially different consequences to the Debtors than
discussed above and below. As noted above, the Debtors have not yet determined the structure of the Restructuring Transactions, and they may be structured in a manner that differs from those discussed above and below, and that would have materially
different tax consequences to the Debtors and U.S. Holders of Claims than discussed above and below. Except where otherwise noted, the remainder of this disclosure assumes that if the Restructuring Transactions are structured as a Restructuring in
Place, Revlon Inc. is Reorganized Holdings, RCPC remains an entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes and the transactions are treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as described above.
|
b. |
Cancellation of Indebtedness Income and Reduction of Tax Attributes.
|
In general, absent an exception, a debtor will realize and recognize “cancellation of indebtedness income” (“COD Income”) upon satisfaction of its outstanding indebtedness for total consideration less than the amount of such indebtedness. The amount of COD Income incurred is,
generally, the amount by which the indebtedness discharged exceeds the value of any consideration given in exchange therefor (or, if the consideration is in the form of new debt of the issuer, the issue price of such new debt).
Under section 108 of the Tax Code, a debtor is not required to include COD Income in gross income if the debtor is under the
jurisdiction of a court in a case under the Bankruptcy Code and the discharge of debt occurs pursuant to that proceeding. Instead, as a consequence of such exclusion, a debtor must reduce its tax attributes by the amount of COD Income that it
excluded from gross income pursuant to section 108(a) of the Tax Code. In general, tax attributes will be reduced in the following order: (a) NOLs and NOL carryforwards; (b) general business credit carryforwards; (c) minimum tax credit carryforwards;
(d) capital loss carryforwards; (e) tax basis in assets (but not below the amount of liabilities to which the debtor remains subject); (f) passive activity loss and credit carryforwards; and (g) foreign tax credit carryforwards. Alternatively, a
debtor with COD Income may elect first to reduce the basis of its depreciable assets pursuant to section 108(b)(5) of the Tax Code. Any excess COD Income over the amount of available tax attributes is not subject to U.S. federal income tax and has no
other U.S. federal income tax impact.
In connection with the Restructuring Transactions, the U.S. Debtors expect to realize significant COD Income. The exact amount of
any COD Income that will be realized by the U.S. Debtors will not be determinable until the consummation of the Plan. However, the U.S. Debtors expect that the amount of such COD Income will significantly reduce or eliminate their NOLs and tax
credits allocable to periods prior to the Effective Date, and may significantly reduce the U.S. Debtors’ tax basis in their assets.
Any reduction in tax attributes attributable to the COD Income incurred does not occur until the end of the taxable year in which
the Plan goes effective. As a result, in the case of a Newco Acquisition, the U.S. Debtors do not expect the resulting attribute reduction to adversely affect the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the Newco Acquisition (as described above),
including the computation of gain or loss on the sale.
The U.S. Debtors may incur other income for U.S. federal income tax purposes in connection with a Restructuring in Place that,
unlike COD Income, generally will not be excluded from the U.S. Debtors’ U.S. federal taxable income. For example, if appreciated assets are transferred by the U.S. Debtors in satisfaction of a Claim that is treated as “recourse” for applicable tax
purposes, the U.S. Debtors would expect to realize gain in connection with such transfer. In addition, the U.S. federal income tax considerations relating to the Plan are complex and subject to uncertainties. No assurance can be given that the IRS
will agree with the U.S. Debtors’ interpretations of the tax rules applicable to, or tax positions taken with respect to, the transactions undertaken to effect the Plan. If the IRS were to successfully challenge any such interpretation or position,
the Debtors may recognize additional taxable income for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and the Debtors may not have sufficient deductions, losses or other attributes for U.S. federal income tax purposes to fully offset such income.
|
d. |
Limitation of NOL Carryforwards and Other Tax Attributes
|
Under the Tax Code, any NOL carryforwards and certain other tax attributes, including carryforward of disallowed interest and
certain “built-in” losses, of a corporation remaining after attribute reduction (collectively, “Pre-Change Losses”) may be subject to an annual limitation if the corporation
undergoes an “ownership change” within the meaning of section 382 of the Tax Code. These limitations apply in addition to, and not in lieu of, the attribute reduction that may result from the COD Income arising in connection with the Plan.
Under section 382 of the Tax Code, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change” and does not qualify for (or elects out of)
the special bankruptcy exception in section 382(l)(5) of the Tax Code discussed below, the amount of its Pre-Change Losses that may be utilized to offset future taxable income is subject to an annual limitation. In general, the amount of the annual
limitation to which a corporation that undergoes an ownership change would be subject is equal to the product of (a) the fair market value of the stock of the loss corporation immediately before the ownership change (with certain adjustments)
multiplied by (b) the “long-term tax-exempt rate” in effect for the month in which the ownership change occurs (currently, 3.29% for an ownership change occurring in February 2023). The annual limitation under section 382 represents the amount of
pre-change NOLs, as well as certain built-in losses recognized within the five year period following the ownership change and, subject to modifications, the amount of capital loss carryforwards and tax credits, that may be used each year to offset
income. The section 382 limitation may be increased, up to the amount of the net unrealized built-in gain (if any) at the time of the ownership change, to the extent that the U.S. Debtors recognize certain built-in gains in their assets during the
five-year period following the ownership change, or are treated as recognizing built-in gains pursuant to the safe harbors provided in IRS Notice 2003-65.
In a Newco Acquisition, the U.S. Debtors expect that the Newco Entities generally would have no tax assets or tax history, except
that the Newco Entities would have a fair market value tax basis in the assets of the U.S. Debtors’ business.
In the case of a Restructuring in Place, the U.S. Debtors anticipate that the Revlon Group will experience an “ownership change”
(within the meaning of section 382 of the Tax Code) on the Effective Date. Section 383 of the Tax Code applies a similar limitation to capital loss carryforwards and tax credits, and, as a result, the Revlon Group’s ability to use its Pre-Change
Losses is expected to be similarly limited. Any unused limitation may be carried forward, thereby increasing the annual limitation in the subsequent taxable year.
An exception to the foregoing annual limitation rules generally applies when former shareholders and so called “qualified
creditors” of a corporation under the jurisdiction of a court in a case under the Bankruptcy Code receive, in respect of their claims, at least 50% of the vote and value of the stock of the reorganized debtor (or a controlling corporation if also
under the jurisdiction of a court in a case under the Bankruptcy Code) pursuant to a confirmed Chapter 11 plan (the “382(l)(5) Exception”). Under the 382(l)(5) Exception, a
debtor’s Pre-Change Losses are not limited on an annual basis but, instead, are required to be reduced by the amount of any interest deductions claimed during the three taxable years preceding the effective date, and during the part of the taxable
year prior to and including the plan of reorganization, in respect of all debt converted into stock in the reorganization. If the 382(l)(5) Exception applies and the Reorganized Debtors undergo another ownership change within two years after
Consummation of the Plan, then the Reorganized Debtors’ section 382 annual limitation will generally be reduced to zero, which would effectively preclude utilization of Pre-Change Losses.
Where the 382(l)(5) Exception is not applicable (either because the debtor company does not qualify for it or the debtor
otherwise elects not to utilize the 382(l)(5) Exception), a second special rule will generally apply (the “382(l)(6) Exception”). When the 382(l)(6) Exception applies, a
corporation under the jurisdiction of a court in a case under the Bankruptcy Code that undergoes an “ownership change” generally is permitted to determine the fair market value of its stock after taking into account the increase in value resulting
from any surrender or cancellation of creditors’ claims in the bankruptcy. This differs from the ordinary rule that requires the fair market value of a corporation that undergoes an ownership change to be determined before the events giving rise to
the change. The 382(l)(6) Exception also differs from the 382(l)(5) Exception in that under it the Reorganized Debtors would not be required to reduce their Pre-Change Losses by the amount of any interest deductions claimed by the U.S. Debtors within
the prior three-year period and the Reorganized Debtors may undergo a change of ownership within two years without automatically triggering the elimination of its Pre-Change Losses.
A Restructuring in Place may qualify for the 382(l)(5) Exception, although analysis is ongoing. Even if the Restructuring in
Place is eligible for the 382(l)(5) Exception, the U.S. Debtors have not yet decided whether they would elect out of its application. Regardless of whether the Reorganized Debtors take advantage of the 382(l)(6) Exception or the 382(l)(5) Exception,
the Reorganized Debtors’ use of their Pre-Change Losses after the Effective Date may be adversely affected if another ownership change were to occur after the Effective Date.
|
B. |
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to Certain U.S. Holders of Certain Allowed Claims
|
|
1.
|
Consequences of the Exchange to U.S. Holders of Allowed 2016 Term Loan
Claims and Allowed 2020 Term B-3 Loan Claims.
|
Pursuant to the Plan, in full satisfaction and discharge of their Claims, each U.S. Holder of an Allowed 2016 Term Loan Claim or an Allowed 2020
Term B-3 Loan Claim will receive cash or, if such Holder so elects or is deemed to so elect, New Common Stock and Equity Subscription Rights or a combination thereof.
|
a. |
Newco Acquisition or Restructure in Place
|
Subject to the discussion below with respect to consequences if RCPC is Reorganized Holdings and the discussion below
in “U.S. Holders Who Hold Claims In Multiple Classes,” regardless of whether the Restructuring Transactions are structured as a Newco Acquisition or a Restructuring in Place, a U.S. Holder of an Allowed 2016 Term Loan Claim or an Allowed 2020 Term
B-3 Loan Claim should be treated as exchanging their Claims for cash and/or New Common Stock and the Equity Subscription Rights, as the case may be, in a fully taxable exchange under section 1001 of the Tax Code. A U.S. Holder of an Allowed 2016
Term Loan Claim or an Allowed 2020 Term B-3 Loan Claim should recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between (a) the amount of cash and/or the total fair market value of the New Common Stock and Equity Subscription Rights received, as the
case may be, in exchange for its Claim (subject to the discussion of “Distributions Attributable to Accrued Interest (and OID)” below) and (b) the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in its Claim. A U.S. Holder’s tax basis in New Common Stock, if any
received in the exchange, should be equal to the fair market value of the New Common Stock and its tax basis in the Equity Subscription Rights, if any received in the exchange, should be equal to the fair market value of the Equity Subscription
Rights. A U.S. Holder’s holding period for the New Common Stock or Equity Subscription Rights, if any, received on the Effective Date should begin on the day following the Effective Date.
|
b. |
Character of Gain or Loss
|
The character of gain or loss as capital gain or loss or as ordinary income or loss will be determined by a number of factors,
including the tax status of the U.S. Holder, whether the Claim was purchased at a discount, and whether and to what extent the U.S. Holder previously has claimed a bad debt deduction with respect to its Claim. If recognized gain is capital gain, it
generally would be long-term capital gain if the U.S. Holder held its Claim for more than one year at the time of the exchange. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to certain limitations as discussed below. To the extent that a portion of
the consideration received in exchange for its Claim is allocable to accrued but untaxed interest, the U.S. Holder may recognize ordinary income. See the discussions of “Accrued Interest,” “Market Discount” and “Limitations on Use of Capital Losses”
below.
|
c. |
Potential Recapitalization Treatment.
|
If, notwithstanding the above, and subject to the discussion in “U.S. Holders Who Hold Claims In Multiple Classes” below, RCPC is Reorganized
Holdings, the extent to which U.S. Holders of Allowed 2016 Term Loan Claims or Allowed 2020 Term B-3 Loan Claims that elect to receive New Common Stock and Equity Subscription Rights will recognize gain or loss in connection with the Restructuring
Transactions will depend upon whether the receipt of consideration in respect of their Claims qualifies as a recapitalization within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(E) of the Tax Code, which, in turn, will depend on whether the Claims surrendered
constitute “securities” for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Whether a debt instrument constitutes a “security” for U.S. federal income tax purposes is determined based on all the relevant facts and
circumstances, but most authorities have held that the length of the term of a debt instrument at initial issuance is an important factor in determining whether such instrument is a security for U.S. federal income tax purposes. These authorities
have indicated that a term of less than five years is evidence that the instrument is not a security, whereas a term of ten years or more is evidence that it is a security.
The 2016 Term Loans have a term of seven (7)
years. The term to maturity of the 2020 Term B-3 Loans is less clear. In general, 2020 Term B-3 Loans have a term of slightly more than five (5) years; however, any 2020 Term B-3 Loans issued in exchange for 2016 Term Loans may be viewed for
applicable tax purposes as having a term of approximately nine (9) years to the extent that, as anticipated, such 2020 Term B-3 Loans are treated as a modification of the 2016 Term Loans that is not a “significant modification” under applicable
Treasury Regulations. There are numerous other factors that could be taken into account in determining whether a debt instrument is a security, including the security for payment, the creditworthiness of the obligor, the subordination or lack thereof
with respect to other creditors, the right to vote or otherwise participate in the management of the obligor, convertibility of the instrument into an equity interest of the obligor, whether payments of interest are fixed, variable, or contingent,
such instrument is deemed to be in exchange for another debt instrument and whether such payments are made on a current basis or accrued. Holders of such Claims are urged to consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of such treatment.
If the 2016 Term Loans or the 2020 Term B-3 Loans, as the case may be, constitute “securities” for U.S. federal income tax purposes and RCPC is Reorganized Holdings,
the U.S. Debtors would expect a U.S. Holder’s exchange of Allowed 2016 Term Loan Claims or Allowed 2020 Term B-3 Loan Claims for New Common Stock and Equity Subscription Rights to constitute a recapitalization within the meaning of Section
368(a)(1)(E) of the Tax Code. In such case, a U.S. Holder will generally not recognize loss on the exchange, but may recognize gain (if any) on the exchange to the extent of any cash received in exchange for their Claims, subject to the discussion
of the “Distributions Attributable to Accrued Interest (and OID)” below. A U.S. Holder’s aggregate tax basis in the New Common Stock and Equity Subscription Rights received in the exchange should be equal to its aggregate tax basis in the 2016 Term
Loans or 2020 Term B-3 Loans surrendered in the exchange plus any gain recognized on the exchange minus the amount of any cash received in the exchange. A U.S. Holder’s holding period for its New Common Stock and Equity Subscription Rights should
include the holding period for the 2016 Term Loans or 2020 Term B-3 Loans exchanged therefor. Subject to the discussion in “U.S. Holders Who Hold Claims In Multiple Classes” below, if the 2016 Term Loans or 2020 Term B-3 Loans do not constitute
“securities” for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the exchange would be fully taxable to U.S. Holders of such claims as described above.
A U.S. Holder of Allowed 2016 Term Loan Claims or Allowed 2020 Term B-3 Loan Claims that exchanges such Claims for New Common Stock and Equity
Subscription Rights would be subject to treatment similar to that as described above if Revlon, Inc. is Reorganized Holdings, but RCPC is converted to a limited liability company disregarded as separate from Revlon, Inc. for U.S. federal income tax
purposes in connection with the Restructuring Transactions.
|
2.
|
Consequences of the Exchange to U.S. Holders of Allowed
2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims.
|
Pursuant to the Plan, in full satisfaction and discharge of their Claims, each U.S. Holder of an Allowed 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claim will receive either
(i) First Lien Take-Back Term Loan or (ii) cash .
The U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Plan to U.S. Holders of Allowed 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims will depend, in part, on whether the First
Lien Take-Back Term Loans will be issued by RCPC (or an entity disregarded as separate from RCPC or an entity from which RCPC is disregarded as separate; “RCPC” as hereinafter used in this disclosure shall be deemed to include such entities) or an
entity other than RCPC and the overall form of the transactions. If the Restructuring Transactions are structured as a Restructuring in Place, a U.S. Holder of the Allowed 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims receives the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans in
connection with the exchange and the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans are issued by RCPC, the extent to which a U.S. Holder of Allowed 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims will recognize gain or loss in connection with the Restructuring Transactions will depend
upon whether the receipt of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans in respect of their Claims qualifies as a recapitalization within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(E) of the Tax Code, which, in turn, will depend on whether the Claims surrendered and
the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans issued constitute “securities” for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Subject to the discussion under “U.S. Holders Who Hold Claims In Multiple Classes” below, the exchange of Allowed 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims for
First Lien Take-Back Term Loans or cash generally will be a taxable transaction to a U.S. Holder in any of the following circumstances: (1) the U.S. Holder receives cash in exchange for its Allowed 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claim in connection with the
Restructuring Transaction, (2) the Restructuring Transactions are structured as a Newco Acquisition, (3) the issuer of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loan is an entity other than RCPC, (4) the 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims or the First Lien Take-Back Term
Loans are not securities for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
|
a. |
Potential Recapitalization Treatment.
|
|
(i)
|
Treatment of a Debt Instrument as a “Security.”
|
As noted above, whether a debt instrument constitutes a “security” for U.S. federal income tax purposes is determined based on
all the relevant facts and circumstances, but most authorities have held that the length of the term of a debt instrument at initial issuance is an important factor in determining whether such instrument is a security for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. These authorities have indicated that a term of less than five years is evidence that the instrument is not a security, whereas a term of ten years or more is evidence that it is a security. The First-Lien Take-Back Term Loans are expected
to have a term to maturity of five (5) years. The term to maturity of the 2020 Term B-1 Loans is less clear. In general, 2020 Term B-1 Loans have a term of slightly more than five (5) years; however, any 2020 Term B-1 Loans issued in exchange for
2016 Term Loans may be viewed for applicable tax purposes as having a term of approximately nine (9) years to the extent that, as anticipated, such 2020 Term B-1 Loans are treated as a modification of the 2016 Term Loans that is not a “significant
modification” under applicable Treasury Regulations. There are numerous other factors that could be taken into account in determining whether a debt instrument is a security, including the security for payment, the creditworthiness of the obligor,
the subordination or lack thereof with respect to other creditors, the right to vote or otherwise participate in the management of the obligor, convertibility of the instrument into an equity interest of the obligor, whether payments of interest are
fixed, variable, or contingent, whether such instrument is deemed to be in exchange for another debt instrument and whether such payments are made on a current basis or accrued.
If the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans and 2020 Term B-1 Loans constitute “securities” for U.S. federal income tax purposes and the issuer of the
First Lien Take-Back Term Loans is RCPC, the U.S. Debtors would expect a U.S. Holder’s exchange of Allowed 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims for First Lien Take-Back Debt as part of a Restructuring in Place transaction to constitute a recapitalization
within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(E) of the Tax Code. In such case, a U.S. Holder will generally not recognize gain or loss on the exchange, subject to the discussion of the “Distributions Attributable to Accrued Interest (and OID)” and “U.S.
Holders Who Hold Claims In Multiple Classes” below . Market discount on the 2020 Term B-1 Loans (if any) would carry over to the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans (see “Market Discount” discussion below). A U.S. Holder’s aggregate tax basis in the
First Lien Take-Back Term Loans received in the exchange should be equal to its aggregate tax basis in the 2020 Term B-1 Loans surrendered therefor . A U.S. Holder’s holding period for its First Lien Take-Back Term Loans should include the holding
period for the 2020 Term B-1 Loans exchanged therefor. If the 2020 Term B-1 Loans or the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans do not constitute “securities” for U.S. federal income tax purposes, subject to the discussion under “U.S. Holders Who Hold
Claims In Multiple Classes” below, the exchange would be fully taxable to U.S. Holders of such claims as described above and below.
|
b. |
Fully Taxable Exchange
|
As noted above, and subject to the discussion under “U.S. Holders Who Hold Claims In Multiple Classes” below, if the Restructuring Transactions are
structured as a Newco Acquisition, the holders of 2020 Term B-1 Loans receive cash in lieu of First Lien Take-Back Term Loans, RCPC is not the issuer on the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans or the 2020 Term B-1 Loans or First Lien Take-Back Term
Loans do not constitute “securities” for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the exchange of Allowed 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims for First Lien Take-Back Term Loans or cash will, in each case, be a fully taxable exchange, in which case such U.S.
Holders will be treated as exchanging their Claims for First Lien Take-Back Term Loans or cash, as the case may be, in a fully taxable exchange under section 1001 of the Tax Code. A U.S. Holder of an Allowed 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claim should
recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between (a) the “issue price” (if RCPC is the issuer) or fair market value (if RCPC is not the issuer) of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans or the amount of cash, as applicable, received in exchange
for its Claim (subject to the discussion of “Distributions Attributable to Accrued Interest (and OID)” below) and (b) the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in its Claim. A U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans should be
equal to the “issue price” (if RCPC is the issuer) or fair market value (if RCPC is not the issuer) of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans (determined as discussed below). A U.S. Holder’s holding period for the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans
received on the Effective Date should begin on the day following the Effective Date.
|
c. |
Character of Gain or Loss
|
The character of gain or loss as capital gain or loss or as ordinary income or loss will be determined by a number of factors,
including the tax status of the U.S. Holder, whether the Claim was purchased at a discount, and whether and to what extent the U.S. Holder previously has claimed a bad debt deduction with respect to its Claim. If recognized gain is capital gain, it
generally would be long-term capital gain if the U.S. Holder held its Claim for more than one year at the time of the exchange. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to certain limitations as discussed below. To the extent that a portion of
the consideration received in exchange for its Claim is allocable to accrued but untaxed interest, the U.S. Holder may recognize ordinary income. See the discussions of “Accrued Interest,” “Market Discount” and “Limitations on Use of Capital Losses”
below.
|
3.
|
Consequences of the Exchange to U.S. Holders of Allowed 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims.
|
Pursuant to the Plan, in full satisfaction and discharge of their Claims, each U.S. Holder of an Allowed 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claim
will receive New Common Stock and Equity Subscription Rights.
|
a. |
Newco Acquisition or Restructure in Place
|
Subject to the discussion below with respect to consequences if RCPC is Reorganized Holdings and the discussion under “U.S. Holders Who Hold Claims In
Multiple Classes” below, regardless of whether the Restructuring Transactions are structured as a Newco Acquisition or a Restructuring in Place, a U.S. Holder of an Allowed 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claim should be treated as exchanging their Claims for the
New Common Stock and the Equity Subscription Rights in a fully taxable exchange under section 1001 of the Tax Code. A U.S. Holder of an Allowed 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claim should recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between (a) the total fair
market value of the New Common Stock and Equity Subscription Rights received in exchange for its Claim (subject to the discussion of “Distributions Attributable to Accrued Interest (and OID)” below) and (b) the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in its
Claim, reduced, in the case of a U.S. Holder of Allowed 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims treated as contingent payment debt instruments under applicable Treasury Regulations, by any negative adjustment carryforward of such Holder in respect of such Claims
pursuant to Treasury Regulations Section 1.1275-4(b)(6)(iii)(C). A U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the New Common Stock should be equal to the fair market value of the New Common Stock and its tax basis in the Equity Subscription Rights should be equal
to the fair market value of the Equity Subscription Rights. A U.S. Holder’s holding period for each item of consideration received on the Effective Date should begin on the day following the Effective Date. The rules governing “contingent payment
debt instruments” such as a subset of the Allowed 2020 B-2 Loan Claims are complex and consequences for U.S. Holders of such claims may be different than as set forth above and below. U.S. Holders of the 2020 Term B-2 Loans issued in November, 2020
are encouraged to discuss the consequences of the Plan under Treasury Regulations governing “contingent payment debt instruments” with their own tax advisors.
|
b. |
Character of Gain or Loss
|
The character of gain or loss as capital gain or loss or as ordinary income or loss will be determined by a number of factors,
including the tax status of the U.S. Holder, whether the Claim was purchased at a discount, and whether and to what extent the U.S. Holder previously has claimed a bad debt deduction with respect to its Claim. In addition, gain recognized with
respect to those Allowed 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims treated as contingent payment debt instruments under applicable Treasury Regulations is expected to be characterized as ordinary income, and any loss may be characterized, in whole or in part, as
ordinary loss. If recognized gain is capital gain, it generally would be long-term capital gain if the U.S. Holder held its Claim for more than one year at the time of the exchange. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to certain
limitations as discussed below. To the extent that a portion of the consideration received in exchange for its Claim is allocable to accrued but untaxed interest, the U.S. Holder may recognize ordinary income. See the
discussions of “Accrued Interest,” “Market Discount” and “Limitations on Use of Capital Losses” below.
|
c. |
Possible Recapitalization Treatment.
|
If, notwithstanding the above, RCPC is Reorganized Holdings, and subject to the discussion under “U.S. Holders Who Hold Claims In Multiple Classes”
below, the extent to which U.S. Holders of Allowed 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims will recognize gain or loss in connection with the Restructuring Transactions will depend upon whether the receipt of consideration in respect of their Claims qualifies as a
recapitalization within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(E) of the Tax Code, which, in turn, will depend on whether the Claims surrendered constitute “securities” for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
As noted above, whether a debt instrument constitutes a “security” for U.S. federal income tax purposes is determined
based on all the relevant facts and circumstances, but most authorities have held that the length of the term of a debt instrument at initial issuance is an important factor in determining whether such instrument is a security for U.S. federal
income tax purposes. These authorities have indicated that a term of less than five years is evidence that the instrument is not a security, whereas a term of ten years or more is evidence that it is a security. The 2020 Term B-2 Loans issued in
November, 2020 had a term to maturity of slightly less than five (5) years when issued. The term to maturity of the 2020 Term B-2 Loans issued in May, 2020 is less clear. In general, 2020 Term B-2 Loans issued in May, 2020 have a term of slightly
more than five (5) years; however, any 2020 Term B-2 Loans issued in exchange for 2016 Term Loans may be viewed for applicable tax purposes as having a term of approximately nine (9) years to the extent that, as anticipated, such 2020 Term B-2
Loans are treated as a modification of the 2016 Term Loans that is not a “significant modification” under applicable Treasury Regulations. There are numerous other factors that could be taken into account in determining whether a debt instrument is
a security, including the security for payment, the creditworthiness of the obligor, the subordination or lack thereof with respect to other creditors, the right to vote or otherwise participate in the management of the obligor, convertibility of
the instrument into an equity interest of the obligor, whether payments of interest are fixed, variable, or contingent, whether such instrument is deemed to be in exchange for another debt instrument and whether such payments are made on a current
basis or accrued. Holders of such Claims are urged to consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of such treatment.
If a U.S. Holder’s 2020 Term B-2 Loans constitute “securities” for U.S. federal income tax purposes and RCPC is Reorganized Holdings, the U.S.
Debtors would expect a U.S. Holder’s exchange of applicable Allowed 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims for New Common Stock and Equity Subscription Rights to constitute a recapitalization within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(E) of the Tax Code. In such
case, a U.S. Holder will generally not recognize gain or loss on the exchange, subject to the discussion of “Distributions Attributable to Accrued Interest (and OID)” and “U.S. Holders Who Hold Claims In Multiple Classes” below. A U.S. Holder’s
aggregate tax basis in the New Common Stock and Equity Subscription Rights received in the exchange should be equal to its aggregate tax basis in the applicable 2020 Term B-2 Loans surrendered in the exchange, generally allocated between such U.S.
Holder’s New Common Stock and Equity Subscription Rights pro rata in accordance with the relative fair market value of such instruments. A U.S. Holder’s holding period for its New Common Stock and Equity Subscription Rights should include the
holding period for the applicable 2020 Term B-2 Loans exchanged therefor. If a U.S. Holder’s 2020 Term B-2 Loans do not constitute “securities” for U.S. federal income tax purposes, subject to the discussion under “U.S. Holders Who Hold Claims In
Multiple Classes” below, the exchange would be fully taxable to U.S. Holders of such claims as described above.
A U.S. Holder of Allowed 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims that exchanges such Claims for New Common Stock and Equity Subscription Rights would be subject
to treatment similar to that described above if Revlon, Inc. is Reorganized Holdings, but RCPC is converted to a limited liability company disregarded as separate from Revlon, Inc. for U.S. federal income tax purposes in connection with the
Restructuring Transactions.
|
4.
|
Consequences of the Exchange to U.S. Holders of Allowed
Unsecured Notes Claims.
|
Pursuant to the Plan, Holders of Unsecured Notes Claims may receive New Warrants in full satisfaction and discharge of their
Claims, or such Holders’ claims may be cancelled, released, and extinguished, and of no further force or effect, with no recovery or distribution on account thereof, depending on whether Holders of Unsecured Notes Claims vote to accept the Plan,
whether individual Holders of Unsecured Notes Claims are Consenting Unsecured Noteholders, and whether the Court finds the treatment of Consenting Unsecured Noteholders proper.
|
a. |
U.S. Holders of Allowed Unsecured Notes Claims Receiving New Warrants
|
Regardless of whether the Restructuring Transactions are structured as a Newco Acquisition or a Restructuring in Place, but subject to the discussion
under “U.S. Holders Who Hold Claims In Multiple Classes” below, a U.S. Holder of an Allowed Unsecured Notes Claim that receives New Warrants in exchange for its Claim should be treated as exchanging its Claim for the New Warrants in a fully taxable
exchange under section 1001 of the Tax Code. A U.S. Holder of an Allowed Unsecured Notes Claim should recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between (a) the total fair market value of the New Warrants received in exchange for its Claim
(subject to the discussion of “Distributions Attributable to Accrued Interest (and OID)” below) and (b) the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in its Claim. A U.S. Holder’s tax basis in New Warrants should be equal to the fair market value of the New
Warrants. A U.S. Holder’s holding period for the New Warrants should begin on the day following the Effective Date.
|
b. |
Character of Gain or Loss For U.S. Holders of Allowed Unsecured Notes Claims Receiving New Warrants
|
The character of gain or loss as capital gain or loss or as ordinary income or loss will be determined by a number of factors,
including the tax status of the U.S. Holder, whether the Claim was purchased at a discount, and whether and to what extent the U.S. Holder previously has claimed a bad debt deduction with respect to its Claim. If recognized gain is capital gain, it
generally would be long-term capital gain if the U.S. Holder held its Claim for more than one year at the time of the exchange. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to certain limitations as discussed below. To the extent that a portion of
the consideration received in exchange for its Claim is allocable to accrued but untaxed interest, the U.S. Holder may recognize ordinary income. See the discussions of “Accrued Interest,” “Market Discount” and “Limitations on Use of Capital Losses”
below.
|
c. |
U.S. Holders of Allowed Unsecured Notes Claims Receiving No Recovery
|
If a Holder of Allowed Unsecured Notes Claim receives no recovery in respect of its Claim, subject to the discussion under “U.S. Holders Who Hold Claims In Multiple Classes” below, such holder should generally recognize
a capital loss equal to the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in its Claim. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to certain limitations as discussed in “Limitations on Use of Capital Losses” below.
5. U.S. Holders Who Hold Claims In Multiple Classes.
It is possible that applicable U.S. federal income tax rules will require a U.S. Holder to determine the consequences of the exchange of such U.S.
Holder’s Claims pursuant to the Restructuring Transactions in the aggregate, not Claim by Claim. Accordingly, if a U.S. Holder is deemed to exchange a Claim for New Common Stock, Equity Subscription Rights and/or First-Lien Take Back Debt in a
transaction treated as a “recapitalization” for U.S. federal income tax purposes, recoveries received in connection with the Restructuring Transactions in exchanges that do not, on their own, qualify as “recapitalizations” for U.S. federal income
tax purposes as described above and below may be treated as “boot” received in a “recapitalization,” and not as a recovery received in a fully taxable transaction. If such recovery is treated as “boot” received in a “recapitalization,” a U.S.
Holder will generally not recognize loss on the exchange, but may recognize gain on the exchange to the extent of any cash and the fair market value of any other “boot” received in exchange for their Claims, subject to the discussion of
“Distributions Attributable to Accrued Interest (and OID)” below. A U.S. Holder’s aggregate tax basis in the New Common Stock, Equity Subscription Rights and/or First-Lien Take Back Debt received in an exchange that would, on its own, qualify as a
“recapitalization” should be equal to its aggregate tax basis in the Claims surrendered by such U.S. Holder pursuant to the Restructuring Transactions plus any gain recognized in connection with the Restructuring Transactions minus the fair market
value of any “boot” received. Such aggregate tax basis should generally be allocated between such U.S. Holder’s New Common Stock, Equity Subscription Rights and/or First-Lien Take Back Debt (as applicable) pro rata in accordance with the relative
fair market value of such instruments. A U.S. Holder’s holding period for such New Common Stock, Equity Subscription Rights and/or First-Lien Take Back Debt should include the holding period for the applicable Claims exchanged therefor. A U.S.
Holder’s aggregate tax basis in any boot received in the exchange should be equal to the fair market value of such boot on the date of the exchange. A U.S. Holder’s holding period for any boot received in the exchange will begin on the day
following the exchange.
Similar treatment would apply to a U.S. Holder who receives New Common Stock, Equity Subscription Rights and/or First Lien Take Back Debt issued by
Revlon, Inc. as Reorganized Holdings (or, in the case of First Lien Take-Back Debt, an entity disregarded as separate from Revlon, Inc. for U.S. federal income tax purposes) in exchange for Claims against RCPC that constitute “securities” for U.S.
federal income tax purposes if RCPC is converted to a limited liability company disregarded as separate from Revlon, Inc. for U.S. federal income tax purposes in connection with the Restructuring Transactions.
|
6.
|
Distributions Attributable to Accrued Interest (and OID).
|
A portion of the consideration received by U.S. Holders of Allowed Claims may be attributable to
accrued but untaxed interest (or original issue discount (“OID”)) on such Claims. If any amount is attributable to such accrued interest (or OID), then such amount should be taxable to
that U.S. Holder as interest income if such accrued interest has not been previously included in the U.S. Holder’s gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Conversely, U.S. Holders of Allowed Claims should be able to recognize a
deductible loss to the extent any accrued interest on the Claims was previously included in the U.S. Holder’s gross income but was not paid in full by the Debtors.
If the fair value of the consideration is not sufficient to fully satisfy all principal and interest on an Allowed Claim, the
extent to which such consideration will be attributable to accrued but untaxed interest is unclear. Under the Plan, the aggregate consideration to be distributed to U.S. Holders of Allowed Claims in each Class will be allocated first to the principal
amount of such Allowed Claims (as determined for United States federal income tax purposes), with any excess allocated to the remaining portion of such Claims, if any. There is no assurance that the IRS will respect such allocation.
U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the allocation of consideration received under the plan, as
well as the deductibility of accrued but unpaid interest and the character of any loss claimed with respect to accrued but unpaid interest previously included in gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Under the “market discount” provisions of the Tax Code, some or all of any gain realized by a U.S. Holder of a Claim who
exchanges a Claim on the Effective Date may be treated as ordinary income (instead of capital gain) to the extent of the amount of accrued “market discount” on the debt instruments constituting the exchanged Claim. In general, a debt instrument is
considered to have been acquired with “market discount” if it is acquired other than on original issue and if the holder’s adjusted tax basis in the debt instrument is less than (i) the sum of all remaining payments to be made on the debt instrument,
excluding “qualified stated interest” or (ii) in the case of a debt instrument issued with original issue discount, its adjusted issue price, by at least a de minimis amount (equal to 0.25% of the sum of all remaining payments to be made on the debt
instrument, excluding qualified stated interest, multiplied by the number of remaining whole years to maturity).
Any gain recognized by a U.S. Holder on the taxable disposition of a Claim that had been acquired with market discount should be
treated as ordinary income to the extent of the market discount that accrued thereon while the Claim was considered to be held by the U.S. Holder (unless the U.S. Holder elected to include market discount in income as it accrued). To the extent that
the Allowed Claims that were acquired with market discount are exchanged in certain tax-free transactions for other property, any market discount that accrued on the Allowed Claims (i.e., up to the time of the exchange) but was not recognized by the
U.S. Holder is carried over to the property received therefor and any gain recognized on the subsequent sale, exchange, redemption, or other disposition of the property is treated as ordinary income to the extent of the accrued, but not recognized,
market discount with respect to the exchanged debt instrument. To date, specific Treasury Regulations implementing this rule have not been issued. U.S. Holders of Allowed Claims who acquired the notes underlying their Claims with market discount are
urged to consult with their own tax advisors as to the appropriate treatment of any such market discount and the timing of the recognition thereof.
|
8.
|
Issue Price of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans.
|
If, as is anticipated, the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans and the New Money Facility are treated as a single “issue” for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, the issue price of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans will depend on whether a “substantial amount” of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans and New Money Facility are considered to have been issued for money. If a “substantial amount” of
the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans and New Money Facility are treated as issued for money, the issue price of each debt instrument in the issue will be the first price at which a substantial amount of the debt instruments is sold for money (ignoring
bond houses, brokers and other similar persons). Whether a “substantial amount” of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans and New Money Facility are considered to have been issued for money will depend, among other factors, on whether the New Money
Facility has a principal amount of sufficient size to constitute a “substantial amount” of the aggregate principal amount of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans and the New Money Facility.
If the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans and New Money Facility are not treated as a single “issue” or a “substantial amount” of the First Lien
Take-Back Term Loans and New Money Facility are not considered to have been issued for money, the issue price of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans will depend on whether a substantial amount of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans and 2020 Term B-1
Loans are considered to be “traded on an established market.” In general, a debt instrument will be treated as traded on an established market if, at any time during the 31-day period ending 15 days after the issue date, (a) a “sales price” for an
executed purchase or sale of the debt instrument during the 31-day period appears on a medium that is made available to issuers of debt instruments, persons that regularly purchase or sell debt instruments, or persons that broker purchases or sales
of debt instruments; (b) a “firm” price quote for the debt instrument is available from at least one broker, dealer or pricing service and the quoted price is substantially the same as the price for which the person receiving the quoted price could
purchase or sell the debt instrument; or (c) an “indicative” price quote for the debt instrument is available from at least one broker, dealer or pricing service for property and the price quote is not a firm quote.
If a debt instrument that is not part of an issue a “substantial amount” of which is considered to have been issued for money is considered to be
traded on an established market, then the issue price of such debt instrument is its fair market value on its date of issuance. Therefore, if the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans are treated as traded on an established market at the Effective Date and
are not treated as part of an issue a “substantial amount” of which is considered to have been issued for money, the issue price of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans will be their fair market value on the Effective Date.
If the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans are not part of an issue a “substantial amount” of which is considered to have been issued for money and are
not treated as traded on an established market and the 2020 Term B-1 Loans are treated as traded on an established market, the issue price of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans will be based on the fair market value of the 2020 Term B-1 Loans. If
the issue price of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans is determined based on the fair market value of the First Lien Take Back Term Loans or the 2020 Term B-1 Loans, the Reorganized Debtors would be required to provide to U.S. Holders the
Reorganized Debtors’ determination of the issue price of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans, and the Reorganized Debtors’ determination of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans’ issue price would be binding on U.S. Holders unless the holder explicitly
discloses that its determination is different from the Reorganized Debtors’ on its U.S. federal income tax return.
If none of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans or the 2020 Term B-1 Loans are treated as traded on an established market and the First Lien Take-Back
Term Loans are not part of an issue a “substantial amount” of which is considered to have been issued for money, the issue price of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans is expected to be equal to the stated redemption price at maturity of the First
Lien Take-Back Term Loans.
|
9.
|
Limitation on Use of Capital Losses.
|
A U.S. Holder of a Claim who recognizes capital losses as a result of the distributions under the Plan will be subject to limits
on the use of such capital losses. For a non-corporate U.S. Holder, capital losses may be used to offset any capital gains (without regard to holding periods), and also ordinary income to the extent of the lesser of (a) $3,000 ($1,500 for married
individuals filing separate returns) or (b) the excess of the capital losses over the capital gains. A non-corporate U.S. Holder may carry over unused capital losses and apply them against future capital gains and a portion of their ordinary income
for an unlimited number of years. For corporate U.S. Holders, capital losses may only be used to offset capital gains. A corporate U.S. Holder that has more capital losses than may be used in a tax year may carry back unused capital losses to the
three years preceding the capital loss year or may carry over unused capital losses for the five years following the capital loss year.
|
C. |
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the GUC Trust and PI Settlement Fund
|
Pursuant to the Plan, each Holder of an Allowed Talc Personal Injury Claim (provided that the Holders of such Class vote to
approve the Plan) will receive, in full and final satisfaction of its applicable claim, the right to receive certain payments, in cash, from the PI Settlement Fund, and each Holder of an Allowed Trade Claim, Allowed Non-Qualified Pension Claim and
Allowed Other General Unsecured Claim (provided that the Holders of each such Class vote to approve the Plan) will receive, in full and final satisfaction of its applicable claim, the right to receive certain payments, in cash, from the GUC Trust.
The PI Settlement Fund and GUC Trust will, in each case, be established pursuant to the Plan for the benefit of the Holders of such Claims and funded by the Debtors with cash and certain Retained Preference Actions. Any claims in a Class that does
not vote to approve the Plan will be cancelled, released and extinguished, and Holders thereof will receive no recovery in respect of their Claims.
On the Effective Date, solely in the event that any Class of General Unsecured Claims votes to accept the Plan, the GUC Trust
shall be established for the benefit of the GUC Trust Beneficiaries, and the Debtors will transfer to the GUC Trust the GUC Trust Assets, free and clear of all Claims, Interests, liens, and other encumbrances.
On the Effective Date, solely in the event that Class 9(a) votes to accept the Plan, the PI Settlement Fund shall be established
in accordance with the terms of the PI Settlement Fund Agreement and the Plan, and the Debtors will transfer to the PI Settlement Fund the PI Settlement Fund Assets, free and clear of all Claims, Interests, liens, and other encumbrances.
|
a. |
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to the GUC Trust Beneficiaries
|
In general, a GUC Trust Beneficiary will recognize gain or loss in connection with the Restructuring Transactions with respect to
its Allowed Trade Claim and Allowed Other General Unsecured Claim in an amount equal to the difference between (i) the fair market value of its undivided interest in the GUC Trust Assets consistent with its economic rights in the GUC Trust received
in respect of its Claim and (ii) the adjusted tax basis of the Allowed Trade Claim or Allowed Other General Unsecured Claim exchanged therefor, while a Holder of an Allowed Non-Qualified Pension Claim may have compensation income (and be subject to
applicable withholding and payroll taxes) in respect of its undivided interest in GUC Trust Assets. Pursuant to the Plan, the GUC Administrator will in good faith value the assets transferred to the GUC Trust, and all parties must consistently use
such valuation for all U.S. federal income tax purposes.
In the event of the subsequent disallowance of any Disputed Claim or the reallocation of undeliverable distributions, or in the
event that additional amounts are transferred by the Reorganized Debtors to the GUC Trust after the Effective Date as provided in the Plan, it is possible that a holder of a previously Allowed Claim may receive additional distributions in respect of
its Claim. Accordingly, it is possible that the recognition of any loss realized by a holder with respect to an Allowed Trade Claim and/or Allowed Other General Unsecured Claim may be deferred until all Trade Claims, Non-Qualified Pension Claims and
Other General Unsecured Claims are Allowed or Disallowed, and the aggregate amount to be transferred by the Reorganized Debtors to the GUC Trust is known. Alternatively, it is possible that a holder will have additional gain or income in respect of
any additional distributions received. See also the discussion of “Tax Reporting for GUC Trust Assets Allocable to Disputed Claims” below.
Any gain or loss recognized with respect to an Allowed Trade Claim and/or Allowed Other General Unsecured Claim may be long-term
capital gain or loss if the Claim disposed of is a capital asset in the hands of the Holder and has been held for more than one year. The amount of cash or other property received by a Holder in respect of accrued but unpaid interest or OID should be
taxed as ordinary income, except to the extent previously included in income by a holder under its method of accounting. See the discussion of “Distributions Attributable to Accrued Interest (and OID)” below. Each Holder of an Allowed Trade Claim
and/or Allowed Other General Unsecured Claim is urged to consult its tax advisor to determine whether gain or loss recognized by such Holder will be long-term capital gain or loss and the specific tax effect thereof on such Holder.
A Holder’s aggregate tax basis in its undivided interest in the GUC Trust Assets (other than those allocable to Disputed Claims)
will generally equal the fair market value of such interest, and a Holder’s holding period in such assets generally will begin the day following establishment of the GUC Trust.
The market discount provisions of the IRC may apply to holders of certain Claims. See the discussion of “Market Discount” below.
|
b. |
U.S. Federal Income Tax Classification of the GUC Trust
|
The GUC Trust shall be established for the sole purpose of liquidating and distributing its assets, in accordance with Treasury
Regulations Section 301.7701-4(d) and as a “grantor trust” for federal income tax purposes, pursuant to sections 671 through 679 of the Tax Code, with no objective to continue or engage in the conduct of a trade of business. In general, a liquidating
trust is not a separate taxable entity but rather is treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as a “grantor” trust (i.e., a pass-through entity). The IRS,
in Revenue Procedure 94-45, 1994-2 C.B. 684, set forth the general criteria for obtaining an IRS ruling as to the grantor trust status of a liquidating trust under a Chapter 11 plan. The GUC Trust will be structured with the intention of complying
with such general criteria.
Pursuant to the Plan, and in conformity with Revenue Procedure 94-45, all parties (including, without limitation, the Debtors,
the GUC Administrator, and Holders of interests in the GUC Trust) shall treat the transfer of GUC Trust Assets to the GUC Trust as (i) a transfer of the GUC Trust Assets directly to Holders of GUC Trust Interests (other than to the extent GUC Trust
Assets are allocable to Disputed Claims), followed by (ii) the transfer by such beneficiaries to the GUC Trust of GUC Trust Assets in exchange for GUC Trust Interests. Accordingly, Holders of GUC Trust Interests should be treated for U.S. federal
income tax purposes as the grantors and deemed owners of the GUC Trust and thus, the direct owners of their respective share of GUC Trust Assets (other than such GUC Trust Assets as are allocable to Disputed Claims).
While the following discussion assumes that the GUC Trust would be so treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes, no ruling
will be requested from the IRS concerning the tax status of the GUC Trust as a grantor trust. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS would not take a contrary position to the classification of the GUC Trust as a grantor trust. If the IRS
were to successfully challenge such classification, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to the GUC Trust and the GUC Trust Beneficiaries could vary from those discussed herein.
|
c. |
General Tax Reporting by the GUC Trust and Holders of GUC Trust Interests
|
In accordance with the treatment of the GUC Trust as a liquidating trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes, all parties must
treat the GUC Trust as a grantor trust of which the Holders of GUC Trust Interests are the owners and grantors, and treat the Holders of GUC Trust Interests as the direct owners of an undivided interest in the GUC Trust Assets (other than any assets
allocable to Disputed Claims) for all U.S. federal income tax purposes, consistent with their economic interests therein. The GUC Administrator will file tax returns for the GUC Trust treating the GUC Trust as a grantor trust pursuant to Treasury
Regulations Section 1.671-4(a).
Items of taxable income, gain, loss, deduction, and/or credit of the GUC Trust (other than otherwise accounted for in a “disputed
ownership fund”) shall be allocated among the holders of GUC Trust Interests in accordance with their relative ownership of GUC Trust Interests.
As soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective Date, the GUC Administrator shall make (or cause to be made) a good faith
valuation of the GUC Trust Assets, and such valuation shall be used consistently by all parties for United States federal income tax purposes. The GUC Trust shall also file (or cause to be filed) any other statements, returns or disclosures relating
to the GUC Trust that are required by any government unit for taxing purposes.
The U.S. federal income tax obligations of a holder with respect to its GUC Trust Interests are not dependent on the GUC Trust
distributing any cash or other proceeds. Thus, a holder may incur a U.S. federal income tax liability with respect to its allocable share of the GUC Trust’s income even if the GUC Trust does not make a concurrent distribution to the holder. In
general, other than in respect of cash retained on account of Disputed Claims and distributions resulting from undeliverable distributions, a distribution of cash by the GUC Trust will not be separately taxable to a holder of GUC Trust Interest as
the beneficiary is already regarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes as owning the underlying assets (and was taxed at the time the cash was earned or received by the GUC Trust). Holders of GUC Trust Interests are urged to consult their tax
advisors regarding the appropriate U.S. federal income tax treatment of any subsequent distributions of cash originally retained by the GUC Trust on account of Disputed Claims.
The GUC Administrator will comply with all applicable governmental withholding requirements. Thus in the case of any non-U.S.
Holders, the GUC Administrator may be required to withhold up to 30% of the income or proceeds allocable to such persons, depending on the circumstances (including whether the type of income is subject to a lower treaty rate or is otherwise excluded
from withholding). Non-U.S. Holders are urged to consult their tax advisors with respect to the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Plan, including holding GUC Trust Interests.
The GUC Administrator will also cooperate with the Reorganized Debtors to ensure that any distributions made in respect of Claims
that are in the nature of compensation for services are subject to appropriate payroll withholding and reporting, and that any applicable payroll taxes associated therewith are properly remitted. The employer portion of any payroll taxes attributed
to Claims that are in the nature of compensation for services shall be borne solely by the Reorganized Debtors. Holders of such Claims are urged to consult their tax advisors with respect to the U.S. federal, state and local income tax consequences
of the Plan, including holding GUC Trust Interests.
|
d. |
Tax Reporting for GUC Trust Assets Allocable to Disputed Claims
|
Subject to definitive guidance from the IRS or a court of competent jurisdiction to the contrary (or the receipt of an adverse
determination by the IRS upon audit if not contested by the GUC Administrator), the GUC Administrator (i) may elect to treat any GUC Trust Assets allocable to, or retained on account of, Disputed Claims (i.e., a Disputed Claims Reserve) as a “disputed ownership fund” governed by Treasury Regulations Section 1.468B-9, if applicable, and (ii) to the extent permitted by applicable law, will report
consistently for state and local income tax purposes. Accordingly, if a “disputed ownership fund” election is made with respect to a Disputed Claims Reserve, such reserve will be subject to tax annually on a separate entity basis on any net income
earned with respect to such reserve (including any gain recognized upon the disposition of such assets). All distributions from such reserve (which distributions will be net of the expenses, including taxes, relating to the retention or disposition
of such assets) will generally be treated as received by holders in respect of their Claims as if distributed by the Debtors at such time. All parties (including, without limitation, the Debtors, the GUC Administrator, and the holders of GUC Trust
Interests) will be required to report for tax purposes consistently with the foregoing. A Disputed Claims Reserve will be responsible for payment, out of the assets of the Disputed Claims Reserve, of any taxes imposed on the Disputed Claims Reserve
or its assets; provided, however, pursuant to the Plan, such taxes will be paid from the GUC Trust/PI Fund Operating Reserve .
|
a. |
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to the Holders of Allowed Talc Personal Injury Claims
|
The Plan provides that: (i) on the Effective Date, in the event that Class 9(a) votes to accept the Plan, the PI Settlement Fund
shall be established in accordance with the terms of the PI Settlement Fund Agreement and the Plan, (ii) the Debtors will transfer to the PI Settlement Fund the PI Settlement Fund Assets, free and clear of all Claims, Interests, liens, and other
encumbrances, and (iii) distributions in respect of Talc Personal Injury Claims shall be exclusively from the PI Settlement Fund. The Plan further provides that the PI Settlement Fund is intended to be treated as a “qualified settlement fund” for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, assuming this treatment is respected for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. Holder of a Talc Personal Injury Claim generally is not expected to be treated as receiving a distribution from the PI
Settlement Fund unless and until such holder is entitled to receive that distribution directly. The U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder of a Talc Personal Injury Claim generally will depend upon the nature and origin of the Claim
and the particular circumstances applicable to such holder. Amounts received or treated as received by a U.S. Holder of a Talc Personal Injury Claim may not be taxable to such holder for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent they represent
payment for damages received on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness, within the meaning section 104 of the Tax Code. However, in the event a payment is treated as attributable to medical expense deductions allowed under section
213 of the Tax Code for a prior taxable year, such payment may be taxable as ordinary income to the U.S. Holder. To the extent a payment from the PI Settlement Fund is treated as a payment on account of damages in respect of a Claim other than for
personal physical injury or physical sickness, whether the payment will be includable in the gross income of the holder will depend upon the nature and origin of the Claim and the particular circumstances applicable to the holder, including whether
the holder has previously claimed deductions or losses for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to such Claim. Because the tax consequences under the Plan relevant to U.S. Holders of Talc Personal Injury Claims will depend on facts
particular to each holder, all U.S. Holders of Talc Personal Injury Claims are urged to consult their own tax advisors as to their proper tax treatment under their particular facts and circumstances.
|
b. |
U.S. Federal Income Tax Treatment of the PI Settlement Fund
|
The Plan provides that the PI Settlement Fund is intended to be treated as a qualified settlement fund for U.S. federal income
tax purposes, and the remainder of this discussion assumes that this treatment is respected. The Plan further provides that all parties (including, without limitation, the Debtors, the PI Claims Administrator and the holders of Talc Personal Injury
Claims) will be required to treat the PI Settlement Fund as a qualified settlement fund for all applicable tax reporting purposes.
The PI Settlement Fund will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on its modified gross income, if any, at the highest marginal
rate provided under the Tax Code for a trust in a taxable year. The PI Settlement Fund’s modified gross income means its gross income less certain allowed deductions, including but not limited to administration fees, expenses for accounting and legal
services, claims processing expenses and other expenses. The PI Claims Administrator, as administrator, will be required to file tax returns on behalf of the PI Settlement Fund and will be responsible for causing the PI Settlement Fund to pay all
taxes, if any, imposed on its modified gross income; provided, however, pursuant to the Plan, such taxes will be paid from the GUC Trust/PI Fund Operating
Reserve.
|
D. |
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of Ownership and Disposition of the
First Lien Take-Back Term Loans.
|
|
1.
|
Characterization of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans.
|
A debt instrument that provides for one or more contingent payments may implicate the provisions of the Treasury Regulations
relating to “contingent payment debt obligations,” in which case the timing and amount of income inclusions and the character of income recognized may be different from the consequences described herein. Under such Treasury Regulations, however, one
or more contingencies will not cause a debt instrument to be treated as a contingent payment debt instrument if, as of the issue date, such contingencies in the aggregate are considered “remote” or “incidental.”
In addition, the Treasury Regulations contain exceptions from the characterization as contingent payment debt obligations for a
number of categories of debt instruments, including “variable rate debt instruments.” A debt instrument qualifies as a “variable rate debt instrument” if (a) the issue price does not exceed the total non-contingent principal payments due under the
debt instrument by more than a specified de minimis amount and (b) the debt instrument provides for stated interest, paid or compounded at least annually, at current values of a single fixed rate and one or more qualified floating rates. A “qualified
floating rate” is any variable rate where variations in the value of such rate can reasonably be expected to measure contemporaneous variations in the cost of newly borrowed funds in the currency in which the debt instrument is denominated.
The Debtors currently intend to treat the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans as, and the remainder of this discussion assumes that
the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans will be treated as, variable rate debt instruments and not as contingent payment debt instruments. However, Reorganized Holdings’ treatment of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans ultimately will be based on the
final terms and conditions as between the Debtors and other relevant stakeholders. Such treatment will be binding on a U.S. Holder, unless the U.S. Holder explicitly discloses to the IRS on its tax return for the year during which such U.S. Holder
acquires an interest in the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans that it is taking a different position. Our position will not be binding on the IRS. Each U.S. Holder is urged to consult its own tax advisor regarding our determination.
|
2.
|
Qualified Stated Interest.
|
A U.S. Holder of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans will be required to include stated interest that accrues on the First Lien
Take-Back Term Loans in income in accordance with the U.S. Holder’s regular method of accounting to the extent such stated interest is “qualified stated interest.” Stated interest is generally “qualified stated interest” if it is unconditionally
payable in cash or property at least annually at a single fixed rate or, subject to certain conditions, based on one or more interest indices. If any interest payment (or portion thereof) is payable in additional debt instruments of the issuer, such
interest payment (or portion thereof) will not be treated as qualified stated interest.
|
3.
|
Original Issue Discount.
|
A debt instrument generally has OID if its “stated redemption price at maturity” exceeds its “issue price” by more than a de minimis amount (generally 0.25% of the product of the stated redemption price at maturity and the number of complete years to maturity from the issue date).
The amount of OID (if any) on the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans will be the difference between the “stated redemption price at
maturity” (the sum of all payments to be made on the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans other than “qualified stated interest,” including certain amounts payable upon repayment or redemption of the debt instrument) of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans
and the “issue price” of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans, determined as described above under “— Article XI.B.6 – Issue Price of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans”.
A U.S. Holder (whether a cash or accrual method taxpayer) generally will be required to include the OID in gross income (as
ordinary interest income) as the OID accrues (on a constant yield to maturity basis), in advance of the Holder’s receipt of cash payments attributable to this OID. In general, the amount of OID includible in the gross income of a U.S. Holder will be
equal to a ratable amount of OID with respect to the debt instrument for each day in an accrual period during the taxable year or portion of the taxable year on which a U.S. Holder held the debt instrument. An accrual period may be of any length and
the accrual periods may vary in length over the term of the debt instrument, provided that each accrual period is no longer than one year and each scheduled payment of principal or interest occurs either on the final day of an accrual period or on
the first day of an accrual period. The amount of OID allocable to any accrual period is an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (i) the product of the debt instrument’s adjusted issue price at the beginning of such accrual period and its yield to
maturity, determined on the basis of a compounding assumption that reflects the length of the accrual period over (ii) the qualified stated interest payments on the debt instruments allocable to the accrual period. The adjusted issue price of a debt
instrument at the beginning of any accrual period generally equals the issue price of the debt instrument increased by the amount of all previously accrued OID and decreased by any cash payments previously made on the debt instrument other than
payments of qualified stated interest.
Under applicable Treasury Regulations, in order to determine the amount of qualified stated interest and OID in respect of a
variable rate debt instrument for which not all interest is qualified stated interest, an “equivalent fixed rate debt instrument” must be constructed. The “equivalent fixed rate debt instrument” is a hypothetical instrument that has terms that are
identical to the debt instrument, except that the equivalent fixed rate debt instrument provides for a fixed rate substitute for each qualified floating rate in lieu of each actual rate on the debt instrument. A fixed rate substitute for each
qualified floating rate on the debt instrument is the value of such rate as of its issue date.
Once the equivalent fixed rate debt instrument has been constructed pursuant to the foregoing rules, the amount of OID and
qualified stated interest, if any, are determined for the equivalent fixed rate debt instrument by applying the general OID rules to the equivalent fixed rate debt instrument and a U.S. Holder of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans will account for
such OID and qualified stated interest as if the U.S. Holder held the equivalent fixed rate debt instrument. For each accrual period, appropriate adjustments will be made to the amount of qualified stated interest or OID assumed to have been accrued
or paid with respect to the “equivalent” fixed rate debt instrument in the event that such amounts differ from the actual amount of interest accrued or paid on the debt instrument during the accrual period. The stated redemption price at maturity of
a debt instrument is the sum of all payments provided by the debt instrument other than payments of qualified stated interest.
|
4.
|
Sale, Taxable Exchange or other Taxable Disposition.
|
Upon the disposition of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans by sale, exchange, retirement, redemption or other taxable
disposition, a U.S. Holder will generally recognize gain or loss equal to the difference, if any, between (i) the amount realized on the disposition (other than amounts attributable to accrued but unpaid interest, which will be taxed as ordinary
interest income to the extent not previously so taxed, and other than any market discount on debt instruments constituting the exchanged Claim that was not realized by the holder) and (ii) the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the First Lien
Take-Back Term Loans. A U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis will generally be equal to the holder’s initial tax basis in the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans, increased by any accrued OID previously included in such holder’s gross income. A U.S. Holder’s
gain or loss will generally constitute capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder has held such First Lien Take-Back Term Loans for longer than one year. Non-corporate taxpayers are generally subject to a
reduced tax rate on net long-term capital gains. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to certain limitations discussed below.
THE APPLICATION OF THE OID RULES IS HIGHLY
COMPLEX. U.S. HOLDERS OF FIRST LIEN TAKE-BACK TERM LOANS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR TAX
ADVISORS REGARDING THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF ANY OID ON SUCH LOANS.
If a U.S. Holder’s initial tax basis in the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans exceeds the stated redemption price at maturity of
such debt instrument, such U.S. Holder will be treated as acquiring the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans with “bond premium” and will not be required to include OID, if any, in income. Such U.S. Holder generally may elect to amortize the premium over
the remaining term of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans, on a constant yield method as an offset to qualified stated interest when includible in income under such U.S. Holder’s regular accounting method. If a U.S. Holder does not elect to amortize
the premium, that premium will decrease the gain or increase the loss such U.S. Holder would otherwise recognize on disposition of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans. Bond premium elections involve certain procedural requirements and U.S. Holders
are urged to consult their tax advisors if they acquire the First Lien Tax-Back Term Loans with bond premium.
|
E. |
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Ownership and Disposition of New Common Stock, and New Warrants.
|
|
1.
|
Dividends on New Common Stock
|
Any distributions made on account of New Common Stock will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the
extent of the current or accumulated earnings and profits of Reorganized Holdings as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. To the extent that a U.S. Holder receives distributions that would otherwise constitute dividends for U.S.
federal income tax purposes but that exceed such current and accumulated earnings and profits, such distributions will be treated first as a non-taxable return of capital reducing the U.S. Holder’s basis in its shares. Any such distributions in
excess of the U.S. Holder’s basis in its shares (determined on a share-by-share basis) generally will be treated as capital gain.
Dividends paid to U.S. Holders that are corporations generally will be eligible for the dividends-received deduction so long as
there are sufficient earnings and profits. However, the dividends-received deduction is only available if certain holding period requirements are satisfied. The length of time that a shareholder has held its stock is reduced for any period during
which the shareholder’s risk of loss with respect to the stock is diminished by reason of the existence of certain options, contracts to sell, short sales, or similar transactions. In addition, to the extent that a corporation incurs indebtedness
that is directly attributable to an investment in the stock on which the dividend is paid, all or a portion of the dividends received deduction may be disallowed.
|
2.
|
Exercise or Lapse of a New Warrant; Possible Constructive Distributions
|
|
a. |
Exercise or Lapse of a New Warrant
|
Except as discussed below with respect to the cashless exercise of a New Warrant, a U.S. Holder generally will not recognize
taxable gain or loss upon receipt of New Common Stock that such U.S. Holder acquired by exercising a New Warrant for cash. A U.S. Holder’s tax basis in New Common Stock received upon exercise of its New Warrant generally will be an amount equal to
the sum of the U.S. Holder’s initial tax basis in the New Warrant and the exercise price of such New Warrant. A U.S. Holder’s holding period for New Common Stock received upon exercise of its New Warrant will begin on the date following the date of
exercise of the New Warrant and will not include the period during which the U.S. Holder held the New Warrant. If a New Warrant is allowed to lapse unexercised, a U.S. Holder of such New Warrant generally will recognize a capital loss equal to such
U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the New Warrant.
The tax consequences of a cashless exercise of a New Warrant are not clear under the Tax Code. A cashless exercise may be
tax-free, either because the exercise is not a gain realization event or because the exercise is treated as a recapitalization for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In either tax-free situation, a U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the New Common Stock
received would equal the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the New Warrant. If the cashless exercise was treated as not being a gain realization event (and not a recapitalization), a U.S. Holder’s holding period in the New Common Stock would be treated as
commencing on the date following the date of exercise (or the date of exercise) of the New Warrant. If the cashless exercise was treated as a recapitalization, a U.S. Holder’s holding period in the New Common Stock would include its holding period
in the New Warrant.
It is also possible that a cashless exercise could be treated in part as a taxable exchange in which gain or loss would be
recognized. In such event, a U.S. Holder could be deemed to have surrendered New Warrants having a value equal to the exercise price for the number of New Warrants treated as actually exercised. The U.S. Holder would recognize capital gain or loss
in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of the New Warrants deemed surrendered and the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in such New Warrants. In this case, a U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the New Common Stock received would
equal the sum of the fair market value of the New Warrants deemed surrendered and the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the New Warrants treated as actually exercised. A U.S. Holder’s holding period for the New Common Stock would commence on the
date following the date of exercise (or the date of exercise) of the New Warrant.
Due to the absence of authority on the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a cashless exercise, there can be no assurance which,
if any, of the alternative tax consequences and holding periods described above would be adopted by the IRS or a court of law. Accordingly, U.S. Holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of a cashless exercise.
|
b. |
Possible Constructive Distributions
|
The terms of each New Warrant may provide for an adjustment to the number of shares of New Common Stock for which the New Warrant
may be exercised or to the exercise price of the New Warrant in certain events. An adjustment which has the effect of preventing dilution generally is not taxable. U.S. Holders of New Warrants would, however, be treated as receiving a constructive
distribution from Reorganized Holdings if, for example, the adjustment increases such U.S. Holders’ proportionate interest in Reorganized Holdings’s assets or earnings and profits (e.g., through an increase in the number of New Common Stock that would be obtained upon exercise) as a result of a distribution of cash to the holders of New Common Stock. Such constructive distribution would be subject
to tax in the same manner as if the U.S. Holders of the New Warrants received a cash distribution from Reorganized Holdings equal to the fair market value of such increased interest. Generally, a U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in its New Warrant
would be increased to the extent any such constructive distribution is treated as a dividend.
|
3.
|
Sale, Redemption, or Repurchase of New Common Stock or a New Warrant
|
Unless a non-recognition provision applies, U.S. Holders generally will recognize gain or loss upon the sale, redemption, or
other taxable disposition of New Common Stock or a New Warrant. In general, this gain or loss will be a capital gain or loss subject to special rules that may apply in the case of redemptions. Such capital gain generally would be long-term capital
gain if at the time of the sale, exchange, retirement, or other taxable disposition, the U.S. Holder held the New Common Stock or New Warrant for more than one year. Long-term capital gains of an individual taxpayer generally are taxed at
preferential rates. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to certain limitations as described below. Under the recapture rules of section 108(e)(7) of the Tax Code, a U.S. Holder may be required to treat gain recognized on the taxable
disposition of the New Common Stock as ordinary income if such U.S. Holder took a bad debt deduction with respect to its Allowed Claim or recognized an ordinary loss on the exchange of its Allowed Claim for New Common Stock.
|
4.
|
Equity Subscription Rights
|
A U.S. Holder that elects to exercise its Equity Subscription Rights should be treated as purchasing, in exchange for its Equity
Subscription Rights and the amount of cash paid by the U.S. Holder to exercise such Equity Subscription Rights, New Common Stock. Such a purchase should generally be treated as the exercise of an option under general tax principles, and such U.S.
Holder should not recognize income, gain, or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes when it receives the New Common Stock upon the exercise of the Equity Subscription Rights. A U.S. Holder’s aggregate tax basis in the New Common Stock should equal
the sum of (i) the amount of cash paid by the U.S. Holder to exercise the Equity Subscription Rights plus (ii) such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the Equity Subscription Rights immediately before the Equity Subscription Rights are exercised. A U.S.
Holder’s holding period for the New Common Stock received pursuant to such exercise should begin on the day following the date the U.S. Holder receives the New Common Stock upon the exercise of such U.S. Holder’s Equity Subscription Rights.
A U.S. Holder that elects not to exercise the Equity Subscription Rights may be entitled to claim a loss equal to the amount of
tax basis allocated to such Equity Subscription Rights, subject to any limitation on such U.S. Holder’s ability to utilize capital losses. U.S. Holders electing not to exercise their Equity Subscription Rights are urged to consult with their own tax
advisors as to the tax consequences of such decision.
|
F. |
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to Certain Non-U.S. Holders of Allowed Claims
|
The following discussion includes only certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Restructuring Transactions to non-U.S.
Holders. The discussion does not include any non-U.S. tax considerations. The rules governing the U.S. federal income tax consequences to non-U.S. Holders are complex. Each non-U.S. Holder is urged to consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S.
federal, state, and local and the non-U.S. tax consequences of the consummation of the Plan and the ownership and disposition of the New Common Stock, New Warrants, First-Lien Take Back Term Loans and Equity Subscription Rights to such non-U.S.
Holders.
Any gain realized by a non-U.S. Holder on the exchange of its Claim under the Plan generally will not be subject to U.S. federal
income taxation unless (a) the non-U.S. Holder is an individual who was present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year in which the Restructuring Transactions occur and certain other conditions are met or (b) such gain is
effectively connected with the conduct by such non-U.S. Holder of a trade or business in the United States (and if an income tax treaty applies, such gain is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by such non-U.S. Holder in the United
States).
If the first exception applies, to the extent that any gain is taxable, the non-U.S. Holder generally will be subject to U.S.
federal income tax at a rate of 30% (or at a reduced rate or exemption from tax under an applicable income tax treaty) on the amount by which such non-U.S. Holder’s capital gains allocable to U.S. sources exceed capital losses allocable to U.S.
sources during the taxable year of the exchange. If the second exception applies, the non-U.S. Holder generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax with respect to any gain realized on the exchange in the same manner as a U.S. Holder. To claim
an exemption from withholding tax, such non-U.S. Holder will be required to provide a properly executed IRS Form W-8ECI (or such successor form as the IRS designates). In addition, if such a non-U.S. Holder is a corporation, it may be subject to a
branch profits tax equal to 30% (or such lower rate provided by an applicable treaty) of its effectively connected earnings and profits for the taxable year, subject to certain adjustments.
|
2.
|
Payments of Interest (Including Accrued Interest on Claims)
|
Subject to the discussion of FATCA and backup withholding below, payments to a non-U.S. Holder that are attributable to (x)
interest on (or OID accruals with respect to) the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans and (y) amounts received pursuant to the Plan in respect of accrued but untaxed interest generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or withholding,
provided that the withholding agent has received or receives, prior to payment, appropriate documentation (generally, IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E) establishing that the non-U.S. Holder is not a U.S. person, unless:
|
• |
the non-U.S. Holder actually or constructively owns 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of the Debtors’ stock (in the case of interest
payments received pursuant to the Plan) or Reorganized Holdings’ stock (in the case of interest payments with respect to the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans) entitled to vote;
|
|
• |
the non-U.S. Holder is a “controlled foreign corporation” that is a “related person” with respect to the Debtors (in the case of interest payments received
pursuant to the Plan) or Reorganized Holdings’ stock (in the case of interest payments with respect to the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans) (each, within the meaning of the Tax Code);
|
|
• |
the non-U.S. Holder is a bank receiving interest described in section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Tax Code; or
|
|
• |
such interest is effectively connected with the conduct by the non-U.S. Holder of a trade or business within the United States.
|
A non-U.S. Holder described in the first three bullets above generally will be subject to withholding of U.S. federal income tax
at a 30% rate (or at a reduced rate or exemption from tax under an applicable income tax treaty) on (x) interest on (or OID accruals with respect to) the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans and (y) amounts received pursuant to the Plan in respect of
accrued but untaxed interest.
A non-U.S. Holder described in the fourth bullet above generally will not be subject to withholding tax if it provides a properly
executed IRS Form W-8ECI (or successor form) to the withholding agent, but will be subject to U.S. federal income tax in the same manner as a U.S. Holder (unless an applicable income tax treaty provides otherwise), and a non-U.S. Holder that is a
corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes may also be subject to a branch profits tax with respect to such non-U.S. Holder’s effectively connected earnings and profits that are attributable to the interest at a rate of 30% (or at a reduced
rate or exemption from tax under an applicable income tax treaty).
For purposes of providing a properly executed IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E, special procedures are provided under applicable
Treasury Regulations for payments through qualified foreign intermediaries or certain financial institutions that hold customers’ securities in the ordinary course of their trade or business. As described above in more detail under the heading
“Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to Certain U.S. Holders of Allowed Claims—Accrued Interest,” the aggregate consideration to be distributed to Holders of Allowed Claims in each Class will be allocated first to the principal amount of
such Allowed Claims, with any excess allocated to unpaid interest that accrued on these Claims, if any. Non-U.S. Holders who participate in the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans in connection with the Restructuring Transactions are urged to consult a
U.S. tax advisor with respect to the U.S. tax consequences applicable to their acquisition, holding and disposition of the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans.
|
3.
|
Ownership of New Common Stock and New Warrants
|
Any distributions made (or deemed to be made) with respect to New Common Stock, or deemed made on the New Warrants will
constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent of the Reorganized Holdings’ current or accumulated earnings and profits as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. To the extent that a non-U.S. Holder receives
distributions that would otherwise constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes but that exceed such current and accumulated earnings and profits, such distributions will be treated first as a non-taxable return of capital reducing the
non-U.S. Holder’s basis in its New Common Stock or New Warrants. Any such distributions in excess of a non-U.S. Holder’s basis in its New Common Stock or New Warrants (determined on a share-by-share or warrant-by-warrant basis) generally will be
treated as capital gain from a sale or exchange. Except as described below, dividends paid with respect to New Common Stock or deemed paid with respect to New Warrants held by a non-U.S. Holder that are not effectively connected with a non-U.S.
Holder’s conduct of a U.S. trade or business (or if an income tax treaty applies, are not attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by such non-U.S. Holder in the United States) will be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax at a rate of
30% (or lower treaty rate, if applicable). A non-U.S. Holder generally will be required to satisfy certain IRS certification requirements in order to claim a reduction of or exemption from withholding under a tax treaty by providing an IRS Form
W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E (or a successor form) to the Reorganized Holdings upon which the non-U.S. Holder certifies, under penalties of perjury, its status as a non-U.S. person and its entitlement to the lower treaty rate or exemption from tax with respect
to such payments. Dividends paid with respect to New Common Stock or deemed paid with respect to New Warrants held by a non-U.S. Holder that are effectively connected with a non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a U.S. trade or business (and if an income tax
treaty applies, are attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by such non-U.S. Holder in the United States) generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax in the same manner as a U.S. Holder, and a non-U.S. Holder that is a
corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes may also be subject to a branch profits tax with respect to such non-U.S. Holder’s effectively connected earnings and profits that are attributable to the dividends at a rate of 30% (or at a reduced
rate under an applicable income tax treaty).
|
4.
|
Sale, Redemption, or Repurchase of New Common Stock and New Warrants
|
A non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax with respect to any gain realized on the sale or other
taxable disposition (including a cash redemption) of New Common Stock or New Warrant unless:
(A) such
non-U.S. Holder is an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of disposition and satisfies certain other conditions or who is subject to special rules applicable to former citizens and residents of
the United States; or
(B) such gain
is effectively connected with such non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a U.S. trade or business (and if an income tax treaty applies, such gain is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by such non-U.S. Holder in the United States); or
(C) Reorganized
Holdings is or has been during a specified testing period a “U.S. real property holding corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
If the first exception applies, the non-U.S. Holder generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at a rate of 30% (or at
a reduced rate or exemption from tax under an applicable income tax treaty) on the amount by which such non-U.S. Holder’s capital gains allocable to U.S. sources exceed capital losses allocable to U.S. sources during the taxable year of disposition
of New Common Stock or New Warrant. If the second exception applies, the non-U.S. Holder generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax with respect to such gain in the same manner as a U.S. Holder, and a non-U.S. Holder that is a corporation
for U.S. federal income tax purposes may also be subject to a branch profits tax with respect to earnings and profits effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business that are attributable to such gains at a rate of 30% (or at a reduced rate or
exemption from tax under an applicable income tax treaty). The Debtors consider it unlikely, based on their current business plans and operations, that any of the Reorganized Holdings will become a “U.S. real property holding corporation” in the
future.
Under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”),
foreign financial institutions and certain other foreign entities must report certain information with respect to their U.S. account holders and investors or be subject to withholding at a rate of 30% on the receipt of “withholdable payments.” For
this purpose, “withholdable payments” are generally U.S.-source payments of fixed or determinable, annual or periodical income (including dividends, if any, on New Common Stock or interest on the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans). Pursuant to proposed
Treasury Regulations on which taxpayers are permitted to rely pending their finalization, this withholding obligation would not apply to gross proceeds from the sale or disposition of property such as the First Lien Take-Back Term Loans, New Common
Stock or New Warrants. FATCA withholding will apply even if the applicable payment would not otherwise be subject to U.S. federal nonresident withholding.
EACH NON-U.S. HOLDER IS URGED TO CONSULT ITS OWN TAX ADVISOR REGARDING THE POSSIBLE IMPACT OF THESE RULES ON
SUCH NON-U.S. HOLDER’S OWNERSHIP OF FIRST LIEN TAKE-BACK TERM LOANS, NEW COMMON STOCK OR NEW WARRANTS.
|
G. |
Information Reporting and Back-Up Withholding
|
All distributions to Holders of Claims under the Plan are subject to any applicable tax withholding, including (as applicable)
employment tax withholding. Under U.S. federal income tax law, interest, dividends, and other reportable payments may, under certain circumstances, be subject to “backup withholding” at the then applicable withholding rate (currently 24%). Backup
withholding generally applies if the holder fails to furnish its social security number or other taxpayer identification number (a “TIN”), furnishes an incorrect TIN, fails
properly to report interest or dividends, or under certain circumstances, fails to provide a certified statement, signed under penalty of perjury, that the TIN provided is its correct number and that it is a United States person that is not subject
to backup withholding. Backup withholding is not an additional tax but merely an advance payment, which may be refunded to the extent it results in an overpayment of tax and the appropriate information is timely supplied to the IRS. Certain persons
are exempt from backup withholding, including, in certain circumstances, corporations and financial institutions.
In addition, from an information reporting perspective, the Treasury Regulations generally require disclosure by a taxpayer on
its U.S. federal income tax return of certain types of transactions in which the taxpayer participated, including, among other types of transactions, certain transactions that result in the taxpayer’s claiming a loss in excess of specified
thresholds. Holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding these regulations and whether the transactions contemplated by the Plan would be subject to these regulations and require disclosure on the Holders’ tax returns.
THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE PLAN
ARE COMPLEX. THE FOREGOING SUMMARY DOES NOT DISCUSS ALL ASPECTS OF FEDERAL INCOME TAXATION THAT MAY BE RELEVANT TO A PARTICULAR HOLDER IN LIGHT OF SUCH HOLDER’S CIRCUMSTANCES AND INCOME TAX SITUATION. ALL HOLDERS OF CLAIMS AND INTERESTS ARE URGED
TO CONSULT WITH THEIR TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE PARTICULAR TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THEM OF THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THE PLAN, INCLUDING THE APPLICABILITY AND EFFECT OF ANY STATE, LOCAL, OR FOREIGN TAX LAWS, AND OF TAX LEGISLATION AND ANY OTHER
CHANGE IN APPLICABLE TAX LAWS.
XII. |
CERTAIN RISK FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED
|
Prior to voting to accept or reject the Plan, holders of Claims should read and carefully consider the risk factors set forth
below, in addition to the information set forth in this Disclosure Statement and the attachments, exhibits, or documents incorporated by reference hereto. The factors below should not be regarded as the only risks associated with the Plan or its
implementation. Documents filed with the SEC may contain important risk factors that differ from those discussed below. Copies of any document filed with the SEC may be obtained by visiting the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov.
|
A. |
Certain Restructuring Law Considerations
|
1. Effect of Chapter 11 Cases. Although the Plan is intended to effectuate a coordinated financial restructuring of the Company, and enjoys support from the Creditors’ Committee,
the Consenting BrandCo Lenders, and the Consenting 2016 Lenders, it is impossible to predict with certainty the amount of time that the Debtors may spend in bankruptcy, or to assure parties in interest that the Plan will be confirmed. Even if
confirmed on a timely basis, court proceedings to confirm the Plan could have an adverse effect on the Company’s businesses. The proceedings also involve additional expense and may divert some of the attention of the Company’s management away from
business operations.
2. The Debtors May Not Be Able to Confirm the Plan. Although the Debtors believe that the Plan will satisfy all requirements necessary for confirmation by the Bankruptcy Court,
there can be no assurance that the Bankruptcy Court will reach the same conclusion or that modifications to the Plan will not be required for confirmation, or that such modifications would not necessitate re-solicitation of votes. Moreover, the
Debtors can make no assurances that they will receive the requisite acceptances to confirm the Plan, and even if all voting Classes vote in favor of the Plan or the requirements for “cramdown” are met with respect to any Class that rejected the Plan,
the Bankruptcy Court, which may exercise its substantial discretion as a court of equity, may choose not to confirm the Plan. If the Plan is not confirmed, it is unclear what distributions holders of Claims ultimately would receive on account of
their Claims under a subsequent plan of reorganization (or liquidation).
3. Non-Consensual Confirmation. In the event that any Impaired Class of Claims does not accept or is deemed not to accept the Plan, the Bankruptcy Court may nevertheless
confirm the Plan at the Debtors’ request if at least one Impaired Class has accepted the Plan (with such acceptance being determined without including the vote of any “insider” in such class), and as to each Impaired Class that has not accepted the
Plan, the Bankruptcy Court determines that the Plan “does not discriminate unfairly” and is “fair and equitable” with respect to the dissenting Impaired Classes. While the Debtors believe that the Plan satisfies these requirements, should any Class
reject the Plan, then these requirements must be satisfied with respect to such rejecting Classes.
4. Risk of Timing or Non-Occurrence of Effective Date. There can be no assurance as to the timing of the Effective Date. If the conditions precedent to the Effective Date set
forth in the Plan do not occur or are not waived as set forth in Article XI of the Plan, then the Confirmation Order may be vacated, in which event no distributions would be made under the Plan, the Debtors and all Holders of Claims and Interests
would be restored to the status quo ante as of the day immediately preceding the Confirmation Date, and the Debtors’ obligations with respect to Claims and
Interests would remain unchanged. Notably, the conditions precedent include the requirement that the Debtors obtain all governmental and material third-party approvals necessary to effectuate the Restructuring Transactions. Moreover, absent an
extension, the Restructuring Support Agreement may be terminated by the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders if the Effective Date does not occur by April 18, 2023. The Debtors cannot assure that the conditions precedent to the Plan’s effectiveness
will occur or be waived by such date.
5. Risk of Termination of Restructuring Support Agreement, Backstop Commitment Agreement, or the Debt Commitment Letter. The Restructuring Support Agreement contains provisions
that give one or more of the Consenting Creditor Parties the ability to terminate the Restructuring Support Agreement if certain conditions are not satisfied or waived, including the failure to achieve certain milestones. Similarly, the Backstop
Commitment Agreement and Debt Commitment Letter contain provisions that give the Equity Commitment Parties and the Debt Commitment Parties, as applicable, the ability to terminate their obligations to fully backstop the Equity Rights Offering, or the
ability to terminate their commitment to provide the Incremental New Money Facility, as applicable, upon the occurrence of certain events or if certain conditions are not satisfied. Termination of the Restructuring Support Agreement, Backstop
Commitment Agreement, and/or Debt Commitment Letter could result in protracted Chapter 11 Cases, which could significantly and detrimentally impact the Debtors’ relationships with vendors, employees, and major customers, or potentially the conversion
of the Chapter 11 Cases into cases under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code (“Chapter 7”).
Upon the occurrence of a Termination Date (as defined in the Restructuring Support Agreement) (other than a Termination Date as a
result of the occurrence of the Effective Date), any and all Ballots submitted prior to such Termination Date by the Consenting Creditor Parties subject to such termination shall automatically be deemed, for all purposes, to be null and void from the
first instance and shall not be counted in determining the acceptance or rejection of the Plan or for any other purpose. Such Ballots may be changed or resubmitted regardless of whether the Voting Deadline has passed (without the need to seek a court
order or consent from the Debtors allowing such change or resubmission).
In the event that any Breach Notice has been delivered by the Required Consenting BrandCo Lenders, the Confirmation Hearing will
be adjourned until either (a) such alleged breach is cured or (b) the Bankruptcy Court determines that there is no breach under the Restructuring Support Agreement
6. The Allocation of the Committee Settlement Amounts May be Successfully Challenged. The allocation of distributions of the GUC Settlement Amount and any Retained
Preference Action Net Proceeds among Classes 9(a)-(d) under the Committee Settlement Terms, as implemented through the Plan, may be challenged. If such challenge is successful, the Bankruptcy Court may require the Debtors to amend the Plan to provide
a modified allocation among such Classes that would satisfy section 1129(b)(1). To the extent that the Bankruptcy Court finds that a different allocation is required for the Plan to be confirmed, the Debtors may seek to (i) modify the Plan to provide
for whatever allocation might be required for confirmation and (ii) use the acceptances received from any holder of Claims pursuant to this solicitation for the purpose of obtaining the approval of the Plan as modified. Any such reallocation of the
GUC Settlement Amount, although subject to the notice and hearing requirements of the Bankruptcy Code, could adversely affect the treatment of Classes 9(a), 9(b), 9(c) and/or 9(d). Except to the extent that modification of the allocation of the GUC
Settlement Amount in the Plan requires re-solicitation, the Debtors may, in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code and the Bankruptcy Rules, seek a determination by the Bankruptcy Court that acceptance of the Plan by any holder of Claims pursuant to
this solicitation will constitute a consent to the Plan’s treatment of such holder, regardless of the allocation of the GUC Settlement Amount.
7. Conversion into Chapter 7 Cases. If no plan of reorganization can be confirmed, or if the Bankruptcy Court otherwise finds that it would be in the best interests of
Holders of Claims, the Chapter 11 Cases may be converted to cases under Chapter 7, pursuant to which a trustee would be appointed or elected to liquidate the Debtors’ assets for distribution in accordance with the priorities established by the
Bankruptcy Code. See Article XV.C hereof, as well as the Liquidation Analysis attached hereto as Exhibit E, for a discussion of the effects that a Chapter 7 liquidation would have on the recoveries to Holders of Claims.
8. The DIP Facilities May Be Insufficient to Fund the Debtors’ Business Operations, or May Be Unavailable if the Debtors Do Not Comply with the Final DIP Order or DIP Credit Agreements.
There can be no assurance that the revenue generated by the Company’s business operations and the cash made available to the Debtors under the Final DIP Order will
be sufficient to fund the Company’s operations. There can be no assurance that additional financing would be available or, if available, offered on terms that are acceptable to the Company or the Bankruptcy Court. If, for one or more reasons, the
Company needs to and is unable to obtain such additional financing, the Company’s business and assets may be subject to liquidation under Chapter 7 and the Company may cease to continue as a going concern.
The Final DIP Order and DIP Credit Agreements include affirmative and negative covenants applicable to the Debtors, including
milestones related to the progress of the Chapter 11 Cases and compliance with a budget and maintenance of certain minimum liquidity. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to comply with these covenants and meet its obligations as
they become due or to comply with the other terms and conditions of the Final DIP Order or DIP Credit Agreements. Any event of default under the Final DIP Order or DIP Credit Agreements could imperil the Debtors’ ability to reorganize.
9. Impact of the Chapter 11 Cases on the Debtors. The Chapter 11 Cases may affect the Debtors’ relationships, and their ability to negotiate favorable terms, with creditors,
customers, vendors, employees, and other personnel and counterparties. While the Debtors expect to continue normal operations, public perception of their continued viability may affect, among other things, the desire of new and existing customers,
vendors, landlords, employees, or other parties to enter into or continue their agreements or arrangements with the Debtors. The failure to maintain any of these important relationships could adversely affect the Debtors’ businesses, financial
condition, and results of operations.
Because of the public disclosure of the Chapter 11 Cases and concerns certain vendors may have about the Debtors’ liquidity, the
Debtors’ ability to maintain normal credit terms with vendors may be impaired. Also, the Debtors’ transactions that are outside of the ordinary course of business are generally subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court, which may limit the
Debtors’ ability to respond on a timely basis to certain events or take advantage of certain opportunities. As a result, the effect that the Chapter 11 Cases will have on the Debtors’ businesses, financial conditions, and results of operations
cannot be accurately predicted or quantified at this time.
Additionally, the terms of the Final DIP Order and DIP Credit Agreements may limit the Debtors’ ability to undertake certain
business initiatives.
10. The Plan Is Based upon Assumptions the Debtors Developed That May Prove Incorrect and Could Render the Plan Unsuccessful. The Plan and the Restructuring Transactions
contemplated thereby reflect assumptions and analyses based on the Debtors’ experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, management’s plans, and expected future developments, as well as other factors that the Debtors consider
appropriate under the circumstances. The feasibility of the Plan for confirmation purposes under the Bankruptcy Code relies on financial projections the Company developed in connection with developing its Business Plan (the “Financial Projections”), including with respect to revenues, EBITDA, debt service, and cash flow. Financial forecasts are necessarily speculative, and it is likely that one or
more of the assumptions and estimates that are the basis of these financial forecasts will not be accurate.
Whether actual future results and developments will be consistent with the Debtors’ expectations and assumptions depends on a
number of factors, including, but not limited to: (i) the ability to maintain customers’ confidence in the Company’s viability as a continuing entity and to attract and retain sufficient business from them; (ii) the ability to retain key employees;
and (iii) the overall strength and stability of general economic conditions in the United States and in the specific markets in which the Debtors currently do business. The failure of any of these factors could not only vitiate the projections and
analyses that informed the Plan, but also otherwise materially adversely affect the successful reorganization of the Debtors’ businesses.
The Company expects that its actual financial condition and results of operations may differ, perhaps materially, from what was
anticipated. Consequently, there can be no assurance that the results or developments contemplated by any plan of reorganization the Debtors may implement will occur or, even if they do occur, that they will have the anticipated effects on the
Debtors and their respective subsidiaries or their businesses or operations. The failure of any such results or developments to materialize as anticipated could materially adversely affect the successful execution of the Plan.
11. Projections, Estimates, and Other Forward-Looking Statements Are Not Assured, and Actual Results May Vary. Certain of the information contained in this Disclosure
Statement is, by its nature, forward-looking, and contains estimates and assumptions that might ultimately prove to be incorrect, and contains projections which may be materially different from actual future experiences. There are uncertainties
associated with any projections and estimates—including estimated recoveries by holders of Allowed Claims—and such projections and estimates should not be considered assurances or guarantees of the amount of assets that will ultimately be available
for distribution on the Effective Date or the amount of Claims in the various Classes that might be Allowed.
12. The Allowed Amount of Claims and the Estimated Percentage of Recoveries May Differ from Current Estimates. There can be no assurance that the estimated Claim amounts set
forth herein are correct, and the actual amount of Allowed Claims may differ materially from the estimates. There can be no assurance that the Allowed amount of Claims in Classes 9(a) (Talc Personal Injury Claims), 9(b) (Non-Qualified Pension
Claims), 9(c) (Trade Claims), and 9(d) (Other General Unsecured Claims) will not be significantly more than currently estimated, which, in turn could cause the estimated value of distributions to be reduced substantially. The estimated amounts are
subject to certain risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, the actual amount of Allowed Claims may vary materially from those estimated
in this Disclosure Statement.
Furthermore, although the Claims Bar Date has passed, there are pending motions filed by multiple groups of hair relaxer cancer claimants which seek to enlarge or
permit late claims to be filed. The Bankruptcy Court may allow additional Claims to be filed, including Talc Personal Injury Claims and/or other personal injury claims including claims relating to hair relaxer products. If additional Claims are
allowed to be filed, the recovery for each Allowed Claim in such classes may be reduced.
13. Parties-in-Interest May Object to the Debtors’ Classification of Claims and Interests. Section 1122 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that a plan may place a claim or an
equity interest in a particular class only if such claim or equity interest is substantially similar to the other claims or equity interests in such class. The Debtors believe that the classification of Claims and Interests under the Plan
complies with the requirements set forth in the Bankruptcy Code because the Debtors created Classes of Claims and Interests, each encompassing Claims or Interests, as applicable, that are substantially similar to the other Claims or Interests in each
such Class. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that the Bankruptcy Court will reach the same conclusion.
14. The Consenting Unsecured Noteholder Recovery May Not Be Approved. The Plan provides that if Class 8 Unsecured Notes Claims does not accept the Plan, Holders of such
Claims that vote to accept the Plan on account of their Unsecured Notes Claim and do not, directly or indirectly, object to, or otherwise impede, delay, or interfere with, solicitation, acceptance, Confirmation, or Consummation of the Plan, will
receive the Consenting Unsecured Noteholder Recovery, unless the Bankruptcy Court finds that such Consenting Unsecured Noteholder Recovery is improper. The Consenting Unsecured Noteholder Recovery may be subject to substantial challenges, including
on the basis that it provides unequal treatment within Class 8 Unsecured Notes Claims pursuant to section 1123(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code, or is other otherwise impermissible under applicable bankruptcy law. If the Bankruptcy Court were to sustain
any such challenge, Consenting Unsecured Noteholders would not be eligible to receive the Consenting Unsecured Noteholder Recovery. As such, Holders of Unsecured Notes Claims should not rely on the Consenting Unsecured Noteholder Recovery in making a
decision to vote to accept the Plan.
15. Releases, Injunctions, and Exculpations Provisions May Not Be Approved. Article XI of the Plan provides for certain releases, injunctions, and exculpations, including a
release of liens and causes of action that may otherwise be asserted against the Debtors, Reorganized Debtors, or Released Parties, as applicable. The releases, injunctions, and exculpations provided in the Plan are subject to objection by parties
and may not be approved. If the releases, injunctions, and exculpations are not approved, certain Released Parties may withdraw their support for the Plan. The releases provided to the Released Parties and the exculpation provided to the Exculpated
Parties are necessary to the success of the Debtors’ reorganization because the Released Parties and Exculpated Parties have made significant contributions to the Debtors’ reorganization efforts and have agreed to make further contributions,
including by agreeing to convert certain of their Claims against the Debtors’ Estates into equity in Reorganized Holdings, but only if they receive the full benefit of the Plan’s release and exculpation provisions. The Plan’s release and exculpation
provisions are an inextricable component of the Restructuring Support Agreement and the significant deleveraging and financial benefits embodied in the Plan.
16. The Debtors May Fail to Obtain the Proceeds of the Exit Facilities or the Equity Rights Offering, and the Backstop Commitment Agreement May Terminate. There can be no
assurance that the Debtors will receive any or all of the proceeds of the Exit Facilities and the Equity Rights Offering. Because final documentation relating to the Exit Facilities has not yet been executed, there can be no assurance that the
Debtors will be able to obtain the proceeds of the Exit Facilities. In addition, and notwithstanding the Backstop Commitment Agreement applicable to the Equity Rights Offering, because the Equity Rights Offering has not yet been completed, there can
be no assurance that the Debtors will receive any or all of the proceeds of the Equity Rights Offering. If the Debtors do not receive the proceeds of the Exit Facilities and the Equity Rights Offering, the Debtors will not be able to consummate the
Plan in its current form.
17. The Debtors May Seek to Amend, Waive, Modify, or Withdraw the Plan at Any
Time Before Confirmation. Subject to and in accordance with the terms of the Restructuring Support Agreement, the Backstop Commitment Agreement, and the Debt Commitment Letter, the Debtors reserve the
right, in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code and the Bankruptcy Rules, to amend or modify the Plan before the entry of the Confirmation Order or waive any conditions thereto if and to the extent such amendments or waivers are necessary or
desirable to consummate the Plan. The potential impact of any such amendment or waiver on the Holders of Claims and Interests cannot presently be foreseen but may include a change in the economic impact of the Plan on some or all of the proposed
Classes or a change in the relative rights of such Classes. All Holders of Claims and Interests will receive notice of such amendments or waivers required by applicable Law and the Bankruptcy Court. If the Debtors seek to modify the Plan after
receiving sufficient acceptances but before the Bankruptcy Court’s entry of an order confirming the Plan, the previously solicited acceptances will be valid only if (i) all Classes of adversely affected Holders accept the modification in writing or
(ii) the Bankruptcy Court determines, after notice to designated parties, that such modification was de minimis or purely technical or otherwise did not adversely change the treatment of Holders of accepting Claims or Interests, or is otherwise
permitted by the Bankruptcy Code.
18. Reorganized Debtors May Be Adversely Affected by Future Claims. Parties may assert in the future certain liability claims, including but not limited to claims related to the presence of talc in certain products sold by the Debtors or Reorganized Debtors and/or claims related to the
use of chemical hair straighteners or relaxers sold by the Debtors or Reorganized Debtors that parties may allege are not dischargeable under the Plan pursuant to applicable law. In general, litigation cannot be predicted with certainty and can be
expensive and time consuming to defend against. While the Debtors believe that such claims are dischargeable and do not have merit, such claims could result in liabilities that could adversely affect the Reorganized Debtors’ business and financial
results, and they could also cause reputational damage for the Reorganized Debtors. It is not possible to predict with certainty the potential claims that the Reorganized Debtors may become party to, nor the final resolution of such claims. The
impact of any such claim on the Reorganized Debtors’ business and financial stability could be adverse and material.
|
B. |
Risks Relating to the Debtors’ and Reorganized Debtors’ Businesses
|
1. Post-Effective Date Indebtedness. On the Effective Date, on a consolidated basis, it is expected that the Reorganized Debtors will have total secured, outstanding indebtedness
of approximately $1.8 billion, which is expected to consist of the Exit Facilities, as described above. This level of expected indebtedness and the funds required to service such debt could, among other things, make it difficult for the Reorganized
Debtors to satisfy their obligations under such indebtedness, increasing the risk that they may default on such debt obligations.
The Reorganized Debtors’ earnings and cash flow may vary significantly from year to year. Additionally, the Reorganized Debtors’
future cash flow may be insufficient to meet their debt obligations and commitments. Any insufficiency could negatively impact the Reorganized Debtors’ businesses. A range of economic, competitive, business, and industry factors will affect the
Reorganized Debtors’ future financial performance and, as a result, their ability to generate cash flow from operations and to pay their debt. Many of these factors are beyond the Reorganized Debtors’ control.
If the Reorganized Debtors do not generate enough cash flow from operations to satisfy their debt obligations, they may have to
undertake alternative financing plans, such as:
|
• |
refinancing or restructuring debt;
|
|
• |
reducing or delaying capital investments; or
|
|
• |
seeking to raise additional capital.
|
It cannot be assured, however, that undertaking alternative financing plans, if necessary, would be possible on commercially
reasonable terms, or at all, and allow the Reorganized Debtors to meet their debt obligations. An inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy their debt obligations or to obtain alternative financing could materially and adversely affect
the Reorganized Debtors’ ability to make payments on the Exit Facilities, as well as the Reorganized Debtors’ businesses, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
The Exit Facilities Documents will contain restrictions, limitations, and specific covenants that could significantly affect the
Reorganized Debtors’ ability to operate their businesses, as well as adversely affect their liquidity, and therefore could adversely affect the Reorganized Debtors’ results of operations. These covenants are expected to restrict the Reorganized
Debtors’ ability (subject to certain exceptions) to: (i) incur additional indebtedness and guarantee indebtedness; (ii) pay dividends or make other distributions or repurchase or redeem capital stock; (iii) prepay, redeem, or repurchase certain debt;
(iv) make loans and investments; (v) sell assets; (vi) incur liens; (vii) enter into transactions with affiliates; (viii) alter the businesses they conduct; (ix) enter into agreements restricting any restricted subsidiary’s ability to pay dividends;
and (x) consolidate, merge, or sell all or substantially all of their assets.
As a result of these restrictive covenants in the Exit Facilities Documents, the Reorganized Debtors may be:
|
• |
limited in how they conduct their business;
|
|
• |
unable to raise additional debt or equity financing;
|
|
• |
unable to compete effectively or to take advantage of new business opportunities; or
|
|
• |
limited or unable to make certain changes in their business and to respond to changing circumstances;
|
any of which could have a material adverse effect on their financial condition or results of operations.
Borrowings under the Exit Facilities Documents are at variable rates of interest and will expose the Reorganized Debtors to
interest rate risk, which could cause the Reorganized Debtors’ debt service obligations to increase significantly. If interest rates increase, the Reorganized Debtors’ debt service obligations on variable rate indebtedness would increase even though
the amount borrowed remained the same, and their net income and cash flow available for capital expenditures and debt repayment would decrease. As a result, a significant increase in interest rates could have a material adverse effect on the
Reorganized Debtors’ financial condition.
2. Risks Associated with the Debtors’ Businesses and Industry. The risks associated with the Debtors’ businesses and industry are described in the Debtors’ SEC filings.
Those risks include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
• |
any future effects as a result of the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases;
|
|
• |
the Debtors’ liquidity and financial outlook;
|
|
• |
the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic;
|
|
• |
disruptions to the supply chain;
|
|
• |
the impact of inflation on the Company’s costs;
|
|
• |
the Debtors’ ability to adjust prices to reflect inflation;
|
|
• |
reductions in the Debtors’ revenue from market pressures, increased competition, or otherwise;
|
|
• |
the Debtors’ ability to attract, motivate, and/or retain their employees necessary to operate competitively in the Debtors’ industry;
|
|
• |
the Debtors’ ability to maintain successful relationships with key customers;
|
|
• |
changes in interest rates;
|
|
• |
exposure to foreign currency;
|
|
• |
the Debtors’ ability to effectively manage costs;
|
|
• |
the Debtors’ ability to drive and manage growth;
|
|
• |
changing consumer tastes;
|
|
• |
the impact of general economic and political conditions in the United States or in specific markets in which the Debtors currently do business;
|
|
• |
the Debtors’ ability to generate revenues from new sources;
|
|
• |
the impact of regulatory rules or proceedings that may affect the Debtors’ businesses from time to time;
|
|
• |
disruptions or security breaches of the Debtors’ information technology infrastructure;
|
|
• |
the Debtors’ ability to generate sufficient cash flows to service or refinance debt and other obligations post-emergence; and
|
|
• |
the Company’s success at managing the foregoing risks.
|
A discussion of additional risks to the Company’s operations, businesses, and financial performance is set forth in the Form 10-K
and in the other filings Holdings has made with the SEC. Holdings’ filings with the SEC are available by visiting the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov.
|
C. |
Risk Factors Relating to Securities to Be Issued under the Plan Generally
|
1. Public Market for Securities. There is no public market for the New Common Stock or New Warrants and there can be no assurance as to the development or liquidity of any market
for the New Common Stock, or New Warrants, or that such securities will be listed upon any national securities exchange or any over-the-counter market after the Effective Date. If a trading market does not develop, is not maintained, or remains
inactive, holders of the New Common Stock and New Warrants may experience difficulty in reselling such securities or may be unable to sell them at all. Even if such a market were to exist, such securities could trade at prices higher or lower than
the estimated value set forth in this Disclosure Statement depending upon many factors, including, without limitation, prevailing interest rates, markets for similar securities, industry conditions, and the performance of, and investor expectations
for, the Reorganized Debtors.
Furthermore, persons to whom the New Common Stock or New Warrants are issued pursuant to the Plan may prefer to liquidate their
investments rather than hold such securities on a long-term basis. Accordingly, the market price for such securities could decline and any market that does develop for such securities may be volatile.
2. Potential Dilution. The ownership percentage represented by the New Common Stock distributed on the Effective Date under the Plan will be subject to dilution from the equity
issued in connection with the (a) Equity Rights Offering (including the Backstop Commitment Premium), (b) the Management Incentive Plan, (c) the exercise of the New Warrants, (d) other post-emergence issuances, and (f) the conversion of any options,
warrants, convertible securities, exercisable securities, or other securities that may be issued post-emergence.
3. Significant Holders. Certain Holders of Allowed Claims are expected to acquire a significant ownership interest in the New Common Stock and/or New Warrants pursuant to the
Plan. If such holders were to act as a group, such holders would be in a position to control the outcome of all actions requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors, without the approval of other stockholders. This
concentration of ownership could also facilitate or hinder a negotiated change of control of the Reorganized Debtors and, consequently, have an impact upon the value of the New Common Stock and/or New Warrants.
4. Equity Interests Subordinated to the Reorganized Debtors’ Indebtedness. In any subsequent liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Reorganized Debtors, the New Common
Stock and the New Warrants would rank below all debt claims against the Reorganized Debtors including claims under the Exit Facilities Documents. Holders of the New Common Stock and/or the New Warrants would not be entitled to receive any payment or
other distribution of assets upon the liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Reorganized Debtors until after all the Reorganized Debtors’ obligations to their debt holders have been satisfied.
5. No Intention to Pay Dividends. The Reorganized Debtors do not anticipate paying any dividends on the New Common Stock as it expects to retain any future cash flows for
debt reduction and to support its operations. In addition, covenants in the documents governing the Reorganized Debtors’ indebtedness may restrict their ability to pay cash dividends and may prohibit the payment of dividends and certain other
payments. As a result, the success of an investment in the New Common Stock (including the New Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of the New Warrants) will depend entirely upon any future appreciation in the value of the New Common Stock.
There is, however, no guarantee that the New Common Stock will appreciate in value or even maintain its initial value.
1. Debtors Have No Duty to Update. The statements contained in this Disclosure Statement are made by the Debtors as of the date hereof, unless otherwise specified herein, and the
delivery of this Disclosure Statement after that date does not imply that there has been no change in the information set forth herein since that date. The Debtors have no duty to update this Disclosure Statement unless otherwise ordered to do so by
the Bankruptcy Court.
2. No Representations Outside This Disclosure Statement Are Authorized. No representations concerning or related to the Debtors, the Chapter 11 Cases, or the Plan are
authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or the Bankruptcy Code, other than as set forth in this Disclosure Statement. Any representations or inducements made to secure your acceptance or rejection of the Plan that are other than those contained in, or
included with, this Disclosure Statement should not be relied upon in making the decision to accept or reject the Plan. You should promptly report unauthorized representations or inducements to the counsel to the Debtors and the U.S. Trustee.
3. No Legal or Tax Advice Is Provided by this Disclosure Statement. The contents of this Disclosure Statement should not be construed as legal, business, or tax advice.
Each Holder of a Claim is urged to consult its own legal counsel and accountant as to legal, tax, and other matters concerning its Claim. This Disclosure Statement may not be relied upon for any purpose other than to determine how to vote on the
Plan or object to confirmation of the Plan.
4. No Representation Made. Nothing contained herein or in the Plan shall constitute evidence of, or a representation of, the tax or other legal effects of the Plan on the
Debtors or Holders of Claims.
5. Certain Tax Consequences. The tax consequences of the Restructuring Transactions to the Reorganized Holdings may materially differ depending on how the Restructuring
Transactions are structured. If the Restructuring Transactions are structured such that the Reorganized Holdings would be treated as purchasing certain of the assets of the Debtors for U.S. federal income tax purposes then the Reorganized Holdings
would have an increased tax basis in those assets and increased future tax deductions that can be used to reduce the Reorganized Holdings’ tax liability. The Debtors have not yet determined whether it will be practicable to structure the
Restructuring Transactions in this manner. For a discussion of certain tax considerations to the Debtors and certain Holders of Claims in connection with the implementation of the Plan as well as certain tax implications of owning and disposing of
the consideration to be received pursuant to the Plan, see Article XII hereof.
XIII. |
SOLICITATION AND VOTING PROCEDURES
|
The procedures and instructions for voting and/or making elections and related deadlines are set forth in the Disclosure
Statement Order. The Disclosure Statement Order is incorporated herein by reference and should be read in conjunction with this Disclosure
Statement.
THE DISCUSSION OF THE SOLICITATION AND VOTING
PROCESS SET FORTH IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT IS ONLY A SUMMARY. PLEASE REFER TO THE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ORDER FOR A MORE COMPREHENSIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE SOLICITATION, VOTING, AND TABULATION PROCESS. TO THE EXTENT OF ANY INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND THE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ORDER, THE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ORDER GOVERNS.
|
A. |
Voting Instructions and Release Opt-Out or Opt-In Elections
|
Only Holders of OpCo Term Loan Claims, 2020 Term B-1 Loan Claims, 2020 Term B-2 Loan Claims, Unsecured Notes Claims, Talc
Personal Injury Claims, Non-Qualified Pension Claims, Trade Claims, and Other General Unsecured Claims (such classes, the “Voting Classes,” and the Holders of Claims in the
Voting Classes as of the Voting Record Date, the “Voting Holders”) are entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan. The Debtors are providing Ballots and other materials,
including, among other things, the Confirmation Hearing notice, a letter from the Creditors’ Committee in support of the Plan, and the Disclosure Statement Order (collectively, the “Solicitation
Materials”) to the Voting Holders, along with instructions to access the Plan and Disclosure Statement on the Debtors’ Case Information Website. Each Ballot will provide Holders the option to elect to not grant the release in Article
XI of the Plan (the “Opt-Out Election”), except that no Holder that votes to accept the Plan will be entitled to select the Opt-Out Election.
The Debtors are not required to provide a copy of the Solicitation Materials to certain Holders of Claims and Interests who: (i)
are not classified in accordance with section 1123(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code; (ii) are not entitled to vote because they are Unimpaired and deemed to accept the Plan under section 1126(f) of the Bankruptcy Code; or (iii) are not entitled to vote
because they are deemed to reject the plan under section 1126(g) of the Bankruptcy Code.
Holders of Other Secured Claims, Other Priority Claims, FILO ABL Claims, Subordinated Claims, Qualified Pension Claims, Retiree
Benefit Claims and Interests in Holdings (the “Non-Voting Holders”) will receive notices of non-voting status on account of such Claims and Interests. For Holders of Other
Secured Claims, Other Priority Claims, FILO ABL Claims, Qualified Pension Claims, Retiree Benefit Claims and Subordinated Claims, such notices of non-voting status will include optional election forms that such Holders may complete if they elect to
not grant the release in Article XI of the Plan (such form, the “Opt-Out Form”), along with related disclosures. For Holders of Interests in Holdings, such notices of
non-voting status will include optional election forms that such Holders may complete if they elect to grant the release in Article XI of the Plan (such form, the “Opt-In Form”),
along with related disclosures.
Each Ballot, Opt-Out Form, and Opt-In Form contains detailed instructions for completion and submission, as well as disclosures
regarding, among other things, the voting record date (the “Voting Record Date”), the Voting Deadline, and the applicable standards for tabulating Ballots.
The Voting Record Date is February 21, 2023.
The Voting Record Date is the record date for determining which entities are entitled to vote on the Plan and receive Solicitation Materials.
|
C. |
Distribution of Consenting Unsecured Noteholder Recovery
|
In the event the Plan is confirmed, the Consenting Unsecured Noteholder Recovery is approved, and Class 8 votes to reject the
Plan or the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are not satisfied, Holders of Unsecured Notes Claims that voted to accept the Plan on account of such Claims and do not, directly or indirectly, object to, or otherwise impede, delay, or
interfere with, solicitation, acceptance, Confirmation, or Consummation of the Plan (i.e., Holders of Unsecured Notes Claims that qualify as Consenting Unsecured Noteholders) will receive a distribution on account of the Consenting Unsecured
Noteholder Recovery according to the information provided on such Holder’s ballot or the applicable master ballot, as applicable, in respect of such vote to accept the Plan.
Holders of Class 8 Unsecured Notes Claims are advised that, if Class 8 votes to reject the Plan, they will not
be entitled to a Plan distribution for any Unsecured Notes Claims as to which they do not vote to accept the Plan, including any Unsecured Notes Claims that they do not hold as of the Voting Record Date. If the Plan is accepted by Class 8, all
Holders of Unsecured Notes Claims at the time of the Plan distribution will receive the same pro rata distribution of New Warrants under the Plan. If the Plan is rejected by Class 8, however, the Plan provides that only Holders of Unsecured Notes
Claims that qualify as Consenting Unsecured Noteholders will be entitled to receive a distribution of New Warrants in an amount equal to 50% of what they would have received if Class 8 had accepted. Holders of Unsecured Notes Claims who cannot
establish that they voted a position in the Unsecured Notes Claims in favor of the Plan will not be eligible for this contingent 50% distribution with respect to such Unsecured Notes Claims position. Accordingly, Unsecured Notes purchased after the
Voting Record Date will not be eligible for a Consenting Unsecured Noteholder Recovery as purchasers of such Unsecured Notes will not be able to establish that they cast the requisite vote in favor of the Plan with respect to such Unsecured Notes
Claims.
In the event that the Consenting Unsecured Noteholder Recovery is not approved by the Bankruptcy Court and Class 8 votes to
reject the Plan or the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are not satisfied, Holders of Unsecured Notes Claims (including Consenting Unsecured Noteholders) will not receive any distribution under the Plan. In the event that Class 8 votes to
accept the Plan and the Creditors’ Committee Settlement Conditions are satisfied, Holders of Unsecured Notes Claims shall receive a distribution in accordance with Article VIII.D of the Plan and the customary procedures of DTC.
The Voting Deadline is March 20, 2023 at 4:00
p.m., prevailing Eastern Time. For a vote or opt-out or opt-in election to count, (i) each Voting Holder or Voting Nominee must properly complete, execute, and deliver its respective Ballot or Master Ballot in accordance with the applicable
instructions on the Ballot, master Ballot, or beneficial holder Ballot, and (ii) each Non-Voting Holder must properly complete, execute, and deliver its respective Opt-Out or Opt-In Form, as applicable, in accordance with the instructions set forth
on such form, in each case to be actually received by the Voting and Claims Agent on or before the Voting Deadline.
Any Ballot may not be counted toward
Confirmation if, among other things, it: (i) partially rejects and partially accepts the Plan; (ii) both accepts and rejects the Plan; (iii) is sent to the Debtors, the Debtors’ agents (other than the Voting and Claims Agent), any indenture
trustee, or the Debtors’ financial or legal advisors; (iv) is sent by facsimile or any electronic means other than via the online balloting portal; (v) is illegible or contains insufficient information to permit the identification of the Holder of
the Claim; (vi) is cast by an Entity that does not hold a Claim in the Class specified in the Ballot; (vii) is submitted by a Holder not entitled to vote pursuant to the Plan; (viii) is unsigned; (ix) is not marked to accept or reject the Plan; (x)
is received after the Voting Deadline (unless otherwise ordered by the Bankruptcy Court).
XIV. |
CONFIRMATION OF PLAN
|
Section 1128(a) of the Bankruptcy Code requires the Bankruptcy Court to hold a confirmation hearing upon appropriate notice to
all required parties. Notice of the Confirmation Hearing will be provided to all known creditors or their representatives. The Confirmation Hearing may be adjourned from time to time by the Bankruptcy Court without further notice except for the
announcement of the continuation date made at the Confirmation Hearing, at any subsequent continued Confirmation Hearing, or pursuant to a notice filed on the docket for the Chapter 11 Cases. With authorization of the Bankruptcy Court, the Debtors
have scheduled the Confirmation Hearing beginning on April 3, 2023 at 10:00 a.m., prevailing Eastern Time, to consider confirmation of the Plan. Additionally, in the event that any Breach Notice has been delivered by the Required Consenting BrandCo
Lenders, the Confirmation Hearing will be adjourned until either (i) such alleged breach is cured or validly waived or (ii) the Bankruptcy Court determines that there is no breach under the Restructuring Support Agreement.
|
B. |
Objections to Confirmation
|
Section 1128(b) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that any party in interest may object to the confirmation of a plan. Any
objection to confirmation of the Plan must: (i) be in writing; (ii) conform to the Bankruptcy Rules, the Local Rules for the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, and any orders of the Bankruptcy Court; (iii) set forth
the name of the objector, and the nature and amount of Claims held or asserted by the objector against the Debtors’ Estates or properties; (iv) state, with particularity, the legal and factual basis for the objection and, if practicable, a proposed
modification to the Plan (or related materials) that would resolve such objection; and (v) be filed with the Bankruptcy Court (contemporaneously with a proof of service) and served upon the following parties so as to be actually received on or before March 23, 2023 at 4:00 p.m., prevailing Eastern Time:
The Debtors at:
Revlon, Inc.
55 Water St., 43rd Floor
New York, NY 10041-0004
Seth Fier
Elise Quinones
|
E-mail:
|
Andrew.Kidd@revlon.com
|
Seth.Fier@revlon.com
Elise.Quinones@revlon.com
Office of the U.S. Trustee at:
Office of the U.S. Trustee for Region 2
U.S. Federal Office Building
201 Varick Street, Suite 1006
New York, NY 10014
|
Attention:
|
Brian Masumoto
|
|
E-mail:
|
Brian.Masumoto@usdoj.gov
|
Counsel to the Debtors at:
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
1285 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10019-6064
Alice Belisle Eaton
Kyle J. Kimpler
Robert A. Britton
Brian Bolin
Sean A. Mitchell
Irene Blumberg
|
E-mail:
|
pbasta@paulweiss.com
|
aeaton@paulweiss.com
kkimpler@paulweiss.com
rbritton@paulweiss.com
bbolin@paulweiss.com
smitchell@paulweiss.com
iblumberg@paulweiss.com
Counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of BrandCo Lenders at:
Davis Polk & Wardell LLP
450 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10017
|
Attention:
|
Eli J. Vonnegut
|
Angela M. Libby
Stephanie Massman
|
E-mail:
|
eli.vonnegut@davispolk.com
|
angela.libby@davispolk.com
stephanie.massman@davispolk.com
Counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of 2016 Lenders at:
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer and Feld LLP
2001 K Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20006-1037
Kevin Zuzolo
|
E-mail:
|
jsavin@akingump.com
|
kzuzolo@akingump.com
Counsel to the Creditors’ Committee at:
Brown Rudnick LLP
Seven Times Square
New York, NY 10036
|
Attention:
|
Robert J. Stark
|
David J. Molton
Jeffrey L. Jonas
Bennett S. Silverberg
Kenneth J. Aulet
|
E-mail:
|
RStark@brownrudnick.com
|
DMolton@brownrudnick.com
JJonas@brownrudnick.com
BSilverberg@brownrudnick.com
KAulet@brownrudnick.com
ONLY THOSE RESPONSES OR OBJECTIONS THAT ARE TIMELY SERVED AND FILED WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THE BANKRUPTCY COURT.
OBJECTIONS NOT TIMELY FILED AND SERVED IN THE MANNER SET FORTH ABOVE WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED AND WILL BE DEEMED OVERRULED.
|
Objections must also be served on those parties that have formally appeared and requested service in these
cases pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2002 and any other parties required to be served pursuant to the Case Management Procedures in these Chapter 11 Cases.
|
C. |
Requirements for Confirmation of Plan
|
|
1.
|
Requirements of Section 1129(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.
|
At the Confirmation Hearing, the Bankruptcy Court will determine whether the confirmation requirements specified in section
1129(a) of the Bankruptcy Code have been satisfied including, without limitation, whether:
|
i. |
the Plan complies with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code;
|
|
ii. |
the Debtors have complied with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code;
|
|
iii. |
the Plan has been proposed in good faith and not by any means forbidden by law;
|
|
iv. |
any payment made or promised by the Debtors or by a person issuing securities or acquiring property under the Plan, for services or for costs and expenses in or
in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases, or in connection with the Plan and incident to the Chapter 11 Cases, has been disclosed to the Bankruptcy Court, and any such payment made before confirmation of the Plan is reasonable, or if such
payment is to be fixed after confirmation of the Plan, such payment is subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court as reasonable;
|
|
v. |
the Debtors have disclosed the identity and affiliations of any individual proposed to serve, after confirmation of the Plan, as a director or officer of the
Reorganized Debtors, an affiliate of the Debtors participating in a Plan with the Debtors, or a successor to the Debtors under the Plan, and the appointment to, or continuance in, such office of such individual is consistent with the
interests of holders of Claims and Interests and with public policy, and the Debtors have disclosed the identity of any insider who will be employed or retained by the Reorganized Debtors, and the nature of any compensation for such insider;
|
|
vi. |
with respect to each Class of Claims or Interests, each Holder of an Impaired Claim has either accepted the Plan or will receive or retain under the Plan, on
account of such Holder’s Claim, property of a value, as of the Effective Date of the Plan, that is not less than the amount such Holder would receive or retain if the Debtors were liquidated on the Effective Date of the Plan under Chapter 7;
|
|
vii. |
except to the extent the Plan meets the requirements of section 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code (as discussed further below), each Class of Claims either accepted
the Plan or is not Impaired under the Plan;
|
|
viii. |
except to the extent that the Holder of a particular Claim has agreed to a different treatment of such Claim, the Plan provides that administrative expenses and
priority Claims, other than priority tax Claims, will be paid in full on the Effective Date, and that priority tax Claims will receive either payment in full on the Effective Date or deferred cash payments over a period not exceeding five
years after the Petition Date, of a value, as of the Effective Date of the Plan, equal to the allowed amount of such Claims;
|
|
ix. |
at least one Class of Impaired Claims has accepted the Plan, determined without including any acceptance of the Plan by any insider holding a Claim in such
Class;
|
|
x. |
confirmation of the Plan is not likely to be followed by the liquidation, or the need for further financial reorganization, of the Debtors or any successor to
the Debtors under the Plan; and
|
|
xi. |
all fees payable under section 1930 of title 28, as determined by the Bankruptcy Court at the Confirmation Hearing, have been paid or the Plan provides for the
payment of all such fees on the Effective Date of the Plan.
|
As noted above, with respect to each impaired class of claims and equity interests, confirmation of a plan requires that each
such holder either (i) accept the plan or (ii) receive or retain under the plan property of a value, as of the effective date of the plan, that is not less than the value such holder would receive or retain if the debtors were liquidated under
Chapter 7. This requirement is referred to as the “best interests test.” The “best interests test” is modified with respect to any class of creditors that makes an 1111(b) Election. If the 1111(b) election is made by a class, the test is satisfied
if each holder of a claim in that class votes to accept the plan or receives property of a value on account of its claim, as of the effective date of a plan, that is not less than the value of such holder’s interest in the estate’s interest in the
property that secures such claim. The Valuation Analysis contains information concerning the value of the collateral securing the Debtors’ funded debt.
Absent an 1111(b) election, this test requires a court to determine what the holders of allowed claims and allowed equity
interests in each impaired class would receive from a liquidation of the debtor’s assets and properties in the context of a liquidation under Chapter 7. To determine if a plan is in the best interests of each impaired class, the value of the
distributions from the proceeds of the liquidation of the debtor’s assets and properties (after subtracting the amounts attributable to the aforesaid claims) is then compared with the value offered to such classes of claims and equity interests under
the plan.
A hypothetical liquidation analysis (the “Liquidation Analysis”)
has been prepared by A&M solely for purposes of estimating proceeds available in a liquidation under Chapter 7 of the Debtors’ Estates, which is attached hereto as Exhibit
E. The Liquidation Analysis is based on a number of estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant economic, competitive, and operational uncertainties and contingencies that are beyond the control of the Debtors
or a trustee under Chapter 7. Further, the actual amounts of claims against the Debtors’ Estates could vary materially from the estimates set forth in the Liquidation Analysis, depending on, among other things, the claims asserted during Chapter 7.
Accordingly, while the information contained in the Liquidation Analysis is necessarily presented with numerical specificity, the Debtors cannot assure you that the values assumed would be realized or the Claims estimates assumed would not change if
the Debtors were in fact liquidated, nor can assurances be made that the Bankruptcy Court would accept this analysis or concur with these assumptions in making its determination under section 1129(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.
As set forth in detail in the Liquidation Analysis, the Debtors believe that the Plan will produce a greater recovery for the
Holders of Claims than would be achieved in a Chapter 7 liquidation. Consequently, the Debtors believe that the Plan, which provides for the continuation of the Debtors’ businesses, will provide a substantially greater ultimate return to the Holders
of Claims than would a Chapter 7 liquidation.
The Debtors do not intend to and do not undertake any obligation to update or otherwise revise the Liquidation Analysis to
reflect events or circumstances existing or arising after the date the Liquidation Analysis is initially filed or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Therefore, the Liquidation Analysis may not be relied upon as a guarantee or other
assurance of the actual results that will occur. In deciding whether to vote to accept or reject the Plan, holders of Claims must make their own determinations as to the reasonableness of any assumptions underlying the Liquidation Analysis and the
reliability of the Liquidation Analysis.
Pursuant to section 1129(a)(11) of the Bankruptcy Code, among other things, the Bankruptcy Court must determine that confirmation
of the Plan is not likely to be followed by the liquidation or need for further financial reorganization of the Debtors or any successors to the Debtors under the Plan. This confirmation condition is referred to as the “feasibility” of the Plan.
The Debtors believe that the Plan satisfies this requirement. Based upon the Financial Projections, the Debtors believe that the Reorganized Debtors will be able to make all payments required pursuant to the Plan and, therefore, that confirmation of
the Plan is not likely to be followed by liquidation or the need for further reorganization. The Debtors also believe that they will be able to repay or refinance on commercially reasonable terms any and all of the indebtedness under the Plan at or
prior to the maturity of such indebtedness. Accordingly, the Debtors believe that the Plan is feasible. The Financial Projections are attached as Exhibit F to
this Disclosure Statement.
|
d.
|
Equitable Distribution of Voting Power
|
On or before the Effective Date, pursuant to and only to the extent required by section 1123(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code, the
organizational documents for the Debtors shall be amended as necessary to satisfy the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and shall include, among other things, pursuant to section 1123(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code, (i) a provision prohibiting the
issuance of non-voting equity securities and (ii) a provision setting forth an appropriate distribution of voting power among classes of equity securities possessing voting power.
|
2.
|
Additional Requirements for Non-Consensual
Confirmation.
|
In the event that any Impaired Class of Claims or Interests does not accept or is deemed to reject the Plan, the Bankruptcy Court
may still confirm the Plan at the request of the Debtors if, as to each Impaired Class of Claims or Interests that has not accepted or is deemed to reject the Plan, the Plan “does not discriminate unfairly” and is “fair and equitable” with respect to
such Classes of Claims or Interests, pursuant to section 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code. Both of these requirements are in addition to other requirements established by case law interpreting the statutory requirements.
|
a.
|
Unfair Discrimination Test
|
The “no unfair discrimination” test applies to Classes of Claims or Interests that are of equal priority and are receiving
different treatment under the Plan. A chapter 11 plan does not discriminate unfairly, within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Code, if the legal rights of a dissenting class are treated in a manner consistent with the treatment of other classes whose
legal rights are substantially similar to those of the dissenting class and if no class of claims or interests receives more than it legally is entitled to receive for its claims or interests. This test does not require that the treatment be the
same or equivalent, but that such treatment be “fair.” The Debtors believe the Plan satisfies the “unfair discrimination” test.
|
b.
|
Fair and Equitable Test
|
The “fair and equitable” test applies to classes of different priority and status (e.g., secured versus unsecured) and includes the general requirement that no class of claims receive more than 100% of the amount of the allowed claims in the class. As to the dissenting class, the test
sets different standards depending upon the type of claims or equity interests in the class.
The Debtors submit that if the Debtors “cramdown” the Plan pursuant to section 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Plan is
structured so that it does not “discriminate unfairly” and satisfies the “fair and equitable” requirement. The Debtors believe that the Plan and the treatment of all Classes of Claims or Interests under the Plan satisfy the foregoing requirements for
nonconsensual Confirmation of the Plan.
|
D. |
Summary of Release Provisions
|
Article XI of the Plan provides for the release of the Released Parties (as defined below) by the Debtors and the Releasing
Parties (as defined below). The Debtors’ release of the Released Parties pursuant to Article XI.D of the Plan (the “Debtor Releases”) and the Releasing Parties’ releases of
the Released Parties pursuant to Article XI.E of the Plan (the “Third-Party Releases”) are each an integral and material part of the Plan and the Plan Settlement embodied
therein. The Debtors believe that the release provisions in the Plan are necessary and appropriate and meet the requisite legal standard promulgated by the Second Circuit. Further, in the exercise of their business judgment, the Debtors believe that
the Debtor Releases are supported by ample consideration, including the mutuality of the releases. Additionally, the Debtor Releases are supported by the Investigation Committee’s finding that there is no basis for a claim on behalf of the Debtors
against any of its non-Debtor affiliates.
The definitions of certain important terms that are used in the descriptions of the Debtor Releases and Third-Party Releases are
set forth below.
“Cause of Action” means, without limitation, any
Claim, Interest, claim, damage, remedy, cause of action, controversy, demand, right, right of setoff, action, cross claim, counterclaim, recoupment, claim for breach of duty imposed by law or in equity, action, Lien, indemnity, contribution,
reimbursement, guaranty, debt, suit, class action, third-party claim, obligation, liability, damage, judgment, account, defense, offset, power, privilege, license, or franchise of any kind or character whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen
or unforeseen, existing or hereinafter arising, contingent or non-contingent, matured or unmatured, direct or indirect, choate or inchoate, liquidated or unliquidated, suspected or unsuspected, disputed or undisputed, secured or unsecured, assertable
directly or derivatively, whether arising before, on, or after the Petition Date, in contract or in tort, in law or in equity, under the Bankruptcy Code or applicable non-bankruptcy law, or pursuant to any other theory of law. For the avoidance of
doubt, Causes of Action include: (a) all rights of setoff, counterclaim, or recoupment and claims on contracts or for breaches of duties imposed by law; (b) the right to object to or otherwise contest Claims or Interests; (c) claims pursuant to
section 362, 510, 542, 543, 544, 545, 546, 547, 548, 549, 550, or 553 of the Bankruptcy Code or similar non-U.S. or state law; and (d) such claims and defenses as fraud, mistake, duress, and usury and any other defenses set forth in section 558 of
the Bankruptcy Code.
“Releasing Parties” means, collectively, and in each
case in its capacity as such: (a) each Debtor; (b) each Reorganized Debtor; (c) each non-Debtor Affiliate that is a direct or indirect subsidiary of a Debtor; (d) each of the Consenting Creditor Parties; (e) the DIP Lenders; (f) the Creditors’
Committee and each of its members; (g) the DIP Agents; (h) the Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee; (i) the BrandCo Agent; (j) Citibank, N.A., as the 2016 Agent; (k) the ABL Agents; (l) the Equity Commitment Parties; (m) the Exit Facilities Lenders;
(n) the Exit Facilities Agents; (o) each of the parties to Adv. Proc. No. 22-01167; (p) each Holder of Qualified Pension Claims or Retiree Benefit Claims that does not elect to opt out of the releases contained in the Plan; (q) each Holder of Claims
or Interests that is deemed to accept the Plan and does not elect to opt out of the releases contained in the Plan; (r) each Holder of Claims that is entitled to vote on the Plan and either (i) votes to accept the Plan, (ii) abstains from voting on
the Plan and does not elect to opt out of the releases contained in the Plan, or (iii) votes to reject the Plan and does not elect to opt out of the releases contained in the Plan; (s) each Holder of Claims that is deemed to reject the Plan but does
not elect to opt out of the releases contained in the Plan; (t) each Holder of publicly traded Interests in Holdings that elects to opt in to the releases contained in the Plan; (u) with respect to each of the Entities in the foregoing clauses (a)
through (t), each such Entity’s current and former Affiliates (regardless of whether such interests are held directly or indirectly); (v) with respect to each of the Entities in the foregoing clauses (a) through (u), each such Entity’s current and
former predecessors, successors, subsidiaries, direct and indirect equityholders, funds, portfolio companies, and management companies; and (w) with respect to each of the Entities in the foregoing clauses (a) through (v), each such Entity’s current
and former directors, officers, managers, members, principals, partners, employees, independent contractors, agents, representatives, managed accounts or funds, management companies, fund advisors, investment advisors, advisory board members,
financial advisors, partners (including both general and limited partners), consultants, financial advisors, attorneys, accountants, investment bankers, and other professionals; provided that no Holder that votes to accept the Plan shall be entitled to opt out of, and each such Holder shall be deemed to opt into, the releases; provided, further that, with respect to any Holder of a Claim or Interest (other than any Holder of publicly traded Interests in
Holdings) that does not elect to opt out of the releases contained in the Plan in any capacity, and with respect to any Holder of publicly traded Interests in Holdings that opts into the releases contained in the Plan in any capacity, such Holder and
each Affiliate of such Holder that is also a Holder of a Claim or Interest shall be deemed to opt into the Third-Party Releases in all capacities.
“Released Parties” means, collectively, the
Releasing Parties; provided that no Excluded Party shall be a Released Party; provided, further, that, in each case, an Entity shall not be a Released Party if it: (a) elects to opt out of the releases, if permitted to
opt out; (b) does not elect to opt into the releases, if permitted to opt in; (c) files with the Bankruptcy Court an objection to the Plan, including the releases, that is not consensually resolved before Confirmation or supports any such objection
or objector; or (d) proposes or supports an Alternative Restructuring Proposal without the Debtors’ consent.
“Excluded Parties” means, collectively, all Entities
liable for Talc Personal Injury Claims in respect of Jean Nate products or other products produced by the Debtors, other than any Debtor or any current or former officer, director, authorized agent, or employee of the Debtors. For the avoidance of
doubt, any insurer of the Debtors that may be liable for Talc Personal Injury Claims and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and its Affiliates shall be Excluded Parties.
Article X.D of the Plan provides a release by the Debtors and their Estates of certain claims and Causes of Action against the
Released Parties in exchange for good and valuable consideration and valuable compromises made by the Released Parties. The Debtor Releases are an important and integral part of the Plan and the Debtors believe that the Released Parties have made
substantial contributions to these Chapter 11 Cases. The Debtor Releases do not release any post-Effective Date obligations of any party or Entity under the Plan, any Restructuring Transaction, any Definitive Document (including those set forth in
the Plan Supplement), or other document, instrument, or agreement executed to implement the Plan.
It is well-settled that debtors are authorized to settle or release their claims in a chapter 11 plan when such releases are in
the best interests of their estates and approved in a reasonable exercise of business judgment. See 11 U.S.C. § 1123(b)(3)(A) (permitting a plan to provide
for the “settlement or adjustment of any claim or interest belonging to the debtor or to the estate”); In re Adelphia Commc’ns Corp., 368 B.R. 140, 263 n.289
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2007) (holding the debtor may release its own claims); In re Oneida Ltd., 351 B.R. 79, 94 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2006) (noting that a debtor’s
release of its own claims is permissible); In re Sabine Oil & Gas Corp., 555 B.R. 180, 309 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2016) (“Debtor releases are approved by courts
in the Second Circuit when the Debtors establish that such releases are in the ‘best interests of the estate[.]’”); In re Global Crossing Ltd., 295 B.R. 726,
747 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2003) (approving, as exercise of reasonable business judgment, a decision by debtors to enter into mutual releases).
As the Debtors will prove at confirmation, the Debtor Releases were negotiated in connection with the Restructuring Support
Agreement, constitute a sound exercise of the Debtors’ business judgment, are supported by the Independent Investigation of the Investigation Committee of the Debtors’ Board of Directors, and are a necessary component of the Plan and the global
settlement embodied therein. In addition to the significant benefits provided by the Plan, the Debtors will receive as consideration for the Debtor Releases mutual releases of potential claims and causes of action from the Releasing Parties. The
Debtors believe that the proposed Debtor Releases are reasonable and in the best interests of their Estates in light of the complex issues in these Chapter 11 Cases and the benefit they will provide to the Debtors on a go-forward basis.
The Third-Party Releases in Article X.E of the Plan provide for the consensual release by the Releasing Parties of certain claims
and Causes of Action against the Released Parties in exchange for good and valuable consideration and the critical compromises made by the Released Parties. The Plan provides that all holders of Claims who (a) are deemed to accept the Plan, and do
not elect to opt out of the Third-Party Releases, (b) are entitled to vote on the Plan and either (i) vote to accept the Plan, (ii) abstain from voting on the Plan and do not elect to opt out of the Third-Party Releases, or (iii) vote to reject the
Plan and do not elect to opt out of the Third-Party Releases, or (c) are deemed to reject that Plan and do not elect to opt out of the Third-Party Releases, will grant a release of any claims or rights they have or may have as against the Released
Parties. In addition, Holders of Interests in Holdings that elect to opt into the Third-Party Releases will be found to have released the Released Parties. The Third-Party Releases include, among other things, any and all claims that such holders
may have against the Released Parties that in any way relate to the Debtors, the Debtors’ restructuring efforts, and the Restructuring Transactions, among other things.
The Third-Party Releases do not release, among other things, any Cause of Action against a Released Party other than the Debtors
unknown to such Releasing Party as of the Effective Date and arising out of actual fraud, gross negligence, or willful misconduct of such Released Party, any Cause of Action against any Excluded Party, or any post-Effective Date obligations of any
party or Entity under the Plan, any Restructuring Transaction, or any Definitive Document.
In the Second Circuit, it is generally settled that creditors and interest holders may consent to third-party releases. See In re Metromedia Fiber Network, Inc., 416 F.3d 136, 142 (2d Cir. 2005) (“Nondebtor releases may be tolerated if the affected creditor consents.”). Pursuant to
the Plan, Holders of Claims and Interests will have the opportunity to demonstrate their consent by either voting to accept the Plan or electing to opt into or out of, as applicable, the Third-Party Releases.
As to those voting to accept a plan that provides for third-party releases, courts have held that an affirmative vote constitutes
consent. See, e.g., In re Adelphia Commc’ns Corp., 368 B.R. at 268 (if, as here, third-party release is appropriately disclosed, consent is established by a
vote to accept the plan).
For those who are deemed to accept or reject the Plan, abstain from voting on the Plan, or vote to reject the Plan but, in each
case, do not elect to opt out of the Third-Party Releases, such releases are an integral part of the Plan and can be approved on a consensual basis with respect to parties that do not opt out and/or object to confirmation. The Debtors believe such
releases are consensual because creditors will be given the opportunity to opt out of the releases and Holders of Interests will be given the opportunity to opt in. Several courts in the Second Circuit have explicitly held that providing parties
with an opt out mechanism that includes clear and appropriate notice of the consequences of not opting out constitutes consent. See e.g., In re LATAM Airlines Group
S.A., 2022 WL 2206829 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2022)( “[i]naction is action under appropriate circumstances.”); In re Avianca Holdings, S.A., 632 B.R. 124,
137 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2021) (“When someone is clearly and squarely told if you fail to act your rights will be affected, that person is then given information that puts them on notice that they need to do something or else.”) (quoting In re Cumulus Media Inc., No. 17-13381 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Feb. 1, 2018) (Tr. of Hr'g at 27–28) (Chapman, J)); In re Calpine Corp., 2007 WL 4565223 at *10 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2007) (approving third party releases on a consensual basis for holders that vote in favor of the plan or abstain from voting and choose not to
opt out of the releases); In re Stoneway Capital Ltd., Case No. 21-10646 (JLG) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Apr. 21, 2021) (approving third-party releases for which
consent was solicited for voting classes who rejected or abstained from the plan via an opt-out mechanism); Conf. Hr’g Tr. at 89:19-24, 90:8-14, In re Automotores
Gildermeister SpA, Case No. 21-10685 (LGB) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. June 7, 2021) [Docket No. 156] (approving a third-party release structure that bound parties who abstained from voting and did not opt out of the releases while noting that “there
is a lot of precedent for my ruling in this district.”).
THE DEADLINE TO OPT OUT OF THE THIRD-PARTY RELEASES IS MARCH 20, 2023 AT 4:00 P.M. (PREVAILING EASTERN TIME).
XV. |
ALTERNATIVES TO CONFIRMATION AND CONSUMMATION OF THE PLAN
|
The Debtors have evaluated several alternatives to the Plan. After studying these alternatives, the Debtors have concluded that
the Plan is the best alternative and will maximize recoveries to parties in interest, assuming confirmation and consummation of the Plan. If the Plan is not confirmed and consummated, the alternatives to the Plan are (i) the preparation and
presentation of an alternative plan of reorganization, (ii) a sale of some or all of the Debtors’ assets pursuant to section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, or (iii) a liquidation under Chapter 7.
|
A. |
Alternative Plan of Reorganization
|
If the Plan is not confirmed, the Debtors (or if the Debtors’ exclusive period in which to file a plan of reorganization has
expired, any other party in interest) could attempt to formulate a different plan. Such a plan might involve either a reorganization and continuation of the Debtors’ businesses or an orderly liquidation of the Debtors’ assets. The Debtors, however,
submit that the Plan, as described herein, enables their creditors to realize the most value under the circumstances.
|
B. |
Sale under Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code
|
If the Plan is not confirmed, the Debtors could seek from the Bankruptcy Court, after notice and a hearing, authorization to sell
their assets under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code. Holders of Secured Claims would be entitled to credit bid on any property to which their security interest is attached, and to offset their Claims against the purchase price of the property,
subject to applicable contractual restrictions governing such Claims. Alternatively, the security interests in the Debtors’ assets held by Holders of Secured Claims would attach to the proceeds of any sale of the Debtors’ assets. After these Claims
are satisfied, the remaining funds could be used to pay Holders of Claims in Classes 8 and 9(a)–(d). Upon analysis and consideration of this alternative, the Debtors do not currently believe a sale of their assets under section 363 of the Bankruptcy
Code would yield a higher recovery for Holders of Claims than the Plan.
|
C. |
Liquidation under Chapter 7 or Applicable Non-Bankruptcy Law
|
If no plan can be confirmed, the Chapter 11 Cases may be converted to cases under Chapter 7 in which a trustee would be elected
or appointed to liquidate the assets of the Debtors for distribution to their creditors in accordance with the priorities established by the Bankruptcy Code. The Liquidation Analysis sets forth the effect that a hypothetical Chapter 7 liquidation
would have on the recovery of holders of Allowed Claims and Interests.
As noted in the Liquidation Analysis, the Debtors believe that liquidation under Chapter 7 would result in lower distributions to
creditors than those provided for under the Plan. Among other things, the value that the Debtors expect to obtain from their assets in a Chapter 7 liquidation, instead of continuing as a going concern as provided in the Plan, would be materially
less. A Chapter 7 liquidation would also generate more unsecured claims against the Debtors’ Estates from, among other things, damages related to rejected contracts and the failure to satisfy post-liquidation obligations. In addition, a Chapter 7
liquidation would result in a delay from the conversion of the cases and the additional administrative expenses associated with the appointment of a trustee and the trustee’s retention of professionals, who would be required to become familiar with
the many legal and factual issues in the Debtors’ Chapter 11 Cases.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank.]
XVI. |
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
|
The Debtors believe the Plan is in the best interests of all stakeholders and urge the Holders of Voting Classes to vote in favor
thereof.
Dated: February 21, 2023
|
REVLON, INC.
|
New York, New York
|
(on behalf of itself and each of its Debtor affiliates)
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert Caruso
|
|
|
Robert Caruso
|
|
Chief Restructuring Officer
|
EXHIBIT A
JOINT PLAN OF REORGANIZATION
OF REVLON, INC. AND ITS DEBTOR AFFILIATES
PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 11 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE
EXHIBIT B
RESTRUCTURING SUPPORT AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT C
CORPORATE STRUCTURE CHART
EXHIBIT D
VALUATION ANALYSIS
EXHIBIT E
LIQUIDATION ANALYSIS
EXHIBIT F
FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS